25427/23;28767/23;28793/23;28798/23;28801/23;28861/23;28864/23;32055/23;32080/23;32354/23;32358/23;35870/23;41922/23;1469/24
WyrokETPCz2024-11-28ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1128JUD002542723
Analiza orzeczenia
Sekcja wygenerowana przez AI na podstawie treści orzeczenia — nie stanowi cytatu.
Zagadnienie prawne
Czy warunki detencji w ukraińskich zakładach karnych oraz brak skutecznego środka odwoławczego w tym zakresie naruszyły prawa skarżących wynikające z art. 3 i 13 Konwencji?Ratio decidendi
Trybunał uznał, że warunki detencji skarżących były nieodpowiednie, powołując się na swoją ugruntowaną linię orzeczniczą dotyczącą przeludnienia i innych niedociągnięć, takich jak brak świeżego powietrza, nieodpowiednia temperatura czy brak higieny. Podkreślono, że rząd nie przedstawił dowodów obalających zarzuty skarżących, co potwierdziło prima facie naruszenie. Dodatkowo, Trybunał stwierdził, że skarżący nie mieli do dyspozycji skutecznego środka odwoławczego w odniesieniu do tych skarg, co stanowiło naruszenie art. 13 Konwencji.Stan faktyczny
Czternastu skarżących było przetrzymywanych w ukraińskich zakładach karnych, w tym w Zamkova Detention Facility, w warunkach, które uznali za nieodpowiednie. Skarżyli się na przeludnienie (poniżej 4 m² na osadzonego), brak świeżego powietrza, bierne palenie, nieodpowiednią temperaturę, pleśń lub brud w celach, brak lub nieodpowiednie urządzenia higieniczne, brak prywatności w toalecie, złą jakość pościeli i pożywienia, oraz ograniczony dostęp do prysznica i wody pitnej. Skarżący twierdzili również, że nie mieli skutecznego środka odwoławczego w prawie krajowym w związku z tymi warunkami.Rozstrzygnięcie
Trybunał jednogłośnie: postanowił połączyć skargi; uznał skargi dotyczące nieodpowiednich warunków detencji i braku skutecznego środka odwoławczego w prawie krajowym za dopuszczalne, a pozostałe skargi za niedopuszczalne; stwierdził naruszenie art. 3 i 13 Konwencji w odniesieniu do nieodpowiednich warunków detencji i braku skutecznego środka odwoławczego; zasądził od państwa pozwanego na rzecz skarżących kwoty wskazane w załączonej tabeli tytułem zadośćuczynienia.Pełny tekst orzeczenia
FIFTH SECTION
CASE OF BOROMENSKYY AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
(Applications nos. 25427/23 and 13 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
28 November 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Boromenskyy and Others v. Ukraine,
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Diana Sârcu, President,
Kateřina Šimáčková,
Mykola Gnatovskyy, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 7 November 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
THE LAW
JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS
4. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 3 AND 13 OF THE CONVENTION
5. The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of their detention during the periods indicated in the appended table and that they had no effective remedy in this connection. They relied on Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention.
6. The Court notes that the applicants were kept in detention in poor conditions. The details of the applicants’ detention are indicated in the appended table. The Court refers to the principles established in its case‑law regarding inadequate conditions of detention (see, for instance, Muršić v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, §§ 96‑101, ECHR 2016). It reiterates in particular that a serious lack of space in a prison cell weighs heavily as a factor to be taken into account for the purpose of establishing whether the detention conditions described are “degrading” from the point of view of Article 3 and may disclose a violation, both alone or taken together with other shortcomings (see Muršić, cited above, §§ 122-41, and Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 149‑59, 10 January 2012).
7. In the leading cases of Melnik v. Ukraine (no. 72286/01, 28 March 2006) and Sukachov v. Ukraine (no. 14057/17, 30 January 2020), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
8. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. In particular, the Court observes that, in reply to a prima facie case of inadequate conditions of detention, complained of by the applicants, the Government have failed to provide any primary evidence showing cell floor plans and the actual number of inmates during the specific periods of the applicants’ detention (see Ananyev and Others, cited above, § 123, and, for example, Sparysh and Kutsmand v. Ukraine [Committee], nos. 49709/18 and 49870/18, 12 September 2024). Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicants’ conditions of detention during the periods indicated in the appended table were inadequate.
9. The Court further notes that the applicants did not have at their disposal an effective remedy in respect of these complaints.
10. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention.
REMAINING COMPLAINTS
11. Some applicants also raised additional complaints under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention.
12. The Court has examined these complaints and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto.
It follows that this part of the applications must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention.
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
13. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see, in particular, Sukachov, cited above, §§ 165 and 167), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
Decides to join the applications;
Declares the complaints concerning the inadequate conditions of detention, during the periods indicated in the appended table, and the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law admissible, and the remainder of the applications inadmissible;
Holds that these complaints disclose a breach of Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention during the periods indicated in the appended table and the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in that regard;
Holds
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 28 November 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina Diana Sârcu
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention
(inadequate conditions of detention and lack of any effective remedy in domestic law)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Facility
Start and end date
Duration
Sq. m per inmate
Specific grievances
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage per applicant
(in euros)[1]
25427/23
04/06/2023
Leonid Sergiyovych BOROMENSKYY
Rybiy Sergiy Mykolayovych
Dnipro
Zamkova Detention Facility
15/08/2018 to
29/08/2023
5 year(s) and 15 day(s)
Zamkova Detention Facility
08/09/2023
pending
More than
11 month(s) and 29 day(s)
3.9 m²
3.9 m²
Overcrowding, lack of fresh air, passive smoking, inadequate temperature, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air
Overcrowding, lack of fresh air, passive smoking, inadequate temperature, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air
7,500
28767/23
06/07/2023
Mykola Mykhaylovych KIRSANOV
Zamkova Detention Facility no. 58
16/02/2023
pending
More than
1 year(s) and
6 month(s) and 22 day(s)
3.8 m²
Overcrowding, lack of fresh air, passive smoking, inadequate temperature, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, mouldy or dirty cell, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of toiletries, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light
4,100
28793/23
06/07/2023
Leonid Oleksandrovych BONDAR
Zamkova Detention Facility no. 58
04/11/2021
pending
More than
2 year(s) and
10 month(s) and 3 day(s)
3.7 m²
6,500
28798/23
06/07/2023
Volodymyr Dmytrovych CHERNETEVYCH
Zamkova Detention Facility no. 58
18/12/2005
pending
More than
18 year(s) and
8 month(s) and 20 day(s)
3.7 m²
7,500
28801/23
06/07/2023
Arkadiy Anatoliyovych SIDYAYEV
Zamkova Detention Facility no. 58
17/01/2015
pending
More than
9 year(s) and
7 month(s) and 21 day(s)
3.7 m²
7,500
28861/23
06/07/2023
Vitaliy Viktorovych MARCHENKO
Zamkova Detention Facility no. 58
05/12/2019
pending
More than
4 year(s) and
9 month(s) and
2 day(s)
3.75 m²
7,500
28864/23
06/07/2023
Oleksandr Vitaliyovych BUYAVETS
Zamkova Detention Facility no. 58
14/03/2022
pending
More than
2 year(s) and
5 month(s) and 24 day(s)
3.7 m²
5,800
32055/23
06/08/2023
Viktor Mykolayovych CHEPIZHKO
Zamkova Detention Facility no. 58
08/11/2022
pending
More than
1 year(s) and
9 month(s) and 30 day(s)
3.9 m²
4,600
32080/23
07/08/2023
Oleksandr Oleksiyovych KORNIYKO
Zamkova Detention Facility no. 58
09/08/2022
pending
More than
2 year(s) and
1 month(s) and
3 day(s)
3.65 m²
5,200
32354/23
07/08/2023
Volodymyr Vasylyovych OLENICH
Zamkova Detention Facility
10/12/2005
pending
More than
17 year(s) and
9 month(s) and 26 day(s)
3.7 m²
7,500
32358/23
07/08/2023
Oleg Viktorovych LYSENKO
Zamkova Detention Facility
05/12/2009
pending
More than
13 year(s) and
10 month(s) and 1 day(s)
3.7 m²
7,500
35870/23
15/09/2023
Igor Mykolayovych YANKOVENKO
Zamkova Detention Facility no. 58
05/06/2023
pending
More than
1 year(s) and
3 month(s) and
2 day(s)
3.7 m²
3,700
41922/23
04/10/2023
Ruslan Anatoliyovych IGLIN
Zamkova Detention Facility no. 58
04/07/2022
pending
More than
2 year(s) and
2 month(s) and 12 day(s)
2.6 m²
5,300
1469/24
12/12/2023
Dmytro Viktorovych MOZER
Rybiy Sergiy Mykolayovych
Dnipro
Zamkova Detention Facility
11/10/2023
pending
More than
11 month(s) and 6 day(s)
3.8 m²
3,100
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
© Rada Europy / Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka, źródło: HUDOC (hudoc.echr.coe.int), pozyskano 29.07.2026. · Źródło