003-7793904-10807819
WyrokETPCz2023-11-09
Analiza orzeczenia
Sekcja wygenerowana przez AI na podstawie treści orzeczenia — nie stanowi cytatu.
Zagadnienie prawne
Czy prawo skarżącego do rzetelnego procesu (art. 6 Konwencji) zostało naruszone w związku z zarzutami stronniczości sądu apelacyjnego i niezgodnego z prawem przekazania jego sprawy do rozpoznania w rozszerzonym składzie?Stan faktyczny
Skarżący, Kari Risto Kalevi Toivanen, jest fińskim prawnikiem. W związku z postępowaniem sądowym, w którym sam był stroną, wysłał e-maile do kilku sędziów i organów sądowych, krytykując ich i prosząc o podjęcie działań w jego imieniu. W rezultacie Rada ds. Pełnomocników Procesowych cofnęła mu licencję na reprezentowanie klientów przed sądami. Skarżący odwołał się od tej decyzji do Sądu Apelacyjnego w Helsinkach, który rozpoznał sprawę w rozszerzonym składzie.Rozstrzygnięcie
Stwierdza brak naruszenia artykułu 6 Konwencji.Pełny tekst orzeczenia
issued by the Registrar of the Court
ECHR 304 (2023)
09.11.2023
Judgments and decisions of 9 November 2023
The European Court of Human Rights has today given notification in writing of 13 judgments1 and
ten decisions2:
two Chamber judgments are summarised below;
a separate press release has been issued for one Chamber judgment in the case of Legros and Others
v. France (application no. 72173/17 and 17 other applications);
a separate press release has also been issued for a decision in the case of Rivadulla Duró v. Spain
(no. 27925/21)
ten Committee judgments, concerning issues which have already been examined by the Court, and
the nine other decisions can be consulted on Hudoc and do not appear in this press release.
The judgments summarised below are available only in English.
Toivanen v. Finland (application no. 46131/19)
The applicant, Kari Risto Kalevi Toivanen, is a Finnish national who was born in 1958 and lives in
Sulkava (Finland). He is a lawyer licensed to act as counsel before the courts.
In connection to court proceedings he himself was involved in, he wrote emails to several judges and
judicial bodies, criticising them and asking them to take measures on his behalf. This led to the Board
on Trial Counsel (oikeudenkäyntiavustajalautakunta, rättegångsbiträdesnämnden) revoking his
licence to represent clients before the courts. The case concerns the applicant’s appeal against that
decision to the Helsinki Court of Appeal and that court’s subsequent decision to hear the case in its
extended composition.
Relying on Article 6 (right to a fair trial) of the European Convention on Human Rights, the applicant
complains of bias against him in the Court of Appeal and of the alleged unlawful transfer of his case
to the extended composition of that court.
No violation of Article 6
Lang v. Ukraine (no. 49134/20)
The applicant, Craig Austin Lang, is a United States national who was born in 1990 and lives in Kyiv.
Mr Lang, who had previously served in the US army, fought with varying Ukrainian armed formations
for several periods between 2015-19. The case concerns the possible extradition of Mr Lang to the
US following requests by the US Government. He is wanted in the States of Florida, North Carolina
and Arizona and for a number of offences, including, among others, use and discharge of a firearm
during and in relation to a crime of violence resulting in murder; conspiracy to kill, kidnap, maim or
Under Articles 43 and 44 of the Convention, Chamber judgments are not final. During the three-month period following a judgment’s
delivery, any party may request that the case be referred to the Grand Chamber of the Court. If such a request is made, a panel of five
judges considers whether the case deserves further examination. In that event, the Grand Chamber will hear the case and deliver a final
judgment. If the referral request is refused, the Chamber judgment will become final on that day. Under Article 28 of the Convention,
judgments delivered by a Committee are final.
Once a judgment becomes final, it is transmitted to the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe for supervision of its execution.
Further information about the execution process can be found here: www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/execution.
Inadmissibility and strike-out decisions are final.
injure persons in a foreign country (specifically Venezuela); violation of the neutrality act; and
passport fraud.
Relying on Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman and degrading treatment) of the European Convention,
Mr Lang alleges that if extradited to the US, he would risk receiving a sentence of life imprisonment
without hope of release.
No violation of Article 3 if the applicant were to be extradited to the United States of America
This press release is a document produced by the Registry. It does not bind the Court. Decisions,
judgments and further information about the Court can be found on www.echr.coe.int. To receive
the Court’s press releases, please subscribe here: www.echr.coe.int/RSS/en or follow us on Twitter
@ECHR_CEDH.
Press contacts
[email protected] | tel.: +33 3 90 21 42 08
We would encourage journalists to send their enquiries via email.
Tracey Turner-Tretz (tel.: + 33 3 88 41 35 30)
Denis Lambert (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 41 09)
Inci Ertekin (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 55 30)
Neil Connolly (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 48 05)
Jane Swift (tel.: + 33 3 88 41 29 04)
The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe member
States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.
2
© Rada Europy / Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka, źródło: HUDOC (hudoc.echr.coe.int), pozyskano 15.07.2026. · Źródło