44147/21;44501/21;44514/21;44580/21;44794/21;44807/21;44883/21;44892/21;44906/21;44910/21;44979/21;44988/21;45020/21;45024/21;45194/21;45200/21;46399/21;46690/21;47031/21;47139/21;47152/21;26850/22;29705/22;37042/22;40717/22;40941/22;41278/22;44809/22

FOURTH SECTION CASE OF POGORELOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 44147/21 and 27 others – see appended list)             JUDGMENT   STRASBOURG 28 March 2024   This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Pogorelova and Others v. Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:  Branko Lubarda, President,  Armen Harutyunyan,  Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 7 March 2024, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.  The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2.  The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS 3.  The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.  The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.  Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. JURISDICTION 6.  The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023). ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION 7.  The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention. 8.  The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009). 9.  In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 10.  Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”. 11.  These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW 12.  Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. 13.  Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); and Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention. REMAINING COMPLAINTS 14.  Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative‑offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs 11 and 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 15.  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022; Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention; Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention; Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table); Holds (a)  that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)  that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. Done in English, and notified in writing on 28 March 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.  Viktoriya Maradudina Branko Lubarda  Acting Deputy Registrar President     APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative / criminal offence Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros)[1]     44147/21 30/08/2021 Yuliya Aleksandrovna POGORELOVA Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Tambov   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 6 days Tambov Regional Court 01/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling administrative offence record and detention at the police station between 1:20 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 4:40 p.m. on 01/02/2021 - detained for more than three hours after the offence record was drawn up, without any justification;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000     44501/21 11/08/2021 Andrey Aleksandrovich RUMYANTSEV Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 12 days Moscow City Court 11/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to the police station on 02/02/2021 for compiling administrative offence record and detention at the police station between 11:20 p.m. on 02/02/2021 and 7:00 p.m. on 03/03/2021 - detained for more than three hours after the offence record was drawn up, without any justification,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000     44514/21 17/08/2021 Aleksandr Alekseyevich PUSHIN Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 7 days Moscow City Court 05/02/2021 (received by the applicant on 02/06/2021) Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty -escorting to the police station on 02/02/2021 for compiling administrative offence record and detention at the police station between 10:30 p.m. on 02/02/2021 and 4:30 p.m. on 03/02/2021 - detained for more than three hours after the offence record was drawn up, without any justification    Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings    Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000     44580/21 27/08/2021 Alisher Khakimbekovich BEKNAZAROV Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 06/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty -escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling administrative offence record and detention at the police station between 3:30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 12:35 p.m. on 02/02/2021 - detained for more than three hours after the offence record was drawn up, without any justification,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000     44794/21 27/08/2021 Lev Borisovich NIKOLSKIY Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 24/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 11.30 p.m. on 02/02/2021 and 9:50 a.m. om 03/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings       4,000     44807/21 27/08/2021 Veniamin Sergeyevich ORLYANSKIY Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 5 days Moscow City Court 30/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 11.30 p.m. on 02/02/2021 and 9:15 a.m. on 03/02/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO 5,000     44883/21 25/07/2021 Pavel Grigoryevich YAKUSHIN Aksenova Darya Dmitriyevna Kolomna Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 6 days Moscow City Court 06/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 2:00 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and the morning of 01/02/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 5,000     44892/21 12/08/2021 Kirill Vladimirovich ALESHIN Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 12 days Moscow City Court 19/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 1:15 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 2:30 p.m. on 02/02/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,    Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.       5,000     44906/21 12/08/2021 Darya Andreyevna ZIMINA Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 15 days Moscow City Court 12/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to the police station on 02/02/2021 for compiling administrative offence record and detention at the police station between 11:05 p.m. on 02/02/2021 and 7:00 p.m. on 03/02/2021 - detained for more than three hours after the offence record was drawn up, without any justification,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO 5,000   44910/21 12/08/2021 Nikita Sergeyevich KARPENKO Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 10 days Moscow City Court 12/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 11.00 p.m. on 02/02/2021 and 5:00 p.m. on 03/02/2021,    Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO 5,000   44979/21 30/08/2021 Dmitriy Gennadyevich NAUMOV Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 10 days Moscow City Court 06/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 11.00 p.m. on 02/02/2021 and 9:00 a.m. on 03/02/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO 5,000   44988/21 11/08/2021 Yegor Aleksandrovich IVANOV Nurgaleyev Danil Ilnurovich Kazan Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Kazan   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 28/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling administrative offence record,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings     4,000   45020/21 11/08/2021 Aleksey Leonidovich BRAYNIN Nurgaleyev Danil Ilnurovich Kazan Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Kazan   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 14/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling administrative offence record; and detention at the police station between 3:45 p.m. on 23/01/2021 and 2:00 p.m. on 24/01/2021 - detained for more than three hours after the offence record was drawn up, without any justification. 5,000   45024/21 11/08/2021 Tatyana Yuryevna SOKOLOVSKAYA Nurgaleyev Danil Ilnurovich Kazan Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Kazan   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 14/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty -escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling administrative offence record and detention at the police station between 3:45 p.m. and 9:21 p.m. on 23/01/2021 - detained for more than three hours after the offence record was drawn up, without any justification 4,000   45194/21 27/08/2021 Ivan Alekseyevich LAGASHIN Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   02/03/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 5 days Moscow City Court 02/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 0:26 and 9:25 a.m. on 03/02/2021,    Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO 5,000   45200/21 27/08/2021 Alena Aleksandrovna PAVLOVA Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 10 days Moscow City Court 24/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 11:47 p.m. on 02/02/2021 and noon on 03/02/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,    Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO 5,000   46399/21 07/08/2021 Kirilla Igorevna LABINTATLO Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   02/02/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 5 days Moscow City Court 06/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to the police station on 02/02/2021 for compiling administrative offence record and detention at the police station between 11:30 p.m. on 02/02/2021 and 7:00 p.m. on 03/02/2021 - detained for more than three hours after the offence record was drawn up, without any justification,    Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,    Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO         5,000   46690/21 07/08/2021 Dmitriy Borisovich RUMSHINSKIY Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 8 days Moscow City Court 26/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty -escorting to the and detention at the police station between 2:48 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 12:45 p.m. on 01/02/2021,    Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000   47031/21 07/09/2021 Lyudmila Ruslanovna PCHELKINA Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   St Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 16/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling administrative offence record and detention at the police station between 1:50 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 7:50 p.m. on 01/02/2021 - detained for more than three hours after the offence record was drawn up, without any justification,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   47139/21 02/09/2021 Aleksey Andreyevich GUNYASHOV Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   St. Petersburg   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 7 days St Petersburg City Court 02/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling administrative offence record and detention at the police station between 1:50 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 3:10 p.m. on 01/02/2021 - detained for more than three hours after the offence record was drawn up, without any justification,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000   47152/21 07/09/2021 Viktor Vasilyevich TIM Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Tula   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 14,000 Tula Regional Court 29/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling administrative offence record and detention at the police station between 12:20 p.m. and 5:20 p.m. on 31/01/2021 - detained for more than three hours after the offence record was drawn up, without any justification,    Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings     4,000   26850/22 05/05/2022 Sabina Umirgaliyevna ZHOLTAYEVA Kabirov Rushan Rafisovich Kazan Anti-war rally   Kazan   27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 8 of CAO detention for 3 days Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 02/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 5:31 p.m. on 27/02/2022 and 28/02/2022, when the applicant was taken to court for a hearing of her case,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,    Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000   29705/22 12/05/2022 Zhanna Andreyevna OSIPOVA Ibragimov Rushan Zubairovich Astrakhan Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Moscow   21/04/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 13/12/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings                 3,500   37042/22 15/07/2022 Aleksandr Vasilyevich MILEV Mangileva Vera Borisovna Yekaterinburg Anti-war rally   Yekaterinburg   24/02/2022 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO detention for 9 days Sverdlovsk Regional Court 02/03/2022 (received by the applicant on 21/03/2021) Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 2:30 p.m. on 24/02/2022 and the evening of 25/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,    Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000   40717/22 12/08/2022 Andrey Leonidovich GRINGAUZ Kuroptev Aleksey Mikhaylovich Balashikha Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO detention for 9 days St Petersburg City Court 14/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 8:00 p.m. on 27/02/2022 and 5:20 p.m. on 28/02/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,    Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 4,000   40941/22 08/08/2022 Timur Olegovich ZAVGORODNIY Dadayeva Yekaterina Viktorovna St Petersburg Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   02/04/2022 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO detention for 7 days St Petersburg City Court 08/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 3:45 p.m. on 02/04/2022 and 12:30 p.m. on 03/04/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 5,000   41278/22 11/08/2022 Pavel Viktorovich KHOLKIN Kapustin Vladimir Yakovlevich Yekaterinburg Anti-war rally   Yekaterinburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 12,000 Sverdlovsk Regional Court 01/06/2022     3,500   44809/22 12/09/2022 Sofya Olegovna LEN Mezak Ernest Aleksandrovich Saint-Barthélemy-d’Anjou Anti-war rally   St Petersburg   02/03/2022 article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 24/05/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence record between 7:40 p.m. on 02/03/2022 and evening of 03/03/2022,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings     4,000     [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.