003-8028081-11213500
WyrokETPCz2024-09-05
Analiza orzeczenia
Sekcja wygenerowana przez AI na podstawie treści orzeczenia — nie stanowi cytatu.
Stan faktyczny
W sprawie Dianova i Inni przeciwko Rosji, skarżący, obywatele Rosji, skarżą się na działania policji w związku ze strajkiem głodowym protestacyjnym oraz tworzeniem satyrycznego filmu o prezydencie Rosji, a także na późniejsze postępowania administracyjne. W sprawie Longo przeciwko Włochom, skarżący, obywatel Włoch, został uznany za winnego nieuprawnionej budowy i skarży się na nakaz rozbiórki oraz jego egzekwowanie. W sprawie Melandri przeciwko San Marino, skarżący, obywatel Włoch, został skazany za pranie pieniędzy i skarży się na brak możliwości obrony oraz nieproporcjonalny nakaz konfiskaty mienia.Pełny tekst orzeczenia
issued by the Registrar of the Court
ECHR 202 (2024) 05.09.2024
Forthcoming judgments and decisions
The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing three judgments on Tuesday 10 September 2024 and 45 judgments and / or decisions on Thursday 12 September 2024.
Press releases and texts of the judgments and decisions will be available at 10 a.m. (local time) on the Court's Internet site (www.echr.coe.int).
Tuesday 10 September 2024
Dianova and Others v. Russia (applications nos. 21286/15, 13140/16, 13162/16, 20802/16, and 24703/16) The applicants, Olga Dianova, Anastasiya Sheveleva, Leonid Mikhaylov, Roman Roslovtsev, and Valeriya Zenyakina, are five Russian nationals who live in Yekaterinburg, Moscow and Novomoskovsk. The case concerns a hunger strike by Ms Dianova in Yekaterinburg in protest against the treatment of a prisoner in correctional colony IK-63 in Ivdel (Sverdlovsk Region). It also concerns the other four applicants' making a satirical film about Russian President Vladimir Putin in Vorobyovy Gory Park in Moscow and their subsequent arrest. Administrative-offence proceedings were taken against all the applicants. Relying on Articles 10 (freedom of expression), 11 (freedom of assembly and association), 5 (right to liberty and security), 6 (right to a fair trial) and 13 (right to an effective remedy) of the European Convention on Human Rights, the applicants complain, in particular, of the police actions to end the hunger strike and the filmmaking, and the subsequent administrative-offence proceedings.
Thursday 12 September 2024
Longo v. Italy (no. 35780/18) The applicant, Cesare Longo, is an Italian national who was born in 1946 and lives in Balestrate (Palermo, Italy). In 1997 Mr Longo was found guilty of the unauthorised construction of a 200 sq. m agricultural warehouse. The case concerns a demolition order issued as part of the judgment. Mr Longo unsuccessfully appealed to the Palermo Court of Appeal against enforcement of that order in 2016. A subsequent appeal of points of law was rejected by the Court of Cassation. Relying on Articles 6 � 1 (right to a fair trial) and 7 (no punishment without law) of the European Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) to the Convention, Mr Longo complains of the national courts' failure to characterise the demolition order as a penalty, and of a disproportionate interference with his property rights.
Melandri v. San Marino (no. 25189/21) The applicant, Vincenzo Secondo Melandri, is an Italian national who was born in 1969 and lives in Russi (Italy).
The case concerns the depositing of over 5 million euros in cash and cheques from 2009 into an account with a San Marinese bank of Mr Melandri along with alleged fraudulent transactions by a wine company traceable to Mr Melandri. This prompted a money-laundering investigation, leading to a final criminal conviction in San Marino. He received a prison sentence of four years and three months and had a number of assets confiscated.
Relying on Article 6 �� 1 and 3 (a) and (b) (right to a fair trial) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property), Mr Melandri complains, in particular, that he was unable to defend himself as he had been charged with money laundering not self-laundering, and that the confiscation order was disproportionate.
The Court will give its rulings in writing on the following cases, some of which concern issues which have already been submitted to the Court, including excessive length of proceedings.
These rulings can be consulted from the day of their delivery on the Court's online database HUDOC.
They will not appear in the press release issued on that day.
Tuesday 10 September 2024
Name
Main application number
Nevada Tours 2004 AD and Bulgarian Tourist Company Global Tours AD 4173/20
v. Bulgaria
Paliouras and Others v. Greece
51031/16
Thursday 12 September 2024
Name
J.B. and Others v. Belgium Duraku v. France Le Dall v. France M.C. v. Greece Csite v. Hungary Z.L. and Others v. Hungary Cassa Nazionale di Previdenza e Assistenza Forense v. Italy De Silvio v. Italy Orlandi v. Italy Pace v. Italy Antonova and Others v. Russia Aynbinder and Others v. Russia Fayzulin and Others v. Russia Frenkel and Others v. Russia Galperin and Others v. Russia Magomedov and Others v. Russia Nazarov and Others v. Russia Orlovskiy and Others v. Russia Panichev and Others v. Russia Rybakov and Others v. Russia Sautiyeva and Others v. Russia Shevrin v. Russia
Main application number
43539/21 26505/19 21655/23 42565/16 21951/17 13899/19 15646/22 15972/20 60894/13 39627/16 20265/18 49839/17 48841/14 2504/19 38377/15 52356/21 23242/20 74186/17 6534/20 143/18 8936/20 15247/18
Name
Simakov and Others v. Russia Slyusarev and Others v. Russia Smirnov and Others v. Russia Tuganov and Others v. Russia Turubanov and Others v. Russia Tyurin and Others v. Russia Yatskiv and Others v. Russia ZAO Redaktsyya 'Nezavisimoy gazety' v. Russia Zhmyrev and Others v. Russia L.B. v. Slovakia Stopar and Kotar v. Slovenia Zobozdravstveni zavod Vertacnik v. Slovenia R.T. v. Spain Moroz v. Ukraine Myronyuk v. Ukraine Pavlyshyn v. Ukraine Pinchuk v. Ukraine Rustinov v. Ukraine S.V.M. v. Ukraine Sonat, PAT v. Ukraine Sparysh and Kutsmand v. Ukraine
Main application number
14035/20 56181/18 12896/20 14539/20 10228/22 795/20 36952/21 16278/21 69927/17 5541/22 1400/22 19746/23 47580/21 63648/14 22566/14 25093/17 72777/13 18939/16 40106/15 50574/20 49709/18
This press release is a document produced by the Registry. It does not bind the Court. Decisions, judgments and further information about the Court can be found on www.echr.coe.int. To receive the Court's press releases, please subscribe here: www.echr.coe.int/RSS/en or follow us on X (Twitter) @ECHR_CEDH.
Press contacts [email protected] | tel.: +33 3 90 21 42 08
We are happy to receive journalists' enquiries via either email or telephone.
Tracey Turner-Tretz (tel.: + 33 3 88 41 35 30) Denis Lambert (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 41 09) Inci Ertekin (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 55 30) Neil Connolly (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 48 05) Jane Swift (tel.: + 33 3 88 41 29 04)
The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe member States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.
3
© Rada Europy / Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka, źródło: HUDOC (hudoc.echr.coe.int), pozyskano 15.07.2026. · Źródło