C-236/94

WyrokTSUE1995-10-12CELEX: 61994CJ0236ECLI:EU:C:1995:316

Analiza orzeczenia

Sekcja wygenerowana przez AI na podstawie treści orzeczenia — nie stanowi cytatu.

Zagadnienie prawne

Czy Królestwo Belgii uchybiło swoim zobowiązaniom wynikającym z Traktatu WE poprzez nieprzyjęcie i/lub niepowiadomienie Komisji o przepisach niezbędnych do transpozycji dyrektywy 91/339/EWG w wyznaczonym terminie?

Ratio decidendi

Trybunał stwierdził, że Królestwo Belgii uchybiło swoim zobowiązaniom, ponieważ nie transponowało dyrektywy 91/339/EWG w wyznaczonym terminie, tj. do 18 czerwca 1992 r. Fakt, że Belgia nie zaprzeczyła uchybieniu i wskazała na przygotowywanie aktu transpozycyjnego, nie zwalnia jej z odpowiedzialności za niedotrzymanie terminu. Zgodnie z utrwalonym orzecznictwem, państwa członkowskie są zobowiązane do transpozycji dyrektyw w wyznaczonym terminie, a brak transpozycji stanowi uchybienie zobowiązaniom traktatowym.

Stan faktyczny

Komisja Europejska wniosła skargę przeciwko Królestwu Belgii na podstawie art. 169 Traktatu WE, zarzucając mu brak transpozycji dyrektywy Rady 91/339/EWG, dotyczącej ograniczeń w obrocie i stosowaniu niektórych substancji i preparatów niebezpiecznych. Zgodnie z art. 2 ust. 1 dyrektywy, państwa członkowskie miały wprowadzić w życie niezbędne przepisy do 18 czerwca 1992 r. i niezwłocznie poinformować o tym Komisję. Królestwo Belgii nie zaprzeczyło uchybieniu, informując jedynie, że dekret królewski mający na celu usunięcie uchybienia zostanie wkrótce przyjęty.

Rozstrzygnięcie

1. Stwierdza, że Królestwo Belgii, nie przyjmując w wyznaczonym terminie przepisów ustawowych, wykonawczych i administracyjnych niezbędnych do zastosowania dyrektywy Rady 91/339/EWG z dnia 18 czerwca 1991 r. zmieniającej po raz jedenasty dyrektywę 76/769/EWG w sprawie zbliżenia przepisów ustawowych, wykonawczych i administracyjnych państw członkowskich odnoszących się do ograniczeń we wprowadzaniu do obrotu i stosowaniu niektórych substancji i preparatów niebezpiecznych, uchybiło zobowiązaniom ciążącym na nim na mocy Traktatu WE. 2. Obciąża Królestwo Belgii kosztami postępowania.

Pełny tekst orzeczenia

Avis juridique important | 61994J0236 Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 October 1995. - Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium. - Failure to fulfil obligations - Directive 91/339/EEC - Failure to transpose. - Case C-236/94. European Court reports 1995 Page I-03025 Parties Grounds Decision on costs Operative part Keywords ++++ Member States ° Obligations ° Implementation of directives ° Undisputed failure to fulfil obligations (EC Treaty, Art. 169) Parties In Case C-236/94, Commission of the European Communities, represented by Hendrik van Lier, Legal Adviser, acting as Agent, with an address for service at the office of Carlos Gómez de la Cruz, of the Legal Service, Wagner Centre, Kirchberg, applicant, v Kingdom of Belgium, represented by Jan Devadder, Director of Administration in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Cooperation, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the Belgian Embassy, 4 Rue des Girondins, defendant, APPLICATION for a declaration that, by not adopting and, in the alternative, by not communicating to the Commission within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 91/339/EEC of 18 June 1991 amending for the eleventh time Directive 76/769/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations (OJ 1991 L 186, p. 64), the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EC Treaty, THE COURT (Sixth Chamber), composed of: C.N. Kakouris, President of the Chamber, G. Hirsch (Rapporteur), G.F. Mancini, F.A. Schockweiler and P.J.G. Kapteyn, Judges, Advocate General: G. Tesauro, Registrar: R. Grass, having regard to the report of the Judge-Rapporteur, after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 13 July 1995, gives the following Judgment Grounds By application lodged at the Court Registry on 18 August 1994, the Commission of the European Communities brought an action under Article 169 of the EC Treaty for a declaration that, by not adopting and, in the alternative, by not communicating to the Commission within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 91/339/EEC of 18 June 1991 amending for the eleventh time Directive 76/769/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations (OJ 1991 L 186, p. 64; hereinafter "the Directive"), the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EC Treaty. 2 Under Article 2(1) of the Directive, Member States were to bring into force the provisions necessary to comply with that Directive no later than 18 June 1992 and forthwith to inform the Commission thereof. 3 The Kingdom of Belgium does not deny that it has failed to fulfil its obligations but points out that a Royal Decree intended to make good that failure is to be adopted shortly. 4 In those circumstances, it must be held that, since the Directive was not transposed within the period prescribed therein, the Commission' s claim that the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations must be upheld. 5 Consequently, it must be held that, by not adopting within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 91/339/EEC of 18 June 1991 amending for the eleventh time Directive 76/769/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EC Treaty. Decision on costs Costs 6 Under Article 69(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the unsuccessful party is to be ordered to pay the costs. Since the Kingdom of Belgium has been unsuccessful, it must be ordered to pay the costs. Operative part On those grounds, THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) hereby: 1. Declares that, by not adopting within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 91/339/EEC of 18 June 1991 amending for the eleventh time Directive 76/769/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EC Treaty; 2. Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.