003-7975823-11123840

issued by the Registrar of the Court   ECHR 154 (2024)   18.06.2024   Judgments of 18 June 2024   The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing three Chamber judgments1:   one judgment is summarised below;   two separate press releases have been issued for the judgments in the cases of Andrey Rylkov   Foundation and Others v. Russia (application no. 37949/18 and 84 other applications) and Suprun   and Others v. Russia (nos. 58029/12, 29440/19, 12396/21, 61350/21, and 25390/22);   The judgment below is only available in English.   A.P. v. Armenia (application no. 58737/14)   The applicant, Ms A.P., is an Armenian national who was born in 1997 and lives in Armenia. She has   had a mild intellectual disability since birth.   The case concerns the applicant’s complaints concerning her sexual abuse at the age of 14 by a   49-year-old man who was her physical education teacher and the administrative head of the   community where she lived. The perpetrator was charged with aggravated rape and indecent acts in   respect of a minor. The Regional Court conducted the trial in camera, with a number of witnesses   giving evidence. He was sentenced to eight years’ imprisonment.   The applicant later introduced a civil claim for damages against the State and was unsuccessful at   three levels of jurisdiction. The details concerning the civil case, including her full name were   published in the publicly accessible online judicial database.   Relying on Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment), Article 8 (right to protection   for private and family life), and Article 13 (right to an effective remedy) of the European Convention   on Human Rights, Ms A.P. complains that the State failed to protect her from the abuse that she   suffered, that her personal data was published in the publicly accessible online judicial database, and   that she did not have an effective remedy for her complaints.   Violation of Article 3   Violation of Article 8   Violation of Article 13   Just satisfaction:   non-pecuniary damage: 32,000 euros (EUR)   This press release is a document produced by the Registry. It does not bind the Court. Decisions,   judgments and further information about the Court can be found on www.echr.coe.int. To receive   the Court’s press releases, please subscribe here: www.echr.coe.int/RSS/en or follow us on Twitter   @ECHR_CEDH.   Under Articles 43 and 44 of the Convention, Chamber judgments are not final. During the three-month period following a Chamber   judgment’s delivery, any party may request that the case be referred to the Grand Chamber of the Court. If such a request is made, a   panel of five judges considers whether the case deserves further examination. In that event, the Grand Chamber will hear the case and   deliver a final judgment. If the referral request is refused, the Chamber judgment will become final on that day. Under Article 28 of the   Convention, judgments delivered by a Committee are final.   Once a judgment becomes final, it is transmitted to the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe for supervision of its execution.   Further information about the execution process can be found here: www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/execution   Press contacts   [email protected]e.int | tel.: +33 3 90 21 42 08   We are happy to receive journalists’ enquiries via either email or telephone.   Tracey Turner-Tretz (tel.: + 33 3 88 41 35 30)   Denis Lambert (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 41 09)   Inci Ertekin (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 55 30)   Neil Connolly (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 48 05)   Jane Swift (tel.: + 33 3 88 41 29 04)   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe member   States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.   2