003-7601989-10457031

issued by the Registrar of the Court   ECHR 085 (2023)   14.03.2023   Judgments of 21 March 2023   The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing 13 judgments1;   Three Chamber judgments are summarised below;   A separate press release has been issued for one other Chamber judgments in the case of: Telek and   Others v. Türkiye (applications nos. 66763/17, 66767/17, and 15891/18);   nine Committee judgments, concerning issues which have already been examined by the Court, can   be consulted on Hudoc and do not appear in this press release.   The judgment in French below is indicated with an asterisk (*).   Deltuva v. Lithuania (application no. 38144/20)   The applicant, Juozas Deltuva, is a Lithuanian national who was born in 1976 and lives in Kaunas   (Lithuania).   The case concerns a prosecutorial decision restricting Mr Deltuva’s phone calls and direct contact –   including with his ten-year-old daughter – while he was on remand, owing to the need to protect the   integrity of an investigation against him. He was wanted on suspicion of leading an organised group   involved in drug trafficking from the Netherlands to Russia via Lithuania, the trial for which is still   pending.   He relies on Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) of the European Convention on   Human Rights.   Violation of Article 8   Just satisfaction:   non-pecuniary damage: 5,000 euros (EUR)   costs and expenses: EUR 5,750   Simona Mihaela Dobre v. Romania (no. 8361/21)   The applicant, Simona Mihaela Dobre, is a Romanian national who was born in 1976 and lives in   Bucharest.   The case concerns the domestic courts’ refusal to allow her request for permission to move her and   her child’s residence to Canada, where she argued she would be able to offer him better living   conditions and better access to education.   Relying on Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) of the European Convention, the   applicant complains that the domestic courts’ decision did not give priority to the child’s best   interests and breached her right to respect for her private and family life.   Under Articles 43 and 44 of the Convention, Chamber judgments are not final. During the three-month period following a judgment’s   delivery, any party may request that the case be referred to the Grand Chamber of the Court. If such a request is made, a panel of five   judges considers whether the case deserves further examination. In that event, the Grand Chamber will hear the case and deliver a final   judgment. If the referral request is refused, the Chamber judgment will become final on that day. Under Article 28 of the Convention,   judgments delivered by a Committee are final.   Once a judgment becomes final, it is transmitted to the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe for supervision of its execution.   Further information about the execution process can be found here: www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/execution   No violation of Article 8   Chief Rabbinate of the Jewish Community in İzmir v. Türkiye (no. 1574/12)*   The applicant is the Chief Rabbinate of the Jewish Community in İzmir. At the relevant time it was a   religious institution whose members were Turkish citizens of the Jewish faith. On 13 December 2011   it acquired the status of foundation and took the name “Foundation of the Jewish Community of   İzmir”.   The case concerns judicial proceedings following which the foundation was denied permission to   register property, namely a plot of land on which was erected a former synagogue, its claim being   that the land had belonged to it for a long time.   The applicant foundation relies on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) to the   Convention and on Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) of the Convention.   Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1   Just satisfaction:   Request for just satisfaction not made within the set time-limit   This press release is a document produced by the Registry. It does not bind the Court. Decisions,   judgments and further information about the Court can be found on www.echr.coe.int. To receive   the Court’s press releases, please subscribe here: www.echr.coe.int/RSS/en or follow us on Twitter   @ECHR_CEDH.   Press contacts   [email protected] | tel: +33 3 90 21 42 08   We would encourage journalists to send their enquiries via email.   Tracey Turner-Tretz (tel.: + 33 3 88 41 35 30)   Denis Lambert (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 41 09)   Inci Ertekin (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 55 30)   Neil Connolly (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 48 05)   Jane Swift (tel.: + 33 3 88 41 29 04)   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe member   States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.   2