003-7586479-10432155

issued by the Registrar of the Court   ECHR 072 (2023)   07.03.2023   Judgments of 7 March 2023   The European Court of Human Rights has today given notification in writing of nine judgments1:   one Chamber judgment is summarised below;   three separate press releases have been issued for Chamber judgments in the cases of Mamasakhlisi   and Others v. Georgia and Russia (applications nos. 29999/04 and 41424/04), Kogan and Others   v. Russia (no. 54003/20), and Ossewaarde v. Russia (no. 27227/17);   five Committee judgments, concerning issues which have already been examined by the Court, can   be consulted on Hudoc and do not appear in this press release.   The judgment summarised below is available only in French.   Tüzünataç v. Türkiye (application no. 14852/18)   The applicant, Birsen Berrak Tüzünataç, is a Turkish national who was born in 1984 and lives in   Istanbul (Türkiye).   The case concerns the broadcasting by a television channel of video footage recorded without the   knowledge of the applicant, a well-known actress, in which she and a male actor (Ş.G.), also a public   figure, were shown kissing on a terrace at the applicant’s home.   In 2010 the applicant brought a civil action against the parent company of the television channel,   claiming that she had been filmed without her knowledge, in breach of her right to privacy. In 2013   the Istanbul Regional Court dismissed the applicant’s claims, noting that the journalists had filmed   her from the street and had not entered her home covertly. The Court of Cassation dismissed an   appeal on points of law by the applicant, who then lodged an individual application with the   Constitutional Court. In 2017 that court held that there had been no breach of the applicant’s right   to privacy as she had been filmed from the street. It found that the images in question had not   contained any elements liable to cause an unacceptable degree of embarrassment to the persons   concerned and that the applicant had not taken adequate precautions or assumed sufficient   responsibility for protecting her privacy.   Relying on Articles 6 (right to a fair hearing) and 8 (right to respect for private life) of the European   Convention on Human Rights, the applicant complains about the broadcasting of the video footage   and maintains that the courts did not respond adequately to the alleged interference with her right   to respect for her private life.   Violation of Article 8   Just satisfaction:   Request for just satisfaction not made within the set time-limit   Under Articles 43 and 44 of the Convention, Chamber judgments are not final. During the three-month period following a judgment’s   delivery, any party may request that the case be referred to the Grand Chamber of the Court. If such a request is made, a panel of five   judges considers whether the case deserves further examination. In that event, the Grand Chamber will hear the case and deliver a final   judgment. If the referral request is refused, the Chamber judgment will become final on that day. Under Article 28 of the Convention,   judgments delivered by a Committee are final.   Once a judgment becomes final, it is transmitted to the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe for supervision of its execution.   Further information about the execution process can be found here: www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/execution.   This press release is a document produced by the Registry. It does not bind the Court. Decisions,   judgments and further information about the Court can be found on www.echr.coe.int. To receive   the Court’s press releases, please subscribe here: www.echr.coe.int/RSS/en or follow us on Twitter   @ECHR_CEDH.   Press contacts   [email protected] | tel.: +33 3 90 21 42 08   We would encourage journalists to send their enquiries via email.   Tracey Turner-Tretz (tel.: + 33 3 88 41 35 30)   Denis Lambert (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 41 09)   Inci Ertekin (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 55 30)   Neil Connolly (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 48 05)   Jane Swift (tel.: + 33 3 88 41 29 04)   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe member   States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.   2