4563/07;19923/08;29853/08;35836/08;37062/08;37064/08;37069/08;37072/08;37568/08;37717/08;38120/08;38832/08;39479/08;39532/08;39601/08;40675/08;40676/08;40678/08;41157/08;41158/08;41161/08;41163/08;41794/08;41804/08;41806/08;41807/08;41810/08;41820/08;41822/08;41824/08;41825/08;41828/08;41911/08;41975/08;41981/08;42005/08;42006/08;44357/08;44361/08;44617/08;45200/08;45204/08;45207/08;45243/08;45246/08;45253/08;45258/08;45261/08;45265/08;45833/08;45834/08;46047/08;46210/08;46211/08;46215/08;46218/08;46965/08;46968/08;47762/08;47768/08;47774/08;47776/08;47779/08;47783/08;47878/08;48025/08;48045/08;48049/08;48054/08;48056/08;48587/08;48606/08;48854/08;48861/08;48877/08;48942/08;48956/08;49322/08;49325/08;49411/08;49415/08;49563/08;51002/08;52521/08;52557/08;52563/08;52566/08;53574/08;53579/08;53583/08;53587/08;53589/08;53593/08;53595/08;53600/08;53603/08;53605/08;53607/08;53611/08;53614/08;53617/08;53620/08;53623/08;53629/08;53632/08;54367/08;54379/08;54384/08;54392/08;54396/08;54398/08;54

FIRST SECTION   CASE OF RYABOV and 151 other “Privileged pensioners” cases v. RUSSIA   (Applications nos. 4563/07, 19923/08, 29853/08, 35836/08, 37062/08, 37064/08, 37069/08, 37072/08, 37568/08, 37717/08, 38120/08, 38832/08, 39479/08, 39532/08, 39601/08, 40675/08, 40676/08, 40678/08, 41157/08, 41158/08, 41161/08, 41163/08, 41794/08, 41804/08, 41806/08, 41807/08, 41810/08, 41820/08, 41822/08, 41824/08, 41825/08, 41828/08, 41911/08, 41975/08, 41981/08, 42005/08, 42006/08, 44357/08, 44361/08, 44617/08, 45200/08, 45204/08, 45207/08, 45243/08, 45246/08, 45253/08, 45258/08, 45261/08, 45265/08, 45833/08, 45834/08, 46047/08, 46210/08, 46211/08, 46215/08, 46218/08, 46965/08, 46968/08, 47762/08, 47768/08, 47774/08, 47776/08, 47779/08, 47783/08, 47878/08, 48025/08, 48045/08, 48049/08, 48054/08, 48056/08, 48587/08, 48606/08, 48854/08, 48861/08, 48877/08, 48942/08, 48956/08, 49322/08, 49325/08, 49411/08, 49415/08, 49563/08, 51002/08, 52521/08, 52557/08, 52563/08, 52566/08, 53574/08, 53579/08, 53583/08, 53587/08, 53589/08, 53593/08, 53595/08, 53600/08, 53603/08, 53605/08, 53607/08, 53611/08, 53614/08, 53617/08, 53620/08, 53623/08, 53629/08, 53632/08, 54367/08, 54379/08, 54384/08, 54392/08, 54396/08, 54398/08, 54399/08, 54400/08, 54431/08, 54456/08, 54470/08, 54473/08, 54507/08, 54513/08, 54526/08, 54530/08, 54590/08, 54593/08, 54596/08, 54602/08, 54605/08, 54608/08, 56037/08, 56774/08, 56778/08, 56781/08, 56784/08, 56786/08, 56789/08, 56801/08, 56806/08, 56813/08, 56816/08, 56827/08, 56832/08, 56837/08, 58306/08, 58344/08, 59027/08, 59599/08, 59626/08, 59628/08, 59698/08, 59699/08, 59703/08, 60036/08, and 4507/09)   JUDGMENT   STRASBOURG 17 December 2009   FINAL   17/03/2010   This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Ryabov and 151 other “Privileged pensioners” cases v. Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:  Christos Rozakis, President,  Nina Vajić,  Anatoly Kovler,  Elisabeth Steiner,  Dean Spielmann,  Giorgio Malinverni,  George Nicolaou, judges, and Søren Nielsen, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 26 November 2009, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.  The case originated in 152 applications (nos. 4563/07, 19923/08, 29853/08, 35836/08, 37062/08, 37064/08, 37069/08, 37072/08, 37568/08, 37717/08, 38120/08, 38832/08, 39479/08, 39532/08, 39601/08, 40675/08, 40676/08, 40678/08, 41157/08, 41158/08, 41161/08, 41163/08, 41794/08, 41804/08, 41806/08, 41807/08, 41810/08, 41820/08, 41822/08, 41824/08, 41825/08, 41828/08, 41911/08, 41975/08, 41981/08, 42005/08, 42006/08, 44357/08, 44361/08, 44617/08, 45200/08, 45204/08, 45207/08, 45243/08, 45246/08, 45253/08, 45258/08, 45261/08, 45265/08, 45833/08, 45834/08, 46047/08, 46210/08, 46211/08, 46215/08, 46218/08, 46965/08, 46968/08, 47762/08, 47768/08, 47774/08, 47776/08, 47779/08, 47783/08, 47878/08, 48025/08, 48045/08, 48049/08, 48054/08, 48056/08, 48587/08, 48606/08, 48854/08, 48861/08, 48877/08, 48942/08, 48956/08, 49322/08, 49325/08, 49411/08, 49415/08, 49563/08, 51002/08, 52521/08, 52557/08, 52563/08, 52566/08, 53574/08, 53579/08, 53583/08, 53587/08, 53589/08, 53593/08, 53595/08, 53600/08, 53603/08, 53605/08, 53607/08, 53611/08, 53614/08, 53617/08, 53620/08, 53623/08, 53629/08, 53632/08, 54367/08, 54379/08, 54384/08, 54392/08, 54396/08, 54398/08, 54399/08, 54400/08, 54431/08, 54456/08, 54470/08, 54473/08, 54507/08, 54513/08, 54526/08, 54530/08, 54590/08, 54593/08, 54596/08, 54602/08, 54605/08, 54608/08, 56037/08, 56774/08, 56778/08, 56781/08, 56784/08, 56786/08, 56789/08, 56801/08, 56806/08, 56813/08, 56816/08, 56827/08, 56832/08, 56837/08, 58306/08, 58344/08, 59027/08, 59599/08, 59626/08, 59628/08, 59698/08, 59699/08, 59703/08, 60036/08, and 4507/09) against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by 156 Russian citizens whose names and dates of birth are tabulated in the Annex (“the applicants”). The applications' dates of introduction are also tabulated in the Annex. 2.  The applicants were represented, respectively, by Mr M. Antonov, Mr I. Fedotov, Mr V. Glukhov, Ms O. Gurova, Mr G. Migay, Mr. Y. Pakin, and Ms L. Yerokhina, consultants from the Moscow Region. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr G. Matyushkin, Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights. 3.  On 12 February 2009 the President of the First Section decided to give notice of the applications to the Government. It was also decided to examine the merits of the applications at the same time as their admissibility (Article 29 § 3). The Government objected to the joint examination of the admissibility and merits, but the Court rejected this objection. THE FACTS[1] 4.  The applicants are pensioners who live in the Moscow Region. Before retirement they used to work in hazardous industries. They had a dispute with a pension authority about the scope of their privileged pensions and appealed to the Region's district and town courts. 5.  In September 2003–November 2006 the courts held for the applicants and ordered the pension authority to recalculate the pensions. The courts based their findings on the Law on Labour Pensions. These judgments became binding and were executed. 6.  On the pension authority's request, in October 2007–June 2008 the district and town courts quashed their judgments due to discovery of new circumstances. The courts found, in particular, that the judgments had ignored the interpretation of the Law on Labour Pensions given by the Supreme Court in December 2005 and March 2007. 7.  The applicants' cases were remitted for a rehearing and eventually dismissed. THE LAW I.  JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 8.  As the applications are similar in terms of both fact and law, the Court decides to join them. II.  ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION AND OF ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No. 1 9.  The applicants complained under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that the quashing of the binding judgments was unjustified. Insofar as relevant, these Articles read as follows: Article 6 § 1 “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ..., everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by [a] ... tribunal...” Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 “Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions. No one shall be deprived of his possessions except in the public interest and subject to the conditions provided for by law and by the general principles of international law. The preceding provisions shall not, however, in any way impair the right of a State to enforce such laws as it deems necessary to control the use of property in accordance with the general interest or to secure the payment of taxes or other contributions or penalties.” A.  Admissibility 10.  The Government argued that the applications were inadmissible. The Supreme Court's interpretations of the Law on Labour Pensions revealed fundamental errors in the district and town courts' reasoning, and hence those judgments had had to be quashed. The quashing had been legitimate, lawful, and compliant with the principle of legal certainty. The quashing was meant to ensure a uniform and coherent functioning of the State pension scheme and to protect the public purse from undue depletion. 11.  The applicants argued that their applications were admissible. The quashing had been unjustified because the district and town courts did take into account the interpretation of 2005, and because the interpretation of 2007 had been given after the judgments. In any event, a legislative interpretation of laws might come only from a lawmaker, not from a court. Besides, the pension authority had missed the statutory time-limit for the quashing, and the courts had extended that limit without good reason. 12.  The Court notes that the applications are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention. It further notes that they are not inadmissible on any other grounds. They must therefore be declared admissible. B.  Merits 13.  The Court reiterates that for the sake of legal certainty implicitly required by Article 6, final judgments should generally be left intact. They may be disturbed only to correct fundamental defects (see Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, §§ 51–52, ECHR 2003‑IX). Quashing of judgments because of newly-discovered circumstances is not by itself incompatible with this requirement, but the manner of its application may be (see Pravednaya v. Russia, no. 69529/01, §§ 27–34, 18 November 2004). 14.  In the case at hand, the domestic courts justified the quashing with the Supreme Court's two interpretations of the Law on Labour Pensions. As to the interpretation of 2005, the Court considers that differing judicial interpretations of a law represent a ground for an ordinary appeal, rather than a discovery warranting a quashing of a binding judgment (see Yerogova v. Russia, no. 77478/01, § 34, 19 June 2008). As to the interpretation of 2007, the Court reiterates that newly-discovered circumstances are circumstances that exist during the trial, remain hidden from the court, and become known after trial. Since the interpretation of 2007 was posterior to the Town Court's judgments, it did not justify the quashing either (see Yerogova, cited above, § 33). 15.  It follows that the quashing of the applicants' judgments was unjustified, and that there has, accordingly, been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1. III.  APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 16.  Article 41 of the Convention provides: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.” A.  Damage, costs, and expenses 17.  In respect of pecuniary damage, the applicants claimed sums ranging from 0 euros (EUR) to EUR 11,344. According to the applicants, these sums represented the difference between the pensions they had been receiving after the quashing and the pensions they would have received if there had been no quashing. The Government argued that this claim was excessive and unreasonable. 18.  The Court rejects this claim in view of its speculative character (see Tarnopolskaya and Others v. Russia, nos. 11093/07, 14558/07, 19660/07, 30166/07, 46736/07, 52681/07, 52985/07, 10633/08, 10652/08, 12694/08, 15437/08, 16691/08, 19447/07, 19457/08, 20857/08, 20872/08, 22546/08, 25820/08, 25839/08, and 25845/08, § 51, 9 July 2009). 19.  In respect of non-pecuniary damage, the applicants claimed sums ranging from EUR 2,000 to EUR 10,000. The Government contested this claim as ill-founded. 20.  In respect of costs and expenses incurred before the Court, the applicants claimed sums ranging from EUR 0 to EUR 1,640. The Government noted that any possible award should cover only proven expenses. 21.  The Court reiterates that it is an international judicial authority contingent on the consent of the States signatory to the Convention, and that its principal task is to secure the respect for human rights, rather than compensate applicants' losses minutely and exhaustively. Unlike in national jurisdictions, the emphasis of the Court's activity is on passing public judgments that set human-rights standards across Europe. 22.  For this reason, in cases involving many similarly situated victims a unified approach may be called for. This approach will ensure that the applicants remain aggregated and that no disparity in the level of the awards will have a divisive effect on the applicants. 23.  In view of the above, making its assessment on equitable and reasonable bases, the Court awards each applicant EUR 2,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage, and costs and expenses. B.  Default interest 24.  The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY 1.  Decides to join the applications;   2.  Declares the applications admissible;   3.  Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1;   4.  Holds (a)  that the respondent State is to pay each applicant, within three months from the date on which the judgment becomes final in accordance with Article 44 § 2 of the Convention, EUR 2,000 (two thousand euros), plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants, in respect of non-pecuniary damage, and costs and expenses, to be converted into Russian roubles at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)  that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points;   5.  Dismisses the remainder of the applicants' claims for just satisfaction. Done in English, and notified in writing on 17 December 2009, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.  Søren Nielsen Christos Rozakis  Registrar Presiden  ANNEX   Application no. Introduced on Applicant Born in Court Judgment of Quashed on 4563/07 26/12/06 Ryabov Vladimir Pavlovich Elektrostal Town Court 01/06/06 22/11/07 19923/08 22/03/08 Zavedeyev Vladimir Nikolayevich Elektrostal Town Court 25/05/06 09/10/07 29853/08 25/05/08 Kochkolda Svetlana Pavlovna Korolyov Town Court 13/04/05 26/11/07 35836/08 24/06/08 Fedosova Olga Mikhaylovna Elektrostal Town Court 21/09/06 17/01/08 37062/08 17/06/08 Titova Tamara Nikolayevna Elektrostal Town Court 11/09/06 24/01/08 37064/08 17/06/08 Motorina Mariya Mikhaylovna Elektrostal Town Court 16/08/06 14/02/08 37069/08 19/06/08 Andronova Tamara Mikhaylovna Elektrostal Town Court 23/10/06 04/03/08 37072/08 25/06/08 Vasyunina Lyudmila Leontyevna Elektrostal Town Court 08/09/06 22/02/08 37568/08 01/07/08 Titov Yevgeniy Nikolayevich Elektrostal Town Court 11/09/06 24/01/08 37717/08 02/07/08 Knyazev Yuriy Anatolyevich Elektrostal Town Court 05/10/06 05/03/08 38120/08 16/07/08 Yevseyeva Nina Vasilyevna Elektrostal Town Court 18/09/06 25/03/08 38832/08 16/07/08 Usova Valentina Mikhaylovna Elektrostal Town Court 18/09/06 25/03/08 39479/08 19/07/08 Lazarenko Tatyana Mikhaylovna Elektrostal Town Court 15/09/06 31/03/08 39532/08 02/08/08 Khrisova Antonina Dmitriyevna Elektrostal Town Court 20/11/06 14/03/08 39601/08 02/08/08 Baranova Lyudmila Ivanovna Elektrostal Town Court 26/09/06 11/03/08 40675/08 18/07/08 Bovtalo Nikolay Ivanovich Elektrostal Town Court 20/10/06 23/01/08 40676/08 19/07/08 Shmakov Vladimir Dmitriyevich Elektrostal Town Court 06/10/06 22/02/08 40678/08 19/07/08 Shmakova Tatyana Aleksandrovna Elektrostal Town Court 06/10/06 22/02/08 41157/08 23/07/08 Shcherbakov Sergey Germanovich Elektrostal Town Court 21/09/06 12/02/08 41158/08 02/08/08 Bezikon Alla Vladimirovna Elektrostal Town Court 20/11/06 14/03/08 41161/08 28/07/08 Gorenshteyn Valentina Alekseyevna Elektrostal Town Court 23/10/06 04/04/08 41163/08 29/07/08 Yevseyeva Emiliya Fyodorovna Shchyolkovo Town Court 31/07/06 04/03/08 41794/08 04/07/08 Musorina Galina Ilyinichna Shchyolkovo Town Court 20/11/06 17/01/08 41804/08 27/06/08 Tishchenko Mikhail Kirillovich Shchyolkovo Town Court 13/10/06 12/02/08 41806/08 23/04/08 Sergeyenko Yuriy Mikhaylovich Elektrostal Town Court 25/05/06 27/11/07 41807/08 04/07/08 Levkina Lyubov Sergeyevna Shchyolkovo Town Court 21/11/06 14/01/08 41810/08 04/07/08 Rusin Vasiliy Pavlovich Elektrostal Town Court 19/09/06 07/02/08 41820/08 08/07/08 Popova Galina Ivanovna Noginsk Town Court 18/09/03 14/01/08 41822/08 09/07/08 Odina Olga Ivanovna Elektrostal Town Court 21/09/06 11/02/08 41824/08 09/07/08 Tikhomirov Viktor Feoktistovich Elektrostal Town Court 16/10/06 15/01/08 41825/08 09/07/08 Bulatova Galina Vasilyevna Elektrostal Town Court 21/09/06 24/03/08     Butskikh Amalia Efimovna Elektrostal Town Court 21/09/06 24/03/08     Chuvatkin Vladimir Yakovlevich Elektrostal Town Court 21/09/06 24/03/08 41828/08 09/07/08 Borisova Zinaida Nilovna Elektrostal Town Court 16/08/06 15/01/08 41911/08 09/08/08 Kharitonova Tatyana Valentinovna Elektrostal Town Court 12/10/06 26/03/08 41975/08 28/06/08 Ionova Svetlana Dmitriyevna Elektrostal Town Court 27/10/06 28/02/08 Application no. Introduced on Applicant Born in Court Judgment of Quashed on 41981/08 05/07/08 Smirnov Yuriy Aleksandrovich Elektrostal Town Court 23/10/06 18/03/08 42005/08 26/07/08 Sukonkina Galina Aleksandrovna Elektrostal Town Court 21/09/06 14/01/08 42006/08 26/07/08 Sukonkin German Alekseyevich Elektrostal Town Court 21/09/06 04/03/08 44357/08 28/08/08 Gunina Natalya Prokofyevna Elektrostal Town Court 03/10/06 13/03/08 44361/08 09/08/08 Anokhina Lyubov Ivanovna Shchyolkovo Town Court 22/09/06 04/03/08 44617/08 08/07/08 Arkhipova Aleksandra Anatolyevna Elektrostal Town Court 21/08/06 21/03/08 45200/08 22/08/08 Pichugina Yekaterina Pavlovna Elektrostal Town Court 28/06/06 31/03/08 45204/08 21/08/08 Parshenkova Olga Viktorovna Elektrostal Town Court 18/09/06 25/03/08     Kuzmina Yevdokiya Pavlovna Elektrostal Town Court 18/09/06 25/03/08 45207/08 22/08/08 Zelova Praskovya Sergeyevna Elektrostal Town Court 09/10/06 27/02/08 45243/08 22/08/08 Semencheva Nadezhda Anatolyevna Elektrostal Town Court 05/10/06 10/04/08 45246/08 21/08/08 Chaykova Galina Grigoriyevna Elektrostal Town Court 15/09/06 26/03/08 45253/08 05/08/08 Bugreyeva Yelena Stepanovna Elektrostal Town Court 07/11/06 27/03/08 45258/08 15/08/08 Mikhaylova Tamara Ivanovna Elektrostal Town Court 03/10/06 13/03/08 45261/08 15/08/08 Inkina Tamara Aleksandrovna Elektrostal Town Court 11/10/06 31/03/08 45265/08 16/08/08 Rakova Natalya Sergeyevna Elektrostal Town Court 28/09/06 19/02/08 45833/08 01/08/08 Myachin Sergey Fyodorovich Elektrostal Town Court 04/10/06 28/03/08 45834/08 17/07/08 Khokhlova Valentina Mikhaylovna Elektrostal Town Court 16/11/06 26/03/08 46047/08 19/08/08 Starchukova Zinaida Ivanovna Shchyolkovo Town Court 13/11/06 11/03/08 46210/08 30/08/08 Fakhrtdinov Aleksandr Gayasovich Voskresensk Town Court 14/04/05 09/04/08 46211/08 03/09/08 Roslyakova Svetlana Aleksandrovna Voskresensk Town Court 20/06/05 06/03/08 46215/08 30/08/08 Romanov Yevgeniy Petrovich Elektrostal Town Court 03/10/06 13/03/08 46218/08 30/08/08 Roslyakova Yelena Aleksandrovna Voskresensk Town Court 04/04/06 11/04/08 46965/08 14/08/08 Antonov Mikhail Alekseevich Elektrostal Town Court 21/11/06 25/03/08 46968/08 02/09/08 Savinova Valentina Maksimovna Elektrostal Town Court 27/10/06 25/03/08 47762/08 16/09/08 Dubanova Tatyana Sergeyevna Elektrostal Town Court 23/10/06 26/03/08 47768/08 22/09/08 Pershin Viktor Ivanovich Elektrostal Town Court 09/11/06 19/02/08 47774/08 05/09/08 Tyuvayev Nikolay Vasilyevich Elektrostal Town Court 23/10/06 26/03/08 47776/08 05/09/08 Fedotova Galina Aleksandrovna Voskresensk Town Court 25/04/05 20/02/08 47779/08 13/09/08 Poloskov Viktor Leonidovich Elektrostal Town Court 30/10/06 31/03/08 47783/08 06/09/08 Romanova Nadezhda Viktorovna Voskresensk Town Court 19/05/05 12/03/08 47878/08 14/08/08 Zenina Valentina Nikityevna Elektrostal Town Court 17/10/06 27/03/08 48025/08 25/08/08 Pavlova Tatyana Anatolyevna Elektrostal Town Court 21/09/06 21/03/08 48045/08 22/08/08 Krayushkina Lyubov Aleksandrovna Elektrostal Town Court 27/10/06 28/02/08 48049/08 22/08/08 Perevitskaya Marina Vladislavovna Elektrostal Town Court 27/10/06 28/02/08 48054/08 23/08/08 Gusarova Maria Efimovna Elektrostal Town Court 14/08/06 03/03/08 48056/08 22/08/08 Krasilnikova Rimma Nikolayevna Elektrostal Town Court 27/09/06 20/03/08 48587/08 16/09/08 Shamova Galina Vasilyevna Elektrostal Town Court 23/10/06 02/04/08 48606/08 16/09/08 Denis Valentina Fedorovna Elektrostal Town Court 09/11/06 02/04/08 48854/08 07/09/08 Samsonov Valentin Nikolayevich Elektrostal Town Court 20/11/06 20/03/08 48861/08 07/09/08 Ogurtsova Antonina Ivanovna Elektrostal Town Court 23/10/06 27/03/08 Application no. Introduced on Applicant Born in Court Judgment of Quashed on 48877/08 20/09/08 Kazina Tatyana Konstantinovna Elektrostal Town Court 21/08/06 21/03/08 48942/08 12/09/08 Bryunina Tatyana Germanovna Elektrostal Town Court 13/10/06 13/03/08 48956/08 16/09/08 Sapunov Vladimir Ignatyevich Elektrostal Town Court 20/11/06 28/03/08 49322/08 19/09/08 Saprykin Igor Nikolayevich Elektrostal Town Court 30/10/06 27/03/08 49325/08 19/09/08 Ivanova Nina Nikolayevna Elektrostal Town Court 30/10/06 20/03/08 49411/08 22/09/08 Galochkina Irina Lvovna Elektrostal Town Court 15/09/06 26/03/08 49415/08 22/09/08 Goncharenko Viktor Grigoryevich Elektrostal Town Court 15/09/06 26/03/08 49563/08 16/09/08 Trimasova Nina Vasilyevna Elektrostal Town Court 21/09/06 25/03/08 51002/08 02/10/08 Kolosovskaya Lyudmila Vasilyeva Elektrostal Town Court 25/10/06 07/06/08 52521/08 22/09/08 Lukina Galina Pavlovna Elektrostal Town Court 15/09/06 26/03/08 52557/08 30/08/08 Feofanov Anatoliy Leonidovich Voskresensk Town Court 26/04/05 17/03/08 52563/08 27/08/08 Mosina Natalya Nikolayevna Elektrostal Town Court 23/10/06 26/03/08 52566/08 21/08/08 Kovyrshina Larisa Vasilyevna Elektrostal Town Court 14/09/06 26/03/08 53574/08 14/08/08 Igonin Oleg Vasilyevich Elektrostal Town Court 30/10/06 26/03/08 53579/08 03/09/08 Larkova Raisa Zakharovna Voskresensk Town Court 04/07/05 06/03/08 53583/08 08/09/09 Mitichev Yevgeniy Vasilyevich Voskresensk Town Court 21/03/06 12/03/08 53587/08 21/08/08 Petrova Lyudmila Vasilyevna Elektrostal Town Court 21/09/06 21/03/08 53589/08 22/08/08 Yefimova Zoya Fedorovna Elektrostal Town Court 04/10/06 26/03/08 53593/08 23/07/08 Zavyalova Kseniya Petrovna Elektrostal Town Court 25/09/06 24/01/08 53595/08 26/07/08 Solomatin Mikhail Pavlovich Elektrostal Town Court 20/11/06 17/03/08 53600/08 09/07/08 Volchukova Mariya Ivanovna Elektrostal Town Court 31/07/06 24/01/08 53603/08 18/09/08 Tulyakova Olga Viktorovna Elektrostal Town Court 18/10/06 26/03/08 53605/08 05/09/08 Rukityanskaya Nina Mikhaylovna Elektrostal Town Court 27/10/06 27/03/08 53607/08 05/09/08 Rukityanskiy Vladimir Dmitriyevich Elektrostal Town Court 27/10/06 02/04/08 53611/08 20/08/08 Kukuy Irina Stepanovna Elektrostal Town Court 09/11/06 02/04/08 53614/08 19/08/08 Starkova Mariya Vasilyevna Elektrostal Town Court 12/10/06 21/02/08 53617/08 13/08/08 Bogatov Akim Fedorovich Elektrostal Town Court 12/10/06 27/03/08 53620/08 20/06/08 Alferova Nadezhda Mikhaylovna Elektrostal Town Court 13/09/06 11/02/08 53623/08 02/09/08 Nazina Yuliya Pavlovna Elektrostal Town Court 09/11/06 25/03/08 53629/08 13/08/08 Bondar Anatoliy Ivanovich Elektrostal Town Court 10/11/06 13/03/08 53632/08 24/09/08 Romanova Galina Dmitriyevna Elektrostal Town Court 27/10/06 25/03/08 54367/08 09/08/08 Khusyainova Rauza Safovna Shchyolkovo Town Court 21/08/06 04/03/08 54379/08 11/08/08 Dent Yuriy Semenovich Shchyolkovo Town Court 17/11/06 15/02/08 54384/08 22/07/08 Mokrinskaya Marina Nikolayevna Elektrostal Town Court 20/10/06 23/01/08 54392/08 18/08/08 Kuznetsova Aleksandra Petrovna unknown Elektrostal Town Court 06/10/06 22/02/08 54396/08 54396/08 Panfilova Olga Georgiyevna Voskresensk Town Court 12/07/05 28/02/08 54398/08 04/07/08 Subbotina Tatyana Vasilyevna Shchyolkovo Town Court 13/11/06 09/01/08 54399/08 03/07/08 Andrianova Antonina Aleksandrovna Elektrostal Town Court 17/10/06 27/03/08 54400/08 03/07/08 Kvasova Olga Yuryevna Elektrostal Town Court 09/11/06 19/02/08 54431/08 19/09/08 Musinov Viktor Nikolayevich Elektrostal Town Court 13/10/06 13/03/08 54456/08 05/06/08 Romantsova Mariya Yakovlevna Elektrostal Town Court 19/09/06 11/03/08 Application no. Introduced on Applicant Born in Court Judgment of Quashed on 54470/08 12/08/08 Khlopova Tatyana Nikolayevna Elektrostal Town Court 06/10/08 28/02/08 54473/08 22/07/08 Lyalkina Galina Ivanovna Elektrostal Town Court 17/11/06 28/03/08 54507/08 24/06/08 Obyedkova Tamara Mikhaylovna Elektrostal Town Court 16/08/06 23/01/08 54513/08 13/08/08 Khakimova Zaynyad Elektrostal Town Court 28/09/06 21/02/08 54526/08 12/08/08 Zaytseva Valentina Leonidovna Elektrostal Town Court 12/10/06 19/03/08 54530/08 08/08/08 Chelnokova Lyudmila Yakovlevna Elektrostal Town Court 05/10/06 10/04/08 54590/08 31/07/08 Shatilov Dmitriy Mikhaylovich Elektrostal Town Court 09/10/06 02/04/08 54593/08 13/08/08 Yefimenko Vladimir Aleksandrovich Elektrostal Town Court 15/10/06 26/03/08 54596/08 13/08/08 Fedorova Valentina Nikolayevna Elektrostal Town Court 18/10/06 27/03/08 54602/08 29/07/08 Solomatina Rimma Mikhaylovna Elektrostal Town Court 21/11/06 19/03/08 54605/08 29/07/08 Klimov Viktor Yegorovich Elektrostal Town Court 30/10/06 02/04/08 54608/08 18/07/08 Dubovitskaya Nina Ivanovna Elektrostal Town Court 29/09/06 28/02/08 56037/08 21/10/08 Musatova Galina Ivanovna Voskresensk Town Court 12/09/06 22/04/08 56774/08 06/10/08 Pusep Viktor Vasilyevich Voskresensk Town Court 24/05/05 08/04/08 56778/08 06/09/08 Sidorova Tatyana Petrovna Elektrostal Town Court 19/10/06 20/03/08 56781/08 30/08/08 Romanova Tatyana Semenovna Elektrostal Town Court 03/10/06 13/03/08 56784/08 04/09/08 Zotova Tamara Yuryevna Voskresensk Town Court 10/08/06 04/03/08 56786/08 12/09/08 Chernikov Aleksey Grigoryevich Voskresensk Town Court 06/03/06 12/03/08 56789/08 09/09/08 Yamshchikova Lidiya Andriyanovna Elektrostal Town Court 18/10/06 26/03/08 56801/08 03/09/08 Sidorova Nadezhda Petrovna Elektrostal Town Court 20/11/06 28/03/08 56806/08 05/09/08 Tyuvayeva Nadezhda Vasilyevna Elektrostal Town Court 23/10/06 28/03/08 56813/08 03/09/08 Chernetskaya Polina Vasilyevna Elektrostal Town Court 16/08/06 14/03/08 56816/08 14/08/08 Chernomurov Yuriy Nikolayevich Elektrostal Town Court 13/09/06 18/02/08 56827/08 10/09/08 Tsybenko Liya Borisovna Elektrostal Town Court 15/11/06 03/04/08 56832/08 02/10/08 Kashtanova Tatyana Vladimirovna Elektrostal Town Court 25/10/06 07/06/08 56837/08 25/09/08 Yeliseyeva Galina Vasilyevna Elektrostal Town Court 05/10/06 10/04/08 58306/08 17/10/08 Akatova Lidiya Alekseyevna Elektrostal Town Court 31/07/06 31/03/08 58344/08 29/04/08 Vaskina Valentina Nikolayevna Elektrostal Town Court 31/05/06 06/11/07 59027/08 08/10/08 Gurova Olga Ivanovna Elektrostal Town Court 21/11/06 07/06/08 59599/08 25/09/08 Rogatin Vyacheslav Aleksandrovich Voskresensk Town Court 11/05/06 03/04/08 59626/08 30/08/08 Moskalenko Vladimir Vasilyevich Voskresensk Town Court 16/02/06 05/03/08 59628/08 01/09/08 Bulekov Pavel Fyodorovich Voskresensk Town Court 18/04/06 03/03/08 59698/08 16/08/08 Krylov Yuriy Vladimirovich Elektrostal Town Court 21/09/06 11/03/08 59699/08 20/09/08 Fomichev Nikolay Petrovich Voskresensk Town Court 05/08/05 26/03/08 59703/08 08/10/08 Sharova Larisa Vasilyevna Elektrostal Town Court 20/10/06 27/03/08 60036/08 22/11/08 Ivanova Nadezhda Vladimirovna Elektrostal Town Court 25/10/06 10/06/08 4507/09 19/11/08 Bakhireva Natalya Dmitriyevna Elektrostal Town Court 26/10/06 07/06/08     [1]. Factual details concerning individual applications are given in the Annex.