003-3515482-3965712
WyrokETPCz2011-04-21
Analiza orzeczenia
Sekcja wygenerowana przez AI na podstawie treści orzeczenia — nie stanowi cytatu.
Zagadnienie prawne
Czy nadmierna długość postępowań niekarnych narusza prawo do rzetelnego procesu w rozsądnym terminie (art. 6 ust. 1 Konwencji) oraz prawo do skutecznego środka odwoławczego (art. 13 Konwencji)?Stan faktyczny
Skargi dotyczyły nadmiernej długości postępowań niekarnych, co miało naruszać prawa skarżących wynikające z Konwencji.Rozstrzygnięcie
Trybunał stwierdził naruszenie art. 6 § 1 Konwencji we wszystkich pięciu sprawach. Stwierdzono również naruszenie art. 13 Konwencji w pierwszej (Kuppinger v. Germany, sygn. 41599/09) i piątej (Zheleznova v. Ukraine, sygn. 6717/07) z wymienionych spraw.Pełny tekst orzeczenia
issued by the Registrar of the Court
no. 364
21.04.2011
Judgments1 concerning Germany and Ukraine
The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing the following five
judgments.
The judgments available only in French are indicated with an asterisk (*).
Kuppinger v. Germany (application no. 41599/09)
Asmolov v. Ukraine (no. 15045/05)*
Vikulova v. Ukraine (no. 12355/06)*
Zheleznova v. Ukraine (no. 6713/07)*
Zheleznova v. Ukraine (no. 6717/07)*
These cases concerned in particular the applicants’ complaint about the excessive length
of non-criminal proceedings. They relied mainly on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing
within a reasonable time) of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Violation of Article 6 § 1 – all cases
Violation of Article 13 – first, fifth and sixth cases
This press release is a document produced by the Registry. It does not bind the Court.
Decisions, judgments and further information about the Court can be found on its
Internet site. To receive the Court’s press releases, please subscribe to the Court’s RSS
feeds.
Press contacts
[email protected] | tel: +33 3 90 21 42 08
Emma Hellyer (tel: + 33 3 90 21 42 15)
Tracey Turner-Tretz (tel: + 33 3 88 41 35 30)
Kristina Pencheva-Malinowski (tel: + 33 3 88 41 35 70)
Frédéric Dolt (tel: + 33 3 90 21 53 39)
Nina Salomon (tel: + 33 3 90 21 49 79)
The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of
Europe Member States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European
Convention on Human Rights. Under Articles 43 and 44 of the Convention, Chamber judgments are not final. During the three-month
period following a judgment’s delivery, any party may request that the case be referred to the Grand Chamber
of the Court. If such a request is made, a panel of five judges considers whether the case deserves further
examination. In that event, the Grand Chamber will hear the case and deliver a final judgment. If the referral
request is refused, the Chamber judgment will become final on that day. Under Article 28 of the Convention,
judgments delivered by a Committee are final.
Once a judgment becomes final, it is transmitted to the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe for
supervision of its execution. Further information about the execution process can be found here:
www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/execution
© Rada Europy / Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka, źródło: HUDOC (hudoc.echr.coe.int), pozyskano 15.07.2026. · Źródło