30319/16;36690/16;41131/16;42488/16;44836/16;57969/16;59611/16;7969/17;26351/17;28221/17;29243/17;30653/17;38292/17;38463/17;39314/17

WyrokETPCz2021-12-02ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1202JUD003031916

Analiza orzeczenia

Sekcja wygenerowana przez AI na podstawie treści orzeczenia — nie stanowi cytatu.

Zagadnienie prawne
Czy nieodpowiednie warunki detencji w rumuńskich zakładach karnych, w tym przeludnienie, naruszyły zakaz nieludzkiego lub poniżającego traktowania z art. 3 Konwencji?
Ratio decidendi
Trybunał, odwołując się do ugruntowanego orzecznictwa (m.in. Muršić, Ananyev i inni, Rezmiveș i inni, Polgar), stwierdził, że warunki detencji skarżących były nieodpowiednie. Podkreślono, że poważny brak przestrzeni w celi więziennej jest kluczowym czynnikiem wskazującym na poniżające traktowanie w rozumieniu art. 3, zarówno samodzielnie, jak i w połączeniu z innymi niedociągnięciami. Trybunał nie znalazł żadnych faktów ani argumentów, które skłoniłyby go do odmiennego wniosku, w tym w odniesieniu do zarzutu niewyczerpania krajowych środków odwoławczych.
Stan faktyczny
Skarżący, których lista i szczegóły są zawarte w załączonej tabeli, byli przetrzymywani w rumuńskich zakładach karnych. Warunki ich detencji były nieodpowiednie, charakteryzując się m.in. przeludnieniem (często poniżej 3 m² na osobę), brakiem dostępu do ciepłej wody i prysznica, złymi warunkami sanitarnymi, obecnością insektów/gryzoni, niewystarczającym oświetleniem i wentylacją, a także niską jakością jedzenia i brakiem odpowiedniego wyposażenia.
Rozstrzygnięcie
Decyduje o połączeniu skarg; uznaje skargi dotyczące nieodpowiednich warunków detencji za dopuszczalne, a pozostałe części skarg za niedopuszczalne; stwierdza naruszenie art. 3 Konwencji w odniesieniu do nieodpowiednich warunków detencji w okresach wskazanych w załączonej tabeli; zasądza od pozwanego państwa na rzecz skarżących kwoty wskazane w załączonej tabeli tytułem zadośćuczynienia, powiększone o odsetki.

Pełny tekst orzeczenia

FOURTH SECTION CASE OF DICU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 30319/16 and 14 others – see appended list)         JUDGMENT   This judgment was revised in accordance with Rule 80 of the Rules of Court in a judgment of 25 May 2023     STRASBOURG 2 December 2021       This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.   In the case of Dicu and Others v. Romania, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:  Armen Harutyunyan, President,  Jolien Schukking,  Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 10 November 2021, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.  The case originated in applications against Romania lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2.  The Romanian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS 3.  The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.  The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.  Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION 6.  The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of their detention. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention, which reads as follows: Article 3 “No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.” 7.  The Court notes that the applicants were kept in detention in poor conditions. The details of the applicants’ detention are indicated in the appended table. The Court refers to the principles established in its case‑law regarding inadequate conditions of detention (see, for instance, Muršić v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, §§ 96‑101, ECHR 2016). It reiterates in particular that a serious lack of space in a prison cell weighs heavily as a factor to be taken into account for the purpose of establishing whether the detention conditions described are “degrading” from the point of view of Article 3 and may disclose a violation, both alone or taken together with other shortcomings (see Muršić, cited above, §§ 122‑41, and Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 149‑59, 10 January 2012). 8.  In the leading case of Rezmiveș and Others v. Romania, (nos. 61467/12 and 3 others, 25 April 2017), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.  Having examined all the material submitted to it and the arguments raised by the parties, including the Government’s objections related to the non-exhaustion of domestic remedies, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject (including its findings in the recent case of Polgar v. Romania, no. 39412/19, §§ 94-97, 20 July 2021), the Court considers that in the instant case the applicants’ conditions of detention, as described in the appended table below, were inadequate. 10.  These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention. REMAINING COMPLAINTS 11.  In applications nos. 36690/16 and 42488/16 the applicants also raised other complaints under Article 3 of the Convention. 12.  The Court has examined the applications listed in the appended table and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto. It follows that this part of the applications must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 13.  Article 41 of the Convention provides: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.” 14.  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see, in particular, Rezmiveș and Others and Polgar, both cited above), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. 15.  The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Declares the complaints concerning the inadequate conditions of detention, as specified in the appended table, admissible, and the remainder of the applications inadmissible; Holds that these complaints disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention for the periods specified in the appended table below; Holds (a)  that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)  that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. Done in English, and notified in writing on 2 December 2021, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court. Viktoriya Maradudina Armen Harutyunyan Acting Deputy Registrar President APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Facility Start and end date Duration Sq. m per inmate Specific grievances Amount awarded for pecuniary and non‑pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros)[1]     30319/16 09/07/2016 Marius-Dumitru DICU Irina Maria Peter Bucharest Deva (Bârcea Mare) and Aiud Prisons 08/01/2015 to 12/04/2016 1 year(s) and 3 month(s) and 5 day(s) 1.65 - 1.86 m² overcrowding, bunk beds, no or restricted access to shower, poor quality of food, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, inadequate temperature, mouldy or dirty cell, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of or insufficient natural light 3,000     36690/16 08/11/2016 Marian MELINTE Irina Maria Peter Bucharest Giurgiu and Mărgineni Prisons 28/05/2013 to 24/12/2016 3 year(s) and 6 month(s) and 27 day(s) 1.71 - 2.90 m² overcrowding (save for 23/12/2013 - 11/02/2014), bunk beds, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of toiletries, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to warm water, no or restricted access to shower, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, poor quality of potable water 3,000     41131/16 07/09/2016 Ionel GOGA Irina Maria Peter Bucharest Bacău, Jilava, Iași, Rahova, Slobozia and Giurgiu Prisons; Rahova Prison Hospital 07/01/2002 to 06/01/2017 15 year(s) 1.79 - 3 m² overcrowding, bunk beds, inadequate temperature, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of toiletries, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to warm water, no or restricted access to shower, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, mouldy or dirty cell, lack or inadequate furniture, poor quality of potable water 5,000     42488/16 18/08/2016 Ionuț-Iulian LOZNEANU Irina Maria Peter Bucharest Tulcea Prison 22/01/2016 to 01/09/2016 7 month(s) and 11 day(s)   Tulcea and Iași Prisons 15/09/2016 to 03/05/2017 7 month(s) and 19 day(s) 1.76 - 2.43 m² overcrowding, bunk beds, no or restricted access to shower, poor quality of food, mouldy or dirty cell, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, inadequate temperature, sharing cells with inmates infected with contagious disease 3,000     44836/16 23/08/2016 Lucian ANGHEL     Rahova and Tulcea Prisons 25/08/2014 to 13/07/2017 2 year(s) and 10 month(s) and 19 day(s) 1.39 - 2.75 m² overcrowding, mouldy or dirty cell, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to warm water, bunk beds, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of fresh air, lack or insufficient quantity of food 3,000     57969/16 20/04/2017 Șofronie-Cristian CALOTĂ Aurora Calotă Uricani Aiud and Deva (Bârcea Mare) Prisons 18/12/2014 to 21/03/2017 2 year(s) and 3 month(s) and 4 day(s) 1.68 - 2.86 m² overcrowding, mouldy or dirty cell, bunk beds, inadequate temperature, poor quality of food, lack of privacy for toilet, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of toiletries, no or restricted access to shower, infestation of cell with insects/rodents 3,000     59611/16 07/10/2016 George Cătălin MUSTĂȚEA Andreea-Gabriela Cadar Galați Constanța County Police Station and Constanța - Poarta Albă Prison 20/02/2012 to 14/03/2012 24 day(s)   Constanța - Poarta Albă and Tulcea Prisons 20/03/2012 to 13/01/2015 2 year(s) and 9 month(s) and 25 day(s)   Constanța - Poarta Albă Prison 20/01/2015 to 08/04/2016 1 year(s) and 2 month(s) and 20 day(s) 1.38 - 3 m² overcrowding (save for the period 20/02/2012 - 12/03/2012), lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to warm water, no or restricted access to shower, mouldy or dirty cell, poor quality of potable water, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of or insufficient electric light, inadequate temperature, passive smoking, lack or insufficient quantity of food, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of toiletries 3,000     7969/17 17/01/2017 Gabriel PUȘCAȘ Vasile Rareş Biro Satu Mare Sălaj County Police Station; Oradea and Satu Mare Prisons 07/06/2015 to 01/11/2016 1 year(s) and 4 month(s) and 26 day(s) 1.16 - 2.77 m² Overcrowding (save for the periods from 28/07/2015 until 13/08/2015 and from 12/11/2015 until 07/12/2015), lack of privacy for toilet, lack of fresh air, lack or inadequate furniture, poor quality of food, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, no or restricted access to shower, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities 3,000     26351/17 27/03/2017 Gabriel-Liviu NICULAE Luminița-Florica Bîrnea Bucharest Bucharest Central Arrest, Rahova and Jilava Prisons 14/07/2011 to 27/09/2016 5 year(s) and 2 month(s) and 14 day(s) 1.26 - 2.48 m² overcrowding, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to warm water, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, poor quality of food, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, inadequate temperature, bunk beds 5,000   28221/17 03/04/2017 Hesamedin EMADI Radu Pascu Oradea Rahova, Satu Mare, Oradea and Jilava Prisons 26/05/2015 to 19/10/2016 1 year(s) and 4 month(s) and 24 day(s) 1.41 - 2.89 m² overcrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack or inadequate furniture, infestation of cell with insects/rodents 3,000   29243/17 05/04/2017 Dănuţ-Chiriţă TRIFU Andreea-Gabriela Cadar Galați Constanța - Poarta Albă Prison 15/12/2014 to 06/10/2016 1 year(s) and 9 month(s) and 22 day(s) 1.67 - 2.62 m² overcrowding (save for the period from 19/06/2015 until 15/07/2015), lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, poor quality of potable water, no or restricted access to warm water, no or restricted access to shower, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of fresh air, lack or inadequate furniture, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, inadequate temperature, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack or insufficient quantity of food 3,000   30653/17 10/04/2017 Géza-Levente SZABÓ Corina Mara Oradea Vâlcea County Police Station; Mioveni (Colibași) and Satu Mare Prisons 28/05/2015 to 23/01/2017 1 year(s) and 7 month(s) and 27 day(s) 1.39 - 2.83 m² overcrowding (save for the period 28/05/2015 - 22/07/2015), bunk beds, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of toiletries, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack or inadequate furniture 3,000   38292/17 18/05/2017 Ion MARIN Andreea-Gabriela Cadar Galați Constanța - Poarta Albă Prison 21/07/2016 to 10/12/2016 4 month(s) and 20 day(s) 1.52 - 2 m² overcrowding (save for the period from 21/09/2016 until 29/09/2016), lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, poor quality of potable water, no or restricted access to warm water, no or restricted access to shower, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of or insufficient electric light, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack or insufficient quantity of food 1,000   38463/17 22/06/2017 Maria GÂNDAC     Târgşor and Cluj Prisons 25/05/2014 to 11/04/2017 2 year(s) and 10 month(s) and 18 day(s) 1.15 m² overcrowding, poor quality of food, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, mouldy or dirty cell, infestation of cell with insects/rodents 3,000   39314/17 17/05/2017 Silviu-Daniel ROTOPĂNESCU Adrian Stancu Oradea Bihor County Police Station; Oradea, Satu Mare and Codlea Prisons 25/03/2014 to 25/04/2017 3 year(s) and 1 month(s) and 1 day(s) 1.31 - 2.86 m² overcrowding (save for the period 22/04/2014 - 13/05/2014), lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or insufficient natural light, no or restricted access to warm water, no or restricted access to shower, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, poor quality of food, lack or inadequate furniture, infestation of cell with insects/rodents 3,000   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.

© Rada Europy / Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka, źródło: HUDOC (hudoc.echr.coe.int), pozyskano 29.07.2026. · Źródło