55480/21;57859/21;57867/21;58305/21;58776/21;59089/21;59453/21;59602/21;59660/21;59770/21;59846/21;59865/21;59879/21;60051/21;60064/21;60078/21;60083/21;60094/21;60133/21;60139/21;60205/21;60489/21;60647/21;60989/21;61020/21;61105/21;61127/21;61246/21;61254/21;61261/21;61307/21;61343/21;61358/21;61457/21;61468/21;61469/21;61517/21;61731/21;61734/21
WyrokETPCz2024-02-01ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0201JUD005548021
Analiza orzeczenia
Sekcja wygenerowana przez AI na podstawie treści orzeczenia — nie stanowi cytatu.
Zagadnienie prawne
Czy środki podjęte przeciwko organizatorom i uczestnikom zgromadzeń publicznych w Rosji, w tym aresztowania i skazania za wykroczenia administracyjne, stanowiły nieproporcjonalną ingerencję w prawo do wolności zgromadzeń (art. 11 Konwencji) oraz naruszały inne prawa wynikające z Konwencji, takie jak prawo do wolności i bezpieczeństwa osobistego (art. 5 ust. 1), prawo do rzetelnego procesu (art. 6 ust. 1) i prawo do odwołania od wyroku skazującego (art. 2 Protokołu nr 7)?Ratio decidendi
Trybunał uznał, że środki podjęte przeciwko skarżącym, polegające na aresztowaniach i skazaniach za wykroczenia administracyjne w związku z udziałem w zgromadzeniach publicznych, były nieproporcjonalne i nie były "konieczne w społeczeństwie demokratycznym", naruszając art. 11 Konwencji. Ponadto, w oparciu o ugruntowane orzecznictwo, Trybunał stwierdził naruszenia art. 5 ust. 1 Konwencji w związku z bezprawnym pozbawieniem wolności, art. 6 ust. 1 Konwencji z powodu braku bezstronności sądu w postępowaniach administracyjnych oraz art. 2 Protokołu nr 7 z uwagi na brak skutku zawieszającego odwołania od kary aresztu administracyjnego.Stan faktyczny
Skarżący byli organizatorami lub uczestnikami zgromadzeń publicznych w Rosji, głównie wieców "Free Navalnyy" oraz jednego wiecu wspierającego Azata Miftakhova, które odbyły się w 2020 i 2021 roku. W wyniku udziału w tych zgromadzeniach zostali zatrzymani i skazani za wykroczenia administracyjne, głównie na podstawie artykułu 20.2 § 5 lub § 6.1 rosyjskiego Kodeksu Wykroczeń Administracyjnych (CAO), otrzymując grzywny lub kary aresztu. Skarżący zarzucali nieproporcjonalne środki podjęte przeciwko nim.Rozstrzygnięcie
Trybunał jednogłośnie:
- Postanowił połączyć skargi.
- Uznał, że ma jurysdykcję do rozpatrzenia skarg, ponieważ dotyczą one faktów, które miały miejsce przed 16 września 2022 r.
- Uznał skargi na podstawie art. 11 Konwencji oraz inne skargi na podstawie ugruntowanego orzecznictwa, zgodnie z załączoną tabelą, za dopuszczalne i stwierdził, że nie ma potrzeby odrębnego rozpatrywania pozostałych skarg na podstawie art. 6 Konwencji.
- Stwierdził, że skargi te ujawniają naruszenie art. 11 Konwencji.
- Stwierdził, że doszło do naruszenia Konwencji i Protokołów do niej w odniesieniu do innych skarg podniesionych na podstawie ugruntowanego orzecznictwa (zob. załączona tabela).
- Zasądził, że pozwane państwo ma zapłacić skarżącym, w ciągu trzech miesięcy, kwoty wskazane w załączonej tabeli, które zostaną przeliczone na walutę pozwanego państwa według kursu obowiązującego w dniu rozliczenia.Pełny tekst orzeczenia
SECOND SECTION
CASE OF PETROVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 55480/21 and 38 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
1 February 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Petrova and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Lorraine Schembri Orland, President,
Frédéric Krenc,
Davor Derenčinović, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 11 January 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
THE LAW
JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
JURISDICTION
6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION
7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014, and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW
12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention.
REMAINING COMPLAINTS
14. Some applicants raised further complaints under Article 6 of the Convention alleging various aspects of unfairness of the administrative‑offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs 11 and 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
Decides to join the applications;
Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;
Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention;
Holds that these complaints disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;
Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);
Holds
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 1 February 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina Lorraine Schembri Orland
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Name of the public event
Location
Date
Administrative charges
Penalty
Final domestic decision
Court Name
Date
Other complaints under well-established case-law
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant
(in euros)[1]
55480/21
22/10/2021
Regina Vyacheslavovna PETROVA Aleksey Alekseyevich Vasilyev
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
22/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 23/01/2021 until 24/01/2021
4,000
57859/21
18/11/2021
Kirill Vitalyevich KUZNETSOV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 18,000
Moscow City Court
19/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 02/02/2021 for compiling an offence report
4,000
57867/21
18/11/2021
Aleksandr Petrovich KLYUKIN Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
25/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 02/02/2021 for compiling an offence report
4,000
58305/21
20/11/2021
Aleksey Sergeyevich GOROKHOV Andrey Olegovich Valenkov
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 5,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
20/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
58776/21
25/11/2021
Vitaliy Olegovich NAZARENKO Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
27/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
59089/21
20/11/2021
Yelena Eduardovna PETROVICHEVA Andrey Olegovich Valenkov
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
20/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report
4,000
59453/21
25/11/2021
Aleksey Yuryevich FONOV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
27/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
59602/21
17/11/2021
Yelena Anatolyevna GORBAN Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally to support Azat Miftakhov
Moscow
25/12/2020
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
17/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
3,500
59660/21
17/11/2021
Veniamin Nikolayevich BLINOV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
17/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.10 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 10.00 a.m. on 02/02/2021
4,000
59770/21
01/12/2021
Anton Mikhaylovich ANDREYEV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
11/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 9.30 p.m. on 02/02/2021 until 4.30 p.m. on 03/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
59846/21
29/11/2021
Dmitriy Aleksandrovich CHERNYSHOV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention of 14 days
Moscow City Court
29/06/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 12.30 p.m. on 25/04/2021 until 6.00 p.m. on 26/04/2021;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
5,000
59865/21
29/11/2021
Vladimir Aleksandrovich CHERKASOV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
01/06/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report
4,000
59879/21
29/11/2021
Sergey Yuryevich NIKULIN Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Kirov
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 5,000
Kirov Regional Court
01/06/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
3,500
60051/21
01/12/2021
David Sergeyevich TE Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
11/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
60064/21
01/12/2021
Anatoliy Valeryevich OPARIN Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
03/08/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 02/02/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
60078/21
25/11/2021
Sergey Leonidovich TIKHONOV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
25/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 10.45 p.m. on 02/02/2021 until 6.00 p.m. on 04/02/2021
4,000
60083/21
24/11/2021
Ivan Aleksandrovich SUROV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Tula
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 15,000
Tula Regional Court
24/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report on 31/01/2021
4,000
60094/21
20/11/2021
Diana Denisovna DYNINA Vladimir Sergeyevich Nemanov
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
29/09/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report
4,000
60133/21
06/12/2021
Pavel Sergeyevich SEREGIN Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
09/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
60139/21
16/11/2021
Yevgeniy Vyacheslavovich YEVCHENKO Sofya Zurabovna Sharangiya
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
27/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report
4,000
60205/21
24/11/2021
Tatyana Sergeyevna NIKOLAYEVA Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Kazan
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
02/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 21/04/2021 until 22/04/2021
4,000
60489/21
24/11/2021
Nikolay Aleksandrovich PANOV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
09/06/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report
4,000
60647/21
16/11/2021
Mikhail Yevgenyevich PESTOV Sofya Zurabovna Sharangiya
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
11/08/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report
4,000
60989/21
29/11/2021
Sofya Aleksandrovna NECHAYEVA Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Naberezhnye Chelny
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
02/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 8.45 p.m. on 21/04/2021 until 3.20 a.m. on 22/04/2021
4,000
61020/21
30/11/2021
Sergey Vladimirovich SAVINOV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
01/06/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 02/02/2021 for compiling an offence report
4,000
61105/21
06/12/2021
Aleksey Valeryevich ORLOV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Yekaterinburg
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 19,000
Sverdlovsk Regional Court
11/08/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 21/04/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
61127/21
06/12/2021
Ivan Aleksandrovich YEMELYANOV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
09/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
61246/21
19/11/2021
Sergey Ruslanovich SEMENOV Olimpiada Valentinovna Usanova
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
27/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report
4,000
61254/21
19/11/2021
Nikita Andreyevich PANFILOV Olimpiada Valentinovna Usanova
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Nizhniy Novgorod
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
20/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
61261/21
19/11/2021
Yakov Andreyevich SHUTOV Olimpiada Valentinovna Usanova
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
20/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report
4,000
61307/21
19/11/2021
Nikita Alekseyevich BORODIN Daniil Alekseyevich Polyakov
Voronezh
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Voronezh
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Voronezh Regional Court
20/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
61343/21
19/11/2021
Irina Aleksandrovna PAKHOMOVA Olimpiada Valentinovna Usanova
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
20/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report
4,000
61358/21
03/12/2021
Marina Vladimirovna SOKOLOVSKAYA Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Kazan
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 5,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
26/05/2021
(served on the applicant 14/10/2021)
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 21/04/2021 for compiling an offence report
4,000
61457/21
19/11/2021
Viktoriya Viktorovna PEREVOZCHIKOVA Olimpiada Valentinovna Usanova
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 5,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
20/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report
4,000
61468/21
06/12/2021
Aleksandr Nikolayevich PROKOFYEV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
11/06/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 02/02/2021 for compiling an offence report
4,000
61469/21
19/11/2021
Anna Vladimirovna SHUTOVA Olimpiada Valentinovna Usanova
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
20/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report
4,000
61517/21
19/11/2021
Irina Anatolyevna PYZHOVA Olimpiada Valentinovna Usanova
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
27/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report
4,000
61731/21
10/12/2021
Maksim Ildarovich KARIMOV Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Surgut
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 15,000
Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Regional Court
24/06/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 21/04/2021 for compiling an offence report
4,000
61734/21
10/12/2021
Timofey Romanovich ZAKHAROV Kseniya Dmitriyevna Prosvirkina
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
11/08/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report
4,000
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
© Rada Europy / Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka, źródło: HUDOC (hudoc.echr.coe.int), pozyskano 29.07.2026. · Źródło