003-7996447-11157123

issued by the Registrar of the Court   ECHR 180 (2024)   09.07.2024   Judgments of 9 July 2024   The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing 11 judgments1:   one Chamber judgment is summarised below;   separate press releases have been issued for two Chamber judgments in the cases of Savinovskikh   and Others v. Russia (application no. 16206/19) and Selçuk v. Türkiye (no. 23093/20).   eight Committee judgments, concerning issues which have already been examined by the Court, can   be consulted on Hudoc and do not appear in this press release.   The judgment summarised below is available only in French.   Delga v. France (application no. 38998/20)   The applicant, Carole Delga, is a French national who was born in 1971 and lives in Toulouse.   The case concerns the foreseeability, within the meaning of Article 7 (no punishment without law) of   the European Convention on Human Rights, of the applicant’s criminal conviction. She is President of   the Regional Council of Occitanie and was convicted of discrimination against a legal entity, the   municipality of Beaucaire, under Articles 225-1 and 432-7 of the Criminal Code.   Relying on Article 7 (no punishment without law), the applicant complains about her conviction for   discrimination, arguing that it was not foreseeable.   Violation of Article 7   Just satisfaction: The applicant did not submit a claim for just satisfaction for pecuniary and non-   pecuniary damage.   This press release is a document produced by the Registry. It does not bind the Court. Decisions,   judgments   and   further   information   about   the   Court   can   be   found   on   https://www.echr.coe.int/home. To receive the Court’s press releases, please subscribe here:   www.echr.coe.int/RSS/en or follow us on Twitter @ECHR_CEDH.   Press contacts   [email protected]e.int | tel.: +33 3 90 21 42 08   We are happy to receive journalists’ enquiries via either email or telephone.   Tracey Turner-Tretz (tel.: + 33 3 88 41 35 30)   Denis Lambert (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 41 09)   Inci Ertekin (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 55 30)   Neil Connolly (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 48 05)   Jane Swift (tel.: + 33 3 88 41 29 04)   Under Articles 43 and 44 of the Convention, Chamber judgments are not final. During the three-month period following a Chamber   judgment’s delivery, any party may request that the case be referred to the Grand Chamber of the Court. If such a request is made, a   panel of five judges considers whether the case deserves further examination. In that event, the Grand Chamber will hear the case and   deliver a final judgment. If the referral request is refused, the Chamber judgment will become final on that day. Under Article 28 of the   Convention, judgments delivered by a Committee are final.   Once a judgment becomes final, it is transmitted to the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe for supervision of its execution.   Further information about the execution process can be found here: www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/execution   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe member   States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.   2