13038/18;18226/19;32325/19;46710/21;46952/21;47049/21;47050/21;47109/21;47129/21;47246/21;47445/21;47650/21;47652/21;47658/21;48209/21;48333/21;48722/21;50600/21;50608/21;50618/21;50621/21;50624/21;51114/21;54788/21;54791/21;55546/21;55580/21;57073/21;57087/21;57100/21;57121/21;57317/21;57552/21;57558/21;57561/21;57570/21;57573/21;57720/21;57740/21;57745/21

WyrokETPCz2024-03-21ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0321JUD001303818

Analiza orzeczenia

Sekcja wygenerowana przez AI na podstawie treści orzeczenia — nie stanowi cytatu.

Zagadnienie prawne
Czy środki podjęte przeciwko organizatorom i uczestnikom zgromadzeń publicznych, w tym aresztowania i skazania za wykroczenia administracyjne, stanowiły nieproporcjonalną ingerencję w prawo do wolności zgromadzeń (art. 11 Konwencji) oraz czy naruszyły inne prawa konwencyjne, takie jak prawo do wolności i bezpieczeństwa (art. 5 ust. 1) i prawo do rzetelnego procesu (art. 6 ust. 1), a także prawo do odwołania w sprawach karnych (art. 2 Protokołu nr 7)?
Ratio decidendi
Trybunał stwierdził naruszenie art. 11 Konwencji, uznając, że środki podjęte przeciwko skarżącym (aresztowania, skazania za wykroczenia administracyjne) były nieproporcjonalne i nie były „konieczne w społeczeństwie demokratycznym”. Trybunał oparł się na swojej ugruntowanej linii orzeczniczej dotyczącej wolności zgromadzeń oraz proporcjonalności ingerencji w nią. Dodatkowo, w odniesieniu do innych skarg, Trybunał stwierdził naruszenia Konwencji i jej Protokołów, powołując się na wcześniejsze wyroki, które dotyczyły niezgodnego z prawem pozbawienia wolności, braku bezstronności trybunału w postępowaniach administracyjnych oraz braku skutku zawieszającego odwołania od aresztu administracyjnego. Trybunał nie znalazł żadnych faktów ani argumentów, które skłoniłyby go do odmiennego wniosku.
Stan faktyczny
Liczni skarżący, organizatorzy lub uczestnicy zgromadzeń publicznych w Rosji (w tym „Anti-corruption rally”, „Rally to call for fair elections”, „Opposition rally”, „Rally 'Free Azat Miftakhov'”, „Rally 'Free Navalnyy'”), zostali zatrzymani i skazani za wykroczenia administracyjne, takie jak naruszenie przepisów dotyczących zgromadzeń publicznych (art. 19.3 § 1 i art. 20.2 § 2, 5, 6.1 rosyjskiego Kodeksu Wykroczeń Administracyjnych). Skarżący zostali ukarani grzywnami, pracami społecznymi lub aresztem administracyjnym. W wielu przypadkach skarżący skarżyli się również na niezgodne z prawem pozbawienie wolności oraz brak bezstronności sądów krajowych.
Rozstrzygnięcie
Decyduje o połączeniu skarg; Stwierdza, że ma jurysdykcję do rozpatrzenia tych skarg, ponieważ dotyczą faktów, które miały miejsce przed 16 września 2022 r.; Uznaje skargi na podstawie art. 11 Konwencji i inne skargi na podstawie ugruntowanego orzecznictwa Trybunału, jak określono w załączonej tabeli, za dopuszczalne i stwierdza, że nie ma potrzeby oddzielnego rozpatrywania pozostałych skarg; Stwierdza, że te skargi ujawniają naruszenie art. 11 Konwencji; Stwierdza, że doszło do naruszenia Konwencji i jej Protokołów w odniesieniu do innych skarg podniesionych na podstawie ugruntowanego orzecznictwa Trybunału (zob. załączona tabela); Zasądza, że państwo pozwane ma zapłacić skarżącym, w terminie trzech miesięcy, kwoty wskazane w załączonej tabeli, które zostaną przeliczone na walutę państwa pozwanego według kursu obowiązującego w dniu rozliczenia; Zasądza, że od upływu wyżej wymienionych trzech miesięcy do dnia rozliczenia, od powyższych kwot będą naliczane odsetki proste według stopy równej krańcowej stopie oprocentowania Europejskiego Banku Centralnego w okresie zwłoki plus trzy punkty procentowe.

Pełny tekst orzeczenia

THIRD SECTION CASE OF SKOBELEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 13038/18 and 39 others – see appended list)             JUDGMENT   STRASBOURG 21 March 2024   This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Skobelev and Others v. Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:  Peeter Roosma, President,  Ioannis Ktistakis,  Andreas Zünd, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 22 February 2024, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.  The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2.  The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS 3.  The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.  The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.  Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. JURISDICTION 6.  The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023). ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION 7.  The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention. 8.  The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009). 9.  In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 10.  Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”. 11.  These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW 12.  Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. 13.  Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention. REMAINING COMPLAINTS 14.  Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention and under Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative-offence proceedings. In view of the findings in the above paragraphs, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 15.  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022; Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints; Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention; Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table); Holds (a)  that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)  that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. Done in English, and notified in writing on 21 March 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.    Viktoriya Maradudina Peeter Roosma  Acting Deputy Registrar President     APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative / criminal offence Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros)[1]     13038/18 10/02/2018 Yevgeniy SKOBELEV     Anti-corruption rally   St Petersburg   12/06/2017 article 19.3 § 1 of CAO, article 20.2 § 5 of CAO two fines of RUB 10,000 each St Petersburg City Court 10/09/2017 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.51 p.m. until 9.53 p.m. on 12/06/2017;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     18226/19 27/03/2019 Yuriy Nikolayevich ZAVARIN Laptev Aleksey Nikolayevich Moscow Rally to call for fair elections   St Petersburg   05/05/2018 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 27/09/2018 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings     3,500     32325/19 20/05/2019 Aleksey Vladimirovich OTRYAKHIN Yatsenko Irina Aleksandrovna Moscow Opposition rally   Moscow   05/05/2018 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO, and   article 19.3 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 and    fine RUB 1,000 Moscow City Court 20/11/2018 (both sets of the proceedings)   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings     3,500     46710/21 08/09/2021 Yelena Nikitichna SANNIKOVA Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow Rally "Free Azat Miftakhov"   Moscow   25/12/2020 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 06/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 4.20 p.m. until 10.30 p.m. on 25/12/2020;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000     46952/21 01/09/2021 Andrey Aleksandrovich BALUSHKIN Tkachenko Nikita Nikolayevich Belgorod Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Belgorod   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO 20 hours of community work Belgorod Regional Court 01/03/2021   3,500     47049/21 01/09/2021 Sergey Dmitriyevich KOTELNIKOV Tkachenko Nikita Nikolayevich Belgorod Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Belgorod   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO 30 hours of community work Belgorod Regional Court 01/03/2021   3,500     47050/21 07/09/2021 Andrey Gennadyevich DEMIN Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 04/03/2021 (decision served on the applicant after 07/03/2021)   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021 until 00.15 a.m. on 24/01/2021;    Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   4,000     47109/21 02/09/2021 Yevgeniy Andreyevich SELIVANOV Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Volgograd   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO, article 20.2 § 2 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 and detention for 5 days Volgograd Regional Court 11/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.30 p.m. until 10.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO 5,000     47129/21 02/09/2021 Nikita Yuryevich KOZLOV Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 8 days Moscow City Court 02/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 6.04 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 6.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021;    Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;    Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO 5,000   47246/21 16/09/2021 Amir Damirovich FATTAKHOV Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 19/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.43 p.m. until 10.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;    Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings         4,000   47445/21 09/09/2021 Maksim Alekseyevich NIKITIN Markin Konstantin Aleksandrovich Velikiy Novgorod Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Velikiy Novgorod   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO 20 hours of community work Novgorod Regional Court 23/04/2021     4,000   47650/21 01/09/2021 Yekaterina Nikolayevna LEZHNEVA Tkachenko Nikita Nikolayevich Belgorod Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Belgorod   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Belgorod Regional Court 01/03/2021   3,500   47652/21 01/09/2021 Artur Vladimirovich GARKOVSKIY Tkachenko Nikita Nikolayevich Belgorod Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Belgorod   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO 20 hours of community work Belgorod Regional Court 01/03/2021   3,500   47658/21 15/09/2021 Kirill Yevgenyevich NADEZHDIN Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Naberezhnye Chelny   23/01/2021     article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 24/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 02/02/2021 for compiling an offence report 4,000   48209/21 24/09/2021 Sergey Nikolayevich POTANIN Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Penza   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Penza Regional Court 01/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.15 p.m. until 6.45 p.m. on 23/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   48333/21 30/08/2021 Aleksandr Konstantinovich KOTELNIKOV Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 06/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 2.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   48722/21 26/08/2021 Yuriy Olegovich DMITRIYEV Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Kazan 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Supreme Court of Tatarstan 17/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report 4,000   50600/21 30/09/2021 Pavel Borisovich MOREV Valenkov Andrey Olegovich Nizhniy Novgorod Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Nizhniy Novgorod   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 31/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 6.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021     4,000   50608/21 22/08/2021 Mars Vygyzovich KHUSAINOV Antokhin Yevgeniy Vyacheslavovich Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 5 days Moscow City Court 02/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 2.25 p.m. on 02/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO 5,000   50618/21 22/09/2021 Olga Mikhaylovna BOGDANOVA Antokhin Yevgeniy Vyacheslavovich Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 3 days Moscow City Court 02/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 1.30 a.m. on 03/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;    Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO 5,000   50621/21 22/09/2021 Ilya Andreyevich MALOV Antokhin Yevgeniy Vyacheslavovich Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 8 days Moscow City Court 02/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.35 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 9.00 a.m. on 02/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;    Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO     5,000   50624/21 24/09/2021 Yuliya Aleksandrovna YUDINA Kachanov Roman Yevgenyevich Yekaterinburg Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Yekaterinburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO 30 hours of community work Sverdlovsk Regional Court 25/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   51114/21 12/10/2021 Vyacheslav Igorevich PYATAKOV Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Moscow City Court 12/04/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 10.05. a.m. until 3.20 p.m. on 02/02/2021 4,000   54788/21 10/10/2021 Viktoriya Vladimirovna KOZYREVA Tkachenko Nikita Nikolayevich Belgorod Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Belgorod   21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Belgorod Regional Court 09/08/2021   3,500   54791/21 10/10/2021 Tatyana Andreyevna KUPRIYENKO Tkachenko Nikita Nikolayevich Belgorod Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Belgorod   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO fine of RUB 5,000 Belgorod Regional Court 28/06/2021   3,500   55546/21 11/11/2021 Tagir Rovshanovich ALIYEV Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 11/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report 4,000   55580/21 20/10/2021 Anna Dmitriyevna SHARONOVA Nurgaleyev Danil Ilnurovich Kazan Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Kazan   21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 02/06/2021   3,500   57073/21 11/10/2021 Yelizaveta Aleksandrovna REMESLOVA Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Krasnoyarsk   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 13/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.20 p.m. until 7.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   57087/21 11/11/2021 Daniil Anatolyevich DUMANSKIY Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Bryansk   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Bryansk Regional Court 11/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.25 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 4.00 p.m. on 02/02/2021;    Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   57100/21 29/10/2021 Anastasiya Ivanovna KORSHUNOVA Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Kursk   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Kursk Regional Court 29/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.42 p.m. until 7.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   57121/21 29/10/2021 Nikita Olegovich PORTNOV Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Samara   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Samara Regional Court 29/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.30 p.m. until 9.00 p.m. on 23/01/2021 4,000   57317/21 10/11/2021 Mariya Vadimovna DRACHEVA Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Tomsk   21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 18,000 Tomsk Regional Court 21/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 8.00 p.m. on 21/04/2021 until 00.30 a.m. on 22/04/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   57552/21 18/11/2021 Georgiy Pavlovich KRYUCHKOV Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 19/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 11.47 p.m. on 02/02/2021 until 05.30 a.m. on 03/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   57558/21 18/11/2021 Aleksandr Igorevich ANDROSOV Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 21/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 2.00 a.m. on 01/02/2021;    Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   57561/21 18/11/2021 Irina Gennadyevna TUGOLUKOVA Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 19/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 11.55. a.m. to 8.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021     4,000   57570/21 18/11/2021 Sergey Viktorovich FILATOV Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000 Moscow City Court 19/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 5.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021 until 01.45 a.m. on 24/01/2021;    Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   57573/21 10/11/2021 Yelena Igorevna NAUMOVA Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Vladivostok   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO 30 hours of community work Primorye Regional Court 11/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.36 p.m. until 9.45 p.m. on 31/01/2021;    Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   57720/21 26/10/2021 Aleksey Romanovich CHIZHIKOV Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Vladivostok   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 7,500 Primorskiy Regional Court 27/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.05 p.m. until 9.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   57740/21 18/11/2021 Aleksandr Alkeseyevich KOSTYUKHIN Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 19/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.30 p.m. until 7.40 p.m. on 02/02/2021;    Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   57745/21 18/11/2021 Margarita Aleksandrovna MALTSEVA Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Vladivostok   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Primorskiy Regional Court 25/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.05 p.m. until 9.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;    Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000     [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.

© Rada Europy / Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka, źródło: HUDOC (hudoc.echr.coe.int), pozyskano 29.07.2026. · Źródło