58437/17;58438/17;58439/17;58452/17;58454/17;58456/17;60995/17;80976/17;82731/17;82739/17;20497/18;27945/18;30186/18;32959/18;32981/18;47192/18;15792/19;16572/19;17512/19;17576/19;19178/19;19832/19;22465/19;22489/19;24839/19;24953/19;25289/19;26037/19;27196/19;27772/19;29535/19;29756/19;30055/19;30057/19;30082/19;30972/19;32207/19;32265/19;34245/19;35131/19;35260/19;35481/19;35989/19;36066/19;36190/19;37100/19;37240/19;37253/19;37276/19;37619/19;38696/19;40185/19;40393/19;40635/19;40692/19;40804/19;40813/19;40940/19;41212/19;41299/19;41659/19;41699/19;41779/19;42047/19;42089/19;42156/19;42540/19;42869/19;43361/19;43388/19;43407/19;43422/19;44990/19;44993/19;45864/19;46150/19;46772/19;47943/19;48063/19;48104/19;48359/19;48400/19;48552/19;49211/19;49391/19;49408/19;49703/19;49722/19;49910/19;50264/19;50714/19;51075/19;51206/19;51415/19;51491/19;51794/19;52109/19;53526/19;53571/19;53673/19;53735/19;54004/19;54136/19;54144/19;54800/19;54823/19;55613/19;55767/19;56434/19;56477/19;56884/19;5

SECOND SECTION CASE OF DUYMAZ AND OTHERS v. TÜRKİYE (Applications nos. 58437/17 and 313 others)             JUDGMENT   STRASBOURG 25 June 2024             This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Duymaz and Others v. Türkiye, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:  Pauliine Koskelo, President,  Lorraine Schembri Orland,  Frédéric Krenc, judges, and Dorothee von Arnim, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to: the applications against the Republic of Türkiye lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by the applicants listed in the appended table (“the applicants”), on the various dates indicated therein; the decision to give notice of the complaints under Article 5 of the Convention concerning the alleged lack of reasonable suspicion regarding the commission of an offence, the alleged lack of relevant and sufficient reasons when ordering and extending the pre-trial detention, the length of pre-trial detention, the ineffectiveness of the judicial review of the lawfulness of detention and the absence of a remedy to obtain compensation to the Turkish Government (“the Government”), represented by their Agent, Mr Hacı Ali Açıkgül, Head of the Department of Human Rights of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Türkiye, and to declare inadmissible the remainder of the applications; the parties’ observations; the decision to reject the Government’s objection to the examination of the applications by a Committee; Having deliberated in private on 4 June 2024, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 1.  The present applications mainly concern the arrest and pre-trial detention of the applicants in the aftermath of the coup attempt of 15 July 2016, on suspicion of their membership of an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as the “Fetullahist Terror Organisation / Parallel State Structure” (Fetullahçı Terör Örgütü / Paralel Devlet Yapılanması, hereinafter referred to as “FETÖ/PDY”), which was considered by the authorities to be behind the coup attempt (for further background information see Akgün v. Turkey, no. 19699/18, §§ 3-9 and §§ 106-07, 20 July 2021). 2.  On various dates, the applicants were arrested and placed in pre-trial detention, mainly on suspicion of membership of the FETÖ/PDY, an offence punishable under Article 314 of the Criminal Code (see Baş v. Turkey, no. 66448/17, § 58, 3 March 2020). The detention orders relied principally on the nature of the alleged offence, the state of the evidence and the potential sentence. It was also noted that investigations into the coup attempt were being conducted across the country, that statements had not yet been taken from all the suspects and that the alleged offence was among the “catalogue” offences listed in Article 100 § 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCP) (for the text of Article 100 of the CCP, as relevant, see Baş, cited above, § 61). It appears from the initial detention orders and the documents available in the case files that the majority of the applicants were identified as users of the ByLock messaging system. Moreover, some of the applicants were suspected of being affiliated with the FETÖ/PDY based on witness statements, or of financing the FETÖ/PDY in view of their use of accounts in Bank Asya – a bank allegedly linked to FETÖ/PDY –, possession of pro-FETÖ/PDY publications and/or United States one-dollar bills with an “F” serial number (denoting the initial of the forename “Fetullah”), and/or their employment by and/or memberships in FETÖ/PDY-affiliated institutions and organisations. The challenges brought by the applicants against their detention, including by reason of the alleged lack of reasonable suspicion of having committed the offence imputed to them, were dismissed, including by the Constitutional Court. 3.  According to the latest information provided by the parties, most of the applicants were convicted of membership of a terrorist organisation by the first instance courts. It appears that, in some of the applications, the criminal proceedings are still pending before appeal courts or the Constitutional Court. THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 4.  Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 5.  The applicants complained that there had been no specific evidence giving rise to a reasonable suspicion, within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (c) of the Convention, that they had committed a criminal offence necessitating pre-trial detention. 6.  The Government urged the Court to declare this complaint inadmissible in respect of the applicants who had not made use of the compensatory remedy under Article 141 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, or whose compensation claims were still pending. They further asked the Court to declare the applications inadmissible for abuse of the right of application to the extent that the applicants had not informed the Court of the developments in their cases following the lodging of their applications. 7.  The Court notes that similar objections have already been dismissed in other cases against Türkiye (see, for instance, Baş v. Turkey, no. 66448/17, §§ 118-21, 3 March 2020, and Turan and Others v. Turkey, nos. 75805/16 and 426 others, §§ 57-64, 23 November 2021), and sees no reason to depart from those findings in the present case. The Court therefore considers that this complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention or inadmissible on any other grounds. It must therefore be declared admissible. 8.  The Court notes that, when ordering the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention, the magistrate’s courts sought to justify their decisions by making a general reference to Article 100 of the CCP and the potential sentence, as well as to “the evidence in the file”. However, in doing so, they simply cited the wording of the provision in question, without actually specifying what the evidence in question entailed and why it constituted a reasonable suspicion that the applicant had committed the offence in question. The Court refers in this connection to its findings in the judgment of Baş (cited above, §§ 190‑195), according to which the vague and general references to the wording of Article 100 of the CCP and to the evidence in the file cannot be regarded as sufficient to justify the “reasonableness” of the suspicion on which the applicants’ detention was supposed to have been based, in the absence either of a specific assessment of the individual items of evidence in the file, or of any information available in the file at the material time that could have justified the suspicion against the applicants, or of any other kinds of verifiable material or facts. 9.  The Court further notes that the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention orders were mainly based on information indicating their use of the ByLock messaging system, banking activities considered as financing the FETÖ/PDY, subscriptions to certain pro-FETÖ/PDY publications, having in their possessions United States one‑dollar bills with an “F” serial number, and/or their employment by and/or memberships in FETÖ/PDY-affiliated institutions and organisations. To the extent that the detention orders have taken into account the applicants’ alleged use of the ByLock messaging system, the Court notes that it has already found that the use of ByLock alone was not of a nature to constitute “reasonable suspicion” within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (c) in respect of the offence attributed to the applicants (see Akgün v. Turkey, no. 19699/18, §§ 151-85, 20 July 2021, and Taner Kılıç v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 208/18, §§ 102-03 and 106-09, 31 May 2022). The Court also notes that as regards some of the applicants, the Government have referred to the existence of witness statements justifying the measures in question. It observes, however, that there are no statements in the case files referring to concrete and specific facts that may have given rise to a reasonable suspicion against the applicants concerned at the material time. The Court further considers, as relevant, that the other acts imputed to the applicants (see paragraph 2 above) were merely circumstantial elements which, in the absence of any other information capable of justifying the suspicions in question, benefited from the presumption of legality and cannot reasonably be regarded as constituting a body of evidence demonstrating the applicants’ membership of a terrorist organisation (compare Taner Kılıç, cited above, §§ 104-05 and the cases cited therein). 10.  Since the Government have not provided any other indications, “facts” or “information” capable of satisfying it that the applicants were “reasonably suspected”, at the time of their initial detention, of having committed the alleged offence, the Court finds that the requirements of Article 5 § 1 (c) regarding the “reasonableness” of a suspicion justifying detention have not been satisfied (see Baş, cited above, § 195, and Taner Kılıç, cited above, §§ 114-16). At this juncture, it cannot be maintained, as the Government argued in their observations, that the fact that the applicants were not members of the judiciary had any bearing on the conclusion reached. Moreover, while the Government commented that the applicants in applications nos. 61564/19, 2841/20 and 22465/19 had actively participated in the failed coup attempt or had been arrested while attempting to leave the country, the Court observes that no such findings were made in the initial detention orders with respect to these applicants. It finally considers that while the applicants were detained a short time after the coup attempt – that is, the event that prompted the declaration of the state of emergency and the notice of derogation by Türkiye –, which is undoubtedly a contextual factor that should be fully taken into account in interpreting and applying Article 5 of the Convention in the present case, the measure at issue cannot be said to have been strictly required by the exigencies of the situation (compare Baş, cited above, §§ 115-16 and §§ 196‑201). It therefore concludes that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention. OTHER COMPLAINTS 11.  As regards any remaining complaints under Article 5 §§ 1, 3, 4 and 5 of the Convention, the Court decides not to examine them, in view of its findings under Article 5 § 1 above and its considerations in the case of Turan and Others (cited above, § 98). APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 12.  The applicants, except for the applicants in applications nos. 48400/19, 49703/19, 49910/19, 62956/19, 1615/20, 4397/20, 9639/20, 11997/20, 13673/20, 22973/20, 30443/20, 34186/20, 38467/20, 16538/21 and 16895/21, requested compensation in varying amounts in respect of non‑pecuniary damage within the time-limit allotted. Most of the applicants in question also claimed pecuniary damage, as well as the legal costs and expenses incurred before the domestic courts and the Court. 13.  The Government contested the applicants’ claims as being unsubstantiated and excessive. 14.  For the reasons put forth in Turan and Others (cited above, §§ 102‑07), the Court rejects any claims for pecuniary damage and awards each of the applicants, save for the applicants in applications nos. 48400/19, 49703/19, 49910/19, 62956/19, 1615/20, 4397/20, 9639/20, 11997/20, 13673/20, 22973/20, 30443/20, 34186/20, 38467/20, 16538/21 and 16895/21, a lump sum of 5,000 euros (EUR), covering non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable on that amount. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Declares the complaint under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention, concerning the alleged lack of reasonable suspicion, at the time of the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention, that they had committed an offence, admissible; Holds that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention on account of the lack of reasonable suspicion, at the time of the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention, that they had committed an offence; Holds that there is no need to examine the admissibility and merits of the applicants’ remaining complaints under Article 5 of the Convention; Holds (a)  that the respondent State is to pay each of the applicants, save for the applicants in applications nos. 48400/19, 49703/19, 49910/19, 62956/19, 1615/20, 4397/20, 9639/20, 11997/20, 13673/20, 22973/20, 30443/20, 34186/20, 38467/20, 16538/21 and 16895/21, within three months, EUR 5,000 (five thousand euros) in respect of non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable on this amount, which is to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)  that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points; Dismisses the remainder of the applicants’ claims for just satisfaction. Done in English, and notified in writing on 25 June 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.    Dorothee von Arnim Pauliine Koskelo  Deputy Registrar President   APPENDIX List of cases:   No. Application no. Case name Lodged on Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Nationality Represented by 1. 58437/17 Duymaz v. Türkiye 12/07/2017 Mehmet DUYMAZ Ankara Turkish Mustafa UYSAL 2. 58438/17 Dorum v. Türkiye 10/07/2017 İsmail DORUM Isparta Turkish Mustafa UYSAL 3. 58439/17 Öz v. Türkiye 12/07/2017 Nuri ÖZ Ankara Turkish Mustafa UYSAL 4. 58452/17 Çipil v. Türkiye 24/07/2017 Yavuz ÇİPİL Ankara Turkish Mustafa UYSAL 5. 58454/17 Reis v. Türkiye 21/07/2017 Selçuk REİS Aksaray Turkish Mustafa UYSAL 6. 58456/17 Tekin v. Türkiye 17/07/2017 Hamdi TEKİN Eskişehir Turkish Gülhis YÖRÜK 7. 60995/17 Bostan v. Türkiye 31/07/2017 Hasan BOSTAN Bursa Turkish Mustafa UYSAL 8. 80976/17 Aksan v. Türkiye 09/11/2017 Hüseyin AKSAN Ankara Turkish Şule GÖKMEN 9. 82731/17 Yıldırım v. Türkiye 31/10/2017 Hakan YILDIRIM Ankara Turkish Gülhis YÖRÜK 10. 82739/17 Keleş v. Türkiye 03/11/2017 Savaş KELEŞ Ankara Turkish Gülhis YÖRÜK 11. 20497/18 Üner v. Türkiye 10/04/2018 Mustafa ÜNER Antalya Turkish Sultan TEKE SOYDİNÇ 12. 27945/18 Mete v. Türkiye 30/05/2018 Sami METE Istanbul Turkish Dilara YILMAZ 13. 30186/18 Öztürk v. Türkiye 20/06/2018 Akif ÖZTÜRK Tokat Turkish Şeyma MISIRLIOĞLU 14. 32959/18 Durdu v. Türkiye 03/07/2018 Raşit DURDU Giresun Turkish Erol GÜNAYDIN 15. 32981/18 Saka v. Türkiye 03/07/2018 Sabri SAKA Giresun Turkish Erol GÜNAYDIN 16. 47192/18 Gülen v. Türkiye 02/10/2018 Pınar GÜLEN Adana Turkish Havva ALAN ÖZCEL 17. 15792/19 Gürel v. Türkiye 11/03/2019 Ahmet GÜREL Tekirdağ Turkish Dilara YILMAZ 18. 16572/19 Uçar v. Türkiye 16/03/2019 Hasan Hüseyin UÇAR Kocaeli Turkish Dilara YILMAZ 19. 17512/19 Arıtürk v. Türkiye 14/03/2019 Burhan ARITÜRK Antalya Turkish Nurcan KAYMAZ ÇEKİÇOĞLU 20. 17576/19 Elma v. Türkiye 01/03/2019 Ahmet ELMA Tekirdağ Turkish Dilara YILMAZ 21. 19178/19 Atasoy v. Türkiye 28/03/2019 Kenan ATASOY Ankara Turkish İbrahim Halil UZUN 22. 19832/19 Türkoğlu v. Türkiye 25/03/2019 Hakan TÜRKOĞLU Konya Turkish Fatih DİŞCİ 23. 22465/19 Tirit v. Türkiye 18/04/2019 Süleyman TİRİT İzmir Turkish Özlem SUZAN 24. 22489/19 Kılıç v. Türkiye 16/04/2019 Fatih KILIÇ Giresun Turkish Erol GÜNAYDIN 25. 24839/19 Küççük v. Türkiye 03/05/2019 Mesut KÜÇÇÜK İstanbul Turkish Şeyma MISIRLIOĞLU 26. 24953/19 Şimşek v. Türkiye 30/04/2019 Mutlu ŞİMŞEK Eskişehir Turkish Mustafa ALGAM 27. 25289/19 Gülgen v. Türkiye 22/04/2019 Cumhur GÜLGEN İzmir Turkish Serkan CENGİZ 28. 26037/19 Kılıçaslan v. Türkiye 23/04/2019 Fatih KILIÇASLAN Giresun Turkish Şeyma MISIRLIOĞLU 29. 27196/19 Çetingül v. Türkiye 10/05/2019 Fatih ÇETİNGÜL Konya Turkish Nursel AKGÜN 30. 27772/19 Tonga v. Türkiye 10/05/2019 Hasan Basri TONGA Kırıkkale Turkish Zafer İRAZ 31. 29535/19 Yaşar v. Türkiye 10/05/2019 Ramazan YAŞAR Antalya Turkish Nurcan KAYMAZ ÇEKİÇOĞLU 32. 29756/19 Yoldaş v. Türkiye 24/05/2019 İshak YOLDAŞ Balıkesir Turkish Burcu HAS 33. 30055/19 Kadıoğlu v. Türkiye 31/05/2019 Dursun Ali KADIOĞLU Rize Turkish Şule GÖKMEN 34. 30057/19 Onat v. Türkiye 17/05/2019 Zeliha Gül ONAT Manisa Turkish Ayşe Rabia YÜREKLİTÜRK 35. 30082/19 Yerkazanoğlu v. Türkiye 28/05/2019 Nevin YERKAZANOĞLU Manisa Turkish Havva ALAN ÖZCEL 36. 30972/19 Er v. Türkiye 31/05/2019 Mevlüt ER Tokat Turkish Şeyma MISIRLIOĞLU 37. 32207/19 Zengin v. Türkiye 10/06/2019 Raşit ZENGİN Manisa Turkish Nursel AKGÜN 38. 32265/19 Aydın v. Türkiye 03/06/2019 İbrahim AYDIN Giresun Turkish Erol GÜNAYDIN 39. 34245/19 Köksal v. Türkiye 18/06/2019 Bayram KÖKSAL Balıkesir Turkish Burcu HAS 40. 35131/19 Altıntaş v. Türkiye 21/06/2019 Sezgin ALTINTAŞ Kocaeli Turkish   41. 35260/19 Yüce v. Türkiye 27/06/2019 Ali YÜCE Ankara Turkish Uğur ALTUN 42. 35481/19 Ünsal v. Türkiye 06/05/2019 Zafer ÜNSAL Ankara Turkish Fatih DÖNMEZ 43. 35989/19 YILDIZ v. Türkiye 21/06/2019 Turgut YILDIZ Kocaeli Turkish İbrahim Halil UZUN 44. 36066/19 Apa v. Türkiye 21/06/2019 Salih APA Denizli Turkish İbrahim Halil UZUN 45. 36190/19 ErYILMAZ v. Türkiye 21/06/2019 Ali ERYILMAZ Karabük Turkish Zehra KARAKULAK BOZDAĞ 46. 37100/19 Çetin v. Türkiye 26/06/2019 Ali Rıza ÇETİN Kocaeli Turkish Fatih DİŞCİ 47. 37240/19 Özbey v. Türkiye 20/06/2019 Yusuf ÖZBEY Ankara Turkish Necip Fazıl YILDIZ 48. 37253/19 Yanbay v. Türkiye 13/06/2019 Ahmet YANBAY Bursa Turkish Ahmet Sami GÜLŞEN 49. 37276/19 Köse v. Türkiye 09/07/2019 İbrahim KÖSE Osmaniye Turkish Zehra KARAKULAK BOZDAĞ 50. 37619/19 Baş v. Türkiye 04/07/2019 Ali BAŞ Aydın Turkish Mustafa AÇICI 51. 38696/19 Polat v. Türkiye 05/07/2019 Abdullah POLAT Tekirdağ Turkish Havva NALBANT TEKİN 52. 40185/19 Duman v. Türkiye 17/07/2019 Çetin DUMAN Istanbul Turkish Dilara YILMAZ 53. 40393/19 Aslan v. Türkiye 19/07/2019 Alper ASLAN Afyonkarahisar Turkish İbrahim KOCAOĞUL 54. 40635/19 Turan v. Türkiye 22/07/2019 Bünyamin Cüneyt TURAN Tekirdağ Turkish Dilara YILMAZ 55. 40692/19 Arıcan v. Türkiye 19/07/2019 Osman Serhat ARICAN Kırıkkale Turkish Tuğba ARICAN 56. 40804/19 Bayraktar v. Türkiye 17/07/2019 Nilüfer BAYRAKTAR Düzce Turkish Dilara YILMAZ 57. 40813/19 Büyükemirusta v. Türkiye 28/07/2019 Hilmi BÜYÜKEMİRUSTA Denizli Turkish Tarık AVŞAR 58. 40940/19 Tunahan v. Türkiye 23/07/2019 Tarık TUNAHAN Ankara Turkish Muhammed Mustafa GÜRSOY 59. 41212/19 Ertaş v. Türkiye 03/07/2019 Fatih ERTAŞ Kocaeli Turkish Fatih DİŞCİ 60. 41299/19 Gürler v. Türkiye 26/07/2019 Aziz GÜRLER Burdur Turkish Nurgül YAYMAN YILMAZ 61. 41659/19 Acar v. Türkiye 27/06/2019 Ahmet ACAR Istanbul Turkish Fatih DİŞCİ 62. 41699/19 Böken v. Türkiye 16/07/2019 Ali Ahmet BÖKEN Ankara Turkish Erşan CANSEVEN 63. 41779/19 Satık v. Türkiye 02/08/2019 Ömer SATIK Ankara Turkish   64. 42047/19 Dağ v. Türkiye 01/08/2019 İsmail DAĞ Ankara Turkish Şule GÖKMEN 65. 42089/19 Bülbül v. Türkiye 29/07/2019 Arslan BÜLBÜL Gaziantep Turkish Hasan Önder SULU 66. 42156/19 Daşkın v. Türkiye 26/07/2019 Fatih DAŞKIN Kırşehir Turkish Elif KATI 67. 42540/19 Türkaydın v. Türkiye 06/08/2019 Kadir TÜRKAYDIN Çorum Turkish Ufuk Sami HAKVERDİ 68. 42869/19 Acar v. Türkiye 05/08/2019 Özkan ACAR Düzce Turkish Şule GÖKMEN 69. 43361/19 Ulun v. Türkiye 06/08/2019 Fatih Sait ULUN Kırıkkale Turkish Vasfiye ULUN 70. 43388/19 Onat v. Türkiye 02/08/2019 Hasan Gürhan ONAT Manisa Turkish Zafer Asım SERBEST 71. 43407/19 Akarsu v. Türkiye 07/08/2019 Üzeyir AKARSU Düzce Turkish Bekir DÖNMEZ 72. 43422/19 Eryaman v. Türkiye 21/07/2019 Metin ERYAMAN Niğde Turkish Firdevs ERYAMAN 73. 44990/19 Aktepe v. Türkiye 23/08/2019 Basri AKTEPE Ankara Turkish Halil Melih AKTEPE 74. 44993/19 Demirbaş v. Türkiye 23/08/2019 Salim DEMİRBAŞ Denizli Turkish Osman TABU 75. 45864/19 Ateş v. Türkiye 29/08/2019 Onur ATEŞ Antalya Turkish Yusuf Sait PEKGÖZ 76. 46150/19 Urbay v. Türkiye 31/08/2019 Osman URBAY Giresun Turkish Yusuf Sait PEKGÖZ 77. 46772/19 ŞAHİN v. Türkiye 26/08/2019 Fatih ŞAHİN Ankara Turkish Fatih DÖNMEZ 78. 47943/19 Çelik v. Türkiye 21/08/2019 Zafer ÇELİK Ankara Turkish Naim UZUN 79. 48063/19 Moran v. Türkiye 05/09/2019 Rukiye MORAN Kayseri Turkish Burak ÇAĞ 80. 48104/19 Bayzan v. Türkiye 11/09/2019 Murat BAYZAN Denizli Turkish İsmail KAPLAN 81. 48359/19 Taner v. Türkiye 02/09/2019 Ayşe TANER Antalya Turkish Yusuf Sait PEKGÖZ 82. 48400/19 Aksoy v. Türkiye 11/09/2019 Erkan AKSOY Manisa Turkish Esra AKSOY 83. 48552/19 Bavik v. Türkiye 20/05/2019 Selahattin BAVİK Kocaeli Turkish Elvan BAĞ CANBAZ 84. 49211/19 Karanfil v. Türkiye 29/08/2019 Remzi KARANFİL Trabzon Turkish Muhammed Nuh POLAT 85. 49391/19 Körpe v. Türkiye 06/09/2019 Mustafa KÖRPE Van Turkish Fatih DİŞCİ 86. 49408/19 Uzun v. Türkiye 11/09/2019 Abdullah UZUN Trabzon Turkish Muhammed Nuh POLAT 87. 49703/19 Gücük v. Türkiye 10/09/2019 Mahmut GÜCÜK Elazığ Turkish Gizem GÜZEL 88. 49722/19 Mertkaya v. Türkiye 09/09/2019 Okan MERTKAYA İzmir Turkish Bülent ÖNÜR 89. 49910/19 Atabay v. Türkiye 19/09/2019 Ulvi Murat ATABAY Istanbul Turkish Serkan BEN 90. 50264/19 Künç v. Türkiye 10/09/2019 Yaşar KÜNÇ Giresun Turkish Erol GÜNAYDIN 91. 50714/19 Bayram v. Türkiye 17/08/2019 Levent BAYRAM Izmir Turkish Ülkü BAYRAM 92. 51075/19 Açar v. Türkiye 02/09/2019 Murat AÇAR Burdur Turkish Hülya AÇAR 93. 51206/19 Gedikli v. Türkiye 03/09/2019 Abdullah GEDİKLİ Aydın Turkish Esra Nur AKYOL 94. 51415/19 Kulaksiz v. Türkiye 23/09/2019 Şenol KULAKSIZ Balıkesir Turkish Burcu HAS 95. 51491/19 Çoban v. Türkiye 27/08/2019 Ahmet ÇOBAN Amasya Turkish Tahir EREN 96. 51794/19 Yıldırım v. Türkiye 29/08/2019 Burhan YILDIRIM Istanbul Turkish Meryem GÜNAY 97. 52109/19 Elmas v. Türkiye 23/09/2019 Leyla ELMAS Balıkesir Turkish Burcu HAS 98. 53526/19 Yıldırım v. Türkiye 26/09/2019 Mehmet Akif YILDIRIM Hatay Turkish Numan YILDIRIM 99. 53571/19 Hancıoğlu v. Türkiye 09/10/2019 Davut HANCIOĞLU İzmir Turkish Özlem SUZAN 100. 53673/19 Zincirkıran v. Türkiye 30/09/2019 Mevlüt ZİNCİRKIRAN Nevşehir Turkish Ali ÇİTİL 101. 53735/19 Tekin v. Türkiye 26/09/2019 Salih TEKİN Karaman Turkish Yunus Emre DOĞAN 102. 54004/19 Doğan v. Türkiye 04/09/2019 Selçuk DOĞAN Çanakkale Turkish Samet YILMAZ 103. 54136/19 Osmanoğlu v. Türkiye 30/09/2019 Ayhan OSMANOĞLU Kocaeli Turkish Erol GÜNAYDIN 104. 54144/19 Cantaş v. Türkiye 02/10/2019 Cengiz CANTAŞ Afyonkarahisar Turkish İbrahim KOCAOĞUL 105. 54800/19 Aksoy v. Türkiye 05/10/2019 Özcan AKSOY Denizli Turkish Serhat ŞAHİN 106. 54823/19 Yurdalan v. Türkiye 14/10/2019 Muhammet YURDALAN Ankara Turkish Yusuf Sait PEKGÖZ 107. 55613/19 Koç v. Türkiye 24/09/2019 Murat KOÇ Nevsehir Turkish Bekir DEMİRCİOĞLU 108. 55767/19 Yalın v. Türkiye 04/10/2019 İlhan YALIN Sakarya Turkish Zerrin YALIN 109. 56434/19 Erden v. Türkiye 18/10/2019 Süleyman ERDEN Denizli Turkish Tarık AVŞAR 110. 56477/19 Kocaman v. Türkiye 15/10/2019 Muharrem KOCAMAN Düzce Turkish Ömer Faruk YAZGELDİ 111. 56884/19 Şatıroğlu v. Türkiye 17/10/2019 Samet ŞATIROĞLU Ankara Turkish Nurcan BÜYÜKÇINAR 112. 57057/19 Yurtcu v. Türkiye 25/10/2019 Ahmet YURTÇU Istanbul Turkish Enes KABADAYI 113. 57349/19 Şekerci v. Türkiye 18/10/2019 Talat ŞEKERCİ Zonguldak Turkish Burhan Temel ÇINAR 114. 57465/19 Karalı v. Türkiye 23/10/2019 Ümit KARALI Istanbul Turkish İbrahim Alper CAN 115. 57479/19 Küçükbaşol v. Türkiye 22/10/2019 Şuayip KÜÇÜKBAŞOL Sivas Turkish Zafer İRAZ 116. 57668/19 Sahin v. Türkiye 15/10/2019 Harun SAHİN Turkish Fatih DÖNMEZ 117. 57763/19 Sert v. Türkiye 04/11/2019 Tuncay SERT Denizli Turkish Mehmet TUNÇER 118. 58097/19 Tekkoyun v. Türkiye 11/10/2019 Mesut TEKKOYUN Denizli Turkish İbrahim KOCAOĞUL 119. 58124/19 İldemir v. Türkiye 30/10/2019 Emre İLDEMİR Zonguldak Turkish Şule GÖKMEN 120. 59151/19 Solmaz v. Türkiye 08/11/2019 İbrahim SOLMAZ Kayseri Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK 121. 59927/19 Birkin v. Türkiye 06/11/2019 Murat BİRKİN Kayseri Turkish Rana BİRKİN 122. 61212/19 Kaplan v. Türkiye 23/11/2019 Muhammed KAPLAN Pamukkale Turkish Bekir Gökhan ÖZTÜRK 123. 61247/19 Manas v. Türkiye 20/11/2019 Mustafa MANAS Denizli Turkish Tarık AVŞAR 124. 61564/19 Sarı v. Türkiye 20/11/2019 Abdulkadir SARI Ankara Turkish Ayşe Süeda ÜNAL 125. 61582/19 Sefil v. Türkiye 11/11/2019 Yusuf SEFİL Bolu Turkish Hatice SEFİL 126. 61597/19 Bostan v. Türkiye 13/11/2019 Necati BOSTAN Elazığ Turkish Arzu BEYAZİT 127. 61634/19 Özkan v. Türkiye 08/11/2019 Mehmet ÖZKAN Aydın Turkish Fatma ÖZKAN 128. 61662/19 Akyürek v. Türkiye 11/11/2019 Mehmet Fatih AKYÜREK Hatay Turkish Özgür Devran ÜNEŞİ 129. 61893/19 Çoban v. Türkiye 15/11/2019 Mehmet Şirin ÇOBAN Konya Turkish Nilay NAYMAN 130. 62030/19 Dogan v. Türkiye 19/11/2019 Hasan DOĞAN Kocaeli Turkish Uğur ALTUN 131. 62378/19 Doğman v. Türkiye 18/11/2019 Ali İhsan DOĞMAN Ankara Turkish Dilara YILMAZ 132. 62623/19 Dişlen v. Türkiye 18/11/2019 Mustafa DİŞLEN Osmaniye Turkish Fatma Zarif TUNÇ 133. 62956/19 Işık v. Türkiye 19/11/2019 Ayhan IŞIK Kırıkkale Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK 134. 63023/19 Ökmen v. Türkiye 14/11/2019 Mustafa ÖKMEN Manisa Turkish İrem TATLIDEDE 135. 63516/19 Çelebi v. Türkiye 18/11/2019 Serkan ÇELEBİ Istanbul Turkish Cihat ÇITIR 136. 64029/19 Koçtürk v. Türkiye 09/12/2019 Uğur KOÇTÜRK Konya Turkish Nursel AKGÜN 137. 64892/19 Dinç v. Türkiye 26/11/2019 İlker DİNÇ Turkish Utku Coşkuner SAKARYA 138. 64941/19 Kuğu v. Türkiye 06/12/2019 Bilgin KUĞU Ankara Turkish Esad MEMİŞ 139. 65111/19 Topatmış v. Türkiye 03/12/2019 Cengiz TOPATMIŞ Afyonkarahisar Turkish Adnan ERDOĞAN 140. 65223/19 Senğül v. Türkiye 18/12/2019 Yavuz SENĞÜL Kırıkkale Turkish Cemaynur GÜVEN 141. 119/20 Yüksel v. Türkiye 19/12/2019 İsmail YÜKSEL Eskişehir Turkish Mustafa ALGAM 142. 125/20 YILMAZ v. Türkiye 19/12/2019 Burak Yasin YILMAZ Eskişehir Turkish Mustafa ALGAM 143. 627/20 Ersöz v. Türkiye 23/12/2019 Süleyman ERSÖZ Bolu Turkish Sezgin ÖZDEMİR 144. 1156/20 Şen v. Türkiye 17/12/2019 Yavuz ŞEN Kocaeli Turkish Çiğdem ŞEN 145. 1265/20 Uzunali v. Türkiye 20/12/2019 Erdinç UZUNALİ Balıkesir Turkish Zafer İRAZ 146. 1398/20 Danışman v. Türkiye 27/12/2019 Abdullah Mutlu DANIŞMAN Bitlis Turkish Mahir ORAK 147. 1615/20 Ayverdi v. Türkiye 13/12/2019 Ferdi AYVERDİ Manisa Turkish Mustafa Safa SOYDAN 148. 2126/20 Şahan v. Türkiye 02/01/2020 Mehmet ŞAHAN Kocaeli Turkish Fatma ŞAHAN 149. 2194/20 Demir v. Türkiye 19/12/2019 Vedat DEMİR Istanbul Turkish Suphi Uğur ÇÖREKÇİ 150. 2465/20 Özcan v. Türkiye 06/01/2020 Özgür ÖZCAN Eskişehir Turkish Ömer Tarık ORMANCI 151. 2523/20 Uysal v. Türkiye 19/12/2019 Erdoğan UYSAL Düzce Turkish Ömer Faruk YAZGELDİ 152. 2567/20 Kınık v. Türkiye 26/12/2019 Özden KINIK Ankara Turkish Erşan CANSEVEN 153. 2841/20 Altınova v. Türkiye 04/12/2019 Suat ALTINOVA Düzce Turkish İsmail CAN 154. 3578/20 Erkart v. Türkiye 30/12/2019 Yusuf ERKART Eskişehir Turkish Mustafa ÖZEL 155. 4193/20 Sayılı v. Türkiye 03/01/2020 Hasan SAYILI Ankara Turkish Erşan CANSEVEN 156. 4397/20 Sağıroğlu v. Türkiye 31/12/2019 Mustafa SAĞIROĞLU Kırıkkale Turkish Halil İbrahim TURAN 157. 4639/20 Elibol v. Türkiye 15/01/2020 Mehmet Emre ELİBOL Kırşehir Turkish Kamile ÖZBULUT 158. 4812/20 Gazioğlu v. Türkiye 03/01/2020 Aynur GAZİOĞLU Gebze Turkish Fatih DİŞCİ 159. 5030/20 Öztürk v. Türkiye 10/01/2020 Seydi Vakkas ÖZTÜRK Gaziantep Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK 160. 5508/20 Yaman v. Türkiye 20/01/2020 Oğuz YAMAN Düzce Turkish Yasemin YAMAN 161. 6082/20 Aytaç v. Türkiye 24/01/2020 Burak AYTAÇ Balıkesir Turkish Ahmet Alp AYTAÇ 162. 6278/20 Yücetürk v. Türkiye 21/01/2020 Ramazan YÜCETÜRK Denizli Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK 163. 6830/20 Tıknas v. Türkiye 21/01/2020 Tufan TIKNAS Kocaeli Turkish Metehan USLUEROL 164. 6915/20 Akkuş v. Türkiye 21/01/2020 Murat AKKUŞ Kocaeli Turkish Metehan USLUEROL 165. 6920/20 Şahan v. Türkiye 16/01/2020 Ferit ŞAHAN Kocaeli Turkish Metehan USLUEROL 166. 7134/20 Uçan v. Türkiye 13/01/2020 Engin UÇAN Balikesir Turkish Hüseyin UÇAN 167. 7857/20 Safaz v. Türkiye 27/01/2020 İsmail SAFAZ Kayseri Turkish Enes Bahadır BAŞKÖY 168. 7900/20 Abidik v. Türkiye 29/01/2020 Adem Ali ABİDİK Antalya Turkish Yusuf Sait PEKGÖZ 169. 7903/20 Topoğlu v. Türkiye 03/02/2020 Serhat TOPOĞLU Ankara Turkish Refia TAŞCIOĞLU 170. 8082/20 Gündüz v. Türkiye 22/01/2020 Fatih GÜNDÜZ Ağrı Turkish Hilal Tuğçe ŞAHİN 171. 8087/20 Koçer v. Türkiye 22/01/2020 Niyazi KOÇER Bursa Turkish Hilal Tuğçe ŞAHİN 172. 8097/20 Şeker v. Türkiye 29/01/2020 Adem ŞEKER Kocaeli Turkish Metehan USLUEROL 173. 9268/20 Oluç v. Türkiye 03/02/2020 Rıdvan OLUÇ Antalya Turkish Yusuf Sait PEKGÖZ 174. 9353/20 Uzun v. Türkiye 17/12/2019 Cem UZUN Ankara Turkish Utku Coşkuner SAKARYA 175. 9639/20 Altan v. Türkiye 05/02/2020 Bayram ALTAN Ankara Turkish Bedirhan Tuna YILDIZ 176. 9986/20 Orta v. Türkiye 18/02/2020 Hüseyin ORTA Ankara Turkish Beyhan ORTA 177. 11014/20 Yavaşcan v. Türkiye 17/02/2020 Yusuf YAVAŞCAN Istanbul Turkish Handan YAVAŞCAN MARHAN 178. 11221/20 Birişik v. Türkiye 10/02/2020 Muhammed BİRİŞİK Malatya Turkish Faik BİRİŞİK 179. 11302/20 Güler v. Türkiye 18/02/2020 Ramazan GÜLER Istanbul Turkish Burak ÇAĞ 180. 11476/20 Özdemir v. Türkiye 18/02/2020 Ergün ÖZDEMİR İzmir Turkish Hatice ÖZDEMİR 181. 11695/20 Özder v. Türkiye 27/02/2020 İsmail ÖZDER Manisa Turkish Havva ALAN ÖZCEL 182. 11997/20 Ak v. Türkiye 18/02/2020 Ayhan AK Kocaeli Turkish Ersayın İŞIK 183. 12646/20 Yamaç v. Türkiye 28/02/2020 Mustafa YAMAÇ Burdur Turkish Mehmet TUNÇER 184. 12671/20 Gürzal v. Türkiye 21/02/2020 Ergün GÜRZAL Antalya Turkish Yusuf Sait PEKGÖZ 185. 12898/20 Özdamar v. Türkiye 04/03/2020 Yusuf Kürşad ÖZDAMAR Manisa Turkish Arzu ÖZDAMAR 186. 13112/20 Akyazı v. Türkiye 20/02/2020 Cengiz AKYAZI Bursa Turkish Yusuf Sait PEKGÖZ 187. 13673/20 İnce v. Türkiye 07/03/2020 Mustafa İNCE Manisa Turkish Salim Serdar YAĞCI 188. 13760/20 Tandoğan v. Türkiye 25/02/2020 Nuh TANDOĞAN Sinop Turkish Uğur ALTUN 189. 14844/20 Genç v. Türkiye 06/03/2020 Mehmet Zeki GENÇ Siirt Turkish Mehmet SATICI 190. 15852/20 Çelik v. Türkiye 16/03/2020 Hasan ÇELİK Ankara Turkish Cihat ÇITIR 191. 16207/20 Özdemir v. Türkiye 16/03/2020 Mehmet ÖZDEMİR Aydın Turkish Zehra KARAKULAK BOZDAĞ 192. 16561/20 Arıcan v. Türkiye 18/03/2020 Ahmet ARICAN Aksaray Turkish Muhammet Emin ÇITIR 193. 16933/20 Çakmak v. Türkiye 23/03/2020 Çağrı ÇAKMAK Tokat Turkish Mustafa YELBEY 194. 16996/20 Tezcan v. Türkiye 20/03/2020 Abdulgani TEZCAN Kayseri Turkish Zehra KARAKULAK BOZDAĞ 195. 17040/20 Kaya v. Türkiye 17/03/2020 Ahmet Hamdi KAYA SEE REP. ADDRESS Turkish Eyyüp SAĞIR 196. 17065/20 Varol v. Türkiye 03/04/2020 Selim VAROL İzmir Turkish   197. 17119/20 Akkuş v. Türkiye 20/03/2020 Necati AKKUŞ Kayseri Turkish Zehra KARAKULAK BOZDAĞ 198. 17120/20 Tezel v. Türkiye 09/04/2020 Aykut TEZEL Denizli Turkish Özge KIYAK MUSAN 199. 17122/20 Erşen v. Türkiye 24/03/2020 Mahmut Sami ERŞEN Kayseri Turkish Zehra KARAKULAK BOZDAĞ 200. 17981/20 Dağdelen v. Türkiye 17/04/2020 Osman DAĞDELEN Afyonkarahisar Turkish Kamile ÖZBULUT 201. 18184/20 Batıhan v. Türkiye 17/04/2020 Sümerya BATIHAN Çamardı/Niğde Turkish Demir ABDULSELAM 202. 20148/20 Kaplan v. Türkiye 13/05/2020 Ahmet KAPLAN Ankara Turkish Alperen AKARSLAN 203. 20245/20 Mıhcı v. Türkiye 13/05/2020 Doğan MIHCI Kayseri Turkish Erşan CANSEVEN 204. 21059/20 Kaya v. Türkiye 22/05/2020 Turgut KAYA Kastamonu Turkish Hamide Nur ALKAÇ 205. 21333/20 Mermer v. Türkiye 11/05/2020 Faruk MERMER Istanbul Turkish Can AHMETOĞLU 206. 21417/20 Kaya v. Türkiye 20/05/2020 Murat KAYA Konya Turkish Muhammet ERDEN 207. 21743/20 Karaca v. Türkiye 28/05/2020 Ayhan KARACA Ankara Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK 208. 21969/20 Demir v. Türkiye 29/05/2020 Sabri DEMİR İzmir Turkish Çiğdem ÇALIŞ ÇAĞAN 209. 22427/20 Kök v. Türkiye 02/06/2020 Mustafa Önder KÖK Antalya Turkish Nurcan KAYMAZ ÇEKIÇOĞLU 210. 22973/20 Aymak v. Türkiye 21/05/2020 Bilal AYMAK Kırıkkale Turkish Adnan DEMİR 211. 23607/20 Sipahioğlu v. Türkiye 02/06/2020 Rıfat SİPAHİOĞLU ZONGULDAK Turkish Ömer Faruk YAZGELDİ 212. 23886/20 Aytekin v. Türkiye 21/05/2020 Mehmet Ertaç AYTEKİN Istanbul Turkish Özkan OGURLU 213. 23990/20 Obur v. Türkiye 01/06/2020 Özlem OBUR İzmir Turkish Metin BOZKURT 214. 24254/20 Eroğlu v. Türkiye 15/06/2020 Abdurrahman EROĞLU Ankara Turkish Uğur ALTUN 215. 24293/20 Yaman v. Türkiye 15/06/2020 Bilal YAMAN Ankara Turkish Gülsüm YAMAN 216. 24308/20 Karabiber v. Türkiye 11/06/2020 Fatih KARABİBER Istanbul Turkish Serdar ATILGAN 217. 24401/20 Uysal v. Türkiye 01/06/2020 Esma Nur UYSAL İzmir Turkish Metin BOZKURT 218. 25270/20 Taşkın v. Türkiye 05/06/2020 Ferhat TAŞKIN Düzce Turkish Fatih DÖNMEZ 219. 25463/20 Karanfil v. Türkiye 09/06/2020 Ümmühan KARANFİL Balıkesir Turkish Burcu HAS 220. 26395/20 Eroğlu v. Türkiye 19/06/2020 Eyüp EROĞLU Düzce Turkish Ömer Faruk YAZGELDİ 221. 26464/20 Özülkü v. Türkiye 22/06/2020 Abdulkadir ÖZÜLKÜ Batman Turkish Mehmet Sefa DUMAN 222. 27189/20 Akyol v. Türkiye 26/06/2020 Abdurrahman AKYOL Afyonkarahisar Turkish Seçkin KESKİN 223. 27256/20 Güller v. Türkiye 17/06/2020 Mücahit GÜLLER Balıkesir Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK 224. 27742/20 Yilmaz v. Türkiye 22/06/2020 Hüseyin YILMAZ Düzce Turkish Uğur ALTUN 225. 28033/20 Baykan v. Türkiye 09/06/2020 Davut BAYKAN Bursa Turkish Mesut Enes AKBULUT 226. 28759/20 Korkmaz v. Türkiye 30/06/2020 Ahmet KORKMAZ Osmaniye Turkish Burak ÇOLAK 227. 28911/20 Kaçmaz v. Türkiye 01/07/2020 Mesut KAÇMAZ Afyonkarahisar Turkish Ayşe Süeda ÜNAL 228. 29048/20 Kuzgun v. Türkiye 06/07/2020 Kürşat KUZGUN Ankara Turkish Fatma HACIPAŞALIOĞLU 229. 29157/20 Uludağ v. Türkiye 24/06/2020 Mustafa Mücahit ULUDAĞ Karaman Turkish İsmet ÇELİK 230. 29181/20 Aydın v. Türkiye 06/07/2020 Özcan AYDIN Rize Turkish Ayşe Süeda ÜNAL 231. 30443/20 Alp v. Türkiye 16/07/2020 Sadık Turan ALP İzmir Turkish İlker BOZ 232. 30661/20 Aydın v. Türkiye 02/07/2020 Mehmet Sabır AYDIN Balikesir Turkish Hilal Tuğçe ŞAHİN 233. 31330/20 Karabacak v. Türkiye 21/07/2020 Burhan KARABACAK Ankara Turkish Şule GÖKMEN 234. 32060/20 Gündar v. Türkiye 27/07/2020 Doğan GÜNDAR Bursa Turkish Mustafa YELBEY 235. 33806/20 Tekdemir v. Türkiye 04/08/2020 Çetin TEKDEMİR Istanbul Turkish Dilara YILMAZ 236. 34186/20 Özkaya v. Türkiye 22/07/2020 Erdoğan ÖZKAYA İzmir Turkish Hande Nur ÖZKAYA 237. 34882/20 Çetin v. Türkiye 06/07/2020 Hüseyin ÇETİN Kayseri Turkish Ebru EKİCİ 238. 34892/20 Çetinkaya v. Türkiye 10/08/2020 Mehmet Sait ÇETİNKAYA Kırıkkale Turkish Mualla ERCAN 239. 35153/20 Şan v. Türkiye 27/07/2020 Ramazan ŞAN Antalya Turkish Sultan TEKE SOYDİNÇ 240. 35431/20 Pilevne v. Türkiye 27/07/2020 Murat PİLEVNE Antalya Turkish Sultan TEKE SOYDİNÇ 241. 35513/20 Ceylan v. Türkiye 28/07/2020 Zeki CEYLAN Yalova Turkish Kubilay TORUN 242. 35598/20 YILDIZ v. Türkiye 13/08/2020 Vehbi YILDIZ İzmir Turkish Havva ALAN ÖZCEL 243. 36489/20 Akkul v. Türkiye 28/07/2020 İbrahim AKKUL Afyonkarahisar Turkish Nurgül YAYMAN YILMAZ 244. 36920/20 Kartalcık v. Türkiye 10/08/2020 Vedat KARTALCIK Isparta Turkish   245. 37627/20 Arslanoğlu v. Türkiye 26/08/2020 Rafet ARSLANOĞLU Kahramanmaraş Turkish Ramazan DANIŞMAN 246. 37810/20 Yörüklü v. Türkiye 18/08/2020 Şaban YÖRÜKLÜ Denizli Turkish Ali YILDIZ 247. 38208/20 Akduman v. Türkiye 28/08/2020 Mehmet AKDUMAN Ankara Turkish Refia TAŞCIOĞLU 248. 38467/20 Yağcı v. Türkiye 27/08/2020 Gülşen YAĞCI İzmir Turkish Salim Serdar YAĞCI 249. 38471/20 Karınca v. Türkiye 20/08/2020 Habibe KARINCA Antalya Turkish İshak IŞIK 250. 40647/20 Cirakoglu v. Türkiye 02/09/2020 Mehmet ÇIRAKOĞLU Ankara Turkish Fatma HACIPAŞALIOĞLU 251. 41368/20 Arlı v. Türkiye 10/09/2020 Seyfettin ARLI Turkish Refia TAŞICOĞLU ERBİROL 252. 41470/20 Başpınar v. Türkiye 10/09/2020 İsmail BAŞPINAR Afyonkarahisar Turkish Refia TAŞCIOĞLU 253. 42543/20 Kara v. Türkiye 15/09/2020 Nevzat KARA Samsun Turkish Mehmet TURANTAYLAK 254. 43464/20 Aydın v. Türkiye 19/09/2020 Ünal AYDIN Yozgat Turkish Hilal Tuğçe ŞAHİN 255. 43656/20 Koç v. Türkiye 24/09/2020 Akif KOÇ Kiriklareli Turkish Esra KOÇ 256. 45338/20 Ermişoğlu v. Türkiye 09/10/2020 Ergun ERMİŞOĞLU SEE REP. ADDRESS Turkish Janset ATİLA 257. 46221/20 Aytaş v. Türkiye 01/10/2020 Kaya Mehmet AYTAŞ Samsun Turkish Zeliha DERVIŞOĞLU 258. 46389/20 Karaduman v. Türkiye 08/10/2020 Mustafa KARADUMAN Kocaeli Turkish Metehan USLUEROL 259. 46415/20 Kahyaoğlu v. Türkiye 15/10/2020 Hasan KAHYAOĞLU Denizli Turkish Cevat KAHYAOĞLU 260. 47619/20 Bozkurt v. Türkiye 22/10/2020 Hasan BOZKURT Zonguldak Turkish Beyza Esma TUNA 261. 49561/20 Dalman v. Türkiye 27/10/2020 Cem DALMAN Afyonkarahisar Turkish Metin BOZKURT 262. 49848/20 Azgın v. Türkiye 04/11/2020 Mehmet AZGIN Düzce Turkish Hasan ARSLAN 263. 51357/20 Demirhan v. Türkiye 02/11/2020 Melek DEMİRHAN Istanbul Turkish Emriye Zerrin TORAMAN 264. 52833/20 Demircan v. Türkiye 19/11/2020 Hamza DEMİRCAN Samsun Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK 265. 54974/20 Aksoy v. Türkiye 20/11/2020 Kadir AKSOY Kırşehir Turkish Zafer İRAZ 266. 274/21 Kocatürk v. Türkiye 15/12/2020 Kerim KOCATÜRK Kayseri Turkish Nesibe Betül KOCATÜRK 267. 544/21 Halıcıoğlu v. Türkiye 14/12/2020 Mevlüt HALICIOĞLU Turkish Rümeysa DENİZ 268. 1121/21 Dinc v. Türkiye 09/12/2020 Yakup DİNÇ Eskişehir Turkish Elvan BAĞ CANBAZ 269. 1614/21 Karataş v. Türkiye 24/12/2020 Emre KARATAŞ Istanbul Turkish Arife ÖZBEK 270. 2100/21 Ayhan v. Türkiye 16/12/2020 Sabri AYHAN Muğla Turkish Enes Malik KILIÇ 271. 2314/21 Uzbaş v. Türkiye 29/12/2020 Ali UZBAŞ Balıkesir Turkish Burcu HAS 272. 2522/21 Çiftdoğan v. Türkiye 09/12/2020 Yakup ÇİFTDOĞAN Ankara Turkish Kamile ÖZBULUT 273. 3085/21 ŞAHİN v. Türkiye 28/12/2020 Akif ŞAHİN Çorum Turkish Zehra KARAKULAK BOZDAĞ 274. 3105/21 Yiğit v. Türkiye 15/12/2020 Ali Galip YİĞİT Ankara Turkish Kamile ÖZBULUT 275. 4215/21 Keten v. Türkiye 08/01/2021 Yusuf KETEN Ankara Turkish Ayşe Süeda ÜNAL 276. 6525/21 Dombaycı v. Türkiye 20/01/2021 Fatma DOMBAYCI Denizli Turkish Tarık AVŞAR 277. 9401/21 Çalık v. Türkiye 28/01/2021 Muhammet Duran ÇALIK Konya Turkish Rukiye COŞGUN 278. 10202/21 Samur v. Türkiye 04/01/2021 Aycan SAMUR Kırıkkale Turkish İbrahim Halil UZUN 279. 10561/21 Kenger v. Türkiye 03/02/2021 Bekir KENGER Antalya Turkish Yusuf Sait PEKGÖZ 280. 11766/21 Usun v. Türkiye 16/02/2021 Yunus USUN Sakarya Turkish Hilal Tuğçe ŞAHİN 281. 12512/21 Demirci v. Türkiye 11/12/2020 Abdurrahman DEMİRCİ Ankara Turkish Rümeysa DENİZ 282. 12612/21 Bayrak v. Türkiye 22/01/2021 Osman BAYRAK Denizli Turkish Tarık AVŞAR 283. 14364/21 Özcan v. Türkiye 12/03/2021 Erhan ÖZCAN Ankara Turkish Uğur ALTUN 284. 14385/21 Tulukçu v. Türkiye 10/03/2021 Fatma Rumeysa TULUKÇU Konya Turkish Refia TAŞCIOĞLU 285. 14430/21 Balcı v. Türkiye 05/03/2021 Sezer BALCI Tokat Turkish Zafer İRAZ 286. 15056/21 Bayram v. Türkiye 11/03/2021 Aşir BAYRAM Afyonkarahisar Turkish Eyyüp SAĞIR 287. 15557/21 Efel v. Türkiye 11/03/2021 Dudu EFEL Konya Turkish Rümeysa DENİZ 288. 16538/21 Soyoral v. Türkiye 05/03/2021 Lokman SOYORAL Van Turkish ŞAHİN CANGÜLEÇ 289. 16706/21 Bingül v. Türkiye 11/03/2021 Aysel BİNGÜL Ankara Turkish Kamile ÖZBULUT 290. 16895/21 Özlem v. Türkiye 04/03/2021 Sezen ÖZLEM Edirne Turkish Yavuzhan VAROL 291. 17102/21 İper v. Türkiye 12/03/2021 Yusuf Emre İPER Istanbul Turkish Tora PEKİN 292. 17425/21 Öztürk v. Türkiye 19/03/2021 Mahmut ÖZTÜRK Konya Turkish Cihat ÇITIR 293. 17499/21 Esen v. Türkiye 29/03/2021 Ercan ESEN Balıkesir Turkish Janset ATİLA 294. 17592/21 Akgül v. Türkiye 23/03/2021 Adem AKGÜL Antalya Turkish Nurcan KAYMAZ ÇEKİÇOĞLU 295. 17595/21 Özdemir v. Türkiye 17/03/2021 Muhammet ÖZDEMİR Gümüşhane Turkish Mehmet EKİNOĞLU 296. 17840/21 Çitekçi v. Türkiye 23/03/2021 Mehmet ÇİTEKÇİ Antalya Turkish Sultan TEKE SOYDİNÇ 297. 20509/21 Taşkent v. Türkiye 14/04/2021 Nurcan TAŞKENT İstanbul Turkish Mehmet Sıddık YURTÇİÇEK 298. 22343/21 Erdem v. Türkiye 21/04/2021 Mürsel ERDEM Izmir Turkish Kadriye Nur AYTAÇ 299. 22347/21 Erçıkdı v. Türkiye 20/04/2021 Erdal ERÇIKDI Denizli Turkish Mehmet TUNÇER 300. 22925/21 Talaz v. Türkiye 29/04/2021 Hüseyin TALAZ Balikesir Turkish Burcu HAS 301. 26910/21 Yıldırım v. Türkiye 17/05/2021 Mahmut Şerif YILDIRIM Uşak Turkish Hilal Tuğçe ŞAHİN 302. 27111/21 Düzenli v. Türkiye 10/05/2021 Halim DÜZENLİ Manisa Turkish Merve AVCI 303. 28991/21 Hayla v. Türkiye 24/05/2021 Hidaye HAYLA Denizli Turkish İbrahim KOCAOĞUL 304. 30423/21 Birinci v. Türkiye 08/06/2021 Erdoğan BİRİNCİ Giresun Turkish Erol GÜNAYDIN 305. 30663/21 Şeker v. Türkiye 08/06/2021 Musa ŞEKER Kırıkkale Turkish Hilal Tuğçe ŞAHİN 306. 30926/21 Tiryaki v. Türkiye 20/05/2021 Yunus TİRYAKİ Ankara Turkish Fatih DÖNMEZ 307. 31151/21 Özdoğan v. Türkiye 04/06/2021 Ahmet ÖZDOĞAN Bolu Turkish Hilal Tuğçe ŞAHİN 308. 33165/21 Eker v. Türkiye 04/06/2021 Turan EKER Bolu Turkish İrem GÜNEŞ (DANACIOĞLU) 309. 33343/21 Serter Özlü v. Türkiye 10/06/2021 Zeynep Sacide SERTER ÖZLÜ Ankara Turkish Maide ÖZLÜ 310. 34556/21 Aslan v. Türkiye 25/06/2021 Sefer ASLAN Kırşehir Turkish Seçkin KESKİN 311. 35695/21 Aslan v. Türkiye 28/06/2021 Hanife Rumeysa ASLAN Trabzon Turkish Zümrüt ŞAHİN 312. 39634/21 Koçyiğit v. Türkiye 12/07/2021 Mustafa KOÇYİĞİT Kırıkkale Turkish Senem DOĞANOĞLU 313. 42984/21 Ünal v. Türkiye 20/08/2021 Kazım ÜNAL İzmir Turkish Kadri İNCE 314. 48723/21 İpkin v. Türkiye 10/09/2021 Gökhan İPKİN Kayseri Turkish Erşan CANSEVEN