21763/20;23552/20;30403/20;30426/20;41107/20;41617/20;49708/20;53364/20;55541/20;55/21;90/21;341/21;696/21;4127/21;5738/21;7241/21;7964/21;8718/21;8844/21;8997/21;9204/21;9311/21;10574/21;12258/21;12626/21;16091/21;16193/21;24572/21;28156/21;28657/21;37329/21;37705/21;41952/21;41963/21;42373/21;44190/21;44728/21;45584/21;46583/21;48369/21;49060/21;49875/21;49996/21;54354/21;54675/21;55346/21;55515/21;55720/21;55916/21;57428/21;57538/21;57559/21;57729/21;58030/21;59417/21;60268/21;60618/21;61005/21;126/22;2965/22;3343/22;4212/22;4371/22;4554/22;4650/22;6300/22;6897/22;7126/22;9370/22;9726/22;9906/22;10048/22;10464/22;10845/22;11991/22;13606/22;13692/22;14485/22;15180/22;15640/22;16008/22;18566/22;18785/22;18995/22;22572/22;22637/22;22956/22;23000/22;23195/22;23508/22;24876/22;28135/22;30593/22;31980/22;32378/22;32659/22;34380/22;35127/22;35250/22;37466/22;37584/22;37625/22;38592/22;38881/22;39175/22;41124/22;41194/22;41200/22;41213/22;41240/22;41409/22;41483/22;41491/22;41545/22;41608/2

SECOND SECTION CASE OF ÇALI AND OTHERS v. TÜRKİYE (Applications nos.21763/20 and 263 others – see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 23 June 2026 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Çalı and Others v. Türkiye, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of: Jovan Ilievski, President, Péter Paczolay, Juha Lavapuro, judges, and Dorothee von Arnim, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to: the applications against the Republic of Türkiye lodged with the Court under Article34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by the applicants listed in the appended table (“the applicants”), on the various dates indicated therein; the decision to give notice of the complaints under Article6 §1 (the right to a fair trial) and Article7 of the Convention (no punishment without law) to the Turkish Government (“the Government”) represented by their Agent, MrAbdullahAydın, Head of the Department of Human Rights of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Türkiye; the parties’ observations; the decision to reject the Government’s objection to the examination of the applications by a Committee; Having deliberated in private on 2June 2026, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 1.The case concerns the applicants’ convictions for membership of an armed terrorist organisation described by the Turkish authorities as the “Fetullahist Terror Organisation/Parallel State Structure” (Fetullahçı Terör Örgütü / Paralel Devlet Yapılanması, hereinafter referred to as “the FETÖ/PDY”), considered by the authorities to be behind the coup attempt that took place in Türkiye on 15 July 2016. The broader domestic background and context to the present applications was set out by the Court inYükselYalçınkaya v.Türkiye ([GC], no.15669/20, §§10-22 and108-40, 26September 2023). 2.The applicants’ convictions were based decisively on their use of an encrypted messaging application by the name of “ByLock”. The domestic authorities and courts considered that the ByLock application was designed for the exclusive use of the members of the FETÖ/PDY and that the establishment of the use of that application was sufficient on its own for conviction under Article314 §2 of the Criminal Code for membership of an armed terrorist organisation (ibid., §§155-65 and 257). 3.Other evidence against the applicants, if any, involved mainly an admission of using ByLock, decrypted message content confirming use of that application or witness statements attesting to such use; membership of a trade union, association and/or foundation considered to be affiliated with the FETÖ/PDY; account activities at Bank Asya, which was considered by the authorities to be a part of the financial structure of the FETÖ/PDY; possession of pro-FETÖ/PDY publications or other audio-visual material; participation in trips considered to have been organised by the FETÖ/PDY and records of exit from and entry to Türkiye; donations to FETÖ/PDY-affiliated foundations; participation in various demonstrations considered to be in support of the FETÖ/PDY or in other organisational activities; social media posts in favour of the organisation; residence in FETÖ/PDY student houses or dormitories; use of other messaging applications, such as Kakao Talk or Eagle, to communicate with other members of the organisation; HTS (Historical Traffic Search) records indicating communications with others prosecuted for the same offence or other digital evidence suggesting membership of the organisation; employment by and/or membership of FETÖ/PDY‑affiliated institutions, organisations or companies; witness statements as regards such employment and/or membership, or as regards other connections to the FETÖ/PDY. In the case of some of the applicants, the convictions were imposed without waiting for the submission to the case files of the detailed ByLock findings and evaluation reports – which potentially included decrypted content of communications over ByLock – on the ground that the establishment of the use of that application sufficed for conviction, irrespective of the nature and content of the communications. 4.The individual applications lodged by the applicants with the Constitutional Court against their convictions were summarily dismissed by that court as being inadmissible, on the basis of its case-law endorsing the Court of Cassation’s landmark judgments on the matter (seeYükselYalçınkaya, cited above, §§169-88). THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLES6§1 AND 7 OF THE CONVENTION Alleged violation of Article6 §1 of the Convention 6.The applicants complained that their trials and convictions under Article314§2 of the Criminal Code for membership of the FETÖ/PDY had violated the right to a fair trial under Article6 §1 of the Convention, primarily for the reasons set out in Demirhan and Others v.Türkiye (nos.1595/20 and 238 others, §29, 22July 2025). In particular, they complained of various alleged irregularities in the collection and admission in evidence of the ByLock data, as well as of the difficulties encountered in challenging them and the inadequacy of the reasoning in the courts’ decisions vis-à-vis that evidence, which in their opinion had rendered their trials unfair. 7.The Government reiterated their observations as outlined in Demirhan and Others (ibid., §§31-34). They submitted that, while notice of the present applications had been given to them as raising issues similar to those addressed by the Court in Yüksel Yalçınkaya (cited above), the Court’s considerations in that judgment had related to the specific facts of that case. They argued that the Court should therefore refrain from extrapolating the findings made therein to the present applications and invited it to assess the criminal proceedings conducted against each applicant on the basis of their own particular circumstances. They claimed, in particular, that the convictions in the present applications had not been based solely on the applicants’ use of the ByLock application, but had involved a wide variety of other evidence, not all of which had been subject to assessment in YükselYalçınkaya (cited above; see the evidence listed in paragraph3 above). The domestic courts, which had enjoyed direct contact with the evidence at issue, had established eachapplicant’s membership of the armed terrorist organisation on an individual basis following a careful assessment of all the elements in their specific case files. 8.The Court notes that the applicants’ complaint under Article6 §1 is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article35 §3 (a) of the Convention or inadmissible on any other grounds. It must therefore be declared admissible. 9.As regards the merits, the Court indeed observes that the evidence in respect of some of the applicants included material that was not at issue in Yüksel Yalçınkaya (cited above). That being said, having examined all the material and arguments submitted to it, the Court finds no reason in the present case to depart from its findings in Yüksel Yalçınkaya (cited above, §§300-56), for the reasons set out in detail in Demirhan and Others (cited above, §§35-47). 10.It notes in this connection that the finding of violations of Articles7 and 6 §1 of the Convention inYüksel Yalçınkaya(cited above) had resulted notably from the domestic courts’ characterisation of the use of ByLock, according to which anyone whose use of ByLock was established could be convicted on that sole basis of membership of an armed terrorist organisation pursuant to Article314 §2 of the Criminal Code (ibid., §§ 364, 413 and 414). It therefore follows, as also underlined in Yüksel Yalçınkaya (cited above, §414), and subsequently reiterated in Demirhan and Others (cited above, §38), that the situation that led to a finding of a violation of Articles7 and 6 §1 of the Convention in that case was not prompted by an isolated incident or attributable to the particular turn of events specific to the facts of that case, but potentially applied to everyone convicted for membership of the FETÖ/PDY on the basis of their use of ByLock. 11.The Court does not rule out that there may be other evidence in respect of some of the applicants, other than their use of ByLock, that may demonstrate their organic link with the FETÖ/PDY based on the continuity, diversity and intensity of their activities and their submission to its hierarchy as required under the Court of Cassation’s case-law (see Yüksel Yalçınkaya, cited above, §184) and thus secure their conviction as charged (see for the Convention requirements in this regard also Yasak v.Türkiye [GC], no.17389/20, §§200-13, 5May 2026). The fact nevertheless remains that the establishment of the mere use of ByLock served, on its own, as conclusive proof of the presence of all of the constituent elements of the crime of membership of an armed terrorist organisation as defined in domestic law. 12.The Court would further note that the criminal proceedings conducted separately against each applicant may indeed have shown differences in certain procedural respects, depending mainly on the evidence produced for or against the applicant and the administration of such evidence. However, irrespective of the possible particularities of each file, the domestic courts’ uniform and global approach to the use of ByLock has effectively defined the procedural framework of the criminal proceedings at issue, which have therefore suffered from the main shortcomings identified in Yüksel Yalçınkaya under Article6 §1 (cited above, §345; see also Demirhan and Others, cited above, §§42-45). The Court concluded in these cases that the domestic courts’ failure to put in place appropriate safeguards vis‑à‑vis the use of the ByLock data as the key piece of evidence at issue to enable the applicants to challenge them effectively, to address the salient issues lying at the core of the case and to provide reasons justifying their decisions was incompatible with the very essence of the applicants’ procedural rights under Article6 §1. The Court accepts that the difficulties facing Türkiye in the aftermath of the attempted military coup of 15July 2016 are undoubtedly a contextual factor which must be taken into account in cases such as the present one. Yet, for the reasons explained in detail in Yüksel Yalçınkaya (cited above, §§353-55), it has no basis on which to hold that the limitations on the applicants’ fair trial rights at issue were strictly required by the exigencies of the situation within the meaning of Article15 of the Convention. 13.In view of the above considerations, the Court concludes that there has been a violation of Article6 §1 of the Convention on the facts of the present case (see also Yüksel Yalçınkaya, cited above, §356, and Demirhan and Others, cited above, §46). Alleged violation of Article7 of the Convention 14.Some of the applicants also complained that their convictions for membership of the FETÖ/PDY had violated the principle of no punishment without law under Article7 of the Convention. The Government argued that those complaints had not been duly raised before the Constitutional Court, either expressly or in substance, and that they should therefore be rejected for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies. 15.The Court reiterates that the main problems identified by the Grand Chamber in this group of cases in Yüksel Yalçınkaya (cited above), and subsequently reaffirmed in Demirhan and Others (cited above), was not attributable to the particular turn of events or procedural issues specific to those cases, but resulted notably from the domestic courts’ characterisation of the use of ByLock and the uniform and global approach adopted by the Turkish judiciary vis-à-vis the ByLock evidence (see Yüksel Yalçınkaya, cited above, §§364, 413 and 414, and Demirhan and Others, cited above, §§37, 38 and 42). Having already found that this approach amounted to a violation of Article6 §1 of the Convention in the present case (see paragraph13 above), which will enable the applicants to seek the reopening of the domestic proceedings in the light of the principles enunciated in Yüksel Yalçınkaya (cited above, §§411, 412 and 425; see also paragraph18 below), the Court does not deem it necessary to examine whether the Government’s preliminary objection under this head may be upheld in respect of each individual application concerned. 16.Accordingly, the Court decides not to examine separately the admissibility and merits of the Article7 complaints raised by some of the applicants (see for the relevant principles Tsaava and Others v.Georgia [GC], nos.13186/20 and 4 others, §§228-29, 11December 2025; and, mutatis mutandis, Turan and Others v.Turkey, nos.75805/16 and 426 others, §98, 23November 2021; and, for an application of these principles in similar circumstances, Seyhan and Others v.Türkiye [Committee], nos.57837/19 and 851 others, §§14-16, 16December 2025). OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF THE CONVENTION 17.The Court notes that some of the applicants also lodged complaints under other provisions of the Convention, such as Articles5, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 14, or raised complaints relating to other aspects of Article6 (as in Yüksel Yalçınkaya, cited above, §§357, 358, 368 and 374). However, having regard to the finding of a violation of Article6 §1 above (see paragraph13), the reasons for that finding (see paragraphs 10-12 and 14-15) and the specific circumstances of the case, the Court considers that it has dealt with the main legal question raised by the case and that there is no need to address the admissibility and merits of any remaining complaints (see, mutatis mutandis, YükselYalçınkaya, cited above, §§365, 367 and 373; Turan and Others, cited above, §98; and Demirhan and Others, cited above, §48). APPLICATION OF ARTICLE41 OF THE CONVENTION 18.The Court considers, for the reasons explained in YükselYalçınkaya (cited above, §§404, 411, 412 and 425; see also Demirhan and Others, cited above, §53), that the finding of a violation of Article6 §1 of the Convention can be regarded as sufficient just satisfaction in respect of any non-pecuniary damage sustained by the applicants in the present case. It notes in this regard that the applicants have the possibility under Article311 §1 (f) of the Code of Criminal Procedure to have the domestic proceedings reopened following the delivery of the present judgment (seeYükselYalçınkaya, cited above, §411), and that the reopening of the proceedings in a manner compatible with the “conclusions and spirit” of the judgment would in principle constitute the most appropriate form of redress, should they so request. 19.Furthermore, for the reasons set out in Demirhan and Others (cited above, §§54-56), the Court makes no awards for costs and expenses in respect of follow-up applications of this type. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Declares the applicants’ complaint that their trials and convictions for membership of the FETÖ/PDY had violated the right to a fair trial under Article6 §1 of the Convention – as concerns the rights of the defence in respect of the evidence underlying the conviction – admissible; Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6§1 of the Convention; Holds that there is no need to examine the admissibility and merits of the applicants’ remaining complaints; Holds that the finding of a violation constitutes in itself sufficient just satisfaction for any non-pecuniary damage sustained by the applicants; Dismisses the remainder of any claim made by the applicants for just satisfaction. Done in English, and notified in writing on 23June 2026, pursuant to Rule77§§2 and 3 of the Rules of Court. Dorothee von ArnimJovan Ilievski Deputy Section RegistrarPresident APPENDIX List of cases: No. Application no. Case name Lodged on Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Nationality Represented by 1. 21763/20 Çalı v. Türkiye 29/05/2020 Elif ÇALI Kahramanmaraş Turkish Ahmet AKSOY 2. 23552/20 Kayci v. Türkiye 22/05/2020 Lokman KAYCİ Van Turkish Kemal KAYCİ 3. 30403/20 Doğan v. Türkiye 17/06/2020 Galip DOĞAN Kahramanmaras Turkish Serdar KILIÇ 4. 30426/20 Akçelik v. Türkiye 16/07/2020 Mehmet Emin AKÇELİK Aydın Turkish 5. 41107/20 Kartal v. Türkiye 01/09/2020 Ebubekir KARTAL Siirt Turkish Nihat KILIÇ 6. 41617/20 Güler v. Türkiye 27/08/2020 Faruk GÜLER Rize Turkish Serdar KILIÇ 7. 49708/20 Anaç v. Türkiye 26/10/2020 Elif ANAÇ Manisa Turkish Adem BEDİR 8. 53364/20 Sönmez v.Türkiye 18/11/2020 İbrahim SÖNMEZ Istanbul Turkish Naim UZUN 9. 55541/20 Yıldırım v.Türkiye 27/11/2020 Mevlüt YILDIRIM Afyonkarahisar Turkish Ayşegül YILDIRIM 10. 55/21 Gün v. Türkiye 04/12/2020 Muhsin GÜN Ankara Turkish Nihat KILIÇ 11. 90/21 Poyraz v. Türkiye 14/12/2020 Ali POYRAZ Manisa Turkish Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ 12. 341/21 Çiçek v. Türkiye 08/12/2020 İbrahim ÇİÇEK Erzurum Turkish İrem TATLIDEDE 13. 696/21 Akgün v. Türkiye 15/12/2020 Murat AKGÜN Düzce Turkish Elif ŞENOL PİROĞLU 14. 4127/21 Gömüç v. Türkiye 21/12/2020 Mehmet GÖMÜÇ Kocaeli Turkish Ali AYDIN 15. 5738/21 Kılıç v. Türkiye 13/01/2021 Bayram KILIÇ Izmir Turkish Bülent ÖNÜR 16. 7241/21 Bostancıoğlu v.Türkiye 27/11/2020 Selçuk BOSTANCIOĞLU Istanbul Turkish 17. 7964/21 Bulut v. Türkiye 26/01/2021 Casim Mehmet BULUT Yozgat Turkish 18. 8718/21 Taşyağan v.Türkiye 14/12/2020 Esma TAŞYAĞAN Manisa Turkish Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ 19. 8844/21 Şimşek v. Türkiye 20/01/2021 Mehmet Salim ŞİMŞEK Yozgat Turkish İlyas ERDOĞAN 20. 8997/21 Dağcı v. Türkiye 15/01/2021 Taner DAĞCI Muş Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK 21. 9204/21 Talu v. Türkiye 29/12/2020 Emre TALU Sivas Turkish Şeyma MISIRLIOĞLU 22. 9311/21 Özkan v. Türkiye 03/02/2021 Sait ÖZKAN İzmir Turkish 23. 10574/21 Ekici v. Türkiye 01/02/2021 Mehmet EKİCİ Kahramanmaraş Turkish Ahmet ÇOBANOĞLU 24. 12258/21 Taştan v. Türkiye 17/02/2021 Murat TAŞTAN Yozgat Turkish 25. 12626/21 Parlakçı v.Türkiye 02/02/2021 Ahmet Şemsettin PARLAKÇI Gaziantep Turkish 26. 16091/21 Koçak v. Türkiye 08/03/2021 Necip KOÇAK Konya Turkish Leyla MESUTOĞLU 27. 16193/21 Poyraz v. Türkiye 04/03/2021 Abdi POYRAZ Balıkesir Turkish Mustafa TUNA 28. 24572/21 Ozan v. Türkiye 21/04/2021 Mehmet Mutlu OZAN Muğla Turkish Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ 29. 28156/21 Özyurt v. Türkiye 28/05/2021 Hüseyin ÖZYURT Tokat Turkish Grégory THUAN DIT DIEUDONNÉ 30. 28657/21 Karaman v.Türkiye 11/05/2021 Alaettin KARAMAN Ordu Turkish Neziha YILMAZ 31. 37329/21 Kara v. Türkiye 16/07/2021 İsmail KARA Mersin Turkish Nurgül YAYMAN 32. 37705/21 Çelik v. Türkiye 16/07/2021 Fatih ÇELİK İzmir Turkish 33. 41952/21 Şanverdi v.Türkiye 16/08/2021 Ersevim ŞANVERDİ Bursa Turkish Semih AKDAĞ 34. 41963/21 Atlı v. Türkiye 14/08/2021 Cenap ATLI Gaziantep Turkish Elif ATLI 35. 42373/21 Düğme v. Türkiye 12/08/2021 Serkan DÜĞME Kocaeli Turkish Metehan USLUEROL 36. 44190/21 Yaylagül v.Türkiye 31/08/2021 Mehmet Sait YAYLAGÜL Adiyahman Turkish Selim YILMAZ 37. 44728/21 Çolak v. Türkiye 27/07/2021 Arslan ÇOLAK Kocaeli Turkish Erdal ÖZDEMİR 38. 45584/21 Çelebi v. Türkiye 02/09/2021 Sadık ÇELEBİ Kocaeli Turkish 39. 46583/21 Şimşek v. Türkiye 17/09/2021 Ahmet ŞİMŞEK Yozgat Turkish İhsan MAKAS 40. 48369/21 Pala v. Türkiye 27/09/2021 Mehmet PALA Tokat Turkish Mehmet ÖNCÜ 41. 49060/21 Güner v. Türkiye 30/09/2021 Hasan GÜNER Denizli Turkish Mehmet MİRZA 42. 49875/21 Dilmen v.Türkiye 24/09/2021 Fatih DİLMEN Ordu Turkish Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ 43. 49996/21 Özkan v. Türkiye 04/10/2021 Osman ÖZKAN Antalya Turkish Nurgül YAYMAN 44. 54354/21 Menek v. Türkiye 05/11/2021 Fuat MENEK Manisa Turkish Ferhat KONUR 45. 54675/21 Keçeci v. Türkiye 28/10/2021 Faruk KEÇECİ Bavel - Breda Turkish Nurullah YILDIRIM 46. 55346/21 Çorbacı v.Türkiye 09/11/2021 Sevinç ÇORBACI Istanbul Turkish Coşkun ATILĞAN 47. 55515/21 Yaşar v. Türkiye 01/11/2021 Battal YAŞAR Gaziantep Turkish Samet YILMAZ 48. 55720/21 Bütün v. Türkiye 26/10/2021 Necmettin BÜTÜN Diyarbakır Turkish Lezgin Ahmet BAYBAŞİN 49. 55916/21 Başaran v.Türkiye 15/11/2021 Süleyman BAŞARAN Batman Turkish İsmail ÇALIŞKAN 50. 57428/21 Karakoç v.Türkiye 22/11/2021 Vesile Betül KARAKOÇ Ankara Turkish Okan ÖZ 51. 57538/21 Değirmenci v.Türkiye 10/11/2021 Efraim DEĞİRMENCİ Konya Turkish Sefanur BOZGÖZ 52. 57559/21 İnan v. Türkiye 24/11/2021 Cevdet İNAN Hatay Turkish Enes Malik KILIÇ 53. 57729/21 Eryaman v.Türkiye 22/11/2021 Metin ERYAMAN Niğde Turkish Firdevs ERYAMAN UTKU 54. 58030/21 Ediz v. Türkiye 10/11/2021 Metin EDİZ Samsun Turkish Tahir EREN 55. 59417/21 Türkan v. Türkiye 30/11/2021 Adem TÜRKAN Amasya Turkish Ahmet UYAR 56. 60268/21 Kocabayraktar v.Türkiye 29/09/2021 Yusuf KOCABAYRAKTAR Nevsehir Turkish Büşra URLU 57. 60618/21 Enis v. Türkiye 26/11/2021 Korkmaz ENİS İzmir Turkish Kadir KORKMAZ 58. 61005/21 Yiğit v. Türkiye 25/11/2021 Halil YİĞİT Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN 59. 126/22 Özak v. Türkiye 16/12/2021 Ali ÖZAK Adana Turkish Selhan SAĞIRER 60. 2965/22 Tomruk v.Türkiye 20/12/2021 Sedat TOMRUK Ankara Turkish Sevda TOMRUK 61. 3343/22 Kamalov v.Türkiye 30/12/2021 Azatjan KAMALOV Bursa Turkmen Osman SEÇKİN 62. 4212/22 Öztürk v. Türkiye 12/01/2022 Recep ÖZTÜRK Ordu Turkish Büşra URLU 63. 4371/22 Özekmekçi v.Türkiye 13/01/2022 Yunus Emre ÖZEKMEKÇİ İzmir Turkish Beyza ÖZEKMEKÇİ 64. 4554/22 Akmeşe v.Türkiye 10/01/2022 Ferdi AKMEŞE Batman Turkish Mehmet SATICI 65. 4650/22 Sezer v. Türkiye 30/12/2021 Osman SEZER Afyonkarahisar Turkish 66. 6300/22 Karabıyık v.Türkiye 21/12/2021 Bayram KARABIYIK İstanbul Turkish Emre AKARYILDIZ 67. 6897/22 Coşkun v.Türkiye 29/12/2021 Hasan COŞKUN Antalya Turkish Tarık BAYSAL 68. 7126/22 Sadıklar v.Türkiye 18/01/2022 Cevdet SADIKLAR Turkish Meral ÖZATA ÖZGÜROL 69. 9370/22 Demir v. Türkiye 09/02/2022 Zafer DEMİR Balıkesir Turkish Burcu HAS 70. 9726/22 Gündoğdu v.Türkiye 26/01/2022 Muhammed GÜNDOĞDU Istanbul Turkish Burhan DEMİRCİ 71. 9906/22 Ekmen v. Türkiye 09/02/2022 Ali EKMEN Istanbul Turkish Lezgin Ahmet BAYBAŞİN 72. 10048/22 Tekin v. Türkiye 24/01/2022 Meryem TEKİN Istanbul Turkish Mustafa YELBEY 73. 10464/22 Kenan v. Türkiye 11/02/2022 Fatih KENAN Trabzon Turkish Adem ŞAHİNTÜRK 74. 10845/22 Yavaş v. Türkiye 23/02/2022 Halime YAVAŞ Mersin Turkish Ali KIZILTEPE 75. 11991/22 Öztürk v. Türkiye 22/02/2022 Tuğba ÖZTÜRK Uşak Turkish Adnan ERDOĞAN 76. 13606/22 Güleç v. Türkiye 25/02/2022 Durmuşali GÜLEÇ Balıkesir Turkish Mustafa YELBEY 77. 13692/22 Şimşek v. Türkiye 21/02/2022 Yusuf ŞİMŞEK Ankara Turkish Naim UZUN 78. 14485/22 Tulukcu v.Türkiye 15/02/2022 Seyit TULUKCU Konya Turkish Ayşe Süeda ÜNAL 79. 15180/22 Kılınç v. Türkiye 11/03/2022 Mehmet Lütfi KILINÇ Balıkesir Turkish Şenay GÜZELBABA 80. 15640/22 Önem v. Türkiye 17/03/2022 Samet ÖNEM Afyonkarahisar Turkish Mustafa Etka ÖZER 81. 16008/22 Bilgin v. Türkiye 24/03/2022 İrfan BİLGİN İstanbul Turkish Melek BİLGİN 82. 18566/22 Tanrıverdi v.Türkiye 22/03/2022 Hasan TANRIVERDİ Bursa Turkish Mustafa YELBEY 83. 18785/22 Turbay v. Türkiye 01/04/2022 Faruk TURBAY Ankara Turkish Mücahit TURBAY 84. 18995/22 Durmuş v.Türkiye 29/03/2022 Burhanettin DURMUŞ Kocaeli Turkish Arzu BEYAZIT 85. 22572/22 Parmaksız v.Türkiye 26/04/2022 İskender PARMAKSIZ Tokat Turkish Kamile ÖZBULUT 86. 22637/22 Akyazı v. Türkiye 24/04/2022 Umur AKYAZI İstanbul Turkish Naim UZUN 87. 22956/22 Cihangir v.Türkiye 30/04/2022 Nurullah CİHANGİR Kütahya Turkish Mehmet ARI 88. 23000/22 Uludağ v. Türkiye 28/03/2022 Mustafa Mücahit ULUDAĞ Konya Turkish Süeda KADIOĞLU 89. 23195/22 Kendüzler v.Türkiye 29/04/2022 Alaattin KENDÜZLER Ankara Turkish Hurigül ÖZCAN KISA 90. 23508/22 Yılmaz v. Türkiye 25/04/2022 Tarık YILMAZ Malatya Turkish İsa KARGIN 91. 24876/22 Bakan v. Türkiye 13/04/2022 Vedat BAKAN İstanbul Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK 92. 28135/22 Okan v. Türkiye 07/06/2022 Osman OKAN Tekirdağ Turkish Mehmet ÇAVDAR 93. 30593/22 Kundakçı v.Türkiye 09/06/2022 Mesut KUNDAKÇI Kırıkkale Turkish Emine KUNDAKÇI 94. 31980/22 Özdil v. Türkiye 20/06/2022 Yasin ÖZDİL Tekirdağ Turkish Adem UZAK 95. 32378/22 Koka v. Türkiye 24/06/2022 İhsan KOKA Antalya Turkish Nurgül YAYMAN 96. 32659/22 Polat v. Türkiye 16/06/2022 Nedim POLAT Ankara Turkish İrem DANACIOĞLU GÜNEŞ 97. 34380/22 Demirci v.Türkiye 08/07/2022 Erdoğan DEMİRCİ Manisa Turkish Burhan DEMİRCİ 98. 35127/22 Gürel v. Türkiye 02/06/2022 Alpaslan GÜREL Karabük Turkish Zümrüt ŞAHİN 99. 35250/22 Akyol v. Türkiye 16/06/2022 Abdurrahman AKYOL Afyonkarahisar Turkish Seçkin KESKİN 100. 37466/22 Tuğberk v.Türkiye 31/05/2022 Murat TUĞBERK Konya Turkish Firdevs ERYAMAN UTKU 101. 37584/22 Özyurt v. Türkiye 07/07/2022 Fatih ÖZYURT Tekirdağ Turkish Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ 102. 37625/22 Ünsal v. Türkiye 04/07/2022 Osman ÜNSAL Turkish Serra Yağmur ERGÜÇ 103. 38592/22 Karacık v.Türkiye 20/07/2022 İbrahim KARACIK Ankara Turkish Naciye Refia ÇOKER 104. 38881/22 Yurtalan v.Türkiye 22/07/2022 Bilal YURTALAN Ankara Turkish Kamile ÖZBULUT 105. 39175/22 Koçaşlı v.Türkiye 22/07/2022 Ali İhsan KOÇAŞLI İzmir Turkish Nafize GÜLCÜ 106. 41124/22 Kalaylı v. Türkiye 01/08/2022 Mehmet KALAYLI Kahramanmaraş Turkish Ökkeş Mihsan YAĞLI 107. 41194/22 Topkara v.Türkiye 30/07/2022 Aysel TOPKARA Antalya Turkish Nurgül YAYMAN 108. 41200/22 Durak v. Türkiye 22/07/2022 Kurtuluş DURAK Samsun Turkish Şükrü KOCUK 109. 41213/22 Aydoğdu v.Türkiye 02/08/2022 Caner AYDOĞDU Ankara Turkish Ahmet Serdar GÜNEŞ 110. 41240/22 Öztürk v. Türkiye 05/07/2022 Savaş ÖZTÜRK Van Turkish Ayşegül ŞEN 111. 41409/22 Günay v. Türkiye 03/08/2022 Abdulkadir GÜNAY Istanbul Turkish Mustafa RESULOĞLU 112. 41483/22 Baş v. Türkiye 09/08/2022 Hüseyin BAŞ Antalya Turkish Esra BAŞ 113. 41491/22 Çolak v. Türkiye 08/08/2022 Sabri ÇOLAK Samsun Turkish Ferhat MEMMEDZADE 114. 41545/22 Karabudak v.Türkiye 05/08/2022 Ufuk KARABUDAK Bilecik Turkish Lütfullah GÜN 115. 41608/22 Yenidoğan v.Türkiye 05/08/2022 Hasan YENİDOĞAN İzmir Turkish Ayşe AYGÜN 116. 41741/22 Karakayalı v.Türkiye 03/08/2022 Eyüp KARAKAYALI Giresun Turkish Şükrü KOCUK 117. 41969/22 Aydoğan v.Türkiye 10/08/2022 Hatice AYDOĞAN Manisa Turkish Arife YÜKSEKDAĞ 118. 42008/22 Bal v. Türkiye 10/08/2022 Adem BAL Turkish Sinan TUMLUKOLÇU 119. 42028/22 Hüsmen v.Türkiye 11/08/2022 Abdulmunis HÜSMEN Isparta Turkish Emine Pınar TEKİNŞEN 120. 42044/22 Öymez v. Türkiye 11/08/2022 Atilla ÖYMEZ Ankara Turkish Adem UZAK 121. 42091/22 Rüzgaresen v.Türkiye 12/08/2022 Zarife RÜZGARESEN İzmir Turkish Nafize GÜLCÜ 122. 42102/22 Yavaş v. Türkiye 05/08/2022 İsmail YAVAŞ Balıkesir Turkish Arif ÖZER 123. 42235/22 Koçhan v.Türkiye 01/08/2022 Murat KOÇHAN Izmir Turkish Nermin KOÇHAN 124. 42280/22 Şimşek v. Türkiye 10/08/2022 Sabiha ŞİMŞEK Denizli Turkish İbrahim KOCAOĞUL 125. 42348/22 Bulut v. Türkiye 18/08/2022 Harun BULUT Elazığ Turkish Abdulkadir BALTACI 126. 42371/22 Gilik v. Türkiye 02/08/2022 Yunus Emre GİLİK Osmaniye Turkish İrem DANACIOĞLU GÜNEŞ 127. 42647/22 Şahin v. Türkiye 11/08/2022 Adnan ŞAHİN Kırıkkale Turkish Mustafa KOÇ 128. 42701/22 Akdemir v.Türkiye 18/08/2022 Alaattin AKDEMİR Düzce Turkish Ömer Faruk YAZGELDİ 129. 42749/22 Gedik v. Türkiye 18/08/2022 Bahtiyar GEDİK Kocaeli Turkish Elvan BAĞ CANBAZ 130. 42769/22 Şener v. Türkiye 22/08/2022 Yasin ŞENER Kocaeli Turkish Meryem GÜNAY 131. 42784/22 Bayram v.Türkiye 08/08/2022 Murat BAYRAM Diyarbakır Turkish Lezgin Ahmet BAYBAŞİN 132. 42803/22 Yıldız v. Türkiye 22/08/2022 Mustafa YILDIZ Adıyaman Turkish Abdurrahman AKINCI 133. 42815/22 Cankesen v.Türkiye 23/08/2022 Mehmet CANKESEN Gaziantep Turkish İdris TAŞKIN 134. 42824/22 Yıldız v. Türkiye 16/08/2022 İbrahim YILDIZ Antalya Turkish Kamile KILDAN 135. 42872/22 Kırtaç v. Türkiye 08/08/2022 Ayşegül KIRTAÇ Kocaeli Turkish Bilal KIRTAÇ 136. 42938/22 Tiryaki v. Türkiye 18/08/2022 Muharrem TİRYAKİ Gaziantep Turkish Alime TİRYAKİ 137. 42977/22 Duymaz v.Türkiye 18/08/2022 Orhan DUYMAZ Adıyaman Turkish Şeyho SAYA 138. 42978/22 Ölmez v. Türkiye 16/08/2022 İbrahim ÖLMEZ Kayseri Turkish Mesut Can TARIM 139. 42990/22 Borazan v.Türkiye 27/07/2022 Ömür BORAZAN Turkish Yücel ALKAN 140. 43082/22 Aydoğan v.Türkiye 02/09/2022 Kasım AYDOĞAN Balıkesir Turkish Arif ÖZER 141. 43362/22 Polat v. Türkiye 26/08/2022 Oğuzhan POLAT Çorum Turkish Ferhat MEMMEDZADE 142. 43403/22 Esen v. Türkiye 17/08/2022 Ahmet ESEN Mersin Turkish Mustafa KOÇ 143. 43642/22 Çatalbaş v.Türkiye 20/08/2022 Resul ÇATALBAŞ Aydın Turkish Orçun MUŞLU 144. 43649/22 Sağır v. Türkiye 20/08/2022 Serdar SAĞIR Aydın Turkish Orçun MUŞLU 145. 43655/22 Sağaz v. Türkiye 20/08/2022 Şahin SAĞAZ Aydın Turkish Orçun MUŞLU 146. 43662/22 Aydın v. Türkiye 24/08/2022 Aykut AYDIN Istanbul Turkish Seçkin KESKİN 147. 43666/22 Taşbademi v.Türkiye 29/08/2022 Murat TAŞBADEMİ İzmir Turkish Lezgin Ahmet BAYBAŞİN 148. 43751/22 Karakuş v.Türkiye 24/08/2022 Uğur KARAKUŞ Antalya Turkish İbrahim KOCAOĞUL 149. 43770/22 Yılmaz v. Türkiye 01/09/2022 Abdullah YILMAZ İzmir Turkish İbrahim Halil UZUN 150. 43800/22 Koçak v. Türkiye 19/08/2022 Veysi KOÇAK Kars Turkish Zehra KARAKULAK BOZDAĞ 151. 43815/22 Algan v. Türkiye 23/08/2022 Mustafa ALGAN Mardin Turkish Saadet ALGAN 152. 43847/22 Ünlü v. Türkiye 22/08/2022 Kadir ÜNLÜ Antalya Turkish Münip ERMİŞ 153. 44195/22 Şen v. Türkiye 05/09/2022 Ramazan ŞEN Amasya Turkish Yusuf APAYDIN 154. 44288/22 Yıldız v. Türkiye 08/09/2022 Refik YILDIZ Manisa Turkish Uğur BAY 155. 44295/22 Arı v. Türkiye 24/08/2022 Aydın ARI Turkish Ahmet Serdar GÜNEŞ 156. 44308/22 Güler v. Türkiye 24/08/2022 Kuddüs GÜLER İzmir Turkish Seçkin KESKİN 157. 44330/22 Ayhan v. Türkiye 05/09/2022 Mustafa AYHAN Ankara Turkish Selçuk TOSUN 158. 44378/22 İnce v. Türkiye 02/09/2022 Mehmet İNCE Osmaniye Turkish Sinan TUMLUKOLÇU 159. 44413/22 Erdur v. Türkiye 05/09/2022 Hasan ERDUR İzmir Turkish Kadri İNCE 160. 44440/22 Kavakoğlu v.Türkiye 29/08/2022 Önder KAVAKOĞLU Denizli Turkish Ebubekir ÇAKIR 161. 44499/22 Erdoğan v. Türkiye 01/09/2022 Emrullah ERDOĞAN Mersin Turkish Demir ABDULSELAM 162. 44568/22 Demirhan v.Türkiye 02/09/2022 Tuncer DEMİRHAN Kırıkkale Turkish Mustafa KOÇ 163. 44585/22 Savaş v. Türkiye 09/09/2022 Ebubekir SAVAŞ Giresun Turkish Yasin TÜRKSOY 164. 44610/22 Aydır v. Türkiye 09/09/2022 Harun AYDIR Manisa Turkish Ceyhun ÇAKIR 165. 44695/22 Yediparmak v.Türkiye 07/09/2022 Ahmet YEDİPARMAK Ankara Turkish Fatih DÖNMEZ 166. 44787/22 Akpınar v.Türkiye 12/09/2022 Nail AKPINAR Aydın Turkish Orçun MUŞLU 167. 44826/22 Karakoç v.Türkiye 01/09/2022 Fatih KARAKOÇ Eskişehir Turkish Mustafa ALGAM 168. 44830/22 Kaya v. Türkiye 08/09/2022 Hasan KAYA Bursa Turkish Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ 169. 44983/22 Karatay v.Türkiye 05/09/2022 Gökhan KARATAY Antalya Turkish Samet YILMAZ 170. 45061/22 Gedik v. Türkiye 07/09/2022 Adem GEDİK Ankara Turkish Meryem GÜNER 171. 45224/22 Uzun v. Türkiye 09/09/2022 Mehmet Ali UZUN Turkish Ahmet Serdar GÜNEŞ 172. 45280/22 Evin v. Türkiye 07/09/2022 Hamza EVİN Aydin Turkish Talha ATAY 173. 45390/22 Demirel v.Türkiye 12/09/2022 Aydın DEMİREL Ankara Turkish Ali ARTUK 174. 45430/22 Güngör v.Türkiye 22/08/2022 Müberra GÜNGÖR Turkish Nazlı MERT 175. 45461/22 Balkan v. Türkiye 16/09/2022 Ersel BALKAN Balıkesir Turkish Burcu HAS 176. 45482/22 Şahin v. Türkiye 12/09/2022 Kıymet ŞAHİN Kırşehir Turkish Büşra KOCAOĞLU 177. 46449/22 Güngör v.Türkiye 21/09/2022 Mehmet Ali GÜNGÖR Afyonkarahisar Turkish Seçkin KESKİN 178. 46555/22 Karataş v.Türkiye 21/09/2022 Davut KARATAŞ Kahramanmaraş Turkish Adem ATEŞ 179. 47976/22 Tanyıldız v.Türkiye 29/09/2022 Yakup TANYILDIZ Konya Turkish Sefanur BOZGÖZ 180. 48048/22 Baran v. Türkiye 30/09/2022 İlknur Nezaket BARAN Malatya Turkish İbrahim ERDOĞAN 181. 48106/22 Kurtgöz v.Türkiye 28/09/2022 Lokman KURTGÖZ Mardin Turkish Ayşe KURTGÖZ 182. 48120/22 Tuncer v. Türkiye 30/09/2022 Tuba TUNCER Samsun Turkish Tahir EREN 183. 48387/22 Avcılar v.Türkiye 06/10/2022 Halil AVCILAR Istanbul Turkish Nihan AVCILAR 184. 48443/22 Kantarcı v.Türkiye 23/09/2022 Bilal KANTARCI Kahramanmaraş Turkish Lezgin Ahmet BAYBAŞİN 185. 48856/22 Altun v. Türkiye 07/10/2022 Burkay ALTUN Ankara Turkish Ahmet Serdar GÜNEŞ 186. 49641/22 Koca v. Türkiye 07/10/2022 Şaban KOCA Mersin Turkish Serpil ATICI 187. 50258/22 Yamlı v. Türkiye 11/10/2022 Zekeriya YAMLI Afyonkarahisar Turkish Beyza ERDOĞUŞ SAĞCAN 188. 50283/22 Çetin v. Türkiye 17/10/2022 Zahit ÇETİN Kocaeli Turkish Nuri TAN 189. 50454/22 Ocak v. Türkiye 19/10/2022 Pınar OCAK Erzurum Turkish Levent MAZILIGÜNEY 190. 50611/22 Sarı v. Türkiye 19/10/2022 Ahmet Yasir SARI Adana Turkish Mücahit AYDIN 191. 51510/22 Öğüdücü v.Türkiye 13/10/2022 Mehmet ÖĞÜDÜCÜ Çanakkale Turkish Hande AKIN 192. 52058/22 Özsoy v. Türkiye 27/10/2022 Naile ÖZSOY Kahramanmaraş Turkish Ahmet AKSOY 193. 52109/22 Başoğul v.Türkiye 31/10/2022 Muhammet BAŞOĞUL Isparta Turkish Ümmü Büşra KARAGÖZ 194. 52145/22 Mert v. Türkiye 24/10/2022 Muhammed MERT Bolu Turkish Samet YILMAZ 195. 52285/22 Uysal v. Türkiye 04/11/2022 İbrahim UYSAL Balıkesir Turkish Burcu HAS 196. 52296/22 Uzunyol v.Türkiye 02/11/2022 Bülent UZUNYOL Ankara Turkish Latife Nazlı GÜVEN 197. 52466/22 Top v. Türkiye 03/11/2022 Numan TOP Afyonkarahisar Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK 198. 52662/22 Emektar v.Türkiye 03/11/2022 Ahmet EMEKTAR Kocaeli Turkish Samed ÖZBULUT 199. 52704/22 Sert v. Türkiye 08/11/2022 Tuncay SERT Denizli Turkish Mehmet TUNÇER 200. 52728/22 Karagöz v.Türkiye 31/10/2022 Ali KARAGÖZ İzmir Turkish Deniz DEMİR 201. 53196/22 Türker v. Türkiye 11/11/2022 Büşra TÜRKER Balıkesir Turkish Burcu HAS 202. 53238/22 Yavuz v. Türkiye 04/11/2022 Sabit YAVUZ Aydın Turkish Orçun MUŞLU 203. 53240/22 Yardım v.Türkiye 04/11/2022 Hasan YARDIM Aydın Turkish Orçun MUŞLU 204. 53247/22 Ekiz v. Türkiye 07/11/2022 Avni EKIZ Denizli Turkish Mehmet TUNÇER 205. 53249/22 Ersoy v. Türkiye 04/11/2022 Kamil ERSOY Aydın Turkish Orçun MUŞLU 206. 53261/22 Şenyiğit v.Türkiye 04/11/2022 Halil ŞENYİĞİT İzmir Turkish Orçun MUŞLU 207. 53267/22 Alancı v. Türkiye 07/11/2022 İbrahim ALANCI Denizli Turkish Mehmet TUNÇER 208. 53312/22 Güngör v.Türkiye 07/11/2022 Murat GÜNGÖR Istanbul Turkish Mahir ORAK 209. 53343/22 Onaylı v. Türkiye 02/11/2022 Ali ONAYLI Adana Turkish Mesut Can TARIM 210. 53376/22 Durmuş v.Türkiye 11/11/2022 Tarık DURMUŞ Denizli Turkish Özge KIYAK MUSAN 211. 53456/22 Durmuş v.Türkiye 11/11/2022 Saliha DURMUŞ Denizli Turkish Özge KIYAK MUSAN 212. 53478/22 Şimşir v. Türkiye 04/11/2022 Sema ŞİMŞİR Bursa Turkish Adem FINDIK 213. 53523/22 Karanfil v.Türkiye 07/11/2022 Coşkun KARANFİL Turkish Nihat KILIÇ 214. 53586/22 Aydın v. Türkiye 04/11/2022 Reşat AYDIN Turkish Ömer Faruk BOZDEMİR 215. 53660/22 Karagöz v.Türkiye 11/11/2022 Meryem KARAGÖZ İzmir Turkish Kamil Furkan CANDEĞER 216. 53808/22 Alceren v.Türkiye 03/11/2022 Naci ALCEREN Kayseri Turkish Vahap ÖZBUDAK 217. 53942/22 Topal v. Türkiye 09/11/2022 Burcak Serap TOPAL Kocaeli Turkish Burcu HAS 218. 54005/22 Karakaya v.Türkiye 07/11/2022 Harun KARAKAYA Konya Turkish Merve ÇALIŞKAN 219. 54168/22 Selim v. Türkiye 17/11/2022 Kamil SELİM Istanbul Turkish Muhammet ÜSTÜN 220. 54338/22 Ersöz v. Türkiye 08/11/2022 Süleyman ERSÖZ Bolu Turkish Sezgin ÖZDEMİR 221. 54389/22 Yatağan v.Türkiye 17/11/2022 Hatice YATAĞAN Sakarya Turkish Özge KIYAK MUSAN 222. 54539/22 Sağır v. Türkiye 10/11/2022 Şerafettin SAĞIR İzmir Turkish Ömer Faruk YAZGELDİ 223. 54546/22 Durmaz v.Türkiye 17/11/2022 Mustafa DURMAZ Ankara Turkish Hasan TOK 224. 54548/22 Seymen v.Türkiye 07/11/2022 Serkan SEYMEN Ankara Turkish Ebubekir ÇAKIR 225. 54626/22 Şahin v. Türkiye 15/11/2022 Levent ŞAHİN Ankara Turkish Fitnat GÜNEY 226. 54699/22 Temiz v. Türkiye 14/11/2022 Mustafa TEMİZ Ankara Turkish Halil ŞAHİN 227. 54710/22 Kırboğa v.Türkiye 21/11/2022 Mehmet KIRBOĞA Denizli Turkish Hazal KIRBOĞA 228. 54953/22 Doğrul v. Türkiye 11/11/2022 Hakan DOĞRUL Eskişehir Turkish İlhan ÇEÇEN 229. 55007/22 Temiz v. Türkiye 11/11/2022 Güngör TEMİZ Samsun Turkish Tahir EREN 230. 55063/22 Yılmaz v. Türkiye 11/11/2022 Nihat YILMAZ Tokat Turkish İlhan ÇEÇEN 231. 55100/22 Ertekin v. Türkiye 21/11/2022 Kanber ERTEKİN Kırıkkale Turkish Merve KOÇ 232. 55144/22 Koca v. Türkiye 23/11/2022 Ali KOCA Denizli Turkish Uğur BAY 233. 55346/22 Likoğlu v.Türkiye 23/11/2022 Merve LİKOĞLU Turkish Kadri İNCE 234. 55380/22 Yıldırım v.Türkiye 21/11/2022 Yahya YILDIRIM Ankara Turkish Ebubekir ÇAKIR 235. 55456/22 Tulukçu v.Türkiye 21/11/2022 Fatma Rumeysa TULUKÇU Konya Turkish Refia TAŞCIOĞLU ERBİROL 236. 55507/22 Aydın v. Türkiye 25/11/2022 Melike AYDIN Afyonkarahisar Turkish Güngör AYDIN 237. 55523/22 Yiğittepe v.Türkiye 28/11/2022 Hüdaverdi YİĞİTTEPE Eskişehir Turkish 238. 55682/22 Özdemir v.Türkiye 08/11/2022 Selçuk ÖZDEMİR Bursa Turkish Abdullah TOMUR 239. 55843/22 Zotluoğlu v.Türkiye 10/11/2022 Yusuf ZOTLUOĞLU Samsun Turkish Metin ATEŞOĞLU 240. 55861/22 İncetaş v. Türkiye 28/11/2022 Hüseyin İNCETAŞ Kahramamaras Turkish Bilge Kağan TOPTAŞ 241. 55903/22 Kutlu v. Türkiye 18/11/2022 Serdar KUTLU Samsun Turkish Metin ATEŞOĞLU 242. 55921/22 Aslanhan v.Türkiye 21/11/2022 Rubeyda ASLANHAN Erzincan Turkish Tahir EREN 243. 56023/22 Topkara v.Türkiye 25/11/2022 Adem TOPKARA Denizli Turkish Mehmet TUNÇER 244. 56850/22 Baz v. Türkiye 05/12/2022 Şeyma BAZ İsparta Turkish Orçun MUŞLU 245. 57421/22 Çelen v. Türkiye 05/12/2022 Murat ÇELEN Isparta Turkish Ümmü Büşra KARAGÖZ 246. 57449/22 Bilgin v. Türkiye 06/12/2022 Cemil BİLGİN Kayseri Turkish Selim YILMAZ 247. 83/23 Karagüven v.Türkiye 16/12/2022 Cafer KARAGÜVEN Aksaray Turkish Kübra GÜLAÇTI 248. 372/23 Ustaoğlu v.Türkiye 02/12/2022 Ersoy USTAOĞLU Ankara Turkish Burhan DEMİRCİ 249. 3132/23 Tuşan v. Türkiye 23/12/2022 Zülfükar TUŞAN Hatay Turkish Esma TUSAN 250. 3286/23 Taş v. Türkiye 28/12/2022 Ahmet TAŞ Ankara Turkish Arzu BEYAZIT 251. 3556/23 Baber v. Türkiye 26/12/2022 Orhan BABER Osmaniye Turkish Elçin MERİÇ 252. 3683/23 Küçük v. Türkiye 10/01/2023 Murat KÜÇÜK Çorum Turkish Muhammet MARAŞLI 253. 3701/23 Tafracı v. Türkiye 03/01/2023 Gazanfer TAFRACI Karabük Turkish Yakup Yaşar MİRZAOĞLU 254. 3929/23 Güney v. Türkiye 17/01/2023 Özcan GÜNEY Ankara Turkish Hasan TOK 255. 5047/23 Kılısarı v.Türkiye 20/01/2023 Hasan KILISARI Konya Turkish Kübra GÜLAÇTI 256. 5073/23 Gündüz v.Türkiye 19/01/2023 Esra GÜNDÜZ Kırıkkale Turkish Merve KOÇ 257. 5101/23 Layık v. Türkiye 17/01/2023 Nurullah LAYIK Çorum Turkish Murat ÇAM 258. 5129/23 Yıldız v. Türkiye 13/12/2022 Cahit YILDIZ Adana Turkish Sinan TUMLUKOLÇU 259. 6251/23 Yılmaz v. Türkiye 13/01/2023 Muharrem YILMAZ Ordu Turkish Neziha YILMAZ 260. 11578/23 Orhan v. Türkiye 22/02/2023 Recep ORHAN Ankara Turkish Ahmet Serdar GÜNEŞ 261. 12599/23 Harmandar v.Türkiye 13/03/2023 Onur HARMANDAR Turkish Hasan TOK 262. 13044/23 Çete v. Türkiye 02/03/2023 Mehmet ÇETE İzmir Turkish Elif GİRGİN 263. 17882/23 Pazar v. Türkiye 14/04/2023 Ali PAZAR Aksaray Turkish İhsan MAKAS 264. 27624/23 Yaşa v. Türkiye 27/03/2023 Hasan YAŞA Bilecik Turkish Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ