003-7127529-9657626

issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 275 (2021) 23.09.2021 Forthcoming judgments and decisions The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing 11 judgments on Tuesday 28 September 2021 and 107 judgments and / or decisions on Thursday 30 September 2021. Press releases and texts of the judgments and decisions will be available at 10 a.m. (local time) on the Court's Internet site (www.echr.coe.int) Thursday 30 September 2021 Aarrass v. Belgium (application no. 16371/18) The applicant, Ali Aarrass, is a joint Belgian and Moroccan national who was born in 1962. He was arrested on 1 April 2008 in Melilla (Spain) under an international arrest warrant issued against him by the Moroccan authorities in order that he could be tried in that country on charges of criminal conspiracy, belonging to a terrorist organisation, and carrying out terrorist attacks likely to cause a breach of the peace. In December 2010 he was extradited to Morocco and immediately detained pending trial. In October 2012 the Rabat Court of Appeal sentenced him to 12 years' imprisonment. After serving his sentence, he was released in April 2020 and he subsequently returned to Belgium on 15 July 2020. In this case, relying on Articles 1 (obligation to respect human rights) and 3 (prohibition of torture, inhuman or degrading treatment) of the European Convention on Human Rights, Mr Aarrass alleges that the Belgian State failed to comply with its positive obligation to provide him with consular protection in order to attempt to end the serious breaches of his physical and psychological integrity to which he had been subjected while imprisoned in Morocco. Demokrat Parti v. Turkey (no. 8372/10) The applicant, Demokrat Parti ("Democrat Party"), is a political party which has its headquarters in Ankara. At its annual conference in 2009 the political party Anavatan Partisi ("ANAP", the Motherland Party) decided to merge with the applicant party, under the latter's name, that is, Demokrat Parti. The case concerns the refusal by the Ministry of Finance to pay the applicant � a political party � public funding for the year 2006, following the repeal in May 2005 of section 16 of Law no. 2820 on the regulation of political parties. Relying on Articles 11 (freedom of assembly and association) and 14 (prohibition of discrimination), the applicant considers that there has been a breach of its right to freedom of association and that it was discriminated against, in that this funding was paid to other political parties. It also submits that this discrimination gave rise to inequality between the various political parties taking part in the electoral campaign. The Court will give its rulings in writing on the following cases, some of which concern issues which have already been submitted to the Court, including excessive length of proceedings. These rulings can be consulted from the day of their delivery on the Court's online database HUDOC. They will not appear in the press release issued on that day. Tuesday 28 September 2021 Name Caner v. the Republic of Moldova Cravciin v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia Drovorub v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia Evghenii Duca v. the Republic of Moldova Jestcov v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia Prutean v. the Republic of Moldova Kuropyatnik v. Russia Novaya Gazeta and Others v. Russia Russian United Democratic Party Yabloko and Others v. Russia Shevelev v. Russia Domenech Figueroa v. Spain Thursday 30 September 2021 Name Y v. Azerbaijan Evgeniev v. Bulgaria Feketi and Others v. Croatia Jankovi and Others v. Croatia Kaci and Tomi v. Croatia Kalini v. Croatia Krsti v. Croatia Mati v. Croatia Mikecin Miseti and Genzi-Horvat v. Croatia Svrabi v. Croatia Vucko v. Croatia K�hler v. Germany Carafa and Others v. Hungary Csaba and Others v. Hungary Cs�kn� Szab� v. Hungary Doornbosch v. Hungary Flautner v. Hungary G�bor and Others v. Hungary Mil�k and Others v. Hungary Nagy v. Hungary N�meth v. Hungary Orosz v. Hungary Colthurst v. Ireland Madajczyk v. Ireland O'Connell v. Ireland Gastaldello and Others v. Italy Rebula and Others v. Italy Sanfilippo v. Italy Florea v. the Republic of Moldova Main application number 46578/09 43176/13 33583/14 18521/13 33567/15 5707/15 64403/11 12996/12 41982/12 46173/15 54696/18 Main application number 21420/18 26405/15 25940/18 23244/16 59067/19 52886/18 64709/19 50614/18 15241/20 53158/18 57227/19 3443/18 34903/20 46732/20 46607/20 44750/20 23319/20 43378/20 2130/20 1621/21 31960/20 3679/21 40044/19 13388/19 35537/19 28426/19 50208/13 39171/15 33276/12 Name Indricean v. the Republic of Moldova Ladini S.R.L. v. the Republic of Moldova Lkw-Aleks Spedition S.R.L. v. the Republic of Moldova L.C. v. the Netherlands Tehno-Intereksport Dushko Dooel v. North Macedonia E.M. and T.A. v. Norway O.S. v. Norway Babiski v. Poland Czeredys and Others v. Poland Fieko v. Poland Matyszczuk and Others v. Poland P�ltorak and Others v. Poland Slowiski and Others v. Poland Ciuntu and Biric v. Romania Govoreanu and Others v. Romania Greurui and Others v. Romania Iordache v. Romania Iordchescu and Others v. Romania Luca and Varga v. Romania Moldovan and Others v. Romania Stoica and Others v. Romania Akavov v. Russia Aleksandrov v. Russia Askhabaliyev v. Russia Burdukovskiy v. Russia Dadusenko and Others v. Russia Degtyarev v. Russia Domyshev and Others v. Russia Gagarov and Others v. Russia Gilfanov and Amirov v. Russia Gladkiy and Others v. Russia Golubkov v. Russia Ignatenko and Others v. Russia Karayaka v. Russia Koshcheyev v. Russia Lunkov v. Russia Lyashkov v. Russia Magomadov and Dong v. Russia Martsinkevich v. Russia Mazurin v. Russia Mezak and Others v. Russia Murzinov v. Russia Myasin and Others v. Russia Popenkov v. Russia Ratekhin v. Russia Main application number 52533/09 43969/09 58511/12 56450/19 22078/17 56271/17 63295/17 10635/20 26589/19 30197/20 26065/19 25106/19 26413/19 26122/16 33491/16 8925/16 79897/13 26098/16 27268/16 9939/16 35991/15 1504/13 20812/08 17709/18 30304/18 36027/19 21997/11 9594/18 33485/20 7859/18 57143/11 747/20 57876/13 25934/20 54330/19 20266/18 16620/19 52735/20 80166/17 48932/18 33681/15 27891/19 11050/06 18364/18 50394/06 Name Rodina and Others v. Russia S.A. v. Russia Shcherbinin and Others v. Russia Shestun v. Russia Sokolov and Others v. Russia Tamamshev and Others v. Russia Vakayev v. Russia Veretennikov and Others v. Russia Vokhidov and Others v. Russia Zavarzin v. Russia Savkovi v. Serbia Bart�k v. Slovakia Sloboda v. Slovakia V.K. and Others v. Switzerland Altinkum � Tourism and Hotels and Aslan v. Turkey Ateolu �zmutafolu and Others v. Turkey �akmak v. Turkey G�ksan v. Turkey laslan v. Turkey ahin and Others v. Turkey eker v. Turkey Dashkevych and Others v. Ukraine Deriglazov and Others v. Ukraine Karas v. Ukraine Larina v. Ukraine Luzan and Others v. Ukraine Maslyuchenko and Others v. Ukraine Morozov and Others v. Ukraine Shkaranov and Others v. Ukraine Shoygo v. Ukraine Tsyganenko and Others v. Ukraine Main application number 57219/15 39187/06 68273/16 9146/20 69168/17 57368/19 29689/11 2682/12 69522/17 26432/13 9864/15 2776/21 48848/20 37207/20 77756/12 46301/16 45016/18 19843/19 21094/11 35996/20 30330/19 25844/20 42363/18 59851/14 34514/14 10990/20 26736/20 32635/12 22980/20 29662/13 5928/20 This press release is a document produced by the Registry. It does not bind the Court. Decisions, judgments and further information about the Court can be found on www.echr.coe.int. To receive the Court's press releases, please subscribe here: www.echr.coe.int/RSS/en or follow us on Twitter @ECHR_CEDH. Press contacts [email protected] | tel: +33 3 90 21 42 08 Tracey Turner-Tretz (tel.: + 33 3 88 41 35 30) Denis Lambert (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 41 09) Inci Ertekin (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 55 30) Neil Connolly (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 48 05) Jane Swift (tel.: + 33 3 88 41 29 04) The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe Member States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights. 5