20397/07;10069/11;10236/11;10314/11;10516/11;10520/11;10569/11;10582/11;10623/11;10807/11;11004/11;11024/11;11185/11;11191/11;11231/11;11569/11;11624/11;11629/11;11697/11;11707/11;11866/11;1190/08;12109/11;12216/11;12264/11;12335/11;12595/11;12696/11;12699/11;12715/11;12717/11;12721/11;13062/11;13091/11;13093/11;13196/11;13318/11;13333/11;13399/11;13564/11;13566/11;13568/11;13599/11;13866/11;13885/11;13892/11;1392/08;14006/11;14188/11;14427/11;14584/11;14589/11;14610/08;14698/11;14700/11;14709/11;14723/11;14728/11;14732/11;14744/11;14855/11;14861/11;14903/11;15094/11;15133/11;15473/11;15480/11;15513/11;15529/11;15536/11;15882/11;16144/11;16152/11;16164/11;16200/11;16286/11;16288/11;16529/11;16555/11;16799/11;16983/11;17145/11;17212/11;17573/11;17575/11;17581/11;17648/11;17732/11;18134/11;18334/11;18376/11;18448/11;18524/11;18819/11;18968/11;18978/11;18982/11;19014/11;19115/11;19148/11;19170/11;19510/11;20037/11;20119/11;20250/11;20320/11;20390/11;20447/11;20455/11;20543/11;20549/11;205
WyrokETPCz2013-06-20ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0620JUD002039707
Analiza orzeczenia
Sekcja wygenerowana przez AI na podstawie treści orzeczenia — nie stanowi cytatu.
Zagadnienie prawne
Czy przewlekłe niewykonywanie prawomocnych orzeczeń sądów krajowych na korzyść skarżących oraz brak skutecznych środków odwoławczych w tym zakresie stanowi naruszenie prawa do rzetelnego procesu (art. 6 ust. 1), prawa do poszanowania mienia (art. 1 Protokołu nr 1) oraz prawa do skutecznego środka odwoławczego (art. 13) Konwencji?Ratio decidendi
Trybunał uznał, że przewlekłe niewykonywanie prawomocnych orzeczeń sądów krajowych, za które odpowiedzialne są władze państwowe, narusza prawo do rzetelnego procesu (art. 6 ust. 1 Konwencji) oraz prawo do poszanowania mienia (art. 1 Protokołu nr 1), ponieważ wykonanie orzeczenia jest integralną częścią 'procesu' w rozumieniu art. 6, a niewykonanie pozbawia skarżących ich 'mienia'. Dodatkowo, brak skutecznych środków odwoławczych w prawie krajowym, które pozwoliłyby skarżącym na naprawienie szkody wynikającej z niewykonania orzeczeń, stanowi naruszenie art. 13 Konwencji.Stan faktyczny
Skarżący, obywatele Ukrainy, spółka ukraińska oraz obywatel Rosji, uzyskali prawomocne orzeczenia sądów krajowych lub komisji ds. sporów pracowniczych, przyznające im różne kwoty pieniężne lub nakazujące podjęcie określonych działań na ich korzyść. Pomimo prawomocności tych decyzji, skarżący nie byli w stanie uzyskać ich wykonania w rozsądnym terminie. Niektórzy skarżący zmarli w trakcie postępowania przed Trybunałem.Rozstrzygnięcie
Trybunał jednogłośnie:
1. Postanawia połączyć skargi wymienione w Załączniku 1 i skreślić je z listy spraw zgodnie z art. 37 § 1 (b) Konwencji.
2. Postanawia połączyć skargi wymienione w Załączniku 2.
3. Uznaje za dopuszczalne skargi skarżących wymienionych w Załączniku 2, dotyczące przewlekłego niewykonywania orzeczeń wydanych na ich korzyść oraz braku skutecznych środków odwoławczych, na podstawie art. 6 § 1 i art. 13 Konwencji oraz art. 1 Protokołu nr 1, a pozostałe części skarg uznaje za niedopuszczalne.
4. Stwierdza naruszenie art. 6 § 1 Konwencji i art. 1 Protokołu nr 1.
5. Stwierdza naruszenie art. 13 Konwencji.
6. Orzeka, że w ciągu trzech miesięcy państwo pozwane ma wykonać krajowe orzeczenia na korzyść skarżących, które pozostają wykonalne, oraz zapłacić 2 000 EUR każdemu skarżącemu lub jego spadkobiercom tytułem szkody majątkowej i niemajątkowej, kosztów i wydatków, powiększone o wszelkie należne podatki, z odsetkami ustawowymi.Pełny tekst orzeczenia
FIFTH SECTION
CASE OF PYSARSKYY AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
(Application no. 20397/07 and 164 other applications)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
20 June 2013
This judgment is final. It may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Pysarskyy and Others v. Ukraine,
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Boštjan M. Zupančič, President,
Ann Power-Forde,
Helena Jäderblom, judges,
and Stephen Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 11 June 2013,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in 165 applications against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by Ukrainian nationals, a company based in Ukraine and a Russian national, whose details are specified in the appended tables (“the applicants”).
2. The applicants Mr Volodymyr Adamovych Umanets (application no. 22064/11) and Mr Petro Dmytrovych Neskoromyuk (application no. 22018/11) died. Their son, Mr Stanislav Volodymyrovych Umanets, and sister, Ms Mariya Dmytrivna Morgun, respectively, manifested the wish to pursue the applications on their behalf.
3. By letters dated 11 February 2013, the Government informed the Court that the applicants Mr Yukhym Mykolayovych Nishchymenko (application no. 14893/11) and Ms Praskovya Ivanivna Kiriyachenko (application no. 20025/11) had died. Copies of the letters were forwarded to the deceased applicants’ addresses, respectively, on 18 and 7 March 2013 by registered post for comments to be submitted by 18 and 8 April 2013. The readers were warned that in the absence of response, the Court would assume that the applicants had died and that no individuals were entitled and wished to pursue the applications. No replies were received.
4. The Government (“the Government”) are represented by their Agent, Mr Nazar Kulchytskyy.
5. On 20 November 2012 the applications above were communicated to the Government of Ukraine.
6. The Russian Government, having been informed of their right to intervene in the proceedings in respect of the applicant in application no. 17575/11 (Article 36 § 1 of the Convention and Rule 44 of the Rules of Court), indicated that they did not wish to exercise that right.
THE FACTS
THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE
7. On the dates set out in the appended tables domestic courts and labour disputes commissions delivered decisions according to which the applicants were entitled to various pecuniary amounts or to have certain actions taken in their favour. The decisions became final and enforceable. However, the applicants were unable to obtain the enforcement of the decisions in due time.
8. Some of the applicants also made submissions concerning factual and legal matters unrelated to the above non-enforcement issues.
THE LAW
I. THE STANDING OF THE APPLICANTS IN APPLICATIONS Nos. 22064/11 and 22018/11
9. The Court considers that the applicants’ heirs or next-of-kin in applications nos. 22064/11 and 22018/11 (see paragraph 2 above) have standing to continue the proceedings in the applicants’ stead (see, among other authorities, Mironov v. Ukraine, no. 19916/04, § 12, 14 December 2006).
II. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 6 AND 13 OF THE CONVENTION AND OF ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No. 1
10. The applicants complained about the lengthy non-enforcement of the decisions given in their favour and about the lack of effective domestic remedies in respect of those complaints. They relied on, expressly or in substance, Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
A. Applications set out in Appendix 1
11. In view of the similarity of the applications in terms of the principal legal issue raised, the Court finds it appropriate to join them.
12. The Court notes that the applicant in application no. 14893/11, Mr Yukhym Mykolayovych Nishchymenko, has died and that no heir has requested permission to pursue the application.
13. It also notes that the applicant in application no. 20025/11, Ms Praskovya Ivanivna Kiriyachenko, has died and that no heir has requested permission to pursue the application.
14. In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention or its Protocols, the Court, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the applications out of the list.
B. Applications set out in Appendix 2
15. In view of the similarity of the applications in terms of the principal legal issue raised, the Court finds it appropriate to join them.
16. In their observations with respect to application no. 10520/11 the Government submitted that the applicant complained about lengthy non-enforcement of the judgment of the Barvinkovo Court of 30 April 2010, but the above judgment had never been delivered by that court. The Barvinkovo Court rendered a judgment in the applicant’s favour on 17 May 2010 and the findings of the judgment are different from the findings of the judgment of 30 April 2010. The Government claimed that the application was an abuse of the right of individual application should be declared inadmissible pursuant to Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention. The applicant argued that he had obtained a copy of the judgment of 30 April 2010 in the Barvinkovo Court and learned about the judgment of 17 May 2010 from the Government’s observations.
17. The Court observes that it appears from the case-file materials that the judgment, enforcement of which the applicant seeks to obtain from the Ukrainian authorities, was delivered by the Barvinkovo Court on 17 May 2010. It was apparently a clerical error that the applicant was provided with the judgment dated 30 April 2010. The Court, therefore, rejects the Government’s objection that the application is an abuse of the right of individual application within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention.
18. The Court notes that the above complaints of the applicants enumerated in Appendix 2 (see paragraph 10 above) are not manifestly ill‑founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention. It further notes that they are not inadmissible on any other grounds. They must therefore be declared admissible.
19. The Court finds that the decisions in the applicants’ favour were not enforced in due time, for which the State authorities were responsible.
20. Having regard to its well-established case-law on the subject (see Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov, cited above, §§ 56-58 and 66-70), the Court finds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of the prolonged non-enforcement of the decisions in the applicants’ favour. It also considers that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention in that the applicants did not have an effective domestic remedy to redress the damage created by such non‑enforcement.
III. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF THE CONVENTION
21. Some of the applicants raised other complaints under the Convention which the Court has carefully examined. In the light of all the material in its possession, and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, the Court finds that they do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols.
22. It follows that those complaints are manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention.
IV. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
23. Article 41 of the Convention provides:
“If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.”
24. In the present case, the Court considers it reasonable and equitable (see Kononova and Others v. Ukraine [Committee], no. 11770/03 and 89 other applications, § 24, 6 June 2013) to award 2,000 euros (EUR) to each of the applicants in Appendix 2. This sum is to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, as well as costs and expenses.
25. The Court further notes that the respondent State has an outstanding obligation to enforce the judgments which remain enforceable.
26. The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY
1. Decides to join the applications set out in Appendix 1, and to strike them out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (b) of the Convention;
2. Decides to join the applications set out in Appendix 2;
3. Declares admissible the complaints of the applicants, listed in Appendix 2, under Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the lengthy non-enforcement of the decisions given in their favour and about the lack of effective domestic remedies in respect of those complaints and declares inadmissible the remainder of the applications;
4. Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1;
5. Holds that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention;
6. Holds
(a) that within three months the respondent State is to enforce the domestic decisions in the applicants’ favour which remain enforceable, and is to pay EUR 2,000 (two thousand euros) to each applicant or his or her estate in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants on the above amounts which are to be converted into the national currency at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 20 June 2013, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Stephen Phillips Boštjan M. Zupančič
Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX 1
(applications struck out of the Court’s list of cases)
No.
Application
no. and date of introduction
Applicant name
date of birth
Relevant domestic decisions
14893/11
01/03/2011
Yukhym Mykolayovych NISHCHYMENKO Kyiv Circuit Administrative Court, 08/12/2008
20025/11
21/03/2011
Praskoviya Ivanivna KIRIYACHENKO Barvinkovo Court, 14/12/2009
APPENDIX 2
(admissible applications)
No.
Application
no. and date of introduction
Applicant name
date of birth
Relevant domestic decisions
20397/07
21/04/2007
Mykhaylo Gavrylovych PYSARSKYY 1) Berdychiv Court, 04/10/2006
2) Berdychiv Court, 12/10/2006
1190/08
21/12/2007
Borys Denysovych LUKYANENKO Oleksandriya Court, 14/05/2007
1392/08
17/12/2007
Vyacheslav Viktorovych KORNEYEV Korolyovskyy District Court of Zhytomyr, 26/05/2006, as amended by the Zhytomyr Regional Court of Appeal, 07/08/2006
14610/08
04/02/2008
Svitlana Anatoliyivna ZAKHARENKO Prymorskyy District Court of Odesa, 19/06/2006, as amended by the Odesa Regional Court of Appeal, 02/10/2007
30537/08
10/06/2008
Aleksandr Petrovich KURILO Konotop Court, 18/02/2008
44807/09
05/08/2009
Mykola Ivanovych KUZUB Darnytskyy District Court of Kyiv, 19/10/2009
61346/09
03/11/2009
Valentyna Petrivna KOTSYURUBA Saksaganskyy District Court of Kryvyy Rig, 21/04/2008
64036/10
25/10/2010
Aleksandr Andreyevich RUBANOVICH Rozdilna Court, 19/06/2009
75147/10
10/12/2010
Vira Vasylivna KRUGLYK Rivne Court, 05/11/2007
3515/11
04/12/2010
Aleksandr Dmitriyevich MEDVEDEV Lysychansk Court, 02/02/2009
3856/11
16/12/2010
Nadiya Ivanivna RYSKINA Tarashcha Court, 18/01/2008
3972/11
30/12/2010
Valeriy Vasilyevich TSUKANOV Kirovogradskyy District Court of the Kirovograd Region, 25/12/2002
4231/11
08/01/2011
Anatoliy Pavlovych TESLENKO 1) Kharkiv Administrative Court of Appeal, 04/11/2009
2) Barvinkovo Court, 22/02/2010
6367/11
19/01/2011
Mykola Mykolayovych NIKOLAYENKO Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 26/09/2008
6691/11
19/01/2011
Viktor Semenovych VLASENKO Barvinkovo Court, 22/01/2010
6806/11
19/01/2011
Petro Mykolayovych TVARDOVSKYY Barvinkovo Court, 12/03/2010
7039/11
18/01/2011
Anna Ivanovna YEVMENKO Krasnyy Luch Court, 28/07/2005
7043/11
18/01/2011
Lyudmila Ivanovna SHEMET Krasnyy Luch Court, 16/06/2005
7045/11
18/01/2011
Nadezhda Ivanovna KIRGIZOVA Krasnyy Luch Court, 13/05/2005
7047/11
18/01/2011
Yuriy Alekseyevich KIRGIZOV Krasnyy Luch Court, 21/07/2005
7166/11
20/01/2011
Leonid Ivanovych GEBULTIVSKYY Tetiyiv Court, 29/11/2007
7180/11
24/01/2011
Marchel Gavrylovych KONSTANTYNOVYCH Pershotravnevyy District Court of Chernivtsi, 27/11/2006
7406/11
24/01/2011
Georgiy Dmytrovych KOSTASH Glyboka Court, 14/05/2009, as amended by the Chernivtsi Regional Court of Appeal on 15/07/2009
7413/11
24/01/2011
Vitaliy Vasylyovych KOSTASH Glyboka Court, 14/05/2009
7524/11
26/01/2011
Yosyp Vasylyovych YATSENKO Zamostyanskyy District Court of Vinnytsya, 27/02/2007
7575/11
17/01/2011
Mykola Fedorovych PETRUSENKO Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 16/01/2008
7653/11
28/01/2011
Petro Grygorovych GUMENYUK Zamostyanskyy District Court of Vinnytsya, 07/05/2007, quashed by the Kyiv Administrative Court of Appeal on 14/02/2012.
7931/11
19/01/2011
Yuriy Ivanovich KLYUYEV Oleksandriya Court, 07/12/1998
8077/11
28/01/2011
Oksana Viktorivna ZHYROVA Krolevets Court, 17/06/2009
8086/11
25/01/2011
KVF SEMKO, TOV
Kirovograd Regional Commercial Court, 18/12/2009
8120/11
25/01/2011
Volodymyr Andriyovych ULYANCHENKO Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 23/10/2008
8128/11
26/01/2011
Volodymyr Ivanovych LUCHKO Zamostyanskyy District Court of Vinnytsya, 27/02/2007
8131/11
25/01/2011
Petro Oleksiyovych BORODIYCHUK Tetiyiv Court, 14/11/2007
8134/11
25/01/2011
Mykola Oleksandrovych SKORBENKO Tetiyiv Court, 04/12/2007
8244/11
24/01/2011
Igor Viktorovich ZAKHARYIN Artemivsk Court, 08/04/2010
8565/11
26/01/2011
Yuriy Grygorovych SEMENYURA Tetiyiv Court, 22/11/2007
9029/11
28/01/2011
Varvara Yakivna PROKOPCHUK Tetiyiv Court, 26/11/2007
9553/11
06/02/2011
Oleksandra Tykhonivna SHPAK 1) Yagotyn District Court of the Kyiv Region, 27/03/2008
2) Kyiv Administrative Court of Appeal, 19/01/2010
9592/11
28/01/2011
Oleksandr Andriyovych MAYBORODA Tetiyiv Court, 11/12/2007
9625/11
04/02/2011
Vitaliy Vasylyovych SHPAK 1) Yagotyn District Court of the Kyiv Region, 27/03/2008
2) Kyiv Administrative Court of Appeal, 20/05/2010
9747/11
27/01/2011
Mykhayla Andriyovych PROKOPCHUK Tetiyiv Court, 22/11/2007
9922/11
05/02/2011
Mykola Ivanovych BONDARENKO 1) Kharkiv Administrative Court of Appeal, 07/09/2009
2) Kharkiv Administrative Court of Appeal, 15/12/2009
10069/11
03/02/2011
Yaroslav Mykhaylovych MARUNCHAK 1) Oleksandriya Court, 11/04/2008
2) Oleksandriya Court, 29/10/2007
10236/11
04/02/2011
Lyubov Vasylivna PANCHENKO Tetiyiv Court, 03/12/2007
10314/11
03/02/2011
Ivan Ivanovych MELNYK Tetiyiv Court, 16/11/2007
10516/11
05/02/2011
Viktor Andriyovych PETRIN 1) Barvinkovo Court, 22/02/2010
2) Barvinkovo Court, 11/03/2010
10520/11
05/02/2011
Volodymyr Vasylyovych LITVINOV Barvinkovo Court, 17/05/2010
10569/11
08/02/2011
Volodymyr Leonidovych OPANASYUK Tetiyiv Court, 07/12/2007
10582/11
01/02/2011
Grygoriy Mykolayovych TKACHUK Tetiyiv Court, 31/01/2008
10623/11
03/02/2011
Mykhaylo Ivanovych SVYATKIN 1) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 29/10/2007
2) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 07/11/2008
10807/11
01/02/2011
Nadiya Anatoliyivna KHRESHCHENYUK
Grygoriy Valentynovych KHRESHCHENYUK 1) Zamostyanskyy District Court of Vinnytsya, 24/05/2007
2) Zamostyanskyy District Court of Vinnytsya, 24/05/2007
11004/11
28/01/2011
Sergiy Dmytrovych KOLOMIYETS Zamostyanskyy District Court of Vinnytsya, 22/12/2006
11024/11
03/02/2011
Oleksiy Mykolayovych SHUSTOV 1) Kharkiv Administrative Court of Appeal, 02/11/2009
2) Barvinkovo Court, 12/05/2009, as amended by the Kharkiv Administrative Court of Appeal, 09/09/2009
3) Barvinkovo Court, 10/03/2010
11185/11
08/02/2011
Kyrylo Oleksandrovych SEMENOV Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 10/12/2007
11191/11
01/02/2011
Stefaniya Mykhaylivna MATIYESHYN Chervonograd Court, 15/03/2010
11231/11
10/02/2011
Volodymyr Gerasymovych GRYBENKO Tarashcha Court, 12/08/2008
11569/11
09/02/2011
Vitaliy Stepanovych VYGOVSKYY Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 13/11/2007
11624/11
09/02/2011
Volodymyr Mykolayovych GAVRYLENKO 1) Barvinkovo Court, 11/11/2009
2) Barvinkovo Court, 11/11/2009
11629/11
10/02/2011
Nikolay Nikolayevich GUKOV Krasnodon Court, 01/11/2002
11697/11
08/01/2011
Anatoliy Mykolayovych MAGDA 1) Barvinkovo Court, 03/06/2009
2) Kharkiv Administrative Court of Appeal, 29/09/2009
3) Barvinkovo Court, 22/01/2010
11707/11
09/02/2011
Yevgen Volodymyrovych ZHAGLOVSKYY Zamostyanskyy District Court of Vinnytsa, 06/03/2007
11866/11
09/02/2011
Sergiy Ivanovych CHUKHNO Barvinkovo Court, 17/11/2009
12109/11
19/01/2011
Oleksandr Gnatovych TARASYUK Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 14/10/2008
12216/11
08/02/2011
Oleksandr Mykhaylovych SAVLUK Tetiyiv Court, 06/12/2007
12264/11
09/02/2011
Vasyl Vasylyovych CHILIY Barvinkovo Court, 14/12/2009
12335/11
11/02/2011
Anatoliy Yakovych BURLACHENKO Tetiyiv Court, 23/03/2006
12595/11
09/02/2011
Petro Ivanovych DOVGAL 1) Barvinkovo Court, 28/04/2010
2) Barvinkovo Court, 28/04/2010
12696/11
09/02/2011
Mykola Pavlovych RESHETNYAK 1) Kharkiv Administrative Court of Appeal, 01/10/2009
2) Kharkiv Administrative Court of Appeal, 11/11/2009
12699/11
10/02/2011
Valentyna Ivanivna GRYBENKO Tarashcha Court, 12/08/2008
12715/11
16/02/2011
Volodymyr Mykhaylovych NAZARENKO Barvinkovo Court, 22/01/2010
12717/11
16/02/2011
Mykhaylo Aksentiyovych SHLYANCHAK Tetiyiv Court, 26/11/2007
12721/11
11/02/2011
Vasyl Ivanovych DONETS Tetiyiv Court, 30/11/2007
13062/11
11/02/2011
Ivan Pavlovych SLOMINSKYY Tetiyiv Court, 07/12/2007
13091/11
14/02/2011
Viktor Ivanovych KAZNADZEY Tetiyiv Court, 07/12/2007
13093/11
15/02/2011
Volodymyr Ivanovych PYZHEVSKYY Tetiyiv Court, 28/03/2008
13196/11
11/02/2011
Galyna Mykhaylivna KAMINSKA Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 11/01/2008
13318/11
12/02/2011
Inna Volodymyrivna VASKOVSKA Lugyny Court, 08/05/2007
13333/11
17/02/2011
Oleksandr Viktorovych GRYGORYEV Barvinkovo Court, 30/04/2010
13399/11
14/02/2011
Fedir Oleksiyovych GARKUSHA Barvinkovo Court, 30/04/2010
13564/11
17/02/2011
Volodymyr Ivanovych AKYMENKO 1) Kharkiv Administrative Court of Appeal, 08/09/2009
2) Barvinkovo Court, 22/02/2010
13566/11
15/02/2011
Mykola Andriyovych PRYKHODKO Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 25/10/2007
13568/11
16/02/2011
Oleksandr Stepanovych KULISH Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 18/09/2008
13599/11
14/02/2011
Volodymyr Yukhymovych BUNDYUK Kharkiv Administrative Court of Appeal, 29/09/2009
13866/11
23/02/2011
Pavlo Andriyovych SOKUR Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 30/10/2007
13885/11
21/02/2011
Mikhail Davydovich ZAKHARCHENKO 1) Kirovskyy District Court of Donetsk, 17/02/2009
2) Kirovsyyy District Court of Donetsk, 27/05/2009
13892/11
18/02/2011
Leonid Sergiyovych LESKOV Vinnytskyy District Court of the Vinnytsya Region, 11/10/2006
14006/11
15/02/2011
Leonid Grygorovych POLISHCHUK Tetiyiv Court, 29/01/2008
14188/11
23/02/2011
Oleksandr Leonidovych ZYKOV Lviv Circuit Administrative Court, 03/12/2008
14427/11
24/02/2011
Anatoliy Andriyovych YATSENKO Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 17/10/2007
14584/11
04/02/2011
Leonid Viktorovych TSESAR Oleksandriya Court, 23/10/2008
14589/11
08/02/2011
Sergiy Mykolayovych ARKHYPOV Tetiyiv Court, 04/12/2007
14698/11
23/02/2011
Igor Anatoliyovych SAVENKOV
Svitlana Grygorivna SAVENKOVA Kramatorsk Court, 25/10/2006
14700/11
25/02/2011
Lyudmila Dmitriyevna BELOKONENKO Krasnyy Luch Court, 28/04/2004
14709/11
25/02/2011
Valentina Mikhaylovna TOKAREVA Krasnyy Luch Court, 12/02/2003
14723/11
25/02/2011
Anatoliy Vladimirovich TOKAREV Krasnyy Luch Court, 26/07/2005
14728/11
25/02/2011
Vitaliy Valentinovich PUZYRKOV Krasnyy Luch Court, 27/07/2005
14732/11
22/02/2011
Mykhaylo Andriyanovych KRYVOBIK Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 02/11/2007
14744/11
25/02/2011
Yevgeniy Vitalyevich PUZYRKOV Krasnyy Luch Court, 27/07/2005
14855/11
24/02/2011
Anatoliy Volodymyrovych CHEREPANSKYY Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 06/12/2007
14861/11
21/02/2011
Leonid Ksenofontovych SIMONOV 1) Barvinkovo Court, 12/05/2009, as amended by the Kharkiv Administrative Court of Appeal on 03/11/2009
2) Kharkiv Administrative Court of Appeal, 19/11/2009
14903/11
22/02/2011
Petro Oleksandrovych KARASYOV Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 12/01/2009
15094/11
24/02/2011
Sergiy Yakovych VORONYUK Starokostyantyniv Court, 30/06/2006
15133/11
15/02/2011
Mykola Petrovych LEBID Oktyabrskyy District Court of Poltava, 19/12/2008, as amended by the Kharkiv Administrative Court of Appeal, 24/11/2009
15473/11
24/02/2011
Igor Vasylyovych BORTNIK Starokostyantyniv Court, 20/11/2006
15480/11
02/03/2011
Valentyn Oleksiyovych VASYLYEV Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 22/10/2007
15513/11
08/02/2011
Leonid Viktorovych TSESAR Oleksandriya Court, 04/11/2008
15529/11
23/02/2011
Volodymyr Dmytrovych LUTSYK Chervonograd Court, 14/05/2001
15536/11
28/02/2011
Zlatana Georgiyivna TARAN 1) Zhovtnevyy District Court of Kharkiv, 15/06/2009
2) Zhovtnevyy District Court of Kharkiv, 17/09/2009
3) Zhovtnevyy District Court of Kharkiv, 17/06/2010
4) Zhovtnevyy District Court of Kharkiv, 17/11/2010
5) Zhovtnevyy District Court of Kharkiv, 30/12/2010
15882/11
02/03/2011
Anatoliy Dmytrovych TATARULYA 1) Kyivskyy District Court of Poltava, 26/09/2005
2) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 18/05/2010
16144/11
01/03/2011
Nadiya Grygorivna MOROZOVA Lysychansk Court, 18/02/2005
16152/11
04/03/2011
Galina Nikolayevna ZAKHAROVA 1) Lugansk Regional Commercial Court, 06/11/2007
2) Lugansk Regional Commercial Court, 19/04/2010
16164/11
03/03/2011
Volodymyr Valeriyovych ZALOZNYY Dnipropetrovsk Regional Commercial Court, 22/05/2006
16200/11
04/03/2011
Mykola Volodymyrovych NESHCHERET Lysychansk Court, 24/02/2005
16286/11
03/03/2011
Vadym Oleksiyovych PLATOV Kharkiv Administrative Court of Appeal, 29/10/2009
16288/11
02/03/2011
Volodymyr Stepanovych STOLYARCHUK Tetiyiv Court, 12/06/2008
16529/11
01/03/2011
Volodymyr Yukhymovych STEPANOV Tetiyiv Court, 03/12/2007
16555/11
04/03/2011
Tadey Vladyslavovych BARANOVSKYY Chervonograd Court, 12/12/2008
16799/11
05/03/2011
Pavel Pavlovich MOVCHAN 1) Kuybyshevskyy District Court of Donetsk, 12/10/1999
2) Kuybyshevskyy District Court of Donetsk, 27/06/2000
16983/11
05/02/2011
Viktor Iosifovich GRIBOVSKIY 1) Nova Kakhovka Court, 05/10/2009
2) Nova Kakhovka Court, 11/05/2011
17145/11
09/03/2011
Yuzefa Tofilivna VIKTORIVSKA Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 26/02/2008
17212/11
28/01/2011
Valentin Aleksandrovich MUKHONKO Krasnyy Luch Court, 30/10/2002
17573/11
22/02/2011
Yevgeniya Ivanovna VORONINA Odesa Administrative Court of Appeal, 29/07/2009
17575/11
10/03/2011
Olena Petrivna ZAYTSEVA Nova Kakhovka Court, 13/02/2009
17581/11
11/03/2011
Mykola Ivanovych BONDARENKO Oleksandriya Court, 28/01/2008
17648/11
09/03/2011
Stanislav Dominikovych BYSTRITSKYY
No information
Baranivtsi Court, 31/03/1999
17732/11
10/03/2011
Petro Petrovych BEZUGLYY Tetiyiv Court, 27/11/2007
18134/11
02/03/2011
Fedir Ivanovych PARTYKA Chervonograd Court, 31/10/2003
18334/11
10/03/2011
Tetyana Yevgeniyivna BADALOVA 1) Bilogirsk Court, 19/11/2007
2) Bilogirsk Court, 18/02/2010
18376/11
03/03/2011
Vasyl Yuriyovych BELEN Zakarpattya Regional Commercial Court, 05/12/2007
18448/11
15/03/2011
Vasyl Vasylyovych KULISH 1) Oleksandriya Court, 24/07/2007
2) Oleksandriya Court, 10/11/2008
3) Oleksandriya Court, 10/11/2008
18524/11
26/02/2011
Oleksiy Stepanovych BARANOV
Polina Stepanivna BARANOVA Trostyanets Court, 18/10/2004
18819/11
16/03/2011
Kateryna Mykolayivna KALENSKA Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 02/12/2008
18968/11
10/03/2011
Oleksandr Yakovych TSYTSKUN 1) Mukachevo Court, 08/12/2006
2) Mukachevo Court, 18/01/2007
18978/11
10/03/2011
Yeva Antoninovna TSYTSKUN 1) Mukachevo Court, 08/12/2006
2) Mukachevo Court, 22/01/2007
18982/11
19/03/2011
Valeriy Leonidovych OLIYNYK Okhtyrka Court, 05/03/2008
19014/11
14/03/2011
Lyudmila Fedorovna POLYAKOVA 1) Slovyansk Court, 06/09/1999
2) Labour Disputes Commission of the Sodovyy Zavod, OJSC, 27/09/2001
3) Slovyansk Court, 12/04/2002
19115/11
14/03/2011
Viktor Andriyovych VASYLYUSHCHENKO Starokostyantyniv Court, 10/10/2006
19148/11
16/03/2011
Tamara Ivanivna STELMAKH 1) Lugansk Circuit Administrative Court, 19/05/2008
2) Artemivskyy District Court of Lugansk, 10/11/2008
19170/11
23/02/2011
Anatoliy Volodymyrovych KLYMENKO Oleksandriya Court, 13/05/2008
19510/11
11/03/2011
Anatoliy Mykhaylovych GONCHARUK Tetiyiv Court, 23/10/2007
20037/11
11/03/2011
Mykola Oleksiyovych BOYCHENKO Oleksandriya Court, 28/01/2008
20119/11
14/03/2011
Petro Ivanovych PROZHOGA 1) Oleksandriya Court, 14/04/2008
2) Oleksandriya Court, 11/09/2008
20250/11
17/03/2011
Valentina Nikolayevna BUCHOK Proletarskyy District Court of Donetsk, 02/09/2009
20320/11
21/03/2011
Ganna Sergiyivna ZHYTOVA Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 14/02/2008
20390/11
24/03/2011
Nina Mykolayivna PROKOPETS Irpen Court, 04/12/2007
20447/11
22/03/2011
Valentyna Mykhaylivna BARSUK Tetiyiv Court, 04/12/2007
20455/11
22/03/2011
Sophiya Ivanivna SOLOVEY Tetiyiv Court, 31/01/2008
20543/11
16/03/2011
Galina Stepanovna CHERNYAVSKAYA Kostyantynivka Court, 26/06/2002
20549/11
22/03/2011
Petro Vasylyovych BARSUK Tetiyiv Court, 03/12/2007
20599/11
22/03/2011
Oksana Mykolayivna RYEZNIKOVA Lugansk Circuit Administrative Court, 30/03/2009
20792/11
21/03/2011
Mykola Oleksiyovych PLYS 1) Kharkiv Administrative Court of Appeal, 29/10/2009
2) Barvinkovo Court, 22/02/2010
20962/11
19/03/2011
Valentina Aleksandrovna FEDICHEVA Kostyantynivka Court, 09/02/2001
21360/11
23/03/2011
Lidiya Prokopivna PALAMARCHUK Tetiyiv Court, 26/11/2007
21364/11
23/03/2011
Nelya Dmytrivna KORDUN Tetiyiv Court, 22/11/2007
21404/11
23/03/2011
Vasyl Oleksiyovych POTIYENKO Tetiyiv Court, 10/12/2007
21409/11
23/03/2011
Vira Oleksandrivna GORBUNOVA Tetiyiv Court, 28/11/2007
21512/11
23/03/2011
Anatoliy Petrovych DIKHTYARUK Tetiyiv Court, 12/12/2007
21523/11
14/03/2011
Sergiy Mykhaylovych PAVLOV Yenakiyeve Court, 05/11/2008
21779/11
28/03/2011
Yuriy Oleksiyovych SHKURKO Barvinkovo Court, 28/12/2009
22018/11
28/03/2011
Petro Dmytrovych NESKOROMYUK Tetiyiv Court, 03/12/2007
22032/11
24/03/2011
Galyna Grygorivna NAGAYCHUK Tetiyiv Court, 22/11/2007
22064/11
24/03/2011
Volodymir Adamovych UMANETS Tetiyiv Court, 10/12/2007
22112/11
24/03/2011
Lyudmyla Oleksandrivna ZVIZDOVSKA Tetiyiv Court, 10/12/2007
© Rada Europy / Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka, źródło: HUDOC (hudoc.echr.coe.int), pozyskano 29.07.2026. · Źródło