003-6363758-8333569

issued by the Registrar of the Court   ECHR 102 (2019)   21.03.2019   Judgments and decisions of 21 March 2019   The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing four judgments1 and 21 decisions2:   one Chamber judgment is summarised below; a separate press release has been issued for one   other Chamber judgment in the case of O.S.A. and Others v. Greece (no. 39065/16);   two Committee judgments, concerning issues which have already been submitted to the Court, and   the 21 decisions, can be consulted on Hudoc and do not appear in this press release.   The judgment below is available only in English.   Just Satisfaction   Akhverdiyev v. Azerbaijan (application no. 76254/11)   The case concerned the question of just satisfaction with regard to Mr Akhverdiyev’s forced   relocation and the demolition of his house for a new construction project.   In its principal judgment of 29 January 2015 the Court held that there had been a violation of   Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) to the European Convention on Human Rights.   Just satisfaction: 140,000 euros (EUR) for pecuniary damage, EUR 3,000 for non-pecuniary damage   and EUR 3,000 for costs and expenses to be paid to Mr Akhverdiyev. The Cour also held hat   Azerbaijan was to pay the expert, Mr Z. Husseynov (ABAK-Az Crowe Ltd), EUR 5,900 for the fees   relating to the preparation of his expert report.   This press release is a document produced by the Registry. It does not bind the Court. Decisions,   judgments and further information about the Court can be found on www.echr.coe.int. To receive   the Court’s press releases, please subscribe here: www.echr.coe.int/RSS/en or follow us on Twitter   @ECHR_Press.   Press contacts   [email protected] | tel: +33 3 90 21 42 08   Tracey Turner-Tretz (tel: + 33 3 88 41 35 30)   Denis Lambert (tel: + 33 3 90 21 41 09)   Inci Ertekin (tel: + 33 3 90 21 55 30)   Patrick Lannin (tel: + 33 3 90 21 44 18)   Somi Nikol (tel: + 33 3 90 21 64 25)   Under Articles 43 and 44 of the Convention, Chamber judgments are not final. During the three-month period following a Chamber   judgment’s delivery, any party may request that the case be referred to the Grand Chamber of the Court. If such a request is made, a   panel of five judges considers whether the case deserves further examination. In that event, the Grand Chamber will hear the case and   deliver a final judgment. If the referral request is refused, the Chamber judgment will become final on that day. Under Article 28 of the   Convention, judgments delivered by a Committee are final.   Once a judgment becomes final, it is transmitted to the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe for supervision of its execution.   Further information about the execution process can be found here: www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/execution   Inadmissibility and strike-out decisions are final.   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe Member   States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.   2