49951/21;49952/21;50098/21;50100/21;4599/22;4603/22;26470/22;26474/22;26484/22;26490/22;30347/23;30351/23;30353/23;30355/23

WyrokETPCz2025-10-09ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1009JUD004995121

Analiza orzeczenia

Sekcja wygenerowana przez AI na podstawie treści orzeczenia — nie stanowi cytatu.

Zagadnienie prawne
Czy automatyczne i bezkrytyczne pozbawienie prawa głosu skazanych więźniów w wyborach parlamentarnych narusza art. 3 Protokołu nr 1 do Konwencji?
Ratio decidendi
Trybunał potwierdził swoją ugruntowaną linię orzeczniczą, zgodnie z którą pozbawienie prawa głosu grupy osób w sposób ogólny, automatyczny i bezkrytyczny, wyłącznie na podstawie odbywania kary pozbawienia wolności, niezależnie od długości wyroku, charakteru lub wagi przestępstw oraz indywidualnych okoliczności, jest niezgodne z art. 3 Protokołu nr 1 do Konwencji. W niniejszej sprawie, ponieważ bułgarskie przepisy prowadziły do takiego automatycznego pozbawienia praw wyborczych, Trybunał stwierdził naruszenie. W odniesieniu do art. 14, Trybunał uznał, że nie powstaje odrębna kwestia, biorąc pod uwagę już stwierdzone naruszenie art. 3 Protokołu nr 1.
Stan faktyczny
Skarżący to skazani więźniowie w Bułgarii, którzy skarżyli się na niemożność głosowania w wyborach parlamentarnych. Twierdzili, że ich wykluczenie z udziału w wyborach legislacyjnych, wynikające z ich statusu skazanych, stanowi naruszenie ich praw. Skargi dotyczyły różnych wyborów parlamentarnych w latach 2021 i 2023.
Rozstrzygnięcie
Trybunał jednogłośnie: - Decyduje o połączeniu skarg; - Uznaje skargi za dopuszczalne; - Stwierdza, że skargi te ujawniają naruszenie art. 3 Protokołu nr 1 do Konwencji w związku z niezdolnością skarżących, jako skazanych więźniów, do głosowania w wyborach legislacyjnych; - Stwierdza, że nie powstaje odrębna kwestia w ramach art. 14 Konwencji; - Stwierdza, że samo stwierdzenie naruszenia stanowi wystarczające słuszne zadośćuczynienie.

Pełny tekst orzeczenia

THIRD SECTION CASE OF KALAYDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA (Applications nos. 49951/21 and 13 others – see appended list)             JUDGMENT   STRASBOURG 9 October 2025       This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.   In the case of Kalaydzhiev and Others v. Bulgaria, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:  Úna Ní Raifeartaigh, President,  Mateja Đurović,  Vasilka Sancin, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 18 September 2025, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.  The case originated in applications against Bulgaria lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2.  The applicants were represented by Mr S. Madin, a lawyer practising in Sofia. 3.  The Bulgarian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS 4.  The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 5.  The applicants complained under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention of their ineligibility, as convicted prisoners, to vote in legislative elections. They also relied on Article 14 of the Convention and argued that this was also in breach of the prohibition of discrimination. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 6.  Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 of Protocol No. 1 7.  The applicants complained principally of their ineligibility as convicted prisoners to vote in legislative elections. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention. 8.  The Court refers to the principles established in its case‑law regarding ineligibility to vote in elections (see, among other authorities, Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no. 2) [GC], no. 74025/01, §§ 56-71, ECHR 2005‑IX; Scoppola v. Italy (no. 3) [GC], no. 126/05, §§ 81-87, 22 May 2012; and Anchugov and Gladkov v. Russia, nos. 11157/04 and 15162/05, §§ 93‑100, 4 July 2013). The essence of these principles, reiterated in all of these key cases, is that when disenfranchisement affects a group of people generally, automatically and indiscriminately, solely on the basis that they are serving a prison sentence, irrespective of the length of the sentence and irrespective of the nature or gravity of their offences and their individual circumstances, it is not compatible with Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention. 9.  In the leading case of Kulinski and Sabev v. Bulgaria, no. 63849/09, 21 July 2016, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 10.  Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. 11.  These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW 12.  The applicants also complained under Article 14 of the Convention having argued that they had been subjected to the discrimination. Having regard to the conclusion above under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1, the Court considers that, while these complaints are admissible, no separate issue arises under Article 14 of the Convention in the circumstances of the present case (compare Hirst (no. 2) [GC], cited above, §§ 87 and 89, and Anchugov and Gladkov, cited above, § 116). APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 13.  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see, in particular, Tingarov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 42286/21, 10 October 2023), the Court considers that the finding of a violation constitutes sufficient just satisfaction in the present cases. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Declares the applications admissible; Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention concerning the ineligibility of the applicants as convicted prisoners to vote in legislative elections; Holds that no separate issue arises under Article 14 of the Convention; Holds that the finding of a violation constitutes in itself sufficient just satisfaction. Done in English, and notified in writing on 9 October 2025, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.    Viktoriya Maradudina Úna Ní Raifeartaigh  Acting Deputy Registrar President       APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (ineligibility of convicted prisoners to vote in legislative elections) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Type of restriction Election details     49951/21 04/10/2021 Ivan Georgiev KALAYDZHIEV   Impossibility for the applicant, convicted prisoners, to vote in parliamentary elections   National parliamentary election, 04/04/2021     49952/21 04/10/2021 Kosta Rumenov KIROV   National parliamentary election, 04/04/2021     50098/21 04/10/2021 Mitko Georgiev HARAKCHIEV   National parliamentary election, 11/07/2021     50100/21 04/10/2021 Encho Kostadinov ENCHEV   National parliamentary election, 04/04/2021     4599/22 11/01/2022 Georgi Valev VALEV   National parliamentary election, 11/07/2021     4603/22 11/01/2022 Nazam Nazmi AZIZ   National parliamentary election, 11/07/2021     26470/22 13/05/2022 Halil Adem HASAN   National parliamentary election, 14/11/2021     26474/22 13/05/2022 Deniz Syuleymanov AHMEDOV   National parliamentary election, 14/11/2021     26484/22 13/05/2022 Ivan Nikolaev RIBOV   National parliamentary election, 14/11/2021   26490/22 13/05/2022 Chernyo Georgiev IVANOV   National parliamentary election, 14/11/2021   30347/23 31/07/2023 Kosta Rumenov KIROV   National parliamentary election, 02/04/2023   30351/23 31/07/2023 Asen Hristov ASENOV   National parliamentary election, 02/04/2023   30353/23 31/07/2023 Nazam Nazmi AZIZ   National parliamentary election, 02/04/2023   30355/23 31/07/2023 Emil Georgiev KOSTADINOV National parliamentary election, 02/04/2023

© Rada Europy / Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka, źródło: HUDOC (hudoc.echr.coe.int), pozyskano 29.07.2026. · Źródło