C-148/81
WyrokTSUE1982-10-12CELEX: 61981CJ0148ECLI:EU:C:1982:348
Analiza orzeczenia
Sekcja wygenerowana przez AI na podstawie treści orzeczenia — nie stanowi cytatu.
Zagadnienie prawne
Czy państwo członkowskie może usprawiedliwić niewdrożenie dyrektywy Unii Europejskiej w wyznaczonym terminie, powołując się na wewnętrzne okoliczności, takie jak złożoność przepisów, długotrwałe procedury legislacyjne lub kryzysy polityczne?Ratio decidendi
Trybunał orzekł, że Królestwo Belgii uchybiło swoim zobowiązaniom wynikającym z Traktatu EWG, ponieważ nie przyjęło w wyznaczonym terminie przepisów niezbędnych do wykonania dyrektywy 77/91/EWG. Trybunał potwierdził swoją ugruntowaną linię orzeczniczą, zgodnie z którą państwo członkowskie nie może powoływać się na przepisy, praktyki lub okoliczności istniejące w jego wewnętrznym systemie prawnym w celu usprawiedliwienia niewykonania zobowiązań i niedotrzymania terminów wynikających z dyrektyw wspólnotowych. Ponadto, rządy państw członkowskich uczestniczą w pracach przygotowawczych nad dyrektywami i dlatego powinny być w stanie przygotować projekty przepisów legislacyjnych niezbędnych do ich wdrożenia w wyznaczonym terminie.Stan faktyczny
Komisja Europejska wniosła skargę przeciwko Królestwu Belgii, zarzucając mu niewdrożenie dyrektywy 77/91/EWG (drugiej dyrektywy Rady z dnia 13 grudnia 1976 r. w sprawie koordynacji zabezpieczeń wymaganych od spółek akcyjnych) w wyznaczonym terminie. Termin na wdrożenie dyrektywy upłynął 16 grudnia 1978 r. Rząd belgijski nie kwestionował niewykonania tego zobowiązania, ale wskazywał na szczególną złożoność dyrektywy, długotrwałe procedury legislacyjne oraz kryzysy polityczne, które opóźniły proces legislacyjny.Rozstrzygnięcie
1. Stwierdza, że Królestwo Belgii, nie przyjmując w wyznaczonym terminie przepisów niezbędnych do wykonania drugiej dyrektywy Rady 77/91/EWG z dnia 13 grudnia 1976 r. w sprawie koordynacji zabezpieczeń, które dla ochrony interesów wspólników i osób trzecich są wymagane przez państwa członkowskie od spółek w rozumieniu akapitu drugiego art. 58 Traktatu, w odniesieniu do tworzenia spółek akcyjnych oraz utrzymania i zmiany ich kapitału, w celu uczynienia tych zabezpieczeń równoważnymi, uchybiło jednemu ze swoich zobowiązań wynikających z Traktatu EWG.
2. Obciąża Królestwo Belgii kosztami postępowania.Pełny tekst orzeczenia
Avis juridique important
|
61981J0148
Judgment of the Court of 12 October 1982. - Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium. - Failure to implement Directive 77/91/EEC. - Case 148/81.
European Court reports 1982 Page 03555
Summary
Parties
Subject of the case
Grounds
Decision on costs
Operative part
Keywords
MEMBER STATES - OBLIGATIONS - IMPLEMENTATION OF DIRECTIVES - FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH TIME-LIMITS FOR THEIR IMPLEMENTATION - JUSTIFICATION FOR FAILURE - NOT POSSIBLE
( EEC TREATY , ART . 169 )
Summary
A MEMBER STATE MAY NOT PLEAD PROVISIONS , PRACTICES OR CIRCUMSTANCES EXISTING IN ITS INTERNAL LEGAL SYSTEM IN ORDER TO JUSTIFY A FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH OBLIGATIONS RESULTING FROM COMMUNITY DIRECTIVES .
SINCE THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES PARTICIPATE IN THE PREPARATORY WORK FOR DIRECTIVES THEY MUST BE IN A POSITION TO PREPARE , WITHIN THE PERIOD PRESCRIBED , THE DRAFT LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NECESSARY FOR THEIR IMPLEMENTATION .
Parties
IN CASE 148/81
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES , REPRESENTED BY ITS LEGAL ADVISER , ANTHONY MCCLELLAN , ACTING AS AGENT , ASSISTED BY JACQUES DELMOLY , A MEMBER OF ITS LEGAL DEPARTMENT , WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT THE OFFICE OF ORESTE MONTALTO , A MEMBER OF ITS LEGAL DEPARTMENT , JEAN MONNET BUILDING , KIRCHBERG ,
APPLICANT ,
V
KINGDOM OF BELGIUM , REPRESENTED BY ROBERT HOEBAER , DIRECTOR AT THE MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS , FOREIGN TRADE AND COOPERATION WITH THE DEVELOPING COUNTRIES , ACTING AS AGENT , WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT THE BELGIAN EMBASSY ,
DEFENDANT ,
Subject of the case
APPLICATION FOR A DECLARATION THAT BY NOT ADOPTING , WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED PERIOD , THE PROVISIONS NEEDED TO COMPLY WITH DIRECTIVE 77/91 , THE SECOND COUNCIL DIRECTIVE OF 13 DECEMBER 1976 ON COORDINATION OF SAFEGUARDS WHICH , FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE INTERESTS OF MEMBERS AND OTHERS , ARE REQUIRED BY MEMBER STATES OF COMPANIES WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE SECOND PARAGRAPH OF ARTICLE 58 OF THE TREATY , IN RESPECT OF THE FORMATION OF PUBLIC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES AND THE MAINTENANCE AND ALTERATION OF THEIR CAPITAL , WITH A VIEW TO MAKING SUCH SAFEGUARDS EQUIVALENT , THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM HAS FAILED TO FULFIL ONE OF ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE EEC TREATY ,
Grounds BY APPLICATION RECEIVED AT THE COURT REGISTRY ON 5 JUNE 1981 THE COMMISSION BROUGHT AN ACTION UNDER ARTICLE 169 OF THE EEC TREATY FOR A DECLARATION THAT BY NOT ADOPTING WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED PERIOD THE NATIONAL PROVISIONS NEEDED TO COMPLY WITH DIRECTIVE 77/91/EEC , THE SECOND COUNCIL DIRECTIVE OF 13 DECEMBER 1976 ON COORDINATION OF SAFEGUARDS WHICH , FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE INTERESTS OF MEMBERS AND OTHERS , ARE REQUIRED BY MEM- BER STATES OF COMPANIES WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE SECOND PARAGRAPH OF ARTICLE 58 OF THE TREATY , IN RESPECT OF THE FORMATION OF PUBLIC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES AND THE MAINTENANCE AND ALTERATION OF THEIR CAPITAL , WITH A VIEW TO MAKING SUCH SAFEGUARDS EQUIVALENT , ( OFFICIAL JOURNAL , 1977 , L 26 , P . 1 ), THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM HAD FAILED TO FULFIL ONE OF ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE EEC TREATY . PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 43 OF THE DIRECTIVE , MEMBER STATES WERE REQUIRED TO BRING INTO FORCE THE LAWS , REGULATIONS AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS NEEDED IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH THE DIRECTIVE WITHIN TWO YEARS OF ITS NOTIFICATION . IT WAS NOTIFIED TO THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM ON 16 DECEMBER 1976 AND THE ABOVE-MENTIONED PERIOD ACCORDINGLY EXPIRED ON 16 DECEMBER 1978 .
3 THE BELGIAN GOVERNMENT DOES NOT CONTEST THAT IT HAS NOT FULFILLED THAT OBLIGATION . IT NEVERTHELESS POINTS OUT THE SPECIAL COMPLEXITY OF THE DIRECTIVE IN QUESTION , THE LENGTH OF THE LEGISLATIVE PROCEDURES AND THE POLITICAL CRISES WHICH BELGIUM HAS UNDERGONE IN RECENT YEARS , WHICH FURTHER RETARDED THE LEGISLATIVE PROCEDURE . IT OBSERVES IN THIS CONNECTION THAT THE PERIODS PRESCRIBED BY THE DIRECTIVES ON COMPANIES HAVING A SHARE CAPITAL ARE TOO SHORT IN VIEW OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE LEGISLATION REQUIRED . THOSE CIRCUMSTANCES CANNOT EXPUNGE THE FAILURE TO FULFIL ONE OF ITS OBLIGATIONS WITH WHICH THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM IS CHARGED . ACCORDING TO WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW OF THE COURT , A MEMBER STATE MAY NOT PLEAD PROVISIONS , PRACTICES OR CIRCUMSTANCES EXISTING IN ITS INTERNAL LEGAL SYSTEM IN ORDER TO JUSTIFY A FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH OBLIGATIONS AND TIME-LIMITS RESULTING FROM COMMUNITY DIRECTIVES . ATTENTION SHOULD ALSO BE DRAWN TO THE FACT THAT THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES PARTICIPATE IN THE PREPARATORY WORK FOR DIRECTIVES AND MUST THEREFORE BE IN A POSITION TO PREPARE , WITHIN THE PERIOD PRESCRIBED , THE DRAFT LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NECESSARY FOR THEIR IMPLEMENTATION . IT APPEARS , HOWEVER , FROM INFORMATION PRODUCED IN THE COURSE OF THE PROCEEDINGS THAT NO DRAFT LAW HAD YET BEEN PLACED BEFORE THE BELGIAN PARLIAMENT WITHIN THE PERIOD PRESCRIBED FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DIRECTIVE . IT MUST THEREFORE BE DECLARED THAT BY FAILING TO ADOPT WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED PERIOD THE PROVISIONS NEEDED IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 77/91 OF 13 DECEMBER 1976 , THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM HAS FAILED TO FULFIL ONE OF ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE TREATY .
Decision on costs
COSTS
7 UNDER ARTICLE 69 ( 2 ) OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE , THE UNSUCCESSFUL PARTY IS TO BE ORDERED TO PAY THE COSTS . SINCE THE DEFENDANT HAS FAILED IN ITS SUBMISSIONS , IT MUST BE ORDERED TO PAY THE COSTS .
Operative part
ON THOSE GROUNDS ,
THE COURT
HEREBY :
1 . DECLARES THAT , BY NOT ADOPTING WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED PERIOD THE PROVISIONS NEEDED IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 77/91/EEC , THE SECOND COUNCIL DIRECTIVE OF 13 DECEMBER 1976 ON COORDINATION OF SAFEGUARDS WHICH , FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE INTERESTS OF MEMBERS AND OTHERS , ARE REQUIRED BY MEMBER STATES OF COMPANIES WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE SECOND PARAGRAPH OF ARTICLES 58 OF THE TREATY , IN RESPECT OF THE FORMATION OF PUBLIC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES AND THE MAINTENANCE AND ALTERATION OF THEIR CAPITAL , WITH A VIEW TO MAKING SUCH SAFEGUARDS EQUIVALENT , THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM HAS FAILED TO FULFIL ONE OF ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE EEC TREATY ; . ORDERS THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM TO PAY THE COSTS .
© Unia Europejska, źródło: EUR-Lex (eur-lex.europa.eu), pozyskano 13.07.2026. Autentyczne są wyłącznie wersje opublikowane w Dz. Urz. UE. · Źródło