C-161/95

WyrokTSUE1996-03-28CELEX: 61995CJ0161ECLI:EU:C:1996:152

Analiza orzeczenia

Sekcja wygenerowana przez AI na podstawie treści orzeczenia — nie stanowi cytatu.

Zagadnienie prawne
Czy Republika Grecka uchybiła zobowiązaniom wynikającym z art. 19 dyrektywy 91/271/EWG poprzez nieprzyjęcie lub nieprzekazanie Komisji w wyznaczonym terminie przepisów niezbędnych do jej transpozycji?
Ratio decidendi
Trybunał uznał skargę Komisji za zasadną, ponieważ Republika Grecka nie transponowała dyrektywy 91/271/EWG do prawa krajowego w wyznaczonym terminie. Państwo członkowskie nie kwestionowało braku transpozycji, a podane uzasadnienia opóźnienia, takie jak trwająca kompleksowa rewizja przepisów krajowych, nie zwalniają z obowiązku terminowej transpozycji dyrektywy. Zatem sam fakt braku transpozycji w terminie jest wystarczający do stwierdzenia uchybienia zobowiązaniom.
Stan faktyczny
Komisja Europejska wszczęła postępowanie przeciwko Republice Greckiej, ponieważ nie otrzymała powiadomienia o środkach transpozycji dyrektywy 91/271/EWG dotyczącej oczyszczania ścieków komunalnych. Termin transpozycji upłynął 30 czerwca 1993 r. Republika Grecka nie zaprzeczyła brakowi transpozycji, wskazując jedynie, że projekt rozporządzenia ministerialnego jest w przygotowaniu, a opóźnienie wynika z kompleksowej rewizji istniejących przepisów dotyczących oczyszczania ścieków.
Rozstrzygnięcie
1. Stwierdza, że nie przyjmując w wyznaczonym terminie przepisów ustawowych, wykonawczych i administracyjnych niezbędnych do zastosowania się do dyrektywy Rady 91/271/EWG z dnia 21 maja 1991 r. dotyczącej oczyszczania ścieków komunalnych, Republika Grecka uchybiła zobowiązaniom ciążącym na niej na mocy art. 19 tej dyrektywy; 2. Obciąża Republikę Grecką kosztami postępowania.

Pełny tekst orzeczenia

Case C-161/95 Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic «(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations – Non-transposition of Directive 91/271/EEC – Urban waste water treatment)» Opinion of Advocate General Fennelly delivered on 1 February 1996      Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber), 28 March 1996      Summary of the Judgment Member States – Obligations – Implementation of directives – Failure to fulfil obligations not disputed (EC Treaty, Art. 169) JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 28 March 1996 (1) ((Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations – Non-transposition of Directive 91/271/EEC – Urban waste water treatment)) In Case C-161/95, Commission of the European Communities, represented by Maria Kontou-Durande, of its Legal Service, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the office of Carlos Gómez de la Cruz, also of its Legal Service, Wagner Centre, Kirchberg, applicant, v Hellenic Republic, represented by Ioanna Galani-Maragkoudaki, Assistant Legal Adviser in the Special Department for Community Legal Affairs in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and Evi Skandalou, Legal Assistant in the same Department, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the Greek Embassy, 117 Val Sainte-Croix, defendant, APPLICATION for a declaration that, by not adopting or by not communicating to the Commission within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste water treatment (OJ 1991 L 135, p. 40), the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EC Treaty and that directive, THE COURT (Fifth Chamber),, composed of: D.A.O. Edward, President of the Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet, C. Gulmann, P. Jann and L. Sevón (Rapporteur), Judges, Advocate General: N. Fennelly, Registrar: R. Grass, having regard to the report of the Judge-Rapporteur, after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 1 February 1996, gives the following Judgment By application lodged at the Court Registry on 22 May 1995, the Commission of the European Communities brought an action under Article 169 of the EC Treaty for a declaration that, by not adopting or by not communicating to the Commission within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste water treatment (OJ 1991 L 135, p. 40), the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EC Treaty and that directive. Article 19(1) of Directive 91/271 provides that the Member States are to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with that directive not later than 30 June 1993 and immediately to inform the Commission thereof. Article 19(3) requires the Member States also to communicate to the Commission the texts of the main provisions adopted. Since the Commission received no notification of implementing measures adopted by the Hellenic Republic and possessed no other information to support a conclusion that that Member State had fulfilled its obligations in that respect, it gave the Greek Government formal notice, by letter of 9 August 1993, to submit its observations within two months, in accordance with the first paragraph of Article 169 of the Treaty. Since it received no reply to its letter, the Commission sent a reasoned opinion to the Hellenic Republic on 25 May 1994 calling upon it to adopt within two months the measures required to comply with that opinion. In the absence of any response from the Greek authorities to the reasoned opinion, and forming the view that the Greek Government had failed to adopt within the period prescribed the measures necessary to comply with its obligations, the Commission brought the present proceedings. Referring to Article 19 of Directive 91/271 and also to the first paragraph of Article 5 and the third paragraph of Article 189 of the Treaty, the Commission maintains in its application that the Hellenic Republic was under a duty to adopt the necessary measures to comply with the directive within the prescribed period and that, by failing to do so, it had failed to fulfil its obligations. Although the Hellenic Republic contends that the application should be dismissed, it does not deny that the directive has not been transposed into national law within the prescribed period. It merely points out that a draft ministerial order, which inter alia transposes Directive 91/271 into Greek legislation, will shortly be signed by the ministers jointly responsible. The reason for the delay, according to the Hellenic Republic, is the fact that transposition of the directive into Greek legislation is part of the comprehensive review of the existing laws governing the treatment of waste. Since the directive has not been transposed within the prescribed period, the action brought by the Commission in relation to that failure must be regarded as well founded. Consequently, it must be held that, by not adopting within the period prescribed the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 91/271, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 19 of that directive. Costs Under Article 69(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the unsuccessful party is to be ordered to pay the costs if they have been applied for in the successful party's pleadings. The Commission has claimed that the Hellenic Republic should be ordered to pay the costs. Since the Hellenic Republic has been unsuccessful, it must be ordered to pay the costs. On those grounds, THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) hereby: 1. Declares that, by not adopting within the period prescribed the laws, regulations and administrative measures necessary to comply with Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste water treatment, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 19 of that directive; 2. Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. Edward Puissochet Gulmann Jann Sevón Delivered in open court in Luxembourg on 28 March 1996. R. Grass D.A.O. Edward Registrar President of the Fifth Chamber – Language of the case: Greek.

© Unia Europejska, źródło: EUR-Lex (eur-lex.europa.eu), pozyskano 13.07.2026. Autentyczne są wyłącznie wersje opublikowane w Dz. Urz. UE. · Źródło