003-7839198-10885205
WyrokETPCz2024-01-04
Analiza orzeczenia
Sekcja wygenerowana przez AI na podstawie treści orzeczenia — nie stanowi cytatu.
Zagadnienie prawne
Czy detencja prewencyjna osoby z zaburzeniami psychicznymi oraz warunki i jakość leczenia w placówce psychiatrycznej, w tym rzekome nieodpowiednie warunki detencji i brak wystarczającego leczenia, naruszyły prawa skarżącego do zakazu nieludzkiego i poniżającego traktowania (art. 3), zakazu pracy przymusowej (art. 4), wolności i bezpieczeństwa osobistego (art. 5), rzetelnego procesu (art. 6), poszanowania życia prywatnego i rodzinnego (art. 8) oraz skutecznego środka odwoławczego (art. 13) Konwencji?Stan faktyczny
Rui Miguel Miranda Magro, portugalski obywatel urodzony w 1975 roku, zdiagnozowany w 2002 roku na schizofrenię paranoidalną. W 2019 roku został uznany za niepoczytalnego w związku z zarzucanymi przestępstwami i orzeczono wobec niego detencję prewencyjną. W 2021 roku został umieszczony przez władze zdrowia publicznego w Hospital do Espírito Santo de Évora. Skarży się na nieodpowiednie warunki detencji, w tym kraty, drut kolczasty i strażników wyposażonych w środki przymusu fizycznego, oraz na niewystarczające leczenie.Pełny tekst orzeczenia
issued by the Registrar of the Court
ECHR 001 (2024) 04.01.2024
Forthcoming judgments and decisions
The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing one judgment on Tuesday 9 January 2024 and 40 judgments and / or decisions on Thursday 11 January 2024.
Press releases and texts of the judgments and decisions will be available at 10 a.m. (local time) on the Court's Internet site (www.echr.coe.int).
Tuesday 9 January 2024
Miranda Magro v. Portugal (application no. 30138/21) The applicant, Rui Miguel Miranda Magro, is a Portuguese national who was born in 1975 and lives in �vora (Portugal). Mr Miranda Magro was diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia in 2002. The case concerns his preventative detention ordered by the courts following his being found in 2019 not criminally responsible owing to his mental disorder for assorted alleged offences. He was later committed in 2021 by the public-health authorities to the Hospital do Esp�rito Santo de �vora before finishing his preventative detention. Mr Miranda Magro asserts that the conditions of detention � including bars, barbed wire and warders equipped with means of physical repression � were not appropriate to his recovery, while the Government assert that he received the medical and specialist care he needed and was prescribed the appropriate therapy and medication for his symptoms. Relying on Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment), Article 4 (prohibition of forced labour), Article 5 (right to liberty and security), Article 6 (right to a fair trial), Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) and Article 13 (right to an effective remedy) of the European Convention on Human Rights, Mr Miranda Magro complains, in particular, of inadequate medical treatment in the psychiatric unit of the Caxias Prison Hospital, and that his detention had not been lawful since he had not received the level of treatment required for his condition.
Thursday 11 January 2024
Wiegandov� v. the Czech Republic (no. 51391/19) The applicant, Helena Wiegandov�, is a Czech national who was born in 1948 and lives in Prague. The case concerns flats in a building in the Prague 10 area owned by Ms Wiegandov� over which easements in favour of a housing cooperative had been created in 1992. In particular, easements for one of the flats had been created free of charge and without any time-limits. The building had come into Ms Wiegandov�'s partner's possession in 1991 as part of restitution arrangements in the postcommunist era in Czechoslovakia. Relying on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the European Convention, Ms Wiegandov� complains that she was restricted in her use of her property making it ownership in name only.
D v. Latvia (no. 76680/17) The applicant, Mr D, is a Latvian national who lives in Riga. The case concerns the applicant's time in prison between 2008-17, during which he allegedly suffered ill-treatment as a result of the informal caste system into which the inmates were organised
and the alleged failure of the authorities to tackle the problem. Mr D was in the lowest caste (the kreisie). He relies on Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) of the Convention.
Tena Arregui v. Spain (no. 42541/18) The applicant, Rodrigo Tena Arregui, is a Spanish national who was born in 1962 and lives in Madrid. The case concerns the collecting and release of some of Mr Tena Arregui's emails by the Unin, Progreso y Democracia political party (of which he had been a senior member) during an operation to monitor suspicions that other members had made backroom deals with the Ciudadanos party. Relying on Article 8 (right to respect for correspondence), the applicant complains of the interception of his emails and of the subsequent court decisions in that connection.
The Court will give its rulings in writing on the following cases, some of which concern issues which have already been submitted to the Court, including excessive length of proceedings. These rulings can be consulted from the day of their delivery on the Court's online database HUDOC. They will not appear in the press release issued on that day.
Thursday 11 January 2024
Name Gurma v. Albania Kostov v. Bulgaria Suty v. France Alunni and Others v. Italy Buono v. Italy Campeggi v. Italy Di Giuseppe v. Italy Libri v. Italy Muraca v. Italy Utzeri v. Italy Marquilie v. Luxembourg Luczkiewicz v. Poland BCR Banca pentru locuine S.A. v. Romania Bochkarev and Others v. Russia Galeyev and Others v. Russia Kargashin and Others v. Russia Kayumovy and Others v. Russia Lavrov and Others v. Russia Lebed and Others v. Russia Malin and Others v. Russia Maslova and Others v. Russia Mikhaylov and Others v. Russia Polezhayev and Others v. Russia Samarukov and Others v. Russia Savchenko and Others v. Russia
Main application number 50249/13 32731/17 34/18 16505/22 22792/11 12592/20 7997/21 45097/20 38750/20 10393/22 28239/21 1464/14 4558/20 1698/19 41539/18 4815/18 56727/18 52342/20 5136/19 57814/18 62807/09 57882/18 59040/18 54274/18 43267/21
Name Tikhonov and Others v. Russia Tranda and Others v. Russia Trevogin and Others v. Russia Nevedelov� v. Slovakia S.C. and Others v. Switzerland Budivelno Investytsiyna Grupa 1 v. Ukraine Centre for Social and Political Technologies "Public Relations", TOV v. Ukraine Grygorov v. Ukraine Kotsupyr v. Ukraine Naftogazvydobuvannya, Pjsc v. Ukraine Shmakova v. Ukraine Tsyoge Fon Manteyfel v. Ukraine
Main application number 18907/19 11278/19 61147/13 978/22 26848/18 56903/10 59690/15 44442/13 18180/11 14767/16 70445/13 29804/16
This press release is a document produced by the Registry. It does not bind the Court. Decisions, judgments and further information about the Court can be found on www.echr.coe.int. To receive the Court's press releases, please subscribe here: www.echr.coe.int/RSS/en or follow us on Twitter @ECHR_CEDH.
Press contacts [email protected] | tel.: +33 3 90 21 42 08
We would encourage journalists to send their enquiries via email.
Tracey Turner-Tretz (tel.: + 33 3 88 41 35 30) Denis Lambert (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 41 09) Inci Ertekin (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 55 30) Neil Connolly (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 48 05) Jane Swift (tel.: + 33 3 88 41 29 04)
The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe member States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.
3
© Rada Europy / Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka, źródło: HUDOC (hudoc.echr.coe.int), pozyskano 15.07.2026. · Źródło