C-70/81

WyrokTSUE1982-02-02CELEX: 61981CJ0070ECLI:EU:C:1982:27

Analiza orzeczenia

Sekcja wygenerowana przez AI na podstawie treści orzeczenia — nie stanowi cytatu.

Zagadnienie prawne
Czy państwo członkowskie może powoływać się na okoliczności związane z jego wewnętrznym systemem prawnym, takie jak trwające reformy instytucjonalne i redystrybucja kompetencji, w celu usprawiedliwienia niewdrożenia dyrektywy UE w wyznaczonym terminie?
Ratio decidendi
Trybunał stwierdził, że Królestwo Belgii uchybiło zobowiązaniom wynikającym z Traktatu, nie przyjmując w wyznaczonym terminie przepisów niezbędnych do zastosowania się do dyrektywy 75/439. Podstawą rozstrzygnięcia było ugruntowane orzecznictwo Trybunału, zgodnie z którym państwo członkowskie nie może powoływać się na przepisy, praktyki lub okoliczności swojego wewnętrznego systemu prawnego, aby usprawiedliwić niewykonanie zobowiązań wynikających z dyrektyw wspólnotowych. Okoliczności te, choć mogą wyjaśniać trudności, nie zwalniają państwa członkowskiego z odpowiedzialności za uchybienie.
Stan faktyczny
Komisja Europejska wniosła skargę przeciwko Królestwu Belgii o stwierdzenie uchybienia zobowiązaniom traktatowym, zarzucając niewdrożenie dyrektywy Rady 75/439 w sprawie unieszkodliwiania olejów odpadowych. Termin wdrożenia upłynął 18 czerwca 1977 r. Rząd belgijski przyznał, że nie wdrożył dyrektywy w pełni, usprawiedliwiając to trwającymi reformami instytucjonalnymi i redystrybucją kompetencji między instytucjami krajowymi a regionalnymi, które utrudniały pełne wdrożenie. Wcześniej Belgia prosiła o dodatkowy roczny termin na wdrożenie.
Rozstrzygnięcie
1. Stwierdza, że nie przyjmując w wyznaczonym terminie przepisów niezbędnych do zastosowania się do dyrektywy Rady 75/439 z dnia 16 czerwca 1975 r. w sprawie unieszkodliwiania olejów odpadowych (Dziennik Urzędowy L 194, s. 23), Królestwo Belgii uchybiło zobowiązaniom wynikającym z Traktatu; 2. Obciąża Królestwo Belgii kosztami postępowania.

Pełny tekst orzeczenia

Avis juridique important | 61981J0070 Judgment of the Court of 2 February 1982. - Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium. - Failure of a State to fulfil its obligations - Non-implementation of a directive on the disposal of waste oils. - Case 70/81. European Court reports 1982 Page 00169 Summary Parties Subject of the case Grounds Decision on costs Operative part Keywords MEMBER STATES - OBLIGATIONS - IMPLEMENTATION OF DIRECTIVES - FAILURE TO COMPLY - JUSTIFICATION - NOT POSSIBLE ( EEC TREATY , ART . 169 ) Summary A MEMBER STATE MAY NOT PLEAD PROVISIONS , PRACTICES OR CIRCUMSTANCES IN ITS INTERNAL LEGAL SYSTEM TO JUSTIFY FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH OBLIGATIONS UNDER COMMUNITY DIRECTIVES . Parties IN CASE 70/81 COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES , REPRESENTED BY ITS LEGAL ADVISER , RENE-CHRISTIAN BERAUD , ACTING AS AGENT , WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT THE OFFICE OF ORESTE MONTALTO , A MEMBER OF THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT OF THE COMMISSION , JEAN MONNET BUILDING , KIRCHBERG , APPLICANT , V KINGDOM OF BELGIUM , REPRESENTED BY ROBERT HOEBAER , A DIRECTOR IN THE MINISTRY FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS , FOREIGN TRADE AND COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT , ACTING AS AGENT , WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT THE BELGIAN EMBASSY , DEFENDANT , Subject of the case APPLICATION FOR A DECLARATION THAT BY NOT IMPLEMENTING WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED PERIOD COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 75/439 OF 16 JUNE 1975 , ON THE DISPOSAL OF WASTE OILS ( OFFICIAL JOURNAL L 194 , P . 23 ), THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM HAS FAILED TO FULFIL ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE TREATY , Grounds BY APPLICATION LODGED AT THE COURT REGISTRY ON 3 APRIL 1981 THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BROUGHT AN ACTION FOR A DECLARATION UNDER ARTICLE 169 OF THE EEC TREATY THAT BY FAILING TO ADOPT WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED PERIOD THE PROVISIONS NEEDED IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 75/439 OF 16 JUNE 1975 ON THE DISPOSAL OF WASTE OILS ( OFFICIAL JOURNAL L 194 , P . 23 ), THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM HAS FAILED TO FULFIL ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE THIRD PARAGRAPH OF ARTICLE 189 OF THE TREATY . BY VIRTUE OF ARTICLE 17 OF THE DIRECTIVE MEMBER STATES WERE TO IMPLEMENT THE MEASURES NEEDED TO COMPLY WITH THE DIRECTIVE WITHIN TWENTY-FOUR MONTHS OF ITS NOTIFICATION AND THAT PERIOD EXPIRED IN THIS CASE ON 18 JUNE 1977 . 3 THE BELGIAN GOVERNMENT HAS STATED THAT THE DIRECTIVE HAS ALREADY BEEN THE SUBJECT OF CERTAIN MEASURES WHICH IMPLEMENT IT IN PART . NEVERTHELESS , IT DOES NOT DENY THAT THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM HAS NOT FULFILLED ITS OBLIGATIONS TO IMPLEMENT THE DIRECTIVE FULLY WITHIN THE PERIOD PROVIDED . ESSENTIALLY , THE BELGIAN GOVERNMENT JUSTIFIES ITS FAILURE BY THE FACT THAT IMPORTANT INSTITUTIONAL REFORMS CONCERNING THE REDISTRIBUTION OF POWERS AND RESPONSIBILITIES BETWEEN THE NATIONAL AND REGIONAL INSTITUTIONS ARE IN PROGRESS , ESPECIALLY IN THE AREA COVERED BY THE DIRECTIVE IN QUESTION . SO LONG AS THE NEW INSTITUTIONS ARE NOT YET IN A POSITION TO EXERCISE THEIR POWERS IT WILL NOT BE POSSIBLE TO IMPLEMENT THE DIRECTIVE FULLY . ALTHOUGH THOSE CIRCUMSTANCES MAY EXPLAIN THE DIFFICULTY IN APPLYING THE DIRECTIVE THEY DO NOT EXPUNGE THE FAILURE OF THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM TO FULFIL ITS OBLIGATIONS . ACCORDING TO ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW OF THE COURT A MEMBER STATE MAY NOT PLEAD PROVISIONS , PRACTICES OR CIRCUMSTANCES IN ITS INTERNAL LEGAL SYSTEM TO JUSTIFY FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH OBLIGATIONS UNDER COMMUNITY DIRECTIVES . IT SHOULD ALSO BE POINTED OUT THAT , IN ORDER THAT THE EXCEPTIONAL SITUATION REFERRED TO BY HIS GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT , THE BELGIAN MINISTER FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT , IN ANSWER TO THE REASONED OPINION PROVIDED FOR IN THE FIRST PARAGRAPH OF ARTICLE 169 OF THE TREATY , REQUESTED THE COMMISSION ON 14 NOVEMBER 1979 TO GRANT TO THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM AN ADDITIONAL PERIOD OF ONE YEAR TO ADOPT THE MEASURES OF NATIONAL LAW NEEDED TO IMPLEMENT THE DIRECTIVE . THOSE MEASURES OUGHT TO HAVE ENTERED INTO FORCE IN JUNE 1977 , AND IN FACT IT WAS ONLY ON 3 APRIL 1981 THAT THE COMMISSION BROUGHT THE MATTER BEFORE THE COURT UNDER THE SECOND PARAGRAPH OF ARTICLE 169 OF THE TREATY . IT MUST THEREFORE BE HELD THAT BY NOT ADOPTING WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED PERIOD THE PROVISIONS NEEDED TO COMPLY WITH COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 75/439 OF 16 JUNE 1975 THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM HAS FAILED TO FULFIL ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE TREATY . Decision on costs COSTS 8 ARTICLE 69 ( 2 ) OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE PROVIDES THAT THE UNSUCCESSFUL PARTY SHALL BE ORDERED TO PAY THE COSTS IF THEY HAVE BEEN ASKED FOR . SINCE THE DEFENDANT HAS BEEN UNSUCCESSFUL , IT MUST BE ORDERED TO PAY THE COSTS . Operative part ON THOSE GROUNDS , THE COURT HEREBY : 1 . DECLARES THAT BY NOT ADOPTING WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED PERIOD THE PROVISIONS NEEDED TO COMPLY WITH COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 75/439 OF 16 JUNE 1975 ON THE DISPOSAL OF WASTE OILS ( OFFICIAL JOURNAL L 194 , P . 23 ), THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM HAS FAILED TO FULFIL ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE TREATY ; 2.ORDERS THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM TO PAY THE COSTS .

© Unia Europejska, źródło: EUR-Lex (eur-lex.europa.eu), pozyskano 13.07.2026. Autentyczne są wyłącznie wersje opublikowane w Dz. Urz. UE. · Źródło