C-270/91
WyrokTSUE1992-07-08CELEX: 61991CJ0270ECLI:EU:C:1992:307
Analiza orzeczenia
Sekcja wygenerowana przez AI na podstawie treści orzeczenia — nie stanowi cytatu.
Zagadnienie prawne
Czy Republika Włoska uchybiła swoim zobowiązaniom wynikającym z Traktatu EWG poprzez brak transpozycji dyrektyw 89/321/EWG i 89/360/EWG w wyznaczonych terminach?Ratio decidendi
Trybunał stwierdził uchybienie zobowiązaniom, ponieważ Republika Włoska nie zakwestionowała zarzutu Komisji, przyznając, że przedmiotowe dyrektywy nie zostały w pełni transponowane do włoskiego systemu prawnego w przewidzianych terminach. Zgodnie z art. 2 obu dyrektyw, państwa członkowskie były zobowiązane do przyjęcia niezbędnych przepisów do 1 września 1989 r. i 1 października 1989 r. odpowiednio, oraz do poinformowania o tym Komisji, czego Włochy nie uczyniły.Stan faktyczny
Komisja Europejska wniosła skargę przeciwko Republice Włoskiej, zarzucając jej brak transpozycji dyrektywy Komisji 89/321/EWG (dotyczącej badania na obecność włośnicy w mięsie wieprzowym) oraz dyrektywy Rady 89/360/EWG (dotyczącej zmian w dyrektywie 64/432/EWG w zakresie obszarów administracyjnych i zaprzestania badań serologicznych na brucelozę u niektórych rodzajów świń). Terminy transpozycji upłynęły odpowiednio 1 września 1989 r. i 1 października 1989 r. Republika Włoska nie powiadomiła Komisji o przyjęciu niezbędnych przepisów, a także nie odpowiedziała na wezwanie do usunięcia uchybienia ani na uzasadnioną opinię Komisji.Rozstrzygnięcie
1. Stwierdza się, że Republika Włoska, nie przyjmując w przewidzianym terminie przepisów ustawowych, wykonawczych i administracyjnych niezbędnych do zastosowania dyrektywy Komisji 89/321/EWG z dnia 27 kwietnia 1989 r. zmieniającej po raz drugi załączniki do dyrektywy Rady 77/96/EWG w sprawie badania na obecność włośnicy (Trichinelle spiralis) przy przywozie z państw trzecich świeżego mięsa pochodzącego od świń domowych, oraz dyrektywy Rady 89/360/EWG z dnia 30 maja 1989 r. zmieniającej dyrektywę 64/432/EWG w odniesieniu do obszarów administracyjnych i zaprzestania badań serologicznych na brucelozę u niektórych rodzajów świń, uchybiła zobowiązaniom ciążącym na niej na mocy Traktatu EWG.
2. Obciąża Republikę Włoską kosztami postępowania.Pełny tekst orzeczenia
Avis juridique important
|
61991J0270
Judgment of the Court of 8 July 1992. - Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic. - Failure to fulfil obligations - EEC directives - Failure to transpose within the prescribed periods. - Case C-270/91.
European Court reports 1992 Page I-04421
Parties
Grounds
Decision on costs
Operative part
Keywords
++++
Member States ° Obligations ° Implementation of directives ° Failure to fulfil obligations not contested
(EEC Treaty, Art. 169)
Parties
In Case C-270/91,
Commission of the European Communities, represented by Eugenio de March, Legal Adviser, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the office of Roberto Hayder, of its Legal Service, Wagner Centre, Kirchberg,
applicant,
v
Italian Republic, represented by Professor Luigi Ferrari Bravo, Head of the Department for Legal Affairs at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, acting as Agent, assisted by Pier Giorgio Ferri, Avvocato dello Stato, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the Italian Embassy, 5, Rue Marie-Adelaide,
defendant,
APPLICATION for a declaration that, by failing to notify to the Commission the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary in order to fulfil the obligations imposed on it by Commission Directive 89/321/EEC of 27 April 1989 amending for the second time the Annexes to Council Directive 77/96/EEC on the examination for Trichinae (Trichinelle spiralis) upon importation from third countries of fresh meat derived from domestic swine (OJ 1989 L 133, p. 33) and Council Directive 89/360/EEC of 30 May 1989 amending Directive 64/432/EEC as regards administrative areas and a cessation of serological testing for brucellosis in certain types of swine (OJ 1989 L 153, p. 29) or by failing to adopt the necessary measures to comply with those directives by the prescribed dates, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EEC Treaty,
THE COURT,
composed of: O. Due, President, F. Grévisse and P.J.G. Kapteyn (Presidents of Chambers), G.F. Mancini, C.N. Kakouris, J.C. Moitinho de Almeida, M. Diez de Velasco, M. Zuleeg and D.A.O. Edward, Judges,
Advocate General: M. Darmon,
Registrar: H. von Holstein, Deputy Registrar,
having regard to the report of the Judge-Rapporteur,
after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 15 May 1992,
gives the following
Judgment
Grounds By application lodged at the Court Registry on 15 October 1991, the Commission of the European Communities brought an action under Article 169 of the EEC Treaty for a declaration that, by failing to notify to the Commission the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary in order to fulfil the obligations imposed on it by Commission Directive 89/321/EEC of 27 April 1989 amending for the second time the Annexes to Council Directive 77/96/EEC on the examination for Trichinae (Trichinelle spiralis) upon importation from third countries of fresh meat derived from domestic swine (OJ 1989 L 133, p. 33) and Council Directive 89/360/EEC of 30 May 1989 amending Directive 64/432/EEC as regards administrative areas and a cessation of serological testing for brucellosis in certain types of swine (OJ 1989 L 153, p. 29) or by failing to adopt the necessary measures to comply with those directives by the prescribed dates, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EEC Treaty.
2 Under Article 2 of Directives 89/321 and 89/360, the Member States are required to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with those directives by not later than 1 September 1989 and 1 October 1989 respectively, and to inform the Commission thereof forthwith.
3 Since the Italian Republic had not within the prescribed period made the requisite notification concerning the transposition into domestic law of the two abovementioned directives, the Commission brought an action under Article 169 of the EEC Treaty for a declaration that Italy had failed to fulfil its obligations. The letter before action of 26 June 1990 and the reasoned opinion of 18 March 1991 addressed by the Commission to the Italian Republic remained unanswered.
4 Reference is made to the Report for the Hearing for a fuller account of the facts of the case, the procedure and the pleas and arguments of the parties, which are mentioned or discussed hereinafter only in so far as is necessary for the reasoning of the Court.
5 The Commission submits that owing to the mandatory nature of directives the Member States are obliged to comply with them within the periods prescribed. Furthermore, a Member State may be considered to have complied with all its obligations under a directive only when all the provisions of that directive expressly form part of its legislation.
6 The Italian Republic acknowledges that the directives in question have not been fully transposed within the Italian legal system, but gives no further particulars. It points out that certain decrees to be adopted could remedy the default.
7 Under those conditions, it must be held that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary in order to comply with Commission Directive 89/321/EEC of 27 April 1989 amending for the second time the Annexes to Council Directive 77/96/EEC on the examination for Trichinae (Trichinelle spiralis) upon importation from third countries of fresh meat derived from domestic swine, and with Council Directive 89/360/EEC of 30 May 1989 amending Directive 64/432/EEC as regards administrative areas and a cessation of serological testing for brucellosis in certain types of swine, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EEC Treaty.
Decision on costs
Costs
8 Under Article 69(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the unsuccessful party is to be ordered to pay the costs. Since the Italian Republic has failed in its submissions, it must be ordered to pay the costs.
Operative part
On those grounds,
THE COURT
hereby:
1. Declares that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary in order to comply with Commission Directive 89/321/EEC of 27 April 1989 amending for the second time the Annexes to Council Directive 77/96/EEC on the examination for Trichinae (Trichinelle spiralis) upon importation from third countries of fresh meat derived from domestic swine, and with Council Directive 89/360/EEC of 30 May 1989 amending Directive 64/432/EEC as regards administrative areas and a cessation of serological testing for brucellosis in certain types of swine, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EEC Treaty.
2. Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.
© Unia Europejska, źródło: EUR-Lex (eur-lex.europa.eu), pozyskano 13.07.2026. Autentyczne są wyłącznie wersje opublikowane w Dz. Urz. UE. · Źródło