003-3698854-4211611

issued by the Registrar of the Court   ECHR 175 (2011)   06.10.2011   Judgments concerning France, Luxembourg and Ukraine   The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing the following six   judgments, four of which (in italics) are Committee judgments and are final. The others   are Chamber judgments and are not final1.   The judgments available only in French are indicated with an asterisk (*).   Repetitive cases   The following cases raised issues which had already been submitted to the Court.   Staszkow v. France (no. 52124/08)*   The applicant, who lives in Kourou (French Guiana), was the subject of an order, made   by the Cayenne District Court on 19 June 1998, for the termination of his lease and for   his eviction from his home. He relied in particular on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) of   the European Convention on Human Rights.   Violation of Article 6 § 1   Wagner v. Luxembourg (no. 43490/08)*   The applicant, a company manager who was the owner of a vehicle stopped by customs   officers and found to be more than 10% over its maximum permissible weight, but was   not driving the vehicle himself, was initially fined 750 euros and was informed several   months later that points had been deducted from his driving licence. Relying on Article 6   (right to a fair trial) of the Convention, the applicant alleged that the procedure for the   deduction of points had infringed his right to a fair hearing.   Violation of Article 6 § 1   Length-of-proceedings cases   In the following cases, the applicants complained in particular about the excessive length   of legal proceedings.   Criminal   Kyrylyuk v. Ukraine (no. 32241/07)   This case concerned the applicant’s complaint about the excessive length of criminal   proceedings brought against him for fraud.   Violation of Article 6 § 1   Non-criminal   Under Articles 43 and 44 of the Convention, Chamber judgments are not final. During the three-month   period following a judgment’s delivery, any party may request that the case be referred to the Grand Chamber   of the Court. If such a request is made, a panel of five judges considers whether the case deserves further   examination. In that event, the Grand Chamber will hear the case and deliver a final judgment. If the referral   request is refused, the Chamber judgment will become final on that day. Under Article 28 of the Convention,   judgments delivered by a Committee are final.   Once a judgment becomes final, it is transmitted to the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe for   supervision of its execution. Further information about the execution process can be found here:   www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/execution   Ponomarenko v. Ukraine (no. 1071/08)   Shchurov v. Ukraine (no. 5050/07)   Zhuzha v. Ukraine (no. 595/08)   Violation of Article 6 § 1 in the three cases above   This press release is a document produced by the Registry. It does not bind the Court.   Decisions, judgments and further information about the Court can be found on   www.echr.coe.int. To receive the Court’s press releases, please subscribe to the Court’s   RSS feeds.   Press contacts   [email protected]e.int | tel: +33 3 90 21 42 08   Emma Hellyer (tel: + 33 3 90 21 42 15)   Tracey Turner-Tretz (tel: + 33 3 88 41 35 30)   Kristina Pencheva-Malinowski (tel: + 33 3 88 41 35 70)   Nina Salomon (tel: + 33 3 90 21 49 79)   Denis Lambert (tel: + 33 3 90 21 41 09)   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of   Europe Member States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European   Convention on Human Rights.   2