003-6934838-9322430

issued by the Registrar of the Court   ECHR 053 (2021)   11.02.2021   Judgments and decisions of 11 February 2021   The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing nine judgments1 and 73 decisions2:   one Chamber judgment is summarised below;   a separate press release has been issued for one decision in the case of Antonopoulou v. Greece   (application no. 46505/19);   eight Committee judgments, concerning issues which have already been submitted to the Court, and   the 72 other decisions, can be consulted on Hudoc and do not appear in this press release.   The judgment summarised below is available only in French.   Casarin v. Italy (application no. 4893/13)   The applicant, Amelia Casarin, is an Italian national who was born in 1950 and lives in Turin.   The case concerned an alleged infringement of the applicant’s property rights. Ms Casarin   complained about the consequences of an action for the recovery of undue payments (azione di   ripetizione dell’indebito) requiring her to repay to the administrative authorities a portion of the   sums paid to her by way of compensation for a difference in salary.   Relying in particular on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) to the European   Convention on Human Rights, the applicant alleged that the order for her to repay the sum of   13,288.39 euros to the National Social Security Institute had infringed her rights under that Article.   Violation Article 1 of Protocol No. 1   Just satisfaction: 15,318 euros (EUR) for pecuniary damage, EUR 8,000 for non-pecuniary damage,   and EUR 2,500 for costs and expenses.   This press release is a document produced by the Registry. It does not bind the Court. Decisions,   judgments and further information about the Court can be found on www.echr.coe.int. To receive   the Court’s press releases, please subscribe here: www.echr.coe.int/RSS/en or follow us on Twitter   @ECHR_CEDH.   Press contacts   During the current public-health crisis, journalists can continue to contact the Press Unit via   [email protected].   Tracey Turner-Tretz   Denis Lambert   Inci Ertekin   Neil Connolly   Under Articles 43 and 44 of the Convention, Chamber judgments are not final. During the three-month period following a judgment’s   delivery, any party may request that the case be referred to the Grand Chamber of the Court. If such a request is made, a panel of five   judges considers whether the case deserves further examination. In that event, the Grand Chamber will hear the case and deliver a final   judgment. If the referral request is refused, the Chamber judgment will become final on that day. Under Article 28 of the Convention,   judgments delivered by a Committee are final.   Once a judgment becomes final, it is transmitted to the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe for supervision of its execution.   Further information about the execution process can be found here: www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/execution.   Inadmissibility and strike-out decisions are final.   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe Member   States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.   2