50374/21;32325/22;43965/22;44447/22;45200/22;45494/22;46001/22;47937/22;48301/22;48357/22;48359/22;48360/22;48600/22;49050/22;49973/22;50877/22;50899/22;50992/22;51408/22;51516/22;52115/22;52377/22;53829/22;54951/22;55875/22;57351/22;57553/22;57587/22;57728/22;7559/23;7565/23;8026/23

THIRD SECTION CASE OF BELOMESTNOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 50374/21 and 31 others – see appended list)             JUDGMENT   STRASBOURG 18 July 2024   This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Belomestnov and Others v. Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:  Ioannis Ktistakis, President,  Oddný Mjöll Arnardóttir,  Diana Kovatcheva, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 27 June 2024, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.  The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2.  The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS 3.  The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.  The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.  Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. JURISDICTION 6.  The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023). ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION 7.  The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention. 8.  The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009). 9.  In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 10.  Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”. 11.  These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW 12.  Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. 13.  Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Yartsev v. Russia, no. 16683/17, §§ 28-38, 20 July 2021, concerning restrictions on the right to freedom of expression; Misan v. Russia, no. 4261/04, 2 October 2014 and Kruglov and Others v. Russia, nos. 11264/04 and 15 others, 4 February 2020, concerning unlawful searches; and Elvira Dmitriyeva v. Russia, nos. 60921/17 and 7202/18, §§ 77-90, 30 April 2019, as to administrative conviction for making calls to participate in public assemblies. REMAINING COMPLAINTS 14.  In view of the above findings, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention lodged by some of the applicants and concerning the fairness of the proceedings and the alleged restrictions on the right to examine witnesses. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 15.  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), as well as taking into account the previous awards made by the Court to Mr Udimov (application no. 8026/23) (compare Ivanov and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 44363/14 and 2 others, § 12, 4 June 2020, and Puzanov v. Russia [Committee], nos. 26895/14 and 2 other applications, § 13, 15 September 2022), the Court considers that the finding of a violation in application no. 8026/23 will constitute in itself sufficient just satisfaction and finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table to the remaining applicants. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to the facts that took place before 16 September 2022; Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints raised by the applicants; Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention; Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see the appended table); Holds (a)  that the finding of a violation in application no. 8026/23 will constitute in itself sufficient just satisfaction; (b)  that the respondent State is to pay the remaining applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (c)  that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. Done in English, and notified in writing on 18 July 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.    Viktoriya Maradudina Ioannis Ktistakis  Acting Deputy Registrar President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative / criminal offence Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under  well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non‑pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]     50374/21 22/09/2021 Roman Vasilyevich BELOMESTNOV     Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy   Vladivostok   31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Primorye Regional Court 24/05/2021 Art. 8 (1) - unlawful search - Search of the applicant’s flat as part of the criminal investigation against unidentified perpetrators on 06/02/2021 authorised by the Pervorechenskiy District Court of Vladivostok on 05/02/2021; final decision on the matter was taken by the Primorye Regional Court on 23/03/2021; Specific defects: no adequate and sufficient safeguards against abuse: broad terms/wide content and scope of the search warrant (objects and documents not specific enough to restrict police’s discretion), no relevant or sufficient reasons to justify the search: no evidence supporting the search authorisation, no relevant or sufficient reasons to justify the search: applicant not a suspect. The regional department of the interior opened criminal investigation on the charges of wilful blocking of transport communications. According to the official version, unidentified persons organised, by means of Internet communications, a gathering. The participants of the gathering blocked the street and, as a result, public buses and ambulances could not follow their routes. The applicant was suspected to be one of the organisers of the gathering. The purpose of the search was to find (1) electronical devices used to document the gathering, (2) documents pertaining to the crime and (3) other objects and documents necessary to establish the circumstances of the case.   5,000     32325/22 11/06/2022 Olga Mikhaylovna IVANOVA Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow Anti-war protest   Irkutsk   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO 10 days’ administrative arrest Irkutsk Regional Court 16/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 06/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 5,000     43965/22 18/08/2022 Vadim Vitalyevich SMIRNOV Vasilchenko Olesya Anatolyevna Minyar Anti-war protest   St Petersburg 06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 19/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 06/03/2022 from 5.15 p.m. to 11 pm. - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO); the complaints were raised in the administrative proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000     44447/22 25/08/2022 Konstantin Sergeyevich FROLOV Lapuzin Aleksey Sergeyevich Samara Anti-war protest   Samara   27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Samara Regional Court 28/04/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 27/02/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; the complaint was raised in the administrative proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000     45200/22 15/09/2022 Semen Aleksandrovich KOVALEV     Anti-war protest   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 31/05/2022 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 7.12 p.m. on 27/02/2022 to 7 a.m. on 28/02/2022. Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO); raised in the administrative proceedings 4,000     45494/22 26/08/2022 Konstantin Valeryevich CHEMEZOV     Anti-war protest   Yekaterinburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 14,000 Sverdlovsk Regional Court 02/06/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3 p.m. till 6.45 p.m. on 06/03/2022 - Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO); the complaint was raised in the administrative proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000     46001/22 10/09/2022 Vladimir Viktorovich RENZHIN Kosnyrev Vladislav Vladimirovich Syktyvkar Anti-war protest   Syktyvkar   24/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Supreme Court of the Komi Republic 11/05/2022 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in respect of both sets of administrative proceedings (final relevant decisions were taken by the Supreme Court of the Komi Republic on 11/05/2022 and 10/08/2022 respectively),   Art. 10 (1) - various restrictions on the right to freedom of expression - Conviction under Article 20.3.3 § 1 of CAO for putting up an anti-war poster in Syktyvkar on 24/02/2022; administrative fine of RUB 35,000/ Supreme Court of the Komi Republic on 10/08/2022,   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 24/02/2022: Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; the complaint was raised in the administrative proceedings 4,500     47937/22 12/09/2022 Mark Dmitriyevich POLYAK Gerasimov Dmitriy Georgiyevich St Petersburg Anti-war protest   St Petersburg   27/02/2022     article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 26/05/2022   3,500     48301/22 14/09/2022 Olga Sergeyena ARTEMYEVA     Anti-war protest   Ufa   27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Supreme Court of the Bashkortostan Republic 16/05/2022 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 27/02/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings). 4,000   48357/22 14/09/2022 Dmitriy Gennadyevich ZAYTSEV Polyakov Daniil Alekseyevich Voronezh Anti-war protest   Voronezh   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Voronezh Regional Court 21/06/2022 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 06/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; the complaint was raised in the administrative proceedings 4,000   48359/22 14/09/2022 Pavel Vitalyevich BELYAYEV Polyakov Daniil Alekseyevich Voronezh Anti-war protest   Voronezh   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 5,000 Voronezh Regional Court 26/07/2022 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 06/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; the complaint was raised in the administrative proceedings 4,000   48360/22 14/09/2022 Valeriya Yevgenyevna KOTOVA Polyakov Daniil Alekseyevich Voronezh Anti-war protest   Voronezh   24/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 5,000 Voronezh Regional Court 19/07/2022 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 24/02/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; the complaint was raised in the administrative proceedings 4,000   48600/22 30/09/2022 Yelena Konstantinovna GORODNITSYNA Lapuzin Aleksey Sergeyevich Samara Anti-war protest   Samara 27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Samara Regional Court 02/06/2022 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 27/02/2022 from 3 p.m. to 8.14 p.m. - Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO); the complaint was raised in the administrative proceedings 4,000   49050/22 15/09/2022 Ivan Aleksandrovich SVIRIDOV Zinovyev Konstantin Mikhaylovich Nizhniy Novgorod Anti-war protest   Nizhniy Novgorod   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 26/05/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 06/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; the complaint raised in the administrative proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   49973/22 07/10/2022 Irina Petrovna SHELKUNOVA Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow Anti-war protest   Moscow   27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 07/06/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 7.30 p.m. on 27/02/2022 till 2.00 a.m. on 28/02/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO); the complaints were raised in the administrative proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   50877/22 19/10/2022 Georgiy Yuryevich SIDORENKO Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow Anti-war protest   Moscow   25/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 21/06/2022 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 25/02/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; the complaint was raised in the administrative proceedings 4,000   50899/22 15/09/2022 Darya Denisovna ANDRIANOVA Slavkin Andrey Anatolyevich Murmansk Anti-war protest   Murmansk   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000 Murmansk Regional Court 30/05/2022   3,500   50992/22 17/10/2022 Anton Aleksandrovich ANDREYEV     Anti-war protest   Moscow   25/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Moscow City Court 17/06/2022 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention from 9 p.m. on 25/02/2022 to 10 a.m. on 26/02/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO); the complaints were raised in the administrative proceedings 4,000   51408/22 26/10/2022 Yelizaveta Alekseyevna DADONOVA Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow Anti-war protest   Moscow   06/03/2022       article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 27/06/2022 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   3,500   51516/22 05/10/2022 Margarita Igorevna YADROVSKAYA Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow Anti-war protest   Moscow   25/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000 Moscow City Court 07/06/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention from 7.45 p.m. on 25/02/2022 to 1.10 a.m. on 26/02/2022 Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (raised in the administrative proceedings),   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   52115/22 27/10/2022 German Aleksandrovich TITOV Arshinova Valeriya Aleksandrovna Moscow Anti-war protest   Moscow   27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Moscow City Court 27/06/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 27/02/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   52377/22 26/10/2022 Anastasiya Andreyevna SERDYUK     Anti-war protest   Krasnoyarsk   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 29/06/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 06/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; the complaint was raised in the administrative proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   53829/22 11/11/2022 Nikolay Vladimirovich PTITSYN Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow Anti-war protest   Moscow   13/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000 Moscow City Court 13/07/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention from 3 p.m. to 10 p.m. on 13/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO); the complaints were raised in the administrative proceedings,    Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   54951/22 29/10/2022 Anton Vyacheslavovich DENGUBOV     Anti-war protest   Yekaterinburg   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000 Sverdlovsk Regional Court 29/06/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention from 2.25 p.m. to 11.30 p.m. on 06/03/2022 - Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO); the complaint was raised in the administrative proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   55875/22 08/10/2022 Anna Rifatovna SAYFUTDINOVA Lipatova Yelena Vladimirovna Moscow Anti-war protest   Moscow   24/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 09/06/2022 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 7.10p.m. on 24/02/2022 to 1 a.m. 25/02/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO); the complaints were raised in the administrative proceedings 4,000   57351/22 13/11/2022 Ulyana Aleksandrovna BOGRACHEVA     Manifestation against the war in Ukraine   Moscow   12/03/2022   Anti-war protest   Moscow   24/02/2022 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO               article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000               fine of RUB 15,000 Moscow City Court 13/07/2022             Moscow City Court 19/07/2022 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in respect of both sets of administrative proceedings,   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 13/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; the complaint was raised in the administrative proceedings 4,000   57553/22 02/12/2022 Polina Yuryevna ZHUCHKOVA     Anti-war protest   Moscow   25/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000 Moscow City Court 03/08/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention from 8.20 p.m. om 25/02/2022 to 6.32 a.m. on 26/02/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO); the complaints were raised in the administrative proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   57587/22 19/11/2022 Kristina Vladimirovna DEYEVA Tyurina Kristina Olegovna Nizhniy Novgorod Anti-war protest   Nizhniy Novgorod   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 20/07/2022 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 06/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; the complaint was raised in the administrative proceedings 4,000   57728/22 08/12/2022 Arseniy Nikolayevich VASILENKO Ushakov Timofey Borisovich Kokoshkino Anti-war protest   Moscow   26/02/2022   Anti-war protest Moscow   27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO           article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000           fine of RUB 15,000 Moscow City Court 11/11/2022         Moscow City Court 15/08/2022 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in respect of the proceedings which ended on 15/08/2022 4,000   7559/23 04/01/2023 Maksim Aleksandrovich DEMINSKIY     Anti-war protest   Moscow   03/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000 Moscow City Court 09/09/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention from 7 p.m. on 03/03/2022 to 6 a.m. on 04/03/2022. Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO); the complaints were raised in the administrative proceedings,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   7565/23 06/01/2023 Yekaterina Aleksandrovna VIKHANSKAYA     Anti-war protest   Moscow   03/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000 Moscow City Court 09/09/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Detention took place from 7.30 p.m. on 03/03/2022 to 2.30 a.m. on 04/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings),   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   8026/23 27/03/2022 Mikhail Leontyevich UDIMOV Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi Anti-war protest   Moscow   20/02/2022 article 19.3 § 1 of CAO administrative detention of 15 days Moscow City Court 25/02/2022 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention on 20/02/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; the complaint was raised in the administrative proceedings The finding of a violation constitutes sufficient just satisfaction   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.