74497/17;11691/18;31714/21;32246/21;33867/21;35304/21;36904/21;38021/21;41349/21;41864/21;44458/21;46388/21;48147/21;48617/21;49162/21;50070/21;52032/21;52592/21;55865/21;57504/21;58442/21;60203/21;61556/21;614/22;2179/22;3675/22;9616/22;11013/22;11815/22;12322/22;18012/22;18026/22;18234/22;21557/22;28058/22;35381/22;38597/22;5346/23

WyrokETPCz2023-11-09ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1109JUD007449717

Analiza orzeczenia

Sekcja wygenerowana przez AI na podstawie treści orzeczenia — nie stanowi cytatu.

Zagadnienie prawne
Czy niewystarczające warunki detencji w rosyjskich zakładach karnych naruszyły art. 3 Konwencji, a w niektórych przypadkach także inne postanowienia Konwencji, takie jak art. 8, oraz czy istniał skuteczny środek odwoławczy w prawie krajowym?
Ratio decidendi
Trybunał stwierdził naruszenie art. 3 Konwencji, opierając się na swojej ugruntowanej linii orzeczniczej dotyczącej niewystarczających warunków detencji, w szczególności przeludnienia. Podkreślił, że skrajny brak miejsca w celi więziennej lub przeludnienie jest kluczowym czynnikiem przy ocenie, czy warunki detencji były „poniżające” w rozumieniu art. 3. Trybunał uznał, że warunki detencji skarżących były niewystarczające, a fakty i argumenty przedstawione przez Rząd nie były w stanie zmienić tego wniosku. W przypadku innych skarg (np. dotyczących stałego nadzoru wideo), Trybunał również stwierdził naruszenia Konwencji w świetle swojej ugruntowanej linii orzeczniczej. Trybunał uznał, że nie ma potrzeby odrębnego rozpatrywania skarg z art. 13, ponieważ naruszenia materialne zostały już stwierdzone.
Stan faktyczny
Liczni skarżący, obywatele Rosji, skarżyli się na niewystarczające warunki ich detencji w różnych zakładach karnych w Rosji. Warunki te obejmowały przeludnienie (często poniżej 3 m² na osadzonego), brak świeżego powietrza, nieodpowiednią temperaturę, brak prywatności w toalecie, niedostateczne warunki higieniczne, złą jakość jedzenia i wody pitnej, a także inne uchybienia. Niektórzy skarżący zgłaszali również inne skargi, takie jak stały nadzór wideo. Fakty te miały miejsce przed 16 września 2022 r., kiedy Federacja Rosyjska przestała być stroną Konwencji.
Rozstrzygnięcie
Decyduje o połączeniu skarg; Uznaje, że ma jurysdykcję do rozpatrzenia tych skarg, ponieważ dotyczą one faktów, które miały miejsce przed 16 września 2022 r.; Uznaje skargi na podstawie art. 3 Konwencji dotyczące warunków detencji skarżących po skazaniu oraz inne skargi podniesione przez skarżących w świetle ugruntowanej linii orzeczniczej Trybunału za dopuszczalne; Uznaje, że nie ma potrzeby odrębnego rozpatrywania skarg podniesionych na podstawie art. 13 Konwencji dotyczących braku skutecznego środka odwoławczego w prawie krajowym w związku z złymi warunkami detencji; Stwierdza, że te skargi ujawniają naruszenie art. 3 Konwencji dotyczące niewystarczających warunków detencji po skazaniu; Stwierdza, że doszło do naruszenia Konwencji w odniesieniu do innych skarg podniesionych w świetle ugruntowanej linii orzeczniczej Trybunału; Zasądza, że państwo pozwane ma zapłacić skarżącym, w ciągu trzech miesięcy, kwoty wskazane w załączonej tabeli, przeliczone na walutę państwa pozwanego po kursie obowiązującym w dniu rozliczenia; Zasądza, że od upływu powyższych trzech miesięcy do dnia rozliczenia odsetki proste będą płatne od powyższych kwot według stopy równej krańcowej stopie oprocentowania podstawowych operacji refinansujących Europejskiego Banku Centralnego w okresie zwłoki plus trzy punkty procentowe.

Pełny tekst orzeczenia

THIRD SECTION CASE OF BOCHAROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 74497/17 and 37 others – see appended list)             JUDGMENT   STRASBOURG 9 November 2023   This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Bocharov and Others v. Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:  Peeter Roosma, President,  Ioannis Ktistakis,  Andreas Zünd, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 19 October 2023, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.  The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. 2.  The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS 3.  The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.  The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.  Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. Jurisdiction 6.  The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023). ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION 7.  The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of their detention. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention. 8.  The Court notes that the applicants were kept in detention in poor conditions. The details of the applicants’ detention are indicated in the appended table. The Court refers to the principles established in its case‑law regarding inadequate conditions of detention (see, for instance, Muršić v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, §§ 96-101, ECHR 2016; Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 90‑94, ECHR 2000‑XI; and Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 139‑65, 10 January 2012). It reiterates in particular that extreme lack of space in a prison cell or overcrowding weighs heavily as an aspect to be taken into account for the purpose of establishing whether the impugned detention conditions were “degrading” from the point of view of Article 3 and may disclose a violation, both alone, or taken together with other shortcomings (see, amongst many authorities, Muršić, cited above, §§ 122-41, and Karalevičius v. Lithuania, no. 53254/99, §§ 36-40, 7 April 2005). 9.  In the leading case of Sergey Babushkin v. Russia, no. 5993/08, 28 November 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 10.  Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicants’ conditions of detention were inadequate. 11.  These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW 12.  Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its well‑established case-law (see Gorlov and Others v. Russia, nos. 27057/06 and 2 others, 2 July 2019, concerning permanent video surveillance of detainees and lack of an effective remedy in that respect). REMAINING COMPLAINTS 13.  Finally, some applicants complained under Article 13 of the Convention about the lack of an effective domestic remedy in respect of the inadequate conditions of their detention. In the light of its findings in paragraphs 10-12 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with the remaining complaints. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 14.  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see, in particular, Sergey Babushkin v. Russia (just satisfaction), no. 5993/08, 16 October 2014, and Mozharov and Others v. Russia, nos. 16401/12 and 9 others, 21 March 2017), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications; Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to the facts that took place before 16 September 2022; Declares the complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the conditions of the applicants’ detention after conviction, and other complaints raised by the applicants under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table), admissible, and finds that it is not necessary to deal separately with the complaints raised under Article 13 of the Convention about the lack of an effective domestic remedy to complain about poor conditions of detention; Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention after conviction; Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see the appended table); Holds (a)  that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)  that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default during the default period plus three percentage points. Done in English, and notified in writing on 9 November 2023, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.  Viktoriya Maradudina Peeter Roosma  Acting Deputy Registrar President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention after conviction) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Facility Start and end date Duration Inmates per brigade Sq. m per inmate Number of toilets per brigade Specific grievances Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros)[1]     74497/17 20/12/2017 Oleg Yuryevich BOCHAROV     IK-49 Komi Republic 18/08/2016 to 05/11/2021 5 year(s) and 2 month(s) and 19 day(s) 2-2.71 m² lack of fresh air, overcrowding, poor quality of potable water, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light   12,500     11691/18 27/01/2018 Sergey Aleksandrovich SAVCHENKO     IK-7 St Petersburg 13/11/2015 to 28/08/2017 2 year(s) and 9 month(s) and 16 day(s) 100 inmate(s) 2.24 m² 3 toilet(s)       overcrowding, lack of privacy for toilet, insufficient number of toilets and wash basins           6,500     31714/21 18/05/2021 Yuriy Aleksandrovich DIKOVCHENKO     IK-18 Murmansk Region 01/05/2010 pending as of 16/09/2022 12 year(s) and 4 month(s) and 16 day(s) < 2 m² poor quality of food, overcrowding, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack or insufficient quantity of food   9,000     32246/21 31/05/2021 Boris Vitalyevich POTEKHIN     IK-2 Zabaykalskiy Region 28/10/2019 pending as of 16/09/2022 2 year(s) and 10 month(s) and 20 day(s) 100 inmate(s) 1.6-1.9 m² 4 toilet(s) overcrowding, no or restricted access to warm water, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of fresh air   9,000     33867/21 15/06/2021 Umardzhon Umarovich SHERBOBOYEV     IK-8 Komi Republic 18/10/2018 pending as of 16/09/2022 3 year(s) and 10 month(s) and 30 day(s) 160 inmate(s) 2 m² 4 toilet(s) overcrowding, lack of fresh air, inadequate temperature, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to running water, poor quality of food, lack or insufficient quantity of food, poor quality of potable water   9,000     35304/21 02/06/2021 Mikhail Mikhaylovich SHIBADAYEV     KP-14 Krasnoyarsk Region 01/10/2020 pending as of 16/09/2022 1 year(s) and 11 month(s) and 16 day(s)         60 inmate(s)   2 toilet(s) lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to shower   8,100     36904/21 29/06/2021 Andrey Aleksandrovich VYSHKEVICH     IK-5 Krasnoyarsk Region 14/09/2016 pending as of 16/09/2022 6 year(s) and 3 day(s) 120 inmate(s) 3-3.3 m² 4 toilet(s) lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of privacy for toilet, lack or inadequate furniture, no or restricted access to shower, overcrowding Art. 8 (1) - permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities - detention in different cells with video surveillance by opposite-sex operators;   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities 11,400     38021/21 30/05/2021 Stanislav Petrovich LEVCHUK Alekseyeva Natalya Vasilyevna Krasnoyarsk KP-3 Orlov Region 21/06/2018 to 26/05/2022 3 year(s) and 11 month(s) and 6 day(s) 75 inmate(s) 2 m² lack of fresh air, lack of privacy for toilet, overcrowding   8,000     41349/21 12/01/2022 Leonid Alekseyevich AVVAKUMOV     IK-5 Krasnoyarsk Region 04/12/2014 pending as of 16/09/2022 7 year(s) and 9 month(s) and 13 day(s) 14 inmate(s) 1.4 m² 5 toilet(s) lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of privacy for toilet, poor quality of food Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities;   Art. 8 (1) - permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities – by opposite-sex operators during all those years of detention in IK-5 Krasnoyarsk Region 7,300   41864/21 29/06/2021 Yuriy Mikhaylovich BOGDANOV     IK-8 Komi Republic 20/09/2019 to 22/09/2021 2 year(s) and 3 day(s) 2 m² overcrowding, lack of fresh air, inadequate temperature, poor quality of potable water, no or restricted access to warm water, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of privacy for toilet, poor quality of food, lack of toiletries   5,800   44458/21 17/08/2021 Aleksandr Vladimirovich KHROMYSHEV     IK-24 Komi Republic 08/10/2019 pending as of 16/09/2022 2 year(s) and 11 month(s) and 9 day(s) 180 inmate(s) 1.1 m² 5 toilet(s) bunk beds, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of or restricted access to leisure or educational activities, lack or inadequate furniture, overcrowding, mouldy or dirty cell, poor quality of potable water, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of privacy for toilet, poor quality of food   8,300   46388/21 02/09/2021 Sergey Aleksandrovich YEROFEYEV     IK-8 Komi Republic 02/07/2019 pending as of 16/09/2022 3 year(s) and 2 month(s) and 15 day(s) 2 m² overcrowding, lack of fresh air, inadequate temperature, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of privacy for toilet, mouldy or dirty cell, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to warm water, poor quality of food   8,300   48147/21 08/09/2021 Yevgeniy Nikolayevich BLAGIKH     IK-29 Kirov Region 27/07/2017 pending as of 16/09/2022 5 year(s) and 1 month(s) and 21 day(s) 2 m² overcrowding, poor quality of potable water, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to toilet, inadequate temperature Art. 8 (1) - permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities – video surveillance by opposite-sex operators during those past years of detention 10,700   48617/21 06/09/2021 Pavel Aleksandrovich GLAZIN     IK-8 Komi Republic 06/09/2018 27/11/2021 3 year(s) and 2 month(s) and 22 day(s) 2 m² overcrowding, lack of fresh air, inadequate temperature, no or restricted access to potable water, sharing cells with inmates infected with contagious disease, lack of privacy for toilet, poor quality of food, mouldy or dirty cell   5,800   49162/21 10/09/2021 Andrey Vladimirovich MYMRIK     IK-19 Komi Republic 24/11/2019 pending as of 16/09/2022 2 year(s) and 9 month(s) and 24 day(s) 1.9 m² 10 toilet(s) overcrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or restricted access to leisure or educational activities, no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to running water, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, poor quality of food, inadequate temperature   8,300   50070/21 22/09/2021 Igor Vyacheslavovich LADANOV      IK-19 Komi Republic 09/05/2020 pending as of 16/09/2022 2 year(s) and 4 month(s) and 8 day(s) 0.5-1.2 m²  overcrowding, bunk beds, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or insufficient natural light, poor quality of food, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air   8,000   52032/21 01/10/2021 Viktor Aleksandrovich MOSKALEV     IK-8 Komi Republic 11/10/2019 to 15/09/2022 2 year(s) and 11 month(s) and 5 day(s) 2 m² overcrowding, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to potable water, inadequate temperature, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of privacy for toilet, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, poor quality of potable water, no or restricted access to toilet             8,000   52592/21 04/10/2021 Aleksandr Yuryevich PASHINOV     IK-5 Krasnoyarsk Region 29/03/2017 pending as of 16/09/2022 5 year(s) and 5 month(s) and 19 day(s) 130 inmate(s) 2,3 m² 8 toilet(s) overcrowding, lack of toiletries, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to running water, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of privacy for toilet   8,000   55865/21 22/10/2021 Yefrem Mikhaylovich IVANOV     Settlement colony no. 14 Krasnoyarsk Region 28/07/2020 to 28/09/2021 1 year(s) and 2 month(s) and 1 day(s) 50 inmate(s) 2.5 m² 3 toilet(s) overcrowding, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to warm water, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities   5,000   57504/21 11/11/2021 Yuriy Vladimirovich KLIMOV     IK-29 Kirov Region 05/07/2017 pending as of 16/09/2022 5 year(s) and 2 month(s) and 12 day(s)         140 inmate(s) 1.5 m² overcrowding, bunk beds, lack of fresh air, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, poor quality of potable water   7,800   58442/21 11/11/2021 Valeriy Yuryevich KUKANOV     IK-29 Kirov Region 03/08/2017 pending as of 16/09/2022 5 year(s) and 1 month(s) and 14 day(s) 1.8 m² overcrowding, bunk beds, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or restricted access to leisure or educational activities, poor quality of food, poor quality of potable water, no or restricted access to running water, sharing cells with inmates infected with contagious disease, no or restricted access to toilet, inadequate temperature Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities;   Art. 8 (1) - permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities - detention in different cells with video surveillance, opposite-sex operators   10,100   60203/21 23/11/2021 Andrey Viktorovich TARASOV     IK-2 Zabaykalskiy Region 20/02/2019 to 26/03/2020 1 year(s) and 1 month(s) and 7 day(s)   The applicant made use of the new remedy introduced by the Compensation Act. Final decision dismissing his claims: Supreme Court of Russia on 07/07/2021 2.5 m² overcrowding, lack of fresh air, passive smoking, inadequate temperature, mouldy or dirty cell, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of privacy for toilet, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of or restricted access to leisure or educational activities   5,000   61556/21 01/12/2021 Vyacheslav Nikolayevich KURIKALOV     IK-2 Zabaykalskiy Region 07/06/2017 pending as of 16/09/2022 5 year(s) and 3 month(s) and 10 day(s) 2 m² bunk beds, lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of or restricted access to leisure or educational activities, sharing cells with inmates infected with contagious disease, poor quality of food   7,500   614/22 03/12/2021 Aleksey Vladimirovich GAGARIN     IK-29 Kirov Region 27/08/2017 pending as of 16/09/2022 5 year(s) and 21 day(s) 150 inmate(s) 1.2 m² 8 toilet(s) overcrowding, lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack or inadequate furniture, poor quality of potable water, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of requisite medical assistance   7 500   2179/22 11/03/2022 Ramiz Makhir Ogly ALIYEV     IK-24 Krasnoyarsk Region 21/12/2017 pending as of 16/09/2022 4 year(s) and 8 month(s) and 27 day(s) 2.66 m² overcrowding, inadequate temperature, lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, mouldy or dirty cell, poor quality of food, lack of or restricted access to leisure or educational activities   6,800   3675/22 24/01/2022 Vladimir Bogdanovich ZAKHARENKO     IK-4 Magadan Region 22/12/2017 pending as of 16/09/2022 4 year(s) and 8 month(s) and 26 day(s) 1.3 m² overcrowding, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air   7,000   9616/22 09/01/2022 Vasiliy Mikhaylovich NAZAROV     IK-7 Krasnoyarsk Region; IK-24 Krasnoyarsk Region 31/01/2018 pending as of 16/09/2022 4 year(s) and 7 month(s) and 15 day(s) 118- 163 inmate(s) 2.14-2.36 m² 5 toilet(s) overcrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of privacy for toilet, overcrowding Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention;   Art. 8 (1) - permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities – during the entire period of detention by opposite-sex operators 9,400   11013/22 01/02/2022 Aleksandr Dmitriyevich ALFEROV     IK-5 Krasnoyarsk Region 27/09/2019 pending as of 16/09/2022 2 year(s) and 11 month(s) and 21 day(s) 2.3 m² lack of privacy for toilet, poor quality of food, overcrowding   7,000   11815/22 21/02/2022 Aleksandr Aleksandrovich VORONIN     IK-4, Magadan Region 20/10/2020 pending as of 16/09/2022 1 year(s) and 10 month(s) and 28 day(s) 1 m² overcrowding, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air   6 800   12322/22 15/04/2022 Aleksandr Anatolyevich TULUSH     IK-24 Irkutsk Region 02/09/2020 pending as of 16/09/2022 2 year(s) and 15 day(s) 150 inmate(s) 0.3-0.8 m² 6 toilet(s) overcrowding, poor quality of food, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to toilet, inadequate temperature, lack of fresh air   6,500   18012/22 21/02/2022 Valeriy Vasilyevich YELIN     IK-4 Magadan Region 01/03/2014 pending as of 16/09/2022 8 year(s) and 6 month(s) and 16 day(s) 6 inmate(s) 2.6 m² 1 toilet(s) lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack or inadequate furniture, overcrowding, lack of or insufficient natural light, bunk beds   6,800   18026/22 21/02/2022 Artur Ramilevich BIKEYEV     IK-4 Magadan Region 12/07/2017 to 14/04/2022 4 year(s) and 9 month(s) and 3 day(s)           2.3 m² lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of privacy for toilet, bunk beds, deterioration in conditions of detention (cumulative effect of lack of physical exercise, breaches of the hygiene regulations, lack of contact with the outside world and uncertainty)   5,500   18234/22 26/02/2022 Yevgeniy Vladimirovich CHADOV Khakhilev Vyacheslav Anatolyevich Arkhangelsk IK-4 Arkhangelsk Region 08/08/2018 pending as of 16/09/2022 4 year (s) and 1 month(s) and 9 day (s) 90 inmate(s) 1.6 m² 2 toilet (s)  overcrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of fresh air   6,800   21557/22 31/03/2022 Vyacheslav Viktorovich KISELEV     IK-35 Perm Region 14/04/2021 pending as of 16/09/2022 1 year(s) and 5 month(s) and 3 day(s) 90 inmate(s) 1.2 m² 4 toilet(s) overcrowding, mouldy or dirty cell, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of or insufficient natural light   6,600   28058/22 23/05/2022 Yevgeniy Mikhaylovich KRASNOV     IK-4 Magadan Region 01/09/2018 pending as of 16/09/2022 4 year(s) and 16 day(s)           6 inmate(s) 2.5 m² 1 toilet(s) overcrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of requisite medical assistance, lack of or insufficient natural light Art. 8 (1) - permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities – during the entire period of detention by the opposite-sex operators 6,000   35381/22 25/06/2022 Vadim Mikhaylovich BEZRUKOV     IK-24, Komi Republic 12/08/2019 pending as of 16/09/2022 3 year(s) and 1 month(s) and 5 day(s) 0.5 m² overcrowding, lack of privacy for toilet, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of fresh air, poor quality of food   5,800   38597/22 18/07/2022 Oleg Nikolayevich MIKHAYLOV     IK-19 Komi Republic 18/08/2019 pending as of 16/09/2022 3 year(s) and 30 day(s) 2 m² overcrowding, inadequate temperature, lack of fresh air, lack of or restricted access to leisure or educational activities, no or restricted access to shower, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, poor quality of food     5,500   5346/23 16/01/2023 Vafa Umyarovich SALEKHOV Prozorov Artem Andreyevich Furmanov IK-6 Kirov Region 07/07/2011 to 08/11/2018 7 year(s) and 4 month(s) and 2 day(s)   The applicant made use of the new remedy introduced by the Compensation Act. Final decision by the Supreme Court of Russia on 16/09/2022. Domestic courts confirmed the lack of personal space, overcrowding, lack of privacy for toilet, insufficient natural and electric light, and granted the applicant RUB 30,000 (approximately 300 euros). 230 inmate(s) 0.9 m² 5 toilet(s) lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of privacy for toilet, overcrowding   5,000     [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.

© Rada Europy / Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka, źródło: HUDOC (hudoc.echr.coe.int), pozyskano 29.07.2026. · Źródło