003-7367286-10067145

issued by the Registrar of the Court   ECHR 211 (2022)   23.06.2022   Judgments and decisions of 23 June 2022   The European Court of Human Rights has today given notification in writing of 24 judgments1 and   decisions2:   two Chamber judgments are summarised below;   three separate press releases have been issued for Chamber judgments in the cases of Grosam v. the   Czech Republic (application no. 19750/13), Rouillan v. France (no. 28000/19), and Haščák v. Slovakia   (nos. 58359/12, 27787/16 and 67667/16);   a separate press release has also been issued for one decision in the case of Jordan v. the United   Kingdom (no. 48066/21);   Committee judgments, concerning issues which have already been examined by the Court, and   the 49 other decisions can be consulted on Hudoc and do not appear in this press release.   The judgments summarised below are available only in English.   Naumenko and SIA Rix Shipping v. Latvia (application no. 50805/14)   The applicants are SIA RIX Shipping, a limited liability company based in Latvia, and its owner,   Andrey Naumenko, a Russian national who was born in 1973 and lives in Riga.   The case concerns a dawn raid on 28 January 2014 on the applicant company’s business premises   and the seizure of large amounts of documents and electronic files. A judge of the Riga City Vidzeme   District Court had granted the request to carry out the unannounced operation in the context of an   investigation into the National Association of Latvian Shipbrokers and Shipping Agents (“the NALSA”)   on suspicion of an infringement of competition law. The Competition Authority subsequently fined   the NALSA for setting a minimum or fixed price for its members for services rendered by shipping   agents.   Relying on Article 8 (right to respect for home and correspondence) of the European Convention on   Human Rights, the applicants allege that the search and seizure was unlawful and disproportionate   and that procedural safeguards in place were insufficient.   No violation of Article 8 in respect of the second applicant   The Court declared the remainder of the application inadmissible.   Alleleh and Others v. Norway (no. 569/20)   The applicants, Neima Aden Alleleh, a Djiboutian national, Rolf Erik Kristensen, a Norwegian   national, and their four children who are Norwegian citizens were born in 1983, 1967, 2005, 2009   and 2013 respectively. They live in Oslo.   Under Articles 43 and 44 of the Convention, Chamber judgments are not final. During the three-month period following a judgment’s   delivery, any party may request that the case be referred to the Grand Chamber of the Court. If such a request is made, a panel of five   judges considers whether the case deserves further examination. In that event, the Grand Chamber will hear the case and deliver a final   judgment. If the referral request is refused, the Chamber judgment will become final on that day. Under Article 28 of the Convention,   judgments delivered by a Committee are final.   Once a judgment becomes final, it is transmitted to the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe for supervision of its execution.   Further information about the execution process can be found here: www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/execution.   Inadmissibility and strike-out decisions are final.   The case concerns the expulsion of the mother who, upon arrival in Norway in 2001, had provided   false information to the immigration authorities about her country of origin and had applied for   asylum on false grounds, and the alleged consequences of the expulsion on their family life.   Relying on Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) of the European Convention, the   applicants complain that the expulsion of the first applicant with a two-year ban on re-entry entailed   a breach of the family members’ right to respect for their family life.   No violation of Article 8   This press release is a document produced by the Registry. It does not bind the Court. Decisions,   judgments and further information about the Court can be found on www.echr.coe.int. To receive   the Court’s press releases, please subscribe here: www.echr.coe.int/RSS/en or follow us on Twitter   @ECHR_CEDH.   Press contacts   [email protected] | tel.: +33 3 90 21 42 08   We would encourage journalists to send their enquiries via email.   Tracey Turner-Tretz (tel.: + 33 3 88 41 35 30)   Denis Lambert (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 41 09)   Inci Ertekin (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 55 30)   Neil Connolly (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 48 05)   Jane Swift (tel.: + 33 3 88 41 29 04)   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe member   States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.   2