73825/13;73363/17;84513/17;24989/18;28878/18;45492/18;47512/18;50533/18;19313/19;20327/19;36693/19;37979/19;38192/19;40994/19;51689/20;4233/21;9635/21;9644/21;19175/21;23108/21;34659/21;2987/22;15972/22;37318/23
WyrokETPCz2024-06-27ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0627JUD007382513
Analiza orzeczenia
Sekcja wygenerowana przez AI na podstawie treści orzeczenia — nie stanowi cytatu.
Zagadnienie prawne
Czy ograniczenia dotyczące miejsca, czasu lub sposobu przeprowadzania zgromadzeń publicznych w Rosji naruszyły prawo do wolności zgromadzeń zagwarantowane w art. 11 Konwencji?Ratio decidendi
Trybunał stwierdził naruszenie art. 11 Konwencji, opierając się na swojej ugruntowanej linii orzeczniczej dotyczącej wolności zgromadzeń. Uznał, że ingerencje w wolność zgromadzeń skarżących były oparte na przepisach prawa, które nie spełniały wymogów „jakości prawa” Konwencji, albo nie były „konieczne w społeczeństwie demokratycznym”. Trybunał nie znalazł żadnych faktów ani argumentów, które skłoniłyby go do odmiennego wniosku niż w podobnych sprawach przeciwko Rosji, w których już wcześniej stwierdzano naruszenia w analogicznych kwestiach.Stan faktyczny
Skarżący, obywatele Rosji, planowali zorganizować różne zgromadzenia publiczne, takie jak wiece, protesty, marsze czy nabożeństwa żałobne. Władze rosyjskie nałożyły na te wydarzenia ograniczenia dotyczące miejsca, czasu lub sposobu ich przeprowadzenia. Ograniczenia te obejmowały propozycje zmiany lokalizacji, całkowite zakazy zgromadzeń lub stosowanie ogólnych zakazów w określonych miejscach, takich jak place, ulice, okolice kościołów, organizacji sportowych czy dworców kolejowych.Rozstrzygnięcie
Trybunał jednogłośnie:
- Decyduje o połączeniu skarg.
- Uznaje, że ma jurysdykcję do rozpatrzenia skarg, ponieważ dotyczą one faktów, które miały miejsce przed 16 września 2022 r.
- Uznaje skargi na podstawie art. 11 Konwencji za dopuszczalne.
- Stwierdza, że nie ma potrzeby odrębnego rozpatrywania pozostałych skarg na podstawie art. 13 Konwencji.
- Stwierdza naruszenie art. 11 Konwencji w związku z ograniczeniami dotyczącymi miejsca, czasu lub sposobu przeprowadzania zgromadzeń publicznych.
- Uznaje, że stwierdzenie naruszenia stanowi samo w sobie wystarczające słuszne zadośćuczynienie.Pełny tekst orzeczenia
FOURTH SECTION
CASE OF SOROKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 73825/13 and 23 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
27 June 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Sorokin and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Branko Lubarda, President,
Armen Harutyunyan,
Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 6 June 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of restrictions on the location, time or manner of conduct of public events. Some applicants also raised complaints under Article 13 of the Convention (marked with an asterisk in the appended table).
THE LAW
JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
Jurisdiction
6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION
7. The applicants complained principally of the restrictions on the location, time or manner of conduct of public events. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention,
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case‑law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references).
9. In the leading case of Lashmankin and Others v. Russia, nos. 57818/09 and 14 others, 7 February 2017, and, more recently, in Pleshkov and Others v. Russia, nos. 29356/19 and 31119/19, 21 November 2023, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicant s’ freedom of assembly were either based on legal provisions which did not meet the Convention’s “quality of law” requirements, or were not “necessary in a democratic society”.
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
remaining complaints
12. Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 13 of the Convention concerning the lack of effective domestic remedy for their complaints of restrictions on the right to freedom of assembly.
13. In view of the findings in paragraph 10 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints (see Pleshkov and Others, cited above, §§ 71-72).
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
14. Having regard to the nature of the applicants’ complaints, the Court considers that the finding of a violation constitutes sufficient just satisfaction for any non‑pecuniary damage the applicants may have suffered (see, among recent authorities, Pleshkov and Others, cited above, § 76, and the cases cited therein; see also, mutatis mutandis, Alekseyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 14988/09 and 50 others, § 29, 27 November 2018).
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
Decides to join the applications;
Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;
Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention admissible and decides that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 13 of the Convention;
Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention concerning the restrictions on the location, time or manner of conduct of public events;
Holds that the finding of a violation constitutes in itself sufficient just satisfaction.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 27 June 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
{signature_p_1} {signature_p_2}
Viktoriya Maradudina Branko Lubarda
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(restrictions on the location, time or manner of conduct of public events)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Location
Date of the public event planned
Restrictions applied
Final domestic decision (type of procedure)
Date
Name of the court
73825/13
02/06/2013
Sergey Vladimirovich SOROKIN
Ernest Aleksandrovich MEZAK
Dmitriy Borisovich SAKHAROV
Mezak Ernest Aleksandrovich
Saint-Barthélemy-d’Anjou
Rally for fair elections
Teatralnaya Square, Syktyvkar
26/02/2012
enhanced security measures taken by the police at the venue of the rally
Notification procedure
Supreme Court of the Komi Republic 03/12/2012
73363/17*
05/10/2017
Petr Aleksandrovich KARMANOV
1995
Vorobyev Viktor Viktorovich
Moscow
Protests against replacement of trolleybuses with buses
Centre of Moscow
between 25-29 April
and 4-8 May 2016
proposal to change the location
Judicial review under the Code of Administrative Procedure
Supreme Court of the Russian Federation 21/03/2017
(received by post on 06/04/2017)
84513/17
02/12/2017
Mikhail Albertovich VOROSHILOV
1960
Pushkin Square,
Moscow
30/10/2016
prohibition on holding the planned public assembly
Judicial review under the Code of Administrative Procedure
Supreme Court of the Russian Federation 22/08/2017
24989/18*
23/05/2018
Sergey Sergeyevich BABINETS
1988
Vanslova Yekaterina
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally to support victims of torture
Bolshaya Pokrovskaya str.,
Nizhniy Novgorod
26/06/2017
proposal to change the location
Judicial review under the Code of Administrative Procedure
Supreme Court of the Russian Federation 28/03/2018
28878/18
23/12/2013
Aleksandr Dmitriyevich PEREDRUK
Dmitriy Valeryevich OSTRYAKOV
Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich
St Petersburg
Political rally
Marsovo Pole,
St Petersburg
01/06/2017
Political rally
Nevskiy Prospekt,
St Petersburg
10/07/2013
proposal to change the location
general prohibition on holding public events at certain locations (general ban on holding public events at the Nevskiy Prospekt)
Judicial review under the Code of Administrative Procedure
Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, 15/01/2018
notification procedure Murmansk Regional Court
02/10/2013
45492/18*
16/09/2018
Vera Petrovna TERESHONKOVA
Viktor Grigoryevich TORLOPOV
Mezak Ernest Aleksandrovich
Saint-Barthélemy-d’Anjou
Memorial service
Stefanovskaya square,
Syktyvkar
30/07/2017
general prohibition on holding public events at certain locations (prohibition to organise public events at Stefanovskaya square)
Judicial review under the Code of Administrative Procedure
Supreme Court of the Russian Federation
16/03/2018
47512/18
14/09/2018
Polina Vladimirovna KOSTYLEVA
1977
Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich
St Petersburg
Political rally
Marsovo Pole,
St Petersburg
07/10/2017
failure to propose an alternative location
Judicial review under the Code of Administrative Procedure
Supreme Court of the Russian Federation
29/03/2018
50533/18
01/10/2018
Anastasiya Yuryevna RONZHINA
Georgiy Andreyevich BORODIN
Pavel Anatolyevich POTASHOV
Darya Viktorovna SHCHERBININA
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Voronezh
08/07/2017
and
09/07/2017
prohibition on holding the planned public assembly
Judicial review under the Code of Administrative Procedure
Supreme Court of the Russian Federation 05/05/2018
19313/19
01/04/2019
Alina Vladimirovna MARTINOVICH
1994
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Entrance to the Gorky Park,
Moscow
17/07/2017
and
18/07/2017
prohibition on holding the planned public assembly
Judicial review under the Code of Administrative Procedure
Supreme Court of the Russian Federation 29/10/2018
20327/19
02/04/2019
Danil Vasilyevich NOVIKOV
1990
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Protest against retirement age hike
Prospekt Revolutsii, Voronezh
09/09/2018
prohibition on holding the planned public assembly
Judicial review under the Code of Administrative Procedure
Supreme Court of the Russian Federation
18/02/2019
36693/19
26/06/2019
Stanislav Nikolayevich KOPYLOV
1983
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Rally against retirement age hike
Prospekt Oktyabrskoy Revolutsii,
Stavropol
01/07/2018
proposal to change the time, proposal to change the location
Judicial review under the Code of Administrative Procedure
Supreme Court of the Russian Federation
18/01/2019
37979/19
03/07/2019
Aleksandr Gennadyevich SUSTOV
Yelena Sergeyevna PONOMAREVA
Zubarev Dmitriy Vladimirovich
Vladivostok
Political rally
Central square,
Vladivostok
26/01/2019
general prohibition on holding public events at certain locations (regional ban on holding public events in the vicinity of churches and other places of worship)
Judicial review under the Code of Administrative Procedure
Supreme Court of the Russian Federation 16/03/2020
38192/19
03/07/2019
Serafima Vadimovna CHERNOUSOVA
Regina Nikolayevna DZUGKOYEVA Zubarev Dmitriy Vladimirovich
Vladivostok
Rally and march to commemorate the death of B. Nemtsov
Waterfront Sports Harbour,
Vladivostok
27/02/2019
general prohibition on holding public events at certain locations (regional ban on holding public events in the vicinity of sports organisations)
Judicial review under the Code of Administrative Procedure
Supreme Court of the Russian Federation 16/03/2020
40994/19
15/07/2019
Arkadiy Alekseyevich CHAPLYGIN
1978
Rally calling for decriminalisation of marijuana
St Petersburg
05/05/2018
prohibition on holding the planned public assembly
Judicial review under the Code of Administrative Procedure
Supreme Court of the Russian Federation
22/01/2019
51689/20
09/11/2020
Aleksandr Gennadyevich SUSTOV
Yevgeniy Ivanovich LYASHENKO
Zubarev Dmitriy Vladimirovich
Vladivostok
Political rally
Railway Station Square
Vladivostok
17/08/2019
general prohibition on holding public events at certain locations (regional ban on holding public events near the railway stations)
Judicial review under the Code of Administrative Procedure
Supreme Court of the Russian Federation 19/10/2020
4233/21
14/12/2020
Ilya Sergeyevich VAGIN
1985
Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna
St Petersburg
Political rally
Lubyanskaya Square, Moscow
05/10/2019
Political rally
Pushkinskaya Square,
Moscow
14/09/2019
proposal to change the location
proposal to change the location
Judicial review under the Code of Administrative Procedure
Supreme Court of the Russian Federation 15/06/2020
Supreme Court of the Russian Federation 15/06/2020
9635/21
22/01/2021
Grigoriy Nikolayevich KABLIS
Vyacheslav Sergeyevich SLYUSAREV
Mezak Ernest Aleksandrovich
Saint-Barthélemy-d’Anjou
Protest against construction of a landfill in Shiyes
Stefanovskaya Square,
Syktyvkar
02/06/2019
general prohibition on holding public events at certain locations (regional ban on holding public events in Stefanovskaya Square in Syktyvkar)
Judicial review under the Code of Administrative Procedure
Supreme Court of the Russian Federation 22/07/2020
9644/21
24/01/2021
Olga Aleksandrovna IVANTSEVA
1965
Tiunov Sergey Yuryevich
Yekaterinburg
Political rally
Yekaterinburg
06/09/2019
proposal to change the location
Judicial review under the Code of Administrative Procedure
Supreme Court of the Russian Federation 03/12/2020
19175/21
21/03/2021
Konstantin Aleksandrovich KOTOV
Svetlana Anatolyevna PCHELINTSEVA
Lev Aleksandrovich PONOMAREV
Irina Aleksandrovna YATSENKO
Oleg Aleksandrovich YELANCHIK
Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich
Moscow
Political march
Centre of Moscow
13/05/2019
proposal to change the location
Judicial review under the Code of Administrative Procedure
Supreme Court of the Russian Federation 05/11/2020
23108/21*
07/04/2021
Svetlana Igorevna SHMELEVA
1982
Eysmont Mariya Olegovna
Moscow
Political rally
Several locations in the centre of Moscow
07/04/2019
general prohibition on holding public events at certain locations (impossibility to hold a public event anywhere in the centre of Moscow)
Judicial review under the Code of Administrative Procedure
Supreme Court of the Russian Federation 07/10/2020
34659/21
18/06/2021
Veronika Konstantinovna ESSEN
1994
Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich
St Petersburg
Climate change rally
Several locations in the centre of Moscow
14/02/2020
proposal to change the location
Judicial review under the Code of Administrative Procedure
Supreme Court of the Russian Federation
21/12/2020
2987/22
15/09/2021
Mariya Vladimirovna CHISTYAKOVA
1996
Valenkov Andrey Olegovich
Nizhniy Novgorod
Artistic performance against 2020 amendments to the Russian Constitution
Bolshaya Pokrovskaya street,
Nizhniy Novgorod
21/03/2020
proposal to change the location, general prohibition on holding public events at certain locations (regional ban on holding public events at Bolshaya Pokrovskaya Street)
Judicial review under the Code of Administrative Procedure
Supreme Court of the Russian Federation 17/03/2021
15972/22
24/02/2022
Dmitriy Aleksandrovich SIDENKO
1999
Rally to support political prisoners
Several locations
in Tomsk
08/12/2019
proposal to change the location
Judicial review under the Code of Administrative Procedure
Supreme Court of the Russian Federation 13/09/2021
37318/23
28/09/2023
Yelena Valentinovna MAKEY
1972
Protest against politically motivated criminal prosecution of people
Square Truda,
Yekaterinburg
06/04/2022
prohibition on holding the planned public assembly
Judicial review under the Code of Administrative Procedure
Supreme Court of the Russian Federation 29/05/2023
© Rada Europy / Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka, źródło: HUDOC (hudoc.echr.coe.int), pozyskano 29.07.2026. · Źródło