003-7063445-9542822

issued by the Registrar of the Court   ECHR 202 (2021)   29.06.2021   Judgments of 29 June 2021   The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing 17 judgments1:   three Chamber judgments are summarised below;   two separate press releases have been issued for two Chamber judgments in the cases of: Broda and   Bojara v. Poland (applications nos. 26691/18 and 27367/18) and Tercan v. Turkey (no. 6158/18);   Committee judgments, concerning issues which have already been submitted to the Court, can be   consulted on Hudoc and do not appear in this press release.   The judgments summarised below are available only in English.   Monir Lotfy v. Cyprus (application no. 37139/13)   The applicant, Nashat Monir Lotfy, is an Egyptian national who was born in 1963 and lives in Egypt.   The case concerns his detention with a view to his deportation and the conditions while being held.   He relies on Articles 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment), 5 § 1 (right to liberty and   security), and 5 § 4 (right to have lawfulness of detention decided speedily by a court) of the   European Convention on Human Rights.   Violation of Article 3 (ill-treatment)   Violation of Article 5 § 1   Just satisfaction:   non-pecuniary damage: 26,000 euros (EUR)   costs and expenses: EUR 4,867.99   A.O. Falun Dafa and Others v. the Republic of Moldova (no. 29458/15)   The applicants are A.O. Falun Dafa, A.O. Qigong Falun Gong Moldova, Tatiana Chiriac and Dumitru   Roman. The first two are organisations registered in the Republic of Moldova. The last two are   Moldovan and Romanian nationals who were born in 1970 and 1965 respectively and live in   Chișinău. They are the presidents and founders of the first two applicant organisations.   The case concerns the banning of the applicant organisations’ symbols, which resemble a swastika,   followed by their dissolution.   The applicants rely on Articles 9 (freedom of thought, conscience and religion) and 11 (freedom of   assembly and association) of the European Convention.   Violation of Article 9   Violation of Article 11   Under Articles 43 and 44 of the Convention, Chamber judgments are not final. During the three-month period following a Chamber   judgment’s delivery, any party may request that the case be referred to the Grand Chamber of the Court. If such a request is made, a   panel of five judges considers whether the case deserves further examination. In that event, the Grand Chamber will hear the case and   deliver a final judgment. If the referral request is refused, the Chamber judgment will become final on that day. Under Article 28 of the   Convention, judgments delivered by a Committee are final.   Once a judgment becomes final, it is transmitted to the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe for supervision of its execution.   Further information about the execution process can be found here: http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/execution - _blank   Just satisfaction:   non-pecuniary damage: EUR 4,500   costs and expenses: EUR 1,500   Yezhov and Others v. Russia (no. 22051/05)   The applicants, Sergey Aleksandrovich Yezhov, Oleg Aleksandrovich Bespalov and Grigoriy   Anatolyevich Tishin, are Russian nationals who were born in 1985, 1977 and 1986 respectively.   The case concerns the applicants’ prosecution and conviction for a gross breach of public order   committed by an organised group.   They rely on Articles 10 (freedom of expression) and 11 (freedom of assembly and association) of the   Convention.   Violation of Article 10   Just satisfaction:   non-pecuniary damage: EUR 7,500   This press release is a document produced by the Registry. It does not bind the Court. Decisions,   judgments and further information about the Court can be found on www.echr.coe.int. To receive   the Court’s press releases, please subscribe here: www.echr.coe.int/RSS/en or follow us on Twitter   @ECHR_CEDH.   Press contacts   [email protected] | tel: +33 3 90 21 42 08   Tracey Turner-Tretz (tel : + 33 3 88 41 35 30)   Denis Lambert (tel : + 33 3 90 21 41 09)   Inci Ertekin (tel : + 33 3 90 21 55 30)   Neil Connolly (tel : + 33 3 90 21 48 05)   Jane Swift (tel : + 33 3 88 41 29 04)   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe Member   States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.   2