51373/21;51376/21;51381/21;51384/21;52648/21;52658/21;52659/21;52660/21;52661/21;52665/21;52668/21;52674/21;53302/21;53307/21;53746/21;53749/21;53960/21;54092/21;54096/21;54141/21;54252/21;54257/21;54260/21;54263/21;54264/21;54340/21;54433/21;54541/21;54548/21;54787/21;54793/21;55315/21;55406/21;58468/21;58503/21;58545/21
WyrokETPCz2024-02-01ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0201JUD005137321
Analiza orzeczenia
Sekcja wygenerowana przez AI na podstawie treści orzeczenia — nie stanowi cytatu.
Zagadnienie prawne
Czy środki podjęte przeciwko organizatorom i uczestnikom zgromadzeń publicznych w Rosji, w tym aresztowania i skazania za wykroczenia administracyjne, stanowiły nieproporcjonalną ingerencję w prawo do wolności zgromadzeń oraz naruszały inne prawa konwencyjne, takie jak prawo do wolności i rzetelnego procesu?Ratio decidendi
Trybunał stwierdził, że środki podjęte przeciwko skarżącym, polegające na aresztowaniach i skazaniach za wykroczenia administracyjne w związku z ich udziałem lub organizacją zgromadzeń publicznych, stanowiły nieproporcjonalną ingerencję w ich prawo do wolności zgromadzeń, co narusza art. 11 Konwencji. Trybunał uznał, że te interwencje nie były „konieczne w społeczeństwie demokratycznym”, odwołując się do swojego ugruntowanego orzecznictwa. Ponadto, w odniesieniu do niektórych skarżących, Trybunał stwierdził naruszenia art. 5 ust. 1 (bezprawne pozbawienie wolności), art. 6 ust. 1 (brak bezstronności sądu z powodu braku strony oskarżającej) oraz art. 2 Protokołu nr 7 (opóźniony przegląd wyroku w przypadku aresztu administracyjnego bez efektu zawieszającego), również w oparciu o wcześniejsze precedensy.Stan faktyczny
Skarżący byli organizatorami lub uczestnikami zgromadzeń publicznych w Rosji, w tym protestów pod hasłem „Free Navalnyy”. W związku z tymi wydarzeniami zostali aresztowani i skazani za wykroczenia administracyjne na podstawie rosyjskiego Kodeksu Wykroczeń Administracyjnych. Kary obejmowały grzywny, prace społeczne lub areszt administracyjny. Niektórzy skarżący zgłosili również skargi dotyczące bezprawnego pozbawienia wolności w związku z zatrzymaniami, braku bezstronności sądów w postępowaniach administracyjnych oraz braku efektu zawieszającego odwołań od kar aresztu administracyjnego.Rozstrzygnięcie
Trybunał postanowił połączyć skargi. Stwierdził, że ma jurysdykcję do rozpatrzenia skarg. Uznał skargi na podstawie art. 11 Konwencji oraz inne skargi na podstawie ugruntowanego orzecznictwa za dopuszczalne. Stwierdził, że nie ma potrzeby odrębnego rozpatrywania pozostałych skarg na podstawie art. 6 Konwencji. Stwierdził naruszenie art. 11 Konwencji. Stwierdził naruszenie Konwencji i Protokołów do niej w odniesieniu do innych skarg podniesionych na podstawie ugruntowanego orzecznictwa. Zasądził od państwa pozwanego na rzecz skarżących kwoty wskazane w załączonej tabeli tytułem szkody majątkowej i niemajątkowej oraz kosztów i wydatków.Pełny tekst orzeczenia
SECOND SECTION
CASE OF USTINOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 51373/21 and 35 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
1 February 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Ustinov and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Lorraine Schembri Orland, President,
Frédéric Krenc,
Davor Derenčinović, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 11 January 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
THE LAW
JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
JURISDICTION
6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION
7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014, and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW
12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention.
REMAINING COMPLAINTS
14. Some applicants raised further complaints under Article 6 of the Convention alleging various aspects of unfairness of the administrative-offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraph 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
Decides to join the applications;
Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;
Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention;
Holds that these complaints disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;
Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);
Holds
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 1 February 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina Lorraine Schembri Orland
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Name of the public event
Location
Date
Administrative charges
Penalty
Final domestic decision
Court Name
Date
Other complaints under well-established case-law
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non‑pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant
(in euros)[1]
51373/21
16/09/2021
Daniil Vasilyevich USTINOV Danil Ilnurovich Nurgaleyev
Kazan
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Kazan
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
24/03/2021
3,500
51376/21
16/09/2021
Mariya Viktorovna SONKINA Danil Ilnurovich Nurgaleyev
Kazan
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Kazan
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
24/03/2021
3,500
51381/21
16/09/2021
Demid Antonovich RAKHMATULLIN Danil Ilnurovich Nurgaleyev
Kazan
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Kazan
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
31/03/2021
3,500
51384/21
16/09/2021
Anton Yuryevich KURENOV Danil Ilnurovich Nurgaleyev
Kazan
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Kazan
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
24/03/2021
3,500
52648/21
29/09/2021
Vladislav Olegovich GLADKIKH Kseniya Dmitriyevna Prosvirkina
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Ekaterinburg
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
30 hours of community work
Sverdlovsk Regional Court
31/03/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report.
4,000
52658/21
04/10/2021
Yekaterina Vladimirovna MASLOVSKAYA Tatyana Georgiyevna Martynova
Pskov
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Pskov
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Pskov Regional Court
05/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report.
4,000
52659/21
04/10/2021
Larisa Vladimirovna YEFIMOVA Tatyana Georgiyevna Martynova
Pskov
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Pskov
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Pskov Regional Court
05/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report.
4,000
52660/21
04/10/2021
Elvira Valentinovna NIKOGOSOVA Tatyana Georgiyevna Martynova
Pskov
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Pskov
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 12,000
Pskov Regional Court
05/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report.
4,000
52661/21
04/10/2021
Pavel Vyacheslavovich VASILYEV Tatyana Georgiyevna Martynova
Pskov
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Pskov
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Pskov Regional Court
05/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report.
4,000
52665/21
12/10/2021
Nikita Alekseyevich SVINCHUKOV Marina Alekseyevna Dubrovina
Novorossiysk
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Anapa
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Krasnodar Regional Court
12/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report.
4,000
52668/21
13/10/2021
Anna Sergeyevna ALIKINA Roman Yevgenyevich Kachanov
Yekaterinburg
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Ekaterinburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
30 hours of community work
Sverdlovsk Regional Court
14/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
52674/21
06/10/2021
Anatoliy Petrovich IVAKIN Aleksandr Vasilyevich Popkov
Sochi
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Sochi
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Krasnodar Regional Court
14/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
.
3,500
53302/21
05/08/2021
Vladislav Valeryevich BELYAKOV Aleksey Viktorovich Tsvetkov
Vladimir
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Vladimir
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
detention of 20 days
Vladimir Regional Court
30/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 21/04/2021 until 22/04/2021.
5,000
53307/21
07/10/2021
Yevgeniy Nikolayevich BOLSHAKOV Olimpiada Valentinovna Usanova
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
07/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 12.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 5.40 p.m. on 01/02/2021.
4,000
53746/21
05/08/2021
Anastasiya Yevgenyevna VASILYEVA Aleksey Viktorovich Tsvetkov
Vladimir
Rally to ensure access of doctors to detained Navalnyy
Pokrov
06/04/2021
article 20.2.2 § 3 of CAO
fine of RUB 180,000
Vladimir Regional Court
17/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 06/04/2021 for compiling an offence report.
4,000
53749/21
05/08/2021
Aleksandr Borisovich GENERALOV Aleksey Viktorovich Tsvetkov
Vladimir
Rally to ensure access of doctors to detained Navalnyy
Pokrov
06/04/2021
article 20.2.2 § 3 of CAO
detention of 8 days
Vladimir Regional Court
14/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 06/04/2021 until 07/04/2021;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
53960/21
18/10/2021
Kirill Sergeyevich RAZUMOV Tatyana Georgiyevna Martynova
Pskov
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Pskov
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Pskov Regional Court
12/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report.
4,000
54092/21
05/10/2021
Valeriya Borisovna MERKULOVA Aleksey Viktorovich Tsvetkov
Vladimir
Rally to ensure access of doctors to detained Navalnyy
Pokrov
06/04/2021
article 20.2.2 § 3 of CAO
detention of 8 days
Vladimir Regional Court
14/04/2010
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 06/04/2021 until 07/04/2021.
5,000
54096/21
05/10/2021
Artem Alekseyevich BORISKIN Aleksey Viktorovich Tsvetkov
Vladimir
Rally to ensure access of doctors to detained Navalnyy
Pokrov
06/04/2021
article 20.2.2 § 3 of CAO
detention of 8 days
Vladimir Regional Court
14/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 06/04/2021 until 07/04/2021.
5,000
54141/21
29/10/2021
Aleksandr Vladimirovich MYACHKOV Yelena Yuryevna Pershakova
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Perm
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
20 hours of community work
Perm Regional Court
30/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 12.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 12.30 a.m. on 02/02/2021.
4,000
54252/21
20/10/2021
Anastasiya Valentinovna KUZNETSOVA Andrey Olegovich Valenkov
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
21/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report.
4,000
54257/21
13/10/2021
Aleksey Sergeyevich STEPANOV Konstantin Mikhaylovich Zinovyev
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
14/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceeding;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 12.25 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 1.00 a.m. on 01/02/2021.
4,000
54260/21
12/10/2021
Mikhail Sergeyevich SERGEYEV Marina Alekseyevna Dubrovina
Novorossiysk
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Anapa
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
detention of 7 days
Krasnodar Regional Court
12/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
54263/21
20/10/2021
Timofey Nikolayevich KUNTSEVICH Sergey Sergeyevich Kulikov
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
21/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 11.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021.
4,000
54264/21
20/10/2021
Alina Romanovna MULIK Sergey Sergeyevich Kulikov
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
21/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report.
4,000
54340/21
22/10/2021
Aleksey Andreyevich POPOV Aleksey Alekseyevich Vasilyev
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
22/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 8.50 p.m. on 23/01/2021 until 4.30 a.m. on 24/01/2021.
4,000
54433/21
20/10/2021
Aleksandr Vitalyevich KIRILLOVICH Danil Ilnurovich Nurgaleyev
Kazan
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Kazan
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
16/06/2021
3,500
54541/21
13/10/2021
Vyacheslav Vladimirovich CHISTOSERDOV Aleksandr Vasilyevich Popkov
Sochi
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Sochi
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Krasnodar Regional Court
19/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report.
4,000
54548/21
14/10/2021
Yuriy Nikolayevich KOBTSEV Aleksandr Vasilyevich Popkov
Sochi
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Sochi
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Krasnodar Regional Court
21/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report.
4,000
54787/21
14/10/2021
Angelina Arkadyevna KRASYUK Marina Alekseyevna Dubrovina
Novorossiysk
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Anapa
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Krasnodar Regional Court
14/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report.
4,000
54793/21
10/10/2021
Anzhelika Konstantinovna ZAVATSKAYA Nikita Nikolayevich Tkachenko
Belgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Belgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Belgorod Regional Court
24/05/2021
3,500
55315/21
20/10/2021
Nikita Mikhaylovich KOROBOV Konstantin Mikhaylovich Zinovyev
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
21/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 31/01/2021 until 01/02/2021.
4,000
55406/21
21/10/2021
Kirill Andreyevich KARAKIN Olimpiada Valentinovna Usanova
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Nizhniy Novgorod
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
21/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 23/01/2021 until 24/01/2021.
4,000
58468/21
13/11/2021
Nadezhda Alekseyevna TIKHONOVA Roman Yevgenyevich Kachanov
Yekaterinburg
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Ekaterinburg
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Sverdlovsk Regional Court
03/06/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
58503/21
26/11/2021
Maksim Konstantinovich ASTAFYEV Mariya Olegovna Eysmont
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention of 7 days
Moscow City Court
03/06/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 31/01/2021 until 01/02/2021.
5,000
58545/21
18/11/2021
Viktoriya Sergeyevna PIKALKOVA Mariya Olegovna Eysmont
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
19/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 31/01/2021 until 01/02/2021.
4,000
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
© Rada Europy / Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka, źródło: HUDOC (hudoc.echr.coe.int), pozyskano 29.07.2026. · Źródło