13038/18;18226/19;32325/19;46710/21;46952/21;47049/21;47050/21;47109/21;47129/21;47246/21;47445/21;47650/21;47652/21;47658/21;48209/21;48333/21;48722/21;50600/21;50608/21;50618/21;50621/21;50624/21;51114/21;54788/21;54791/21;55546/21;55580/21;57073/21;57087/21;57100/21;57121/21;57317/21;57552/21;57558/21;57561/21;57570/21;57573/21;57720/21;57740/21;57745/21
WyrokETPCz2024-03-21ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0321JUD001303818
Analiza orzeczenia
Sekcja wygenerowana przez AI na podstawie treści orzeczenia — nie stanowi cytatu.
Zagadnienie prawne
Czy środki podjęte przeciwko organizatorom i uczestnikom zgromadzeń publicznych, w tym aresztowania i skazania za wykroczenia administracyjne, stanowiły nieproporcjonalną ingerencję w prawo do wolności zgromadzeń (art. 11 Konwencji) oraz czy naruszyły inne prawa konwencyjne, takie jak prawo do wolności i bezpieczeństwa (art. 5 ust. 1) i prawo do rzetelnego procesu (art. 6 ust. 1), a także prawo do odwołania w sprawach karnych (art. 2 Protokołu nr 7)?Ratio decidendi
Trybunał stwierdził naruszenie art. 11 Konwencji, uznając, że środki podjęte przeciwko skarżącym (aresztowania, skazania za wykroczenia administracyjne) były nieproporcjonalne i nie były „konieczne w społeczeństwie demokratycznym”. Trybunał oparł się na swojej ugruntowanej linii orzeczniczej dotyczącej wolności zgromadzeń oraz proporcjonalności ingerencji w nią. Dodatkowo, w odniesieniu do innych skarg, Trybunał stwierdził naruszenia Konwencji i jej Protokołów, powołując się na wcześniejsze wyroki, które dotyczyły niezgodnego z prawem pozbawienia wolności, braku bezstronności trybunału w postępowaniach administracyjnych oraz braku skutku zawieszającego odwołania od aresztu administracyjnego. Trybunał nie znalazł żadnych faktów ani argumentów, które skłoniłyby go do odmiennego wniosku.Stan faktyczny
Liczni skarżący, organizatorzy lub uczestnicy zgromadzeń publicznych w Rosji (w tym „Anti-corruption rally”, „Rally to call for fair elections”, „Opposition rally”, „Rally 'Free Azat Miftakhov'”, „Rally 'Free Navalnyy'”), zostali zatrzymani i skazani za wykroczenia administracyjne, takie jak naruszenie przepisów dotyczących zgromadzeń publicznych (art. 19.3 § 1 i art. 20.2 § 2, 5, 6.1 rosyjskiego Kodeksu Wykroczeń Administracyjnych). Skarżący zostali ukarani grzywnami, pracami społecznymi lub aresztem administracyjnym. W wielu przypadkach skarżący skarżyli się również na niezgodne z prawem pozbawienie wolności oraz brak bezstronności sądów krajowych.Rozstrzygnięcie
Decyduje o połączeniu skarg; Stwierdza, że ma jurysdykcję do rozpatrzenia tych skarg, ponieważ dotyczą faktów, które miały miejsce przed 16 września 2022 r.; Uznaje skargi na podstawie art. 11 Konwencji i inne skargi na podstawie ugruntowanego orzecznictwa Trybunału, jak określono w załączonej tabeli, za dopuszczalne i stwierdza, że nie ma potrzeby oddzielnego rozpatrywania pozostałych skarg; Stwierdza, że te skargi ujawniają naruszenie art. 11 Konwencji; Stwierdza, że doszło do naruszenia Konwencji i jej Protokołów w odniesieniu do innych skarg podniesionych na podstawie ugruntowanego orzecznictwa Trybunału (zob. załączona tabela); Zasądza, że państwo pozwane ma zapłacić skarżącym, w terminie trzech miesięcy, kwoty wskazane w załączonej tabeli, które zostaną przeliczone na walutę państwa pozwanego według kursu obowiązującego w dniu rozliczenia; Zasądza, że od upływu wyżej wymienionych trzech miesięcy do dnia rozliczenia, od powyższych kwot będą naliczane odsetki proste według stopy równej krańcowej stopie oprocentowania Europejskiego Banku Centralnego w okresie zwłoki plus trzy punkty procentowe.Pełny tekst orzeczenia
THIRD SECTION
CASE OF SKOBELEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 13038/18 and 39 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
21 March 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Skobelev and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Peeter Roosma, President,
Ioannis Ktistakis,
Andreas Zünd, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 22 February 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
THE LAW
JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
JURISDICTION
6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION
7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW
12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention.
REMAINING COMPLAINTS
14. Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention and under Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative-offence proceedings. In view of the findings in the above paragraphs, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
Decides to join the applications;
Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;
Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints;
Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;
Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);
Holds
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 21 March 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina Peeter Roosma
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Name of the public event
Location
Date
Administrative / criminal offence
Penalty
Final domestic decision
Court Name
Date
Other complaints under well-established case-law
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant
(in euros)[1]
13038/18
10/02/2018
Yevgeniy SKOBELEV
Anti-corruption rally
St Petersburg
12/06/2017
article 19.3 § 1 of CAO, article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
two fines of RUB 10,000 each
St Petersburg City Court
10/09/2017
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.51 p.m. until 9.53 p.m. on 12/06/2017;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
18226/19
27/03/2019
Yuriy Nikolayevich ZAVARIN Laptev Aleksey Nikolayevich
Moscow
Rally to call for fair elections
St Petersburg
05/05/2018
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
27/09/2018
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
3,500
32325/19
20/05/2019
Aleksey Vladimirovich OTRYAKHIN Yatsenko Irina Aleksandrovna
Moscow
Opposition rally
Moscow
05/05/2018
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO,
and
article 19.3 § 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000 and
fine RUB 1,000
Moscow City Court
20/11/2018 (both sets of the proceedings)
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings
3,500
46710/21
08/09/2021
Yelena Nikitichna SANNIKOVA Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna
Moscow
Rally "Free Azat Miftakhov"
Moscow
25/12/2020
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
06/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 4.20 p.m. until 10.30 p.m. on 25/12/2020;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
46952/21
01/09/2021
Andrey Aleksandrovich BALUSHKIN Tkachenko Nikita Nikolayevich
Belgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Belgorod
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
20 hours of community work
Belgorod Regional Court
01/03/2021
3,500
47049/21
01/09/2021
Sergey Dmitriyevich KOTELNIKOV Tkachenko Nikita Nikolayevich
Belgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Belgorod
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
30 hours of community work
Belgorod Regional Court
01/03/2021
3,500
47050/21
07/09/2021
Andrey Gennadyevich DEMIN Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
04/03/2021 (decision served on the applicant after 07/03/2021)
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021 until 00.15 a.m. on 24/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
47109/21
02/09/2021
Yevgeniy Andreyevich SELIVANOV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Volgograd
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO, article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000 and detention for 5 days
Volgograd Regional Court
11/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.30 p.m. until 10.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
5,000
47129/21
02/09/2021
Nikita Yuryevich KOZLOV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention for 8 days
Moscow City Court
02/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 6.04 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 6.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
5,000
47246/21
16/09/2021
Amir Damirovich FATTAKHOV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
19/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.43 p.m. until 10.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
47445/21
09/09/2021
Maksim Alekseyevich NIKITIN Markin Konstantin Aleksandrovich
Velikiy Novgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Velikiy Novgorod
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
20 hours of community work
Novgorod Regional Court
23/04/2021
4,000
47650/21
01/09/2021
Yekaterina Nikolayevna LEZHNEVA Tkachenko Nikita Nikolayevich
Belgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Belgorod
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Belgorod Regional Court
01/03/2021
3,500
47652/21
01/09/2021
Artur Vladimirovich GARKOVSKIY Tkachenko Nikita Nikolayevich
Belgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Belgorod
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
20 hours of community work
Belgorod Regional Court
01/03/2021
3,500
47658/21
15/09/2021
Kirill Yevgenyevich NADEZHDIN Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Naberezhnye Chelny
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
24/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 02/02/2021 for compiling an offence report
4,000
48209/21
24/09/2021
Sergey Nikolayevich POTANIN Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Penza
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Penza Regional Court
01/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.15 p.m. until 6.45 p.m. on 23/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
48333/21
30/08/2021
Aleksandr Konstantinovich KOTELNIKOV Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
06/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 2.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
48722/21
26/08/2021
Yuriy Olegovich DMITRIYEV Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Kazan
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of Tatarstan
17/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report
4,000
50600/21
30/09/2021
Pavel Borisovich MOREV Valenkov Andrey Olegovich
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
31/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 6.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021
4,000
50608/21
22/08/2021
Mars Vygyzovich KHUSAINOV Antokhin Yevgeniy Vyacheslavovich
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention for 5 days
Moscow City Court
02/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 2.25 p.m. on 02/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
5,000
50618/21
22/09/2021
Olga Mikhaylovna BOGDANOVA Antokhin Yevgeniy Vyacheslavovich
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention for 3 days
Moscow City Court
02/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 1.30 a.m. on 03/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
5,000
50621/21
22/09/2021
Ilya Andreyevich MALOV Antokhin Yevgeniy Vyacheslavovich
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention for 8 days
Moscow City Court
02/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.35 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 9.00 a.m. on 02/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
5,000
50624/21
24/09/2021
Yuliya Aleksandrovna YUDINA Kachanov Roman Yevgenyevich
Yekaterinburg
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Yekaterinburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
30 hours of community work
Sverdlovsk Regional Court
25/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
51114/21
12/10/2021
Vyacheslav Igorevich PYATAKOV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
12/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 10.05. a.m. until 3.20 p.m. on 02/02/2021
4,000
54788/21
10/10/2021
Viktoriya Vladimirovna KOZYREVA Tkachenko Nikita Nikolayevich
Belgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Belgorod
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Belgorod Regional Court
09/08/2021
3,500
54791/21
10/10/2021
Tatyana Andreyevna KUPRIYENKO Tkachenko Nikita Nikolayevich
Belgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Belgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
fine of RUB 5,000
Belgorod Regional Court
28/06/2021
3,500
55546/21
11/11/2021
Tagir Rovshanovich ALIYEV Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
11/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report
4,000
55580/21
20/10/2021
Anna Dmitriyevna SHARONOVA Nurgaleyev Danil Ilnurovich
Kazan
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Kazan
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
02/06/2021
3,500
57073/21
11/10/2021
Yelizaveta Aleksandrovna REMESLOVA Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Krasnoyarsk
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Krasnoyarsk Regional Court
13/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.20 p.m. until 7.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
57087/21
11/11/2021
Daniil Anatolyevich DUMANSKIY Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Bryansk
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Bryansk Regional Court
11/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.25 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 4.00 p.m. on 02/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
57100/21
29/10/2021
Anastasiya Ivanovna KORSHUNOVA Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Kursk
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Kursk Regional Court
29/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.42 p.m. until 7.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
57121/21
29/10/2021
Nikita Olegovich PORTNOV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Samara
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Samara Regional Court
29/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.30 p.m. until 9.00 p.m. on 23/01/2021
4,000
57317/21
10/11/2021
Mariya Vadimovna DRACHEVA Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Tomsk
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 18,000
Tomsk Regional Court
21/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 8.00 p.m. on 21/04/2021 until 00.30 a.m. on 22/04/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
57552/21
18/11/2021
Georgiy Pavlovich KRYUCHKOV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
19/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 11.47 p.m. on 02/02/2021 until 05.30 a.m. on 03/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
57558/21
18/11/2021
Aleksandr Igorevich ANDROSOV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
21/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 2.00 a.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
57561/21
18/11/2021
Irina Gennadyevna TUGOLUKOVA Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
19/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 11.55. a.m. to 8.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021
4,000
57570/21
18/11/2021
Sergey Viktorovich FILATOV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
19/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 5.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021 until 01.45 a.m. on 24/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
57573/21
10/11/2021
Yelena Igorevna NAUMOVA Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Vladivostok
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
30 hours of community work
Primorye Regional Court
11/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.36 p.m. until 9.45 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
57720/21
26/10/2021
Aleksey Romanovich CHIZHIKOV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Vladivostok
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 7,500
Primorskiy Regional Court
27/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.05 p.m. until 9.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
57740/21
18/11/2021
Aleksandr Alkeseyevich KOSTYUKHIN Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
19/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.30 p.m. until 7.40 p.m. on 02/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
57745/21
18/11/2021
Margarita Aleksandrovna MALTSEVA Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Vladivostok
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Primorskiy Regional Court
25/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.05 p.m. until 9.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
© Rada Europy / Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka, źródło: HUDOC (hudoc.echr.coe.int), pozyskano 29.07.2026. · Źródło