003-68364-68832
WyrokETPCz2001-01-16
Analiza orzeczenia
Sekcja wygenerowana przez AI na podstawie treści orzeczenia — nie stanowi cytatu.
Zagadnienie prawne
Czy przewlekłość postępowań cywilnych i administracyjnych naruszyła prawo do rozpoznania sprawy w rozsądnym terminie z art. 6 ust. 1 Konwencji?Ratio decidendi
Trybunał stwierdził, że długotrwałość postępowań cywilnych w 25 sprawach przeciwko Włochom przekroczyła „rozsądny termin” wymagany przez art. 6 ust. 1 Konwencji. W konsekwencji, państwo pozwane nie zapewniło skarżącym prawa do rozpoznania ich spraw w odpowiednim czasie. W sprawie przeciwko Francji, kwestia przewlekłości postępowania została rozwiązana w drodze ugody.Stan faktyczny
Skarżący w sprawie Ait-Said przeciwko Francji, Menouer Ait-Said i Karima Malla, skarżyli się na pięcioletnią przewlekłość postępowania administracyjnego dotyczącego śmierci ich 14-letniej córki. W 25 sprawach przeciwko Włochom, skarżący, obywatele Włoch, zarzucali przewlekłość postępowań cywilnych, które trwały od ponad pięciu do ponad dwudziestu czterech lat.Rozstrzygnięcie
W sprawie Ait-Said przeciwko Francji, sprawa została wykreślona z listy Trybunału. W 25 sprawach przeciwko Włochom, Trybunał jednogłośnie stwierdził naruszenie art. 6 ust. 1 Konwencji.Pełny tekst orzeczenia
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
24
16.01.2001
Press release issued by the Registrar
CHAMBER JUDGMENTS CONCERNING FRANCE AND ITALY
16 January 2001
The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing the following 26 Chamber judgments concerning France and Italy. Only Ait-Said v. France is final [1].
Section 3
(1) Ait-Said v. France (application no. 42224/98) Friendly settlement
The applicants Menouer Ait-Said and Karima Malla complained about the length of administrative proceedings to which they were parties (which lasted five years) in relation to the death of their 14-year-old daughter in a municipal park.
The case has been struck out following a friendly settlement in which FF 30,000 is to be paid to the applicants. (Judgment in French)
Violations Article 6 § 1
In the following cases, the applicants, all Italian nationals, complained about the length of the civil proceedings to which they were parties. In each case, the European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a determination of civil rights within a reasonable time). (The judgments exist only in French)
(2) Iorillo v. Italy (no. 45875/99) - The civil proceedings have lasted more than seven years and seven months and are still pending. Debora Iorillo was awarded ITL 16,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage.
(3) C. ar.l v. Italy (No.1) (no. 45882/99) - lasted 11 years and one month. ITL 15,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage and ITL 4,789,858 for costs and expenses.
(4) C. ar.l v. Italy (no. 2) (no. 45883/99) - lasted 11 years and one month. ITL 15,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage and ITL 4,679,291 for costs and expenses.
(5) Verini v. Italy (no. 46982/99) - more than 10 years and still pending on 10 November 2000. ITL 18,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage and ITL 4,000,000 for costs and expenses.
(6) Verini v. Italy (no. 2) (no. 46983/99) - more than nine years and six months. ITL 11,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage and ITL 4,000,000 for costs and expenses.
(7) Ravignani v. Italy (no. 46984/99) - 24 years and 10 months, of which the Court took into consideration just over 23 years and nine months[2]. ITL 76,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage and ITL 5,000,000 for costs and expenses.
(8) M.Q. v. Italy (no. 46985/99) - approximately eight years and five months. ITL 20,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage and ITL 3,000,000 for costs and expenses.
(9) Ianni v. Italy (no. 46986/99) - more than 18 years and 10 months. ITL 50,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage and ITL 4,000,000 for costs and expenses.
(10) Arienzo v. Italy (no. 46987/99) - more than 14 years and five months and still pending. ITL 7,856,300 for non-pecuniary damage and ITL 5,000,000 for costs and expenses.
(11) Silvia Ricci v. Italy (no. 46988/99) - approximately 17 years and six months. ITL 50,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage and ITL 4,000,000 for costs and expenses.
(12) Ciabocco v. Italy (no. 46989/99) - more than 18 years and one month and still pending. ITL 60,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage and ITL 5,000,000 for costs and expenses.
(13) Gallo v. Italy (no. 46990/99) - more than seven years and one month and still pending. ITL 16,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage and ITL 5,000,000 for costs and expenses.
(14) Paolelli v. Italy (no. 46991/99) - more than 12 years and nine months and still pending. ITL 28,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage and ITL 4,000,000 for costs and expenses.
(15) Verini v. Italy (no. 3) (no. 46992/99) - more than eight years and six months. ITL 15,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage and ITL 4,000,000 for costs and expenses.
(16) Antonini v. Italy (no. 46993/99) - almost 17 years and 10 months. ITL 56,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage and ITL 2,500,000 for costs and expenses.
(17) Mancinelli v. Italy (no. 46994/99) - more than 12 years and four months. ITL 32,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage and ITL 1,000,000 for costs and expenses.
(18) Berto v. Italy (no. 46995/99) - more than eight years and two months and still pending. ITL 16,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage and ITL 1,000,000 for costs and expenses.
(19) Fracchia v. Italy (no. 46996/99) - more than 17 years and still pending on 19 October 2000. ITL 45,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage and ITL 5,000,000 for costs and expenses.
(20) G. Giappichelli Editore s.r.l. v. Italy (no. 46997/99) - more than five years and six months. ITL 8,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage and ITL 3,758,100 for costs and expenses.
(21) Ciuffetelli v. Italy (no. 46999/99) - more than eight years and one month and still pending on 6 December 2000. ITL 18,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage and ITL 4,000,000 for costs and expenses.
(22) P.I. v. Italy (no. 47000/99) - approximately 12 years and 10 months. ITL 22,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage and ITL 2,315,800 for costs and expenses.
(23) Baldini v. Italy (no. 47001/99) - more than seven years and two months. ITL 10,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage and ITL 500,000 for costs and expenses.
(24) Storti v. Italy (no. 47002/99) - more than nine years and eight months. ITL 14,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage and ITL 300,000 for costs and expenses.
(25) Piccoli v. Italy (no. 47003/99) - more than 10 years and nine months and still pending. ITL 25,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage and ITL 5,000,000 for costs and expenses.
(26) Cantù v. Italy (no. 47004/99) - more than 14 years and six months. ITL 32,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage and ITL 5,000,000 for costs and expenses.
***
The Court’s judgments are available its Internet site (http://www.echr.coe.int).
Registry of the European Court of Human Rights
F – 67075 Strasbourg Cedex
Contacts: Roderick Liddell (telephone: (0)3 88 41 24 92)
Emma Hellyer (telephone: (0)3 90 21 42 15)
Fax: (0)3 88 41 27 91
The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights. On 1 November 1998 a full-time Court was established, replacing the original two-tier system of a part-time Commission and Court.
[1] Under Article 43 of the European Convention on Human Rights, within three months from the date of a Chamber judgment, any party to the case may, in exceptional cases, request that the case be referred to the
17-member Grand Chamber of the Court. In that event, a panel of five judges considers whether the case raises a serious question affecting the interpretation or application of the Convention or its Protocols, or a serious issue of general importance, in which case the Grand Chamber will deliver a final judgment. If no such question or issue arises, the panel will reject the request, at which point the judgment becomes final. Otherwise Chamber judgments become final on the expiry of the three-month period or earlier if the parties declare that they do not intend to make a request to refer.
[2] From 1 August 1973, when Italy recognised the right of individual petition.
© Rada Europy / Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka, źródło: HUDOC (hudoc.echr.coe.int), pozyskano 15.07.2026. · Źródło