003-7339369-10020112
WyrokETPCz2022-05-19
Analiza orzeczenia
Sekcja wygenerowana przez AI na podstawie treści orzeczenia — nie stanowi cytatu.
Zagadnienie prawne
Czy anulowanie zwolnienia z podatku od przeniesienia własności nieruchomości dla kupujących po raz pierwszy, skutkujące obowiązkiem zapłaty tego podatku, stanowiło naruszenie prawa do poszanowania mienia z art. 1 Protokołu nr 1 do Konwencji?Stan faktyczny
Skarżący, Aleksandar Bežanić i Stipica Baškarad, obywatele Chorwacji, nabyli nieruchomości, korzystając początkowo ze zwolnienia z podatku od przeniesienia własności jako kupujący po raz pierwszy. Władze anulowały te zwolnienia, twierdząc, że skarżący przestali spełniać warunki, co skutkowało obowiązkiem zapłaty podatku.Rozstrzygnięcie
Stwierdza brak naruszenia artykułu 1 Protokołu nr 1.Pełny tekst orzeczenia
issued by the Registrar of the Court
ECHR 160 (2022)
19.05.2022
Judgments and decisions of 19 May 2022
The European Court of Human Rights has today given notification in writing of eight judgments1 and decisions2:
two Chamber judgments are summarised below;
three separate press releases have been issued for Chamber judgments in the cases of Bouras
v. France (application no. 31754/18), L.F. v. Hungary (no. 621/14), and T.C. v. Italy (no. 54032/18);
a separate press release has also been issued for one decision in the case of De Kok v. the
Netherlands (no. 1443/19);
three Committee judgments, concerning issues which have already been examined by the Court, and
the 25 other decisions, can be consulted on Hudoc and do not appear in this press release.
The judgments summarised below are available only in English.
Bežanić and Baškarad v. Croatia (applications nos. 16140/15 and 13322/16)
The applicants, Aleksandar Bežanić and Stipica Baškarad, are Croatian nationals who were born in and 1966 respectively and live in Rijeka.
The case concerns the obligation to pay real estate transfer tax on two properties that the applicants
bought separately, after they were initially exempt from paying that tax as first-time buyers. The
exemptions in their cases were annulled by the authorities, which stated that the applicants had no
longer met the conditions.
They rely on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) to the European Convention on
Human Right.
No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1
Roengkasettakorn Eriksson v. Sweden (no. 21574/16)
The applicants are Siremon Roengkasettakorn Eriksson, who is a dual Swedish and Thai national, X
and Y, who are both Swedish nationals. They were born in 1977, 2007 and 2006 respectively.
Ms Roengkasettakorn Eriksson is the mother of the other two applicants, on whose behalf she
lodged the application.
In 2007 at the age of two weeks X was admitted to hospital with physical injuries including bone
fractures and bruising. Following this, X was placed in emergency care and later in a foster home.
The case concerns the subsequent proceedings which ended with X’s foster parents being given
custody of the child.
They rely on Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) of the European Convention.
Under Articles 43 and 44 of the Convention, Chamber judgments are not final. During the three-month period following a judgment’s
delivery, any party may request that the case be referred to the Grand Chamber of the Court. If such a request is made, a panel of five
judges considers whether the case deserves further examination. In that event, the Grand Chamber will hear the case and deliver a final
judgment. If the referral request is refused, the Chamber judgment will become final on that day. Under Article 28 of the Convention,
judgments delivered by a Committee are final.
Once a judgment becomes final, it is transmitted to the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe for supervision of its execution.
Further information about the execution process can be found here: www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/execution.
Inadmissibility and strike-out decisions are final.
No violation of Article 8
This press release is a document produced by the Registry. It does not bind the Court. Decisions,
judgments and further information about the Court can be found on www.echr.coe.int. To receive
the Court’s press releases, please subscribe here: www.echr.coe.int/RSS/en or follow us on Twitter
@ECHR_CEDH.
Press contacts
[email protected] | tel.: +33 3 90 21 42 08
We would encourage journalists to send their enquiries via email
Tracey Turner-Tretz (tel.: + 33 3 88 41 35 30)
Denis Lambert (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 41 09)
Inci Ertekin (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 55 30)
Neil Connolly (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 48 05)
Jane Swift (tel.: + 33 3 88 41 29 04)
The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe member
States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.
2
© Rada Europy / Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka, źródło: HUDOC (hudoc.echr.coe.int), pozyskano 14.07.2026. · Źródło