C-62/72

WyrokTSUE1973-03-01CELEX: 61972CJ0062ECLI:EU:C:1973:24

Analiza orzeczenia

Sekcja wygenerowana przez AI na podstawie treści orzeczenia — nie stanowi cytatu.

Zagadnienie prawne
Czy przepisy prawa wspólnotowego, w szczególności art. 103 ust. 1 Regulaminu Postępowania Trybunału, regulują kwestię zwrotu kosztów i kosztów niezbędnie poniesionych przez strony w postępowaniu prejudycjalnym na podstawie art. 177 Traktatu EWG, czy też kwestia ta podlega prawu krajowemu?
Ratio decidendi
Trybunał uznał, że postępowanie prejudycjalne na podstawie art. 177 Traktatu EWG jest postępowaniem niespornym i stanowi jedynie etap postępowania toczącego się przed sądem krajowym. W przeciwieństwie do tego, przepisy Regulaminu Postępowania Trybunału (art. 69-75) dotyczące kosztów odnoszą się do postępowań spornych, które kończą się ostatecznym rozstrzygnięciem sporu. Ze względu na zasadniczą różnicę między tymi rodzajami postępowań, przepisów dotyczących kosztów w postępowaniach spornych nie można rozciągać na postępowania prejudycjalne bez wyraźnego postanowienia. W związku z tym, w obecnym stanie prawa wspólnotowego, zwrot kosztów w postępowaniu prejudycjalnym jest regulowany przez prawo krajowe.
Stan faktyczny
Bundesfinanzhof (Federalny Sąd Finansowy) w Niemczech zwrócił się do Trybunału Sprawiedliwości z pytaniem prejudycjalnym w sprawie toczącej się między Paulem G. Bollmannem a Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Waltershof. Pytanie dotyczyło tego, czy procedura zwrotu kosztów i możliwość odzyskania wydatków, w szczególności honorariów adwokackich, poniesionych w związku z wnioskiem o wydanie orzeczenia w trybie prejudycjalnym na podstawie art. 177 Traktatu EWG, są regulowane przez prawo wspólnotowe czy krajowe.
Rozstrzygnięcie
Zwrot kosztów i możliwość odzyskania wydatków niezbędnie poniesionych przez strony postępowania głównego w związku z wnioskiem o wydanie orzeczenia w trybie prejudycjalnym na podstawie art. 177 Traktatu EWG nie są objęte art. 103 ust. 1 Regulaminu Postępowania Trybunału. Zwrot tych kosztów i możliwość odzyskania tych wydatków są regulowane przez przepisy prawa krajowego mające zastosowanie do postępowania głównego.

Pełny tekst orzeczenia

Avis juridique important | 61972J0062 Judgment of the Court of 1 March 1973. - Paul G. Bollmann v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Waltershof. - Reference for a preliminary ruling: Bundesfinanzhof - Germany. - Case 62-72. European Court reports 1973 Page 00269 Greek special edition Page 00481 Portuguese special edition Page 00145 Spanish special edition Page 00143 Summary Parties Subject of the case Grounds Decision on costs Operative part Keywords ++++ 1 . PRELIMINARY QUESTIONS - PROCEDURE - NATURE - PARTIES - CONCEPT - LAWS ( EEC TREATY, ART . 177; PROTOCOL ON THE STATUTE OF THE EEC COURT, ART . 20 ) 2 . PRELIMINARY QUESTIONS - COSTS - RECOVERY - EXPENSES NECESSARILY INCURRED BY THE PARTIES - RECOVERABILITY - NATIONAL LAW - APPLICATION ( RULES OF PROCEDURE, ART . 103 ( 1 )) Summary . PROCEEDINGS INSTITUTED UNDER ARTICLE 177 ARE NON-CONTENTIOUS AND ARE IN THE NATURE OF A STEP IN THE ACTION PENDING BEFORE A NATIONAL COURT, AS THE PARTIES TO THE MAIN ACTION ARE MERELY INVITED TO STATE THEIR CASE WITHIN THE LEGAL LIMITS LAID DOWN BY THE NATIONAL COURT . BY THE EXPRESSION " PARTIES ", ARTICLE 20 OF THE PROTOCOL ON THE STATUTE OF THE EEC COURT REFERS TO THE PARTIES TO THE ACTION PENDING BEFORE THE NATIONAL COURT . 2 . IN VIEW OF THE ESSENTIAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONTENTIOUS PROCEEDINGS AND PROCEEDINGS UNDER ARTICLE 177 OF THE TREATY, ONE CANNOT, WITHOUT EXPRESS PROVISION, EXTEND TO THE LATTER PROCEEDINGS RULES LAID DOWN SOLELY FOR CONTENTIOUS PROCEEDINGS . THE RECOVERY OF COSTS AND THE RECOVERABILITY OF EXPENSES NECESSARILY INCURRED BY THE PARTIES TO THE MAIN ACTION FOR THE PURPOSES OF AN APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING UNDER ARTICLE 177 OF THE EEC TREATY ARE NOT COVERED BY ARTICLE 103 ( 1 ) OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE COURT . THE RECOVERY OF THOSE COSTS AND THE RECOVERABILITY OF THOSE EXPENSES ARE GOVERNED BY THE PROVISIONS OF NATIONAL LAW APPLICABLE TO THE MAIN ACTION . Parties IN CASE 62/72 APPLICATION TO THE COURT UNDER ARTICLE 177 OF THE EEC TREATY BY THE BUNDESFINANZHOF FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING IN THE ACTION PENDING BEFORE THAT COURT BETWEEN PAUS G . BOLLMANN, HAMBURG, AND HAUPTZOLLAMT HAMBURG - WALTERSHOF, Subject of the case ON THE INTERPRETATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE COURT RELATING TO COSTS, Grounds BY ORDER DATED 8 AUGUST 1972, FILED AT THE COURT ON 11 SEPTEMBER 1972, THE BUNDESFINANZHOF HAS SUBMITTED TO THE COURT A QUESTION ON WHETHER THE PROCEDURE FOR RECOVERY OF COSTS AND THE RECOVERABILITY OF EXPENSES, IN PARTICULAR LAWYERS' FEES, NECESSARILY INCURRED IN AN APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING UNDER ARTICLE 177 OF THE EEC TREATY, ARE MATTERS OF COMMUNITY LAW OR DOMESTIC LAW . 2 THE QUESTION POSED CONCERNS THE INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 103 ( 1 ) OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE COURT, WHICH CONSTITUTES ONE OF THE ACTS REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 177 ( B ) OF THE TREATY . 3 UNDER THE TERMS OF ARTICLE 103 ( 1 ), THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLES 44 ET SEQ . OF THE SAID RULES " SHALL APPLY ", AFTER THE WRITTEN STATEMENTS OF CASE OR WRITTEN OBSERVATIONS PROVIDED FOR IN ARTICLE 20 OF THE EEC STATUTE HAVE BEEN LODGED, TO PROCEEDINGS BROUGHT UNDER ARTICLE 177 . IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO REPLY TO THE QUESTION POSED THEREFORE, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO EXAMINE WHETHER, BY THIS REFERENCE, THE PROVISIONS OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE WHICH DEAL WITH COSTS, PARTICULARLY THOSE OF ARTICLES 73 AND 74 CONCERNING EXPENSES REGARDED AS RECOVERABLE, AND THEIR RECOVERY, ARE BY ARTICLE 103 ( 1 ) RENDERED APPLICABLE TO SUCH PROCEEDINGS . 4 PROCEEDINGS INSTITUTED UNDER ARTICLE 177 ARE NON-CONTENTIOUS AND ARE IN THE NATURE OF A STEP IN THE ACTION PENDING BEFORE A NATIONAL COURT, AS THE PARTIES TO THE MAIN ACTION ARE MERELY INVITED TO STATE THEIR CASE WITHIN THE LEGAL LIMITS LAID DOWN BY THE NATIONAL COURT . BY THE EXPRESSION " PARTIES ", ARTICLE 20 OF THE PROTOCOL ON THE STATUTE OF THE EEC COURT REFERS TO THE PARTIES TO THE ACTION PENDING BEFORE THE NATIONAL COURT . 5 ON THE OTHER HAND, ARTICLES 69 TO 75 OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE REFER TO COSTS IN CONTENTIOUS PROCEEDINGS . THE PROCEEDINGS REFERRED TO BY THOSE PROVISIONS ARE DISTINGUISHED BY THE PRESENCE OF PARTIES, AND ARE CLOSED BY A JUDGMENT OR ORDER OF THE COURT WHICH DECIDES DEFINITIVELY THE DISPUTE WHICH GAVE RISE TO THE PROCEEDINGS . ARTICLE 73 OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE ALSO REFERS TO EXPENSES INCURRED IN SUCH PROCEEDINGS WHEN DEFINING THE RECOVERABILITY OF " EXPENSES NECESSARILY INCURRED BY THE PARTIES ". ARTICLE 74 IS RESTRICTED TO SETTLING THE PROCEDURE FOR THE RECOVERY OF THOSE EXPENSES . IN VIEW OF THE ESSENTIAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONTENTIOUS PROCEEDINGS AND PROCEEDINGS UNDER ARTICLE 177 OF THE TREATY, ONE CANNOT, WITHOUT EXPRESS PROVISION, EXTEND TO THE LATTER PROCEEDINGS THE RULES LAID DOWN SOLELY FOR CONTENTIOUS PROCEEDINGS . 6 IN THE PRESENT STATE OF COMMUNITY LAW, THEREFORE, IT MUST BE CONCLUDED THAT THE RECOVERY OF COSTS AND THE RECOVERABILITY OF EXPENSES NECESSARILY INCURRED BY THE PARTIES TO THE MAIN ACTION FOR THE PURPOSES OF AN APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING UNDER ARTICLE 177 OF THE EEC TREATY ARE GOVERNED BY THE PROVISIONS OF NATIONAL LAW APPLICABLE TO THE SAID PROCEEDINGS . IN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES, IT DEVOLVES ON THE COMPETENT NATIONAL COURTS TO CONSIDER, IN THE CONTEXT OF THEIR NATIONAL LAW, THE EXTENT TO WHICH MATTERS INCIDENTAL TO AN APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING SHOULD BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT . Decision on costs THE COSTS INCURRED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY AND THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, WHICH HAVE SUBMITTED OBSERVATIONS TO THE COURT, ARE NOT RECOVERABLE, AND AS THESE PROCEEDINGS ARE, INSOFAR AS THE PARTIES TO THE MAIN ACTION ARE CONCERNED, IN THE NATURE OF A STEP IN THE ACTION PENDING BEFORE THE NATIONAL COURT, THE DECISION ON COSTS IS A MATTER FOR THAT COURT . Operative part THE COURT, IN ANSWER TO THE QUESTION REFERRED TO IT BY THE BUNDESFINANZHOF OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY BY A DECISION OF THAT COURT DATED 8 AUGUST 1972, HEREBY RULES : THE RECOVERY OF COSTS AND THE RECOVERABILITY OF EXPENSES NECESSARILY INCURRED BY THE PARTIES TO THE MAIN ACTION FOR THE PURPOSES OF AN APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING UNDER ARTICLE 177 OF THE EEC TREATY ARE NOT COVERED BY ARTICLE 103 ( 1 ) OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE COURT . THE RECOVERY OF THOSE COSTS AND THE RECOVERABILITY OF THOSE EXPENSES ARE GOVERNED BY THE PROVISIONS OF NATIONAL LAW APPLICABLE TO THE MAIN ACTION .

© Unia Europejska, źródło: EUR-Lex (eur-lex.europa.eu), pozyskano 12.07.2026. Autentyczne są wyłącznie wersje opublikowane w Dz. Urz. UE. · Źródło