42166/21;957/22;1731/22;1745/22;5350/22;5356/22;11180/22;12057/22;12092/22;12097/22;12103/22;12108/22;14056/22;14334/22;14352/22;14552/22;22583/22;23107/22;23134/22;31253/22;36602/22;40279/22;44866/22;45077/22;45133/22;45185/22;45278/22;45451/22;45940/22;50644/22;53611/22
WyrokETPCz2024-06-13ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0613JUD004216621
Analiza orzeczenia
Sekcja wygenerowana przez AI na podstawie treści orzeczenia — nie stanowi cytatu.
Zagadnienie prawne
Czy środki podjęte przeciwko organizatorom i uczestnikom zgromadzeń publicznych, w tym aresztowania i skazania za wykroczenia administracyjne, były proporcjonalne i zgodne z prawem do wolności zgromadzeń (art. 11 Konwencji), czy doszło do bezprawnego pozbawienia wolności (art. 5 ust. 1 Konwencji) oraz czy postępowania administracyjne były rzetelne, w szczególności w kontekście braku strony oskarżającej (art. 6 ust. 1 Konwencji)?Ratio decidendi
Trybunał zastosował swoje ugruntowane orzecznictwo dotyczące wolności zgromadzeń i proporcjonalności ingerencji w nią, stwierdzając, że środki podjęte przeciwko skarżącym nie były „niezbędne w społeczeństwie demokratycznym”. Odwołał się do wcześniejszych wyroków, w których stwierdzono naruszenia w podobnych sprawach. W odniesieniu do innych skarg, Trybunał oparł się na ugruntowanym orzecznictwie dotyczącym bezprawnego pozbawienia wolności oraz braku bezstronności sądu z powodu braku strony oskarżającej w postępowaniach o wykroczenia administracyjne. Trybunał nie znalazł żadnych faktów ani argumentów, które skłoniłyby go do odmiennego wniosku.Stan faktyczny
Skarżący byli organizatorami lub uczestnikami zgromadzeń publicznych w Rosji. W związku z tymi zgromadzeniami zostali poddani nieproporcjonalnym środkom, takim jak aresztowania i skazania za wykroczenia administracyjne. Niektórzy skarżący zgłosili również skargi dotyczące bezprawnego pozbawienia wolności oraz braku bezstronności w postępowaniach administracyjnych, które doprowadziły do ich skazania. Wszystkie te zdarzenia miały miejsce przed 16 września 2022 r.Rozstrzygnięcie
Trybunał jednogłośnie:
- Postanawia połączyć skargi.
- Uznaje, że ma jurysdykcję do rozpatrzenia tych skarg, ponieważ dotyczą one faktów, które miały miejsce przed 16 września 2022 r.
- Uznaje skargi na podstawie art. 11 Konwencji oraz inne skargi na podstawie ugruntowanego orzecznictwa Trybunału, zgodnie z załączoną tabelą, za dopuszczalne i stwierdza, że nie ma potrzeby odrębnego badania pozostałych skarg na podstawie art. 6 Konwencji.
- Stwierdza, że skargi te ujawniają naruszenie art. 11 Konwencji.
- Stwierdza, że doszło do naruszenia Konwencji w odniesieniu do innych skarg podniesionych na podstawie ugruntowanego orzecznictwa Trybunału (zob. załączona tabela).
- Orzeka, że państwo pozwane ma zapłacić skarżącym, w terminie trzech miesięcy, kwoty wskazane w załączonej tabeli, które zostaną przeliczone na walutę państwa pozwanego według kursu obowiązującego w dniu rozliczenia, wraz z odsetkami od upływu tego terminu.Pełny tekst orzeczenia
SECOND SECTION
CASE OF LOYKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 42166/21 and 30 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
13 June 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Loyko and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Lorraine Schembri Orland, President,
Frédéric Krenc,
Davor Derenčinović, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 23 May 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
THE LAW
JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
JURISDICTION
6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION
7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW
12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; and Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58‑85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO).
REMAINING COMPLAINTS
14. Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative‑offence proceedings. In view of the findings above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
Decides to join the applications;
Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;
Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention;
Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;
Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);
Holds
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 13 June 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina Lorraine Schembri Orland
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Name of the public event
Location
Date
Administrative / criminal offence
Penalty
Final domestic decision
Court Name
Date
Other complaints under
well-established case-law
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant
(in euros)[1]
42166/21
05/08/2021
Anna
Yevgenyevna LOYKO Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich
St Petersburg
Rally in front of a court to support 2 convicts
St Petersburg
22/06/2020
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
St Peterburg City Court
09/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.01 p.m. until 7.23 p.m. on 22/06/2020,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
957/22
07/12/2021
Yaroslav Konstantinovich KUKSIN Pershakova Yelena
Yuryevna
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of
RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
09/06/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
1731/22
16/12/2021
Yuliya
Pavlovna SAMOFEYEVA Mezak
Ernest Aleksandrovich
Saint-Barthélemy-d’Anjou
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Ukhta
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Komi Republic
16/06/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
1745/22
16/12/2021
Irina
Gennadyevna SHCHUKINA Mezak
Ernest Aleksandrovich
Saint-Barthélemy-d’Anjou
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Ukhta
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Komi Republic
16/06/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
5350/22
23/12/2021
Yelena
Leonidovna BOZHENOVA Mezak
Ernest Aleksandrovich
Saint-Barthélemy-d’Anjou
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Magadan
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
50 hours of community work
Magadan Regional Court
25/06/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
5356/22
23/12/2021
Larisa
Anatolyevna YELFIMOVA Mezak
Ernest Aleksandrovich
Saint-Barthélemy-d’Anjou
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Ukhta
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Komi Republic
30/06/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
11180/22
11/02/2022
Aleksey
Mikhaylovich SKOVORODNIKOV Mezak
Ernest Aleksandrovich
Saint-Barthélemy-d’Anjou
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Syktyvkar
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
Fine of
RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Komi Republic
22/09/2021
3,500
12057/22
08/02/2022
Konstantin Yevgenyevich MIRONOV Sharangiya
Sofya
Zurabovna
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
11/08/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
12092/22
16/02/2022
Vasilisa Aleksandrovna DESHEVYKH Polyakov
Daniil Alekseyevich
Voronezh
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Voronezh
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 15,000
Voronezh Regional Court
17/08/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
12097/22
16/02/2022
Semen Aleksandrovich KRASOVSKIY Polyakov
Daniil Alekseyevich
Voronezh
Rally "free Navalnyy"
Voronezh
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Voronezh Regional Court
17/08/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
12103/22
16/02/2022
Nikita
Igorevich
MINAKOV Polyakov
Daniil Alekseyevich
Voronezh
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Voronezh
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Voronezh Regional Court
20/08/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
12108/22
16/02/2022
Ivan
Mikhaylovich
BUNIN Polyakov
Daniil Alekseyevich
Voronezh
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Voronezh
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Voronezh Regional Court
24/08/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
14056/22
12/02/2022
Aleksandr
Olegovich
KOREPIN Mezak
Ernest Aleksandrovich
Saint-Barthélemy-d’Anjou
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Syktyvkar
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 5,000
Supreme Court of the Komi Republic
18/08/2021
3,500
14334/22
08/02/2022
Mikhail
Andreyevich TORGOVISHCHEV Sharangiya
Sofya
Zurabovna
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally "Free Navalny"
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
19/08/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.30 p.m. until 9.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021.
4,000
14352/22
10/02/2022
Vera
Adamovna
STROK Sharangiya
Sofya
Zurabovna
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
11/08/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station after compiling an offence report from 5.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
14552/22
08/02/2022
Oleg
Alekseyevich KHITRYUK Sharangiya
Sofya
Zurabovna
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of
RUB 5,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
11/08/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 12.15 p.m. until 9.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021.
4,000
22583/22
24/03/2022
Pavel
Ivanovich
FOMIN Polyakov
Daniil Sergeyevich
Voronezh
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Voronezh
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 5,000
Voronezh Regional Court
19/10/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.20 p.m. until 10.20 p.m. on 23/01/2021.
4,000
23107/22
24/03/2022
Sergey Aleksandrovich PERTSEV Polyakov
Daniil Alekseyevich
Voronezh
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Voronezh
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Voronezh Regional Court
17/11/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 7.30 p.m. on 21/04/2021 until 1.40 a.m. on 22/04/2021.
4,000
23134/22
21/03/2022
Lyubov
Davidovna MOLDAVSKAYA Usanova Olimpiada Valentinovna
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
23/09/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.30 p.m. until 11.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021.
4,000
31253/22
10/06/2022
Pavel
Ruslanovich KONYSHEV Polyakov
Daniil Alekseyevich
Voronezh
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Voronezh
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Voronezh Regional Court
16/12/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
36602/22
01/07/2022
Alisa
Vyacheslavovna ISAKOVA Kulikov
Sergey Sergeyevich
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally in memory of Nemtsov
Nizhniy Novgorod
27/02/2022
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
detention for 7 days
Nizhniy Novgorod City Court
04/03/2022
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 4.55 p.m. on 27/02/2022 until 5.00 a.m. on 28/02/2022.
4,000
40279/22
04/08/2022
Daniil
Dmitriyevich KORNILOV Podolskiy
Sergey Viktorovich
St Petersburg
Anti-war protest
St Petersburg
24/02/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
17/05/2022
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 9.15 p.m. on 24/02/2022 until 10.00 p.m. on 25/02/2022.
4,000
44866/22
25/08/2022
Darya
Sergeyevna STARTSEVA Kulikov
Sergey Sergeyevich
Nizhniy Novgorod
Anti-war protests
Nizhniy Novgorod
07/03/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
27/04/2022
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
45077/22
24/08/2022
Stanislav Nikolayevich YELIZARENKOV Lapuzin
Aleksey Sergeyevich
Samara
Anti-war protest
Samara
27/02/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Samara Regional Court
28/04/2022
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.40 p.m. on 27/02/2022. Released on the same day.
4,000
45133/22
27/08/2022
Diana
Romanovna YAVLENINA Tregubova
Yuliya Mikhaylovna
Balashikha
Anti-war protests
Moscow
25/02/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
27/04/2022
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 10.00 p.m. on 25/02/2022 for more than 3 hours.
4,000
45185/22
25/08/2022
Ilya
Vladislavovich ALEKSEYEV Kulikov
Sergey Sergeyevich
Nizhniy Novgorod
Anti-war protests
Nizhniy Novgorod
06/03/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod City Court
18/05/2022
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 6.05 p.m. on 06/03/2022 for 28 hours, until the court hearing held on 07/03/2022.
4,000
45278/22
31/08/2022
Anton
Dmitriyevich SHAPKO Kulikov
Sergey Sergeyevich
Nizhniy Novgorod
Anti-war protests
Nizhniy Novgorod
06/03/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod City Court
18/05/2022
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
45451/22
26/08/2022
Ilnur
Zufarovich GALIULLIN Sabirov
Rim
Faridovich
Kazan
Anti-war protests
Kazan
24/02/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
27/04/2022
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 7.15 p.m. on 24/02/2022 until 11.15 a.m. on 25/02/2022.
4,000
45940/22
01/09/2022
Andrey Gennadyevich BUKAMIN Kulikov
Sergey Sergeyevich
Nizhniy Novgorod
Anti-war protests
Nizhniy Novgorod
06/03/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
18/05/2022
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.00 p.m. on 06/03/2022 until 4.30 p.m. on 07/03/2022.
4,000
50644/22
07/10/2022
Kseniya
Valeryevna
BELOVA Sozonov
Ruslan Vladimirovich
Nizhniy Novgorod
Anti-war protests
Yekaterinburg
24/02/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 20,000
Sverdlovsk Regional Court
22/06/2022
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
53611/22
08/11/2022
Yelena Aleksandrovna NESTEROVA Pershakova Yelena
Yuryevna
Moscow
Anti-war protests
Moscow
06/03/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
11/07/2022
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.12 p.m. until 8.16 p.m. on 06/03/2022.
4,000
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
© Rada Europy / Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka, źródło: HUDOC (hudoc.echr.coe.int), pozyskano 29.07.2026. · Źródło