36952/21;41847/21;45911/21;48219/21;48221/21;60227/21;60230/21;60486/21;60883/21;60907/21;61024/21;61026/21;61032/21;61118/21;61305/21;61328/21;61335/21;61362/21;61368/21;61371/21;61476/21;61681/21;61687/21;61742/21;67/22;842/22;874/22;1143/22;1148/22;2030/22;2034/22;2037/22;2044/22;10042/23;11077/23;11767/23;12163/23;12472/23;12723/23;13660/23;13664/23;14330/23
WyrokETPCz2024-09-12ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0912JUD003695221
Analiza orzeczenia
Sekcja wygenerowana przez AI na podstawie treści orzeczenia — nie stanowi cytatu.
Zagadnienie prawne
Czy środki podjęte przeciwko organizatorom i uczestnikom zgromadzeń publicznych w Rosji, w tym aresztowania i skazania za wykroczenia administracyjne, stanowiły nieproporcjonalną ingerencję w wolność zgromadzeń (art. 11 Konwencji) oraz naruszały prawo do wolności i bezpieczeństwa osobistego (art. 5 ust. 1), prawo do rzetelnego procesu (art. 6 ust. 1) i prawo do odwołania w sprawach karnych (art. 2 Protokołu nr 7)?Ratio decidendi
Trybunał stwierdził, że ingerencje w wolność zgromadzeń skarżących nie były „konieczne w społeczeństwie demokratycznym”, odwołując się do ugruntowanego orzecznictwa dotyczącego wolności zgromadzeń i proporcjonalności ingerencji. W odniesieniu do innych skarg, Trybunał uznał, że naruszenia Konwencji i jej Protokołów miały miejsce w świetle wcześniejszych wyroków dotyczących bezprawnego pozbawienia wolności, braku bezstronności sądów w postępowaniach administracyjnych oraz braku skutku zawieszającego odwołania od kary aresztu administracyjnego. Trybunał podkreślił, że fakty miały miejsce przed 16 września 2022 r., co uzasadniało jego jurysdykcję.Stan faktyczny
Skarżący, będący organizatorami lub uczestnikami zgromadzeń publicznych w Rosji, w tym wieców poparcia dla Aleksieja Nawalnego i wieców antywojennych, zostali zatrzymani i skazani za wykroczenia administracyjne. W wielu przypadkach zatrzymania były nieudokumentowane lub odbywały się bez nakazu sądowego. Skarżący skarżyli się na nieproporcjonalne środki podjęte przeciwko nim, w tym kary grzywny i aresztu, a także na brak bezstronności sądów krajowych i brak skutku zawieszającego odwołań od kar aresztu administracyjnego.Rozstrzygnięcie
Trybunał postanawia połączyć skargi; stwierdza, że ma jurysdykcję do rozpatrzenia tych skarg; uznaje skargi na podstawie art. 11 Konwencji i inne skargi na podstawie ugruntowanego orzecznictwa za dopuszczalne; stwierdza, że nie ma potrzeby odrębnego rozpatrywania pozostałych skarg na podstawie art. 6 Konwencji; uznaje pozostałą część skarg za niedopuszczalną; stwierdza naruszenie art. 11 Konwencji; stwierdza naruszenie Konwencji i Protokołów do niej w odniesieniu do innych skarg podniesionych na podstawie ugruntowanego orzecznictwa; orzeka, że państwo-strona ma zapłacić skarżącym, w ciągu trzech miesięcy, kwoty wskazane w załączonej tabeli, wraz z odsetkami.Pełny tekst orzeczenia
FIFTH SECTION
CASE OF YATSKIV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 36952/21 and 41 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
12 September 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Yatskiv and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
María Elósegui, President,
Kateřina Šimáčková,
Stéphane Pisani, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 11 July 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. They also raised other complaints under the Convention.
THE LAW
JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
JURISDICTION
6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION
7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW
12. The applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (CAO); and Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention.
REMAINING COMPLAINTS
14. Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative‑offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs 11 and 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
15. The Court has further examined the rest of the complaints raised by the applicants and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto. It follows that this part of the applications must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention.
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
16. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
Decides to join the applications;
Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;
Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention, and declares the remainder of the applications inadmissible;
Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;
Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);
Holds
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 12 September 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina María Elósegui
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Name of the public event
Location
Date
Administrative / criminal offence
Penalty
Final domestic decision
Court Name
Date
Other complaints under
well-established case-law
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non‑pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant
(in euros)[1]
36952/21
30/06/2021
Oleg Dmitriyevich YATSKIV Bochilo Anna Yevgenyevna
Barnaul
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Syktyvkar
23/01/2021
Anti-war rally
Syktyvkar
24/02/2022
Anti-war rally
Syktyvkar
27/02/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
fine of
RUB 5,000
detention for 7 days
detention for 5 days
Supreme Court of the Komi
Republic
10/03/2021
Supreme Court of the Komi
Republic
20/04/2022
Supreme Court of the Komi
Republic
11/05/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis – escorting to the police station for compiling offence records on 23/01/2021, 24/02/2022 and 27/02/2022;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings.
5,000
41847/21
02/08/2021
Olga Alekseyevna KORSHIKOVA Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
detention for 6 days
Moscow City Court
02/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis – escorting to the police station and detention there after compiling an offence record between 11.55 p.m. on 02/02/2021 and 5.30 p.m. on 03/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
45911/21
30/08/2021
Andrey Yevgenyevich SHCHUKIN
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
detention for 5 days
Moscow City Court
22/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis – escorting to the police station and detention there after compiling an offence record between 1.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and the afternoon of 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
5,000
48219/21
24/09/2021
Georgiy Georgiyevich TEROGONYANTS Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
21/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis – escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report between 6 p.m. and 11.45 p.m. on 23/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
48221/21
24/09/2021
Nikolay Aleksandrovich MADAYEV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
02/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station and detention there after compiling an offence record between 10.30 p.m. on 02/02/2021 and 9 p.m. on 03/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
60227/21
24/11/2021
Nikita Andreyevich BUGROV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 19,000
Moscow City Court
29/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 4 p.m. and 10.40 p.m. on 23/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
60230/21
24/11/2021
Aliya Shamilevna GALINA Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Kazan
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
02/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station and detention there after compiling an offence record between 7.30 p.m. on 21/04/2021 and 2.30 p.m. on 22/04/2021.
4,000
60486/21
24/11/2021
Yuliya Vladimirovna NOVGORODOVA Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
25/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 8.25 p.m. on 23/01/2021 and 12.27 a.m. on 24/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
60883/21
29/11/2021
Robert Floritovich GABDRAKIPOV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Kazan
31/01/2021
article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
02/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station and detention there after compiling an offence record between 1.50 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 5 p.m. on 01/02/2021.
4,000
60907/21
29/11/2021
Viktor Ivanovich SOSHNIKOV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Kursk
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Kursk Regional Court
02/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 12.30 p.m. and 6.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
61024/21
30/11/2021
Irina Vladimirovna BOGANTSEVA Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
11/05/2021
The final judgment was served on the applicant on 16/08/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 3.50 p.m. and 10.05 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
61026/21
30/11/2021
Mikhail Anatolyevich GAYVORONSKIY Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Stavropol
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Stavropol Regional Court
02/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 1.30 p.m. and 6.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
61032/21
30/11/2021
Anastasiya Kirillovna YEDAPINA Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Tambov
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Tambov Regional Court
31/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
61118/21
06/12/2021
Diana Antonovna KAZARINA Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Kazan
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
09/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station and detention there after compiling an offence record between 7.50 p.m. on 21/04/2021 and 6.30 p.m. on 22/04/2021.
4,000
61305/21
19/11/2021
Daniil Andreyevich ZALUYEV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
detention for 10 days
Moscow City Court
21/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station and detention there after compiling an offence record between 10.40 p.m. on 02/02/2021 and 5.30 p.m. on 03/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
5,000
61328/21
03/12/2021
Olga Valeryevna STEPANYANTS Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
07/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 4 p.m. and 7.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
61335/21
03/12/2021
Dina Viktorovna LITVINA Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
21/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 5.20 p.m. and 9.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
61362/21
03/12/2021
Aleksey Mikhaylovich MOZOLEV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
21/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 5.20 p.m. and 11.55 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
61368/21
26/11/2021
Valeriy Dmitriyevich SENOTOV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
27/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 4.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021 and 1 a.m. on 24/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
61371/21
26/11/2021
Kristina Mikhaylovna PANFILOVA Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally in support of
A. Navalnyy
Kazan
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
26/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station and detention there after compiling an offence record between 7.45 p.m. on 21/04/2021 and 5 p.m. on 22/04/2021.
4,000
61476/21
06/12/2021
Tigran Grachyayevich OGANNISYAN Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
23/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 6.15 p.m. and 11.20 p.m. on 23/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
61681/21
10/12/2021
Anton Nikolayevich DULEPOV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
28/07/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 1.45 p.m. and 7.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
61687/21
10/12/2021
Mariya Vladimirovna SAVOSINA Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
25/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station and detention there after compiling an offence record between 2.45 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 4.30 p.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
61742/21
10/12/2021
Dmitriy Sergeyevich CHERNAVIN Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
21/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 4.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 12.10 a.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
67/22
05/12/2021
Artem Vladimirovich KHUKHOREV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
07/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 2.30 p.m. and 11.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
842/22
25/11/2021
Ivan Sergeyevich VEREVKIN Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
25/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station and detention there after compiling an offence record between 1 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 2 p.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
874/22
25/11/2021
Oleg Yevgenyevich MOSHKOV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
St Petersburg City Court
25/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 1.35 p.m. and 11.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
1143/22
17/12/2021
Viktor Pavlovich ITSKOVICH Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
17/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 3.35 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 12.15 a.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
1148/22
17/12/2021
Deniel Vlalimirovich BARBAKADZE Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
17/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 4 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 1 a.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
2030/22
22/12/2021
Vasiliy Markovich MARKOVICH Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
23/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 5.20 p.m. and 9.15 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
2034/22
22/12/2021
Ivan Nikolayevich GAVVA Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
07/07/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 4.25 p.m. and 10.10 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
2037/22
22/12/2021
Andrey Vladimirovich BRYLOV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
25/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 5.20 p.m. and 11.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
2044/22
15/12/2021
Ilya Mikhaylovich PARTANSKIY Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally to support
A. Navalnyy
Moscow
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
23/08/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
10042/23
09/02/2023
Bogdan Olegovich PECHERSKIY
Anti-war rally
Moscow
06/03/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
11/10/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 2.30 p.m. and 9.30 p.m. on 06/03/2022.
4,000
11077/23
20/02/2023
Farkhad Alikhanovich ISRAFILLI-GELMAN Ryzhova Ekaterina Nikolaevna
Dolgoprudnyy
Anti-war rally
Moscow
24/02/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
19/10/2022
(decision served on the applicant on the following days)
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 8.50 p.m. on 24/02/2022 and 5.40 a.m. on 25/02/2022.
4,000
11767/23
21/02/2023
Oleg Vladimirovich GOLUBEV
Anti-war rally
Moscow
27/02/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
25/10/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 5 p.m. on 27/02/2022 and 12.30 a.m. on 28/02/2022.
4,000
12163/23
09/03/2023
Vasiliy Vasilyevich KOLESOV
Anti-war rally
Moscow
24/02/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
15/11/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 7.30 p.m. on 24/02/2022 and 4 a.m. on 25/02/2022.
4,000
12472/23
25/02/2023
Vladimir Viktorovich PRIVALOV
Anti-war rally
Moscow
06/03/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
27/10/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 3 p.m. and 11.50 p.m. on 06/03/2022.
4,000
12723/23
10/03/2023
Aleksandr Sergeyevich FINIAREL
Assembly in connection with the sentencing of the Doxa journalists
Moscow
12/04/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
23/11/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 5.22 p.m. and 9.30 p.m. on 12/04/2022.
4,000
13660/23
15/03/2023
Aleksandr Sergeyevich SHULGIN
Anti-war rally
Moscow
06/03/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
17/11/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 2.40 p.m. on 06/03/2022 and 1 a.m. on 07/03/2022.
4,000
13664/23
09/03/2023
Bogdan Vyacheslavovich BOCHKAREV
Anti-war rally
Moscow
27/02/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
09/11/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 4.45 p.m. and 9 p.m. on 27/02/2022.
4,000
14330/23
20/03/2023
Anton Vyacheslavovich KRASILNIKOV
Anti-war rally
Moscow
27/02/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
21/11/2022
Art. 5 (1) unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence record between 8.55 p.m. on 27/02/2022 and 3.30 a.m. on 28/02/2022.
4,000
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
© Rada Europy / Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka, źródło: HUDOC (hudoc.echr.coe.int), pozyskano 29.07.2026. · Źródło