38691/21;50394/21;50397/21;50399/21;54533/21;59080/21;24057/22;34233/22;34613/22;34838/22;35209/22;35539/22;35662/22;35808/22;36505/22;36692/22;36820/22;36823/22;36827/22;36837/22;38569/22;39864/22;39990/22;39993/22;40063/22;41050/22;41061/22;41339/22;41987/22;44561/22;45082/22;48738/22

THIRD SECTION CASE OF MARGOVICH AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 38691/21 and 31 others – see appended list)             JUDGMENT   STRASBOURG 11 December 2025     This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Margovich and Others v. Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:  Úna Ní Raifeartaigh, President,  Mateja Đurović,  Vasilka Sancin, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 20 November 2025, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.  The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2.  The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS 3.  The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.  The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies in connection with their participation in various public events in breach of COVID‑19‑related restrictions. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.  Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. JURISDICTION 6.  The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023). ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION 7.  The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies in connection with their participation in various public events in breach of COVID-19-related restrictions, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention. 8.  The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009). It further refers to Nemytov and Others v. Russia, nos. 1257/21 and 2 others, 27 May 2025, in so far as the application by the authorities of the COVID-19-related restrictions to assemblies are concerned. 9.  In the leading cases of Nemytov and Others, cited above, Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014, and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 10.  Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”. 11.  These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW 12.  Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. 13.  Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); and Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention. REMAINING COMPLAINTS 14.  Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative-offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs 9-13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 15.  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022; Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention; Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention; Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table); Holds (a)  that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)  that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. Done in English, and notified in writing on 11 December 2025, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.    Viktoriya Maradudina Úna Ní Raifeartaigh  Acting Deputy Registrar President     APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative / criminal offence Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non‑pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros)[1]     38691/21 15/07/2021 Vladislav Georgiyevich MARGOVICH   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally in support of A Navalnyy   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 4 days St Petersburg City Court 25/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 3.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 5.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO   5,000     50394/21 30/09/2021 Irina Aleksandrovna MAMSUROVA   Zyryanova Mariya Sergeyevna St Petersburg Rally in support of A Navalnyy   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 St Petersburg City Court 01/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 5.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000     50397/21 30/09/2021 Entoni Aleks MZILANGVE   Zyryanova Mariya Sergeyevna St Petersburg Rally in support of A Navalnyy   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 18,000 St Petersburg City Court 01/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 5.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   4,000     50399/21 30/09/2021 Roman Vladimirovich PISAREVSKIY   Zyryanova Mariya Sergeyevna St Petersburg Rally in support of A Navalnyy   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 St Petersburg City Court 01/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 5.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000     54533/21 18/10/2021 Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich DENISOV   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally in support of A Navalnyy   St Petersburg   21/04/2021 article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 10 days St Petersburg City Court 28/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 8.30 p.m. on 21/04/2021 to 4.00 p.m. on 22/04/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO 5,000     59080/21 27/11/2021 Andrey Genrikhovich BESEDIN   Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius Rally in support of A Navalnyy   St Petersburg   23/01/2021 article 8.6.1 § 2 of the Law of St Petersburg on administrative offences fine of RUB 4,000 Oktyabrskiy District Court of St Petersburg 29/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 1.20 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 1.00 a.m. on 24/01/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   4,000     24057/22 09/02/2022 Denis Mikhaylovich OLSHIN   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally in support of A Navalnyy   St Petersburg   21/04/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 St Petersburg City Court 17/08/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 8.30 p.m. on 21/04/2021 to 6.00 p.m. on 22/04/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   4,000     34233/22 29/06/2022 Yekaterina Vasilyevna AYDAROVA   Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 5 days St Petersburg City Court 03/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 6.15 p.m. on 27/02/2022 to 10.30 a.m. on 28/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO   5,000     34613/22 29/06/2022 Anastasiya Vladimirovna MAKSIMOVA   Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 10 days St Petersburg City Court 15/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 4.00 p.m. on 06/03/2022 to 5.00 p.m. on 07/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO   5,000   34838/22 01/07/2022 Anton Aleksandrovich NIKITIN   Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   01/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 10 days St Petersburg City Court 04/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 8.35 p.m. on 01/03/2022 to 10.00 a.m. on 02/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO 5,000   35209/22 25/06/2022 Anna Yuryevna ARKHIPOVA   Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 12 days St Petersburg City Court 11/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 5.20 p.m. on 27/02/2022 to 6.15 p.m. on 28/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO   5,000   35539/22 05/07/2022 Anton Andreyevich CHEREPOV   Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 15 days St Petersburg City Court 10/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 3.30 p.m. on 06/03/2022 to 3.00 p.m. on 07/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO   5,000   35662/22 05/07/2022 Olga Aleksandrovna KOSHKAROVA   Vasilchenko Olesya Anatolyevna Minyar Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 7 days St Petersburg City Court 11/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 4.55 p.m. on 06/03/2022 to 2.30 p.m. on 07/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO   5,000   35808/22 05/07/2022 Leonid Yevgenyevich VINOGRADOV   Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow Rally in support of A. Navalnyy   St Petersburg   21/04/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000 St Petersburg City Court 22/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 10.15 p.m. on 21/04/2021 to 4.00 p.m. on 22/04/2021   4,000   36505/22 04/07/2022 Daliya Fedorovna MESHCHANKINA   Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 10 days St Petersburg City Court 04/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 5.25 p.m. on 27/02/2022 to 4.00 p.m. on 01/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO   5,000   36692/22 04/07/2022 Yekaterina Mikhaylovna KUCHINSKAYA   Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 5 days St Petersburg City Court 04/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 5.20 p.m. on 27/02/2022 to 12.00 a.m. on 28/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO   5,000   36820/22 11/07/2022 Aleksandr Aleksandrovich KONONOV   Krikun Leonid Leonidovich St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 5 days St Petersburg City Court 11/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 3.40 p.m. on 06/03/2022 to 07/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO   5,000   36823/22 11/07/2022 Anna Vyacheslavovna GUK   Krikun Leonid Leonidovich St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   06/03/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 5 days St Petersburg City Court 11/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 6.22 p.m. on 06/03/2022 to 3.10 p.m. on 07/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO   5,000   36827/22 11/07/2022 Mark Vyacheslavovich KHUAKO   Krikun Leonid Leonidovich St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 10 days St Petersburg City Court 11/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 6.22 p.m. on 06/03/2022 to 2.15 p.m. on 07/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO 5,000   36837/22 11/07/2022 Matvey Mikhaylovich ANTIPOV   Krikun Leonid Leonidovich St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 7 days St Petersburg City Court 11/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 6.25 p.m. on 06/03/2022 to 3.00 p.m. on 07/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO   5,000   38569/22 25/07/2022 Dmitriy Nikolayevich MASHKIN   Vasilchenko Olesya Anatolyevna Minyar Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   24/02/2022 article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 29/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 7.30 p.m. on 24/02/2022 to 1.10 p.m. on 26/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   4,000   39864/22 29/07/2022 Vasilisa Dmitriyevna SATIRSKAYA   Krikun Leonid Leonidovich St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   24/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000 St Petersburg City Court 29/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 9.00 p.m. on 24/02/2022 to 5.45 p.m. on 26/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   4,000   39990/22 04/08/2022 Petr Mikhaylovich POPOV   Vasilchenko Olesya Anatolyevna Minyar Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   24/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000 St Petersburg City Court 05/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 8.03 p.m. on 24/02/2022 to 9.00 p.m. on 25/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   4,000   39993/22 04/08/2022 Sergey Nikolayevich KABEYEV   Vasilchenko Olesya Anatolyevna Minyar Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 07/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 8.00 p.m. on 27/02/2022 to 4.00 p.m. on 28/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   4,000   40063/22 03/08/2022 Kira Iosifovna KOVALENKO   Vasilchenko Olesya Anatolyevna Minyar Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 07/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 2.15 p.m. on 06/03/2022 to 11.00 a.m. on 07/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   4,000   41050/22 29/07/2022 Natalya Igorevna BALAYEVA   Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 12,000 St Petersburg City Court 05/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 8.10 p.m. on 27/02/2022 to 4.25 a.m. on 28/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   4,000   41061/22 14/08/2022 Vladislav Viktorovich ISAKOV   Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   25/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 28/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 9.30 p.m. on 25/02/2022 to 3.00 a.m. on 26/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   41339/22 15/08/2022 Dmitriy Sergeyevich SARYCHEV   Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 19/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 6.00 p.m. on 27/02/2022 to 1.30 p.m. on 28/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   4,000   41987/22 05/08/2022 Viktoriya Konstantinovna ZAVALSKAYA   Krikun Leonid Leonidovich St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 5 days St Petersburg City Court 05/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 6.22 p.m. on 06/03/2022 to 1.30 p.m. on 07/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO 5,000   44561/22 19/08/2022 Yevgeniya Gennadyevna TOLOKONNIKOVA   Krikun Leonid Leonidovich St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO 50 hours of community works St Petersburg City Court 19/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 2.40 p.m. on 06/03/2022 to 12.20 a.m. on 07/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   45082/22 28/08/2022 Aleksandr Arsenyevich ROGINSKIY   Krikun Leonid Leonidovich St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   24/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 10 days St Petersburg City Court 28/04/2022 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO 5,000   48738/22 30/09/2022 Vyacheslav Ramisovich ASTREDINOV   Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 St Petersburg City Court 31/05/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 5.10 p.m. on 06/03/2022 to 5.00 a.m. on 07/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.