C-91/96

Opinia rzecznika generalnegoTSUE1996-10-24CELEX: 61996CC0091ECLI:EU:C:1996:418

Analiza orzeczenia

Sekcja wygenerowana przez AI na podstawie treści orzeczenia — nie stanowi cytatu.

Zagadnienie prawne

Czy Republika Grecka uchybiła swoim zobowiązaniom wynikającym z Traktatu WE oraz dyrektyw 92/118/EWG i 93/52/EWG poprzez niezastosowanie i niewprowadzenie w życie w wyznaczonym terminie przepisów niezbędnych do ich transpozycji oraz poprzez niepowiadomienie o tym Komisji?

Ratio decidendi

Istota rozstrzygnięcia opiera się na fakcie, że rząd grecki nie zaprzeczył zarzucanemu uchybieniu zobowiązaniom. Zgodnie z opinią rzecznika generalnego, w momencie wniesienia skargi przez Komisję, Grecja nie przyjęła środków niezbędnych do transpozycji dyrektyw do prawa krajowego, mimo że termin upłynął 1 stycznia 1994 r. W konsekwencji, skarga Komisji powinna zostać uwzględniona, a Republika Grecka obciążona kosztami postępowania.

Stan faktyczny

Komisja Europejska wniosła skargę przeciwko Republice Greckiej, zarzucając jej brak transpozycji dyrektyw 92/118/EWG i 93/52/EWG do prawa krajowego oraz brak powiadomienia o tym Komisji. Termin transpozycji upłynął 1 stycznia 1994 r. Rząd grecki nie zaprzeczył zarzucanemu uchybieniu, wskazując jedynie, że projekty dekretów prezydenckich w tej sprawie zostały przedłożone ministrowi rolnictwa do podpisu.

Rozstrzygnięcie

Rzecznik generalny proponuje, aby Trybunał: (1) Stwierdził, że Republika Grecka, nie przyjmując i nie wprowadzając w życie w wyznaczonym terminie przepisów niezbędnych do przestrzegania dyrektyw 92/118/EWG i 93/52/EWG oraz nie powiadamiając o tym Komisji, uchybiła swoim zobowiązaniom wynikającym z Traktatu WE oraz z art. 20 ust. 1 dyrektywy 92/118/EWG i art. 2 ust. 1 dyrektywy 93/52/EWG; (2) Obciążył Republikę Grecką kosztami postępowania.

Pełny tekst orzeczenia

Important legal notice | 61996C0091 Opinion of Mr Advocate General Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer delivered on 24 October 1996. - Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic. - Failure to fulfil obligations not contested - Directives 92/118/EEC and 93/52/EEC - Failure to transpose within the prescribed periods. - Case C-91/96. European Court reports 1996 Page I-06393 Opinion of the Advocate-General In these proceedings, the Court of Justice is called upon to give a decision in the action brought under Article 169 of the EC Treaty by the Commission on 22 March 1996 for a declaration that, by not adopting and bringing into force within the prescribed period the provisions necessary to comply with Directives 92/118/EEC (1) and 93/52/EEC, (2) and by failing to notify the Commission thereof, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Treaty and under Article 20(1) of Directive 92/118 and Article 2(1) of Directive 93/52. 2 In accordance with those provisions, the Member States were required to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the directives by 1 January 1994 and to notify the Commission thereof. 3 Since by 1 January 1994 the Commission had not received any notification of the transposition into national law of those directives, on 10 February 1994 it formally drew the Greek Government's attention to the lack of notification, complained that the Greek Government had failed to fulfil its obligations under the Treaty and the abovementioned directives and gave it two months in which to submit its observations. 4 In the absence of a reply from the Greek Government within the period allowed, the Commission delivered a reasoned opinion on 21 September 1994 in which it stated that, according to the information available, the Hellenic Republic had not transposed those directives into national law or sent any such notification to the Commission, which constituted a failure to fulfil obligations, and therefore it requested that the measures necessary to implement the directives be adopted within two months. 5 Since more than a year later the Commission had no evidence that Greece had implemented either of the directives, it brought this action, which was lodged at the Registry of the Court of Justice on 22 March 1996. 6 In its defence, the Greek Government does not deny the alleged failure to fulfil its obligations, merely stating that two draft presidential decrees have been put before the Minister of Agriculture for signature which will transpose those directives into national law. 7 It is clear from the Greek Government's defence that, when the Commission lodged its application, the Greek Republic had not adopted the measures necessary to transpose the directives into national law, since the time-limit for doing so had expired on 1 January 1994. 8 The application should therefore be upheld and, in accordance with Article 69(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the defendant Member State should be ordered to pay the costs. 9 I therefore propose that the Court should: (1) declare that by not adopting and bringing into force within the prescribed period the provisions necessary to comply with Directives 92/118/EEC and 93/52/EEC, and by failing to notify the Commission thereof, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EC Treaty and under Article 20(1) of Directive 92/118/EEC and Article 2(1) of Directive 93/52/EEC; (2) order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. (1) - Council Directive 92/118/EEC of 17 December 1992 laying down animal health and public health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Community of products not subject to the said requirements laid down in specific Community rules referred to in Annex A(I) to Directive 89/662/EEC and, as regards pathogens, to Directive 90/425/EEC (OJ 1993 L 62, p. 49). (2) - Council Directive 93/52/EEC of 24 June 1993 amending Directive 89/556/EEC on animal health conditions governing intra-Community trade in and importation from third countries of embryos of domestic animals of the bovine species (OJ 1993 L 175, p. 21).