3479/22;57696/22;9077/23;12940/23;15334/23;15457/23;15722/23

FIFTH SECTION CASE OF YAROSH AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Application no. 3479/22 and 6 others – see appended list)             JUDGMENT   STRASBOURG 25 April 2024   This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Yarosh and Others v. Ukraine, The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:  Mārtiņš Mits, President,  Kateřina Šimáčková,  Mykola Gnatovskyy, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 4 April 2024, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.  The case originated in applications against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2.  The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS 3.  The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 4.  Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE  6 § 1 AND ARTICLE 13 OF THE CONVENTION 5.  The applicants complained principally that the length of the criminal proceedings in question had been incompatible with the “reasonable time” requirement and that they had no effective remedy in this connection. They relied on Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention. 6.  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicants in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999‑II, and Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000‑VII). 7.  In the leading case of Nechay v. Ukraine (no. 15360/10, 1 July 2021) the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 8.  Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the “reasonable time” requirement. 9.  The Court further notes that the applicants did not have at their disposal an effective remedy in respect of these complaints. 10.  These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 6 § 1 and of Article 13 of the Convention. REMAINING COMPLAINTS 11.  In application no. 15334/23 the applicant also raised other complaints under Article 6 of the Convention. 12.  The Court considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto. It follows that this part of application no. 15334/23 must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 13.  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see, in particular, Bevz v. Ukraine, no. 7307/05, § 52, 18 June 2009), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Declares the complaints concerning the excessive length of criminal proceedings and the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law admissible, and the remainder of application no. 15334/23 inadmissible; Holds that these complaints disclose a breach of Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of criminal proceedings and lack of an effective domestic remedy in that regard; Holds (a)  that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)  that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. Done in English, and notified in writing on 25 April 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.  Viktoriya Maradudina Mārtiņš Mits  Acting Deputy Registrar President     APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention (excessive length of criminal proceedings and lack of any effective remedy in domestic law) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Start of proceedings End of proceedings Total length Levels of jurisdiction Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage per applicant (in euros)[1]     3479/22 05/01/2022 Ruslan Romanovych YAROSH Mytsyk Oleg Volodymyrovych Lviv 19/01/2012 pending More than 12 year(s) and 1 month(s) and 26 day(s) 2 level(s) of jurisdiction 4,200     57696/22 01/12/2022 Gennadiy GOLOVATYUK Pogibko Oleksandr Olegovych Odesa 24/01/2019 pending More than 5 year(s) and 1 month(s) and 21 day(s) 1 level(s) of jurisdiction 1,500     9077/23 17/02/2023 Andriy Valeriyovych TERENTYEV Boychenko Yegor Leonidovych Strasbourg 08/02/2006 pending More than 18 year(s) and 1 month(s) and 8 day(s) 2 level(s) of jurisdiction 7,800     12940/23 02/03/2023 Mykola Mykhaylovych ROMANYUK Romanyuk Ivan Mykolayovych Nova Romanivka 20/10/2005 17/03/2014 13/11/2013 02/11/2022 16 year(s) and 8 month(s) and 12 day(s) 2 level(s) of jurisdiction 7,200     15334/23 27/03/2023 Oleksandr Anatoliyovych KAPSHYTAR Myronova Valeriya Valeriyivna Dnipro 17/02/2016 14/12/2022 6 year(s) and 9 month(s) and 28 day(s) 3 level(s) of jurisdiction     15457/23 24/03/2023 Oleksandr Mykhaylovych SULYM     25/12/2009 pending More than 14 year(s) and 2 month(s) and 20 day(s) 1 level(s) of jurisdiction 6,600     15722/23 21/03/2023 Inna Volodymyrivna BUDARINA Ignatov Oleksandr Anatoliyovych Dnipro 15/11/2019 pending More than 4 year(s) and 4 month(s) and 1 day(s) 1 level(s) of jurisdiction 1,200   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.